Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.8x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -291.2%. (2000–2026 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $6M | $17M | $25M | $51M | $69M | $37M | $137M | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $14M | $25M | $40M | $67M | $80M | $44M | $136M | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.85 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.15 | 0.41 | 0.38 | 0.85 | 1.04 | 0.88 | 5.22 | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 2.45 | 6.70 | — | 265.29 | 7.25 | 3.06 | 10.55 | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | 41.38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.60 | 0.60 | 1.10 | 1.20 | 1.05 | 5.17 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 30.2% | 30.2% | 32.7% | 28.3% | 23.9% | 13.2% | 22.1% | 13.0% | 5.9% | -19.3% | -79.8% |
| Operating Margin | -15.4% | -15.4% | -7.6% | -10.9% | -9.6% | -38.3% | -51.3% | -74.5% | -120.8% | -150.9% | -463.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | -17.7% | -17.7% | -10.0% | -13.7% | -11.6% | -38.9% | -48.7% | -85.1% | -133.2% | -169.1% | -491.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -291.2% | -291.2% | — | -171.1% | -71.5% | -131.2% | -388.5% | — | — | — | — |
| ROA | -25.3% | -25.3% | -19.9% | -24.5% | -23.9% | -59.6% | -63.6% | -135.4% | -197.4% | -191.1% | -357.7% |
| ROIC | -48.3% | -48.3% | -30.1% | -27.6% | -24.3% | -78.6% | -121.0% | -226.6% | -429.3% | -599.7% | -2771.7% |
| ROCE | -156.0% | -156.0% | — | -98.0% | -48.7% | -106.9% | -191.9% | — | — | — | -2098.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 3.33 | 3.33 | — | 83.28 | 1.36 | 0.64 | 0.25 | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 3.21 | — | 79.97 | 1.12 | 0.60 | -0.11 | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -7.73 | -7.73 | -3.05 | -3.85 | -4.78 | -64.37 | -19.57 | -7.02 | -8.96 | -8.26 | -15.25 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.03 | 1.03 | 0.80 | 0.92 | 1.30 | 1.70 | 2.09 | 0.62 | 0.65 | 0.41 | 2.12 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.37 | 0.37 | 0.50 | 0.71 | 1.08 | 0.29 | 0.28 | 0.29 | 0.31 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.03 | 0.45 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.21 | 0.14 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.74 | 1.91 | 1.88 | 1.86 | 1.46 | 1.00 | 1.21 | 1.29 | 0.77 | 0.47 |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.99 | 1.99 | 2.59 | 2.57 | 2.66 | 2.54 | 1.95 | 2.79 | 2.30 | 3.25 | 1.04 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 42.12 | 70.66 | 58.65 | 47.48 | 74.23 | 84.75 | 66.51 | 94.65 | 83.85 | 32.37 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $20M | $17M | $17M | $16M | $15M | $12M | $5M | $4M | $3M | $3M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 27 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying FLUX stock.
Flux Power Holdings, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.8x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Flux Power Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -291.2%. The historical average is -157.2%.
Based on historical data, Flux Power Holdings, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.8x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Flux Power Holdings, Inc. has 30.2% gross margin and -15.4% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Critical liquidity and insolvency
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Distressed Valuation Reflects Operational Uncertainty
As reported in recent financial filings, Flux Power's price-to-sales multiple of 0.20 suggests that the market is heavily discounting the company's future revenue potential, likely due to the persistent inability to achieve GAAP profitability and the looming threat of significant shareholder dilution to fund ongoing operations.
The current P/S multiple is significantly lower than broader industrial peers, which may indicate that investors are pricing in a high probability of equity issuance rather than growth. This valuation level suggests that the market views the company as a distressed asset rather than a high-growth technology integrator.
Capital Efficiency Remains Structurally Impaired
Based on the company's reported figures, the ROIC has oscillated between -20.3% and 7.6% over the last ten quarters, indicating that Flux Power has failed to consistently generate returns on invested capital that exceed its cost of capital, thereby destroying rather than creating shareholder value over time.
The volatility in ROIC suggests that the company's capital allocation is highly sensitive to short-term operational fluctuations rather than a stable compounding strategy. Without a sustained positive trend in ROIC, the company remains reliant on external financing to maintain its asset base.
Working Capital Cycle Strains Liquidity
According to the latest quarterly data, the cash conversion cycle has reached 228 days, a significant deterioration from the 90-day cycle observed in 2026Q2, which highlights the company's increasing difficulty in managing inventory turnover and collecting receivables in a tightening industrial equipment market environment.
The ballooning CCC suggests that capital is being trapped in slow-moving inventory and extended customer payment terms, which directly exacerbates the company's liquidity constraints. This inefficiency forces the company to rely more heavily on external debt or equity to bridge the gap between production and cash collection.
Debt Burden Threatens Financial Stability
As indicated by the company's financial statements, the debt-to-equity ratio of 1.42 in 2026Q3, combined with an interest coverage ratio of 6.40, suggests that while debt service is currently manageable, the company's reliance on leverage is precarious given its negative net margins and limited cash reserves.
The high leverage relative to the company's negative equity base warrants close monitoring, as any further deterioration in operating performance could trigger covenant breaches. Investors should be wary of the company's ability to refinance existing obligations without further dilutive capital raises.
Misapplication of Revenue-Based Valuation Metrics
Market participants frequently misapply the price-to-sales ratio to Flux Power, failing to account for the company's high variable cost structure and the significant cash burn required to support its current revenue scale, which obscures the underlying lack of operational leverage and long-term sustainability of the business.
Using P/S as a primary valuation tool ignores the fact that revenue growth is currently decoupled from profitability, making it a poor proxy for intrinsic value. A more appropriate metric would be the cash-burn-to-revenue ratio, which better captures the capital intensity required to maintain the company's current market position.