Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 46.6x · EV/EBITDA 5.9x · ROE 2.6%. (1999–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $18.1B | $34.5B | $44.8B | $35.5B | $41.0B | $67.8B | $88.7B | $62.7B | $34.0B | $31.6B | $25.0B |
| Enterprise Value | $21.5B | $37.9B | $55.5B | $54.4B | $60.9B | $86.6B | $107.4B | $82.4B | $42.3B | $39.7B | $34.8B |
| P/E Ratio → | 46.64 | 88.61 | 56.88 | — | — | 162.55 | 561.35 | 210.52 | 40.22 | 25.09 | 43.98 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.69 | 3.23 | 4.43 | 3.61 | 4.22 | 4.88 | 7.07 | 6.07 | 4.04 | 3.65 | 2.70 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.31 | 2.48 | 2.86 | 1.86 | 1.50 | 1.43 | 1.79 | 1.27 | 3.33 | 2.92 | 2.54 |
| P/FCF | 6.44 | 12.28 | 22.71 | 8.41 | 11.16 | 19.05 | 26.77 | 39.65 | 24.83 | 28.03 | 19.07 |
| P/OCF | 6.10 | 11.64 | 21.65 | 8.19 | 10.40 | 14.09 | 19.97 | 26.03 | 17.08 | 18.16 | 12.97 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.55 | 5.48 | 5.53 | 6.27 | 6.24 | 8.55 | 7.97 | 5.03 | 4.58 | 3.76 |
| EV / EBITDA | 5.90 | 10.41 | 16.12 | 15.23 | 17.22 | 14.16 | 20.41 | 19.59 | 13.53 | 13.34 | 12.62 |
| EV / EBIT | 12.22 | 37.27 | 33.70 | 39.57 | 49.18 | 86.22 | 177.45 | 102.96 | 29.87 | 29.77 | 26.74 |
| EV / FCF | — | 13.49 | 28.13 | 12.89 | 16.60 | 24.35 | 32.40 | 52.06 | 30.87 | 35.21 | 26.55 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 36.9% | 36.9% | 37.6% | 37.2% | 36.0% | 37.4% | 33.5% | 36.0% | 33.9% | 33.2% | 32.6% |
| Operating Margin | 16.5% | 16.5% | 16.9% | 20.8% | 19.6% | 15.1% | 12.3% | 17.0% | 20.3% | 18.6% | 17.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | 3.6% | 3.6% | 14.3% | -67.7% | -172.0% | 3.0% | 1.3% | 2.9% | 10.0% | 14.5% | 6.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 2.6% | 2.6% | 8.3% | -28.6% | -44.6% | 0.9% | 0.3% | 1.0% | 8.0% | 12.2% | 5.9% |
| ROA | 1.1% | 1.1% | 3.3% | -11.3% | -22.9% | 0.5% | 0.2% | 0.6% | 3.5% | 5.0% | 2.2% |
| ROIC | 6.0% | 6.0% | 4.0% | 3.6% | 2.5% | 2.3% | 1.7% | 3.0% | 6.9% | 6.3% | 5.9% |
| ROCE | 6.6% | 6.6% | 5.3% | 4.9% | 3.3% | 3.0% | 2.1% | 3.7% | 8.3% | 7.4% | 6.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.74 | 1.01 | 0.74 | 0.44 | 0.42 | 0.42 | 0.88 | 0.81 | 1.06 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.10 | 1.10 | 3.35 | 5.41 | 5.77 | 3.41 | 3.92 | 4.94 | 2.87 | 2.94 | 3.81 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.25 | 0.68 | 0.99 | 0.73 | 0.40 | 0.38 | 0.40 | 0.81 | 0.75 | 0.99 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.94 | 0.94 | 3.11 | 5.29 | 5.64 | 3.08 | 3.55 | 4.67 | 2.65 | 2.72 | 3.56 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 1.22 | 5.42 | 4.48 | 5.44 | 5.30 | 5.63 | 12.41 | 6.04 | 7.18 | 7.48 |
| Interest Coverage | 2.77 | 2.77 | 4.70 | 1.93 | 4.16 | 4.65 | 1.78 | 2.07 | 4.53 | 3.73 | 3.30 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.59 | 0.59 | 0.85 | 0.75 | 0.79 | 0.74 | 0.80 | 0.84 | 1.19 | 0.92 | 1.36 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.59 | 0.59 | 0.85 | 0.75 | 0.79 | 0.74 | 0.80 | 0.84 | 1.19 | 0.92 | 1.36 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.14 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.11 | 0.22 | 0.17 | 0.22 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.32 | 0.30 | 0.18 | 0.15 | 0.17 | 0.15 | 0.12 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.35 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 87.58 | 80.95 | 74.29 | 91.03 | 140.56 | 105.59 | 153.66 | 88.49 | 88.13 | 74.22 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 4.7% | 2.5% | 1.8% | 3.5% | 2.8% | 1.4% | 1.0% | 1.0% | 1.2% | 1.2% | 1.4% |
| Payout Ratio | 221.7% | 221.7% | 55.2% | — | — | 230.5% | 549.4% | 220.1% | 49.8% | 30.5% | 60.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 2.1% | 1.1% | 1.8% | — | — | 0.6% | 0.2% | 0.5% | 2.5% | 4.0% | 2.3% |
| FCF Yield | 15.5% | 8.1% | 4.4% | 11.9% | 9.0% | 5.3% | 3.7% | 2.5% | 4.0% | 3.6% | 5.2% |
| Buyback Yield | 7.9% | 4.1% | 9.0% | 1.5% | 4.7% | 3.1% | 0.1% | 0.7% | 3.7% | 0.5% | 0.2% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 12.5% | 6.6% | 10.8% | 4.9% | 7.5% | 4.5% | 1.1% | 1.8% | 4.9% | 1.7% | 1.5% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $519M | $555M | $591M | $604M | $621M | $627M | $451M | $332M | $336M | $330M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 27 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying FIS stock.
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 46.6x. The historical average is 34.4x. This places it at the 81th percentile of its historical range.
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 5.9x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 11.6x.
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 2.6%. The historical average is 10.4%.
Based on historical data, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 46.6x. This is at the 81th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 4.67% with a payout ratio of 221.7%.
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. has 36.9% gross margin and 16.5% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.1x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Debt spike post-acquisition
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Conglomerate Discount Masks Segment Value
FIS trades at 7.05x forward earnings versus JKHY's 25.1x, per market data, implying the market prices in operational risk and complexity despite strong recurring revenue. This gap suggests a potential re-rating if simplification proceeds.
The forward P/E of 7.05x is dramatically below the peer group, with Jack Henry at 25.1x and Broadridge at 17.5x, indicating the market applies a substantial conglomerate discount to FIS's diversified segments. The EV/EBITDA of 7.22x is also at a steep discount to peers, which may reflect skepticism about the sustainability of post-Worldpay earnings quality. Investors should monitor whether the recent EPS beat and management's focus on debt reduction can narrow this valuation gap, as the current pricing appears to embed expectations of continued margin pressure and execution risk.
Margin Volatility Masks Core Stability
Gross margin swung from 42.5% in Q3 2025 to 34.8% in Q2 2026, as reported in financial statements, while operating margin contracted to 15.0% from 21.4% year-over-year. This volatility suggests mix shifts and investment spending rather than a structural deterioration.
The 700 basis point decline in gross margin over four quarters appears tied to revenue mix, with lower-margin processing volumes growing faster than software. Operating margin compression to 15.0% in Q2 2026, despite a 29.1% revenue surge, indicates that SG&A and R&D investments are outpacing operating leverage. The net margin of 6.8% in Q2 2026 is distorted by non-recurring items, so investors should focus on adjusted operating margins, which may better reflect the underlying earning power of the recurring revenue base.
ROIC Trapped by Acquisition Hangover
ROIC has hovered between 0.8% and 2.1% over the past ten quarters, based on reported figures, far below the cost of capital and peer averages like Jack Henry's 21.0%. This suggests the Worldpay acquisition continues to depress returns on invested capital.
Despite revenue acceleration, ROIC remains in the low single digits, indicating that the capital base expanded faster than operating profits. The 1.4% ROIC in Q2 2026, while slightly improved from 0.8% in Q1 2024, is still inadequate relative to the company's weighted average cost of capital, which likely exceeds 8%. This implies that management's deleveraging and divestiture strategy is critical to unlocking value, as the current capital intensity is not generating sufficient returns.
Working Capital Drag Intensifies
DSO remained elevated at 72 days in Q2 2026, as per balance sheet data, while DPO extended to 100 days, yet the cash conversion cycle is unavailable due to missing DIO. This suggests FIS is stretching payables to offset slow collections, a sign of working capital strain.
The stable DSO of 72 days over the last two quarters, combined with a DPO of 100 days, indicates that FIS is managing its cash conversion cycle by delaying supplier payments, which may not be sustainable. The current ratio of 0.53 in Q2 2026, down from 1.52 in Q1 2024, highlights a deteriorating liquidity position that could pressure working capital efficiency. Investors should monitor whether the elongation of DPO reflects improved negotiating power or a sign of cash flow stress, as the latter would warrant concern.
Leverage Spike Demands Scrutiny
Debt-to-equity surged to 1.32 in Q2 2026 from 0.29 in Q1 2026, according to recent SEC filings, while interest coverage fell to 2.48x from 11.55x. This reflects the $16.9B debt increase from the Worldpay reconsolidation, materially raising financial risk.
The sequential jump in leverage is directly tied to the reconsolidation of Worldpay, which added significant debt to the balance sheet. Interest coverage of 2.48x in Q2 2026 is thin, suggesting that operating income barely covers interest expense, leaving little cushion for earnings volatility. While the D/E ratio of 1.32 may overstate risk if the debt is tied to a soon-to-be-divested stake, the current interest burden warrants close monitoring, especially if forward guidance of slower growth materializes.
Liquidity Squeeze Amidst Growth
The current ratio fell to 0.53 in Q2 2026 from 0.59 in Q1 2026, as per balance sheet data, with cash at $744M against short-term obligations. This indicates a tight liquidity position that could be vulnerable to a downturn.
With a current ratio well below 1.0, FIS relies on operating cash flow and access to credit markets to meet short-term obligations. The quick ratio of 0.53, which excludes inventory, confirms that the company has limited liquid assets relative to current liabilities. Given the elevated debt load and interest coverage of 2.48x, a severe economic shock could strain liquidity, though the recurring revenue base provides some stability. Investors should monitor whether management prioritizes cash preservation over shareholder returns in the coming quarters.
P/E Misleads on Post-Deal Earnings
The trailing P/E of 59.01x is distorted by non-recurring items and the Worldpay deconsolidation, while the forward P/E of 7.05x may overstate cheapness. Adjusted EV/EBITDA or P/FCF provides a cleaner view of valuation.
The wide gap between trailing and forward P/E reflects the volatile earnings base, with net income swinging from losses to gains due to one-time items. The forward P/E of 7.05x appears optically cheap, but it may be based on adjusted earnings that exclude necessary investments. Investors should use EV/EBITDA (7.22x) or P/FCF (8.14x) to normalize for capital structure and non-cash charges, as these metrics better capture the underlying cash-generating ability of the business.