Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -4.7x · EV/EBITDA 13.0x · ROE 11.0%. (2011–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $224M | $880M | $403M | $879M | $318M | $2.1B | $14.9B | $2.4B | $1.0B | $242M | — |
| Enterprise Value | $442M | $1.1B | $620M | $1.1B | $423M | $2.1B | $14.8B | $2.4B | $1.0B | $242M | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -4.73 | 5.65 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 150.81 | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.04 | 0.32 | 0.25 | 0.64 | 0.31 | 3.34 | 68.66 | 557.60 | — | 5894.71 | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.08 | 0.33 | 2.23 | 3.10 | 0.79 | 3.18 | 24.00 | 10.67 | 4.49 | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | 0.00 | — | — | — | — | — | 1823.50 | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 0.00 | 0.00 | — | — | — | — | — | 1375.79 | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.40 | 0.38 | 0.79 | 0.42 | 3.33 | 68.19 | 568.29 | — | 5908.34 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 12.98 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | 6.93 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 0.00 | — | — | — | — | — | 1858.49 | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 11.1% | 11.1% | 12.6% | 6.3% | -4.1% | -1.6% | -7.4% | 100.0% | — | 80.5% | 75.0% |
| Operating Margin | -2.6% | -2.6% | -12.1% | -21.1% | -40.8% | -51.4% | -220.4% | -910.4% | — | -2790.2% | -4879.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | 5.7% | 5.7% | -10.6% | -21.0% | -55.7% | -60.0% | -261.9% | -804.5% | — | 25546.3% | -41941.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 11.0% | 11.0% | -74.2% | -83.7% | -104.5% | -59.2% | -134.8% | -15.1% | -9.2% | — | — |
| ROA | 6.0% | 6.0% | -14.9% | -22.9% | -42.4% | -34.3% | -92.9% | -10.5% | -7.4% | 10421.9% | -4700.0% |
| ROIC | -3.3% | -3.3% | -33.4% | -43.8% | -52.8% | -41.7% | -91.1% | -11.5% | -9.5% | — | — |
| ROCE | -4.1% | -4.1% | -30.7% | -37.2% | -44.0% | -39.4% | -102.9% | -13.7% | -11.3% | — | — |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.25 | 0.25 | 2.09 | 1.56 | 1.10 | 0.54 | 0.05 | 0.24 | 0.02 | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.08 | 1.20 | 0.70 | 0.26 | -0.02 | -0.16 | 0.20 | 0.02 | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | 0.00 | — | — | — | — | — | 34.99 | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 10.35 | 10.35 | -7.49 | -17.05 | -24.60 | -11.49 | -31.68 | -20.05 | -4.74 | -1.26 | -5.48 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.53 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 1.27 | 0.69 | 0.27 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.01 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.53 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 1.27 | 0.69 | 0.27 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.01 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.39 | 0.39 | 0.31 | 0.47 | 0.77 | 1.10 | 0.59 | 0.11 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.01 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.66 | 1.51 | 1.11 | 0.79 | 0.47 | 0.25 | 0.01 | — | 0.48 | 0.21 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 14.92 | 15.99 | 21.42 | 15.92 | 19.61 | 29.33 | 760.94 | — | — | 152.08 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | 17.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.7% | — |
| FCF Yield | — | 46173.0% | — | — | — | — | — | 0.1% | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $29M | $27M | $23M | $15M | $11M | $44M | $22M | $13M | $2M | $1130 |
Includes 30+ ratios · 15 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying FUBO stock.
fuboTV Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -4.7x. The historical average is 78.2x.
fuboTV Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 13.0x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA.
fuboTV Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 11.0%. The historical average is -81.6%.
Based on historical data, fuboTV Inc. is trading at a P/E of -4.7x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
fuboTV Inc. has 11.1% gross margin and -2.6% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Goodwill impairment risk against thin margins
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Reset Undermines Earning Power
Gross margin fell to 7.9% in 2026Q2 from a 20.4% peak in 2025Q2, while operating margin stayed negative in all ten reported quarters, suggesting the enlarged revenue base carries structurally weaker unit economics than fuboTV's legacy streaming operation.
The persistent operating losses, narrowing from -$63.3M in 2024Q1 to -$9.1M in 2026Q1, appear driven more by the revenue mix shift following the 2025Q4 acquisition than by operating leverage, since SG&A nearly doubled in that same quarter. Because the 2025Q1 net margin of 45.3% coincided with a positive 38.7% FCF margin but no operating profit, that quarter's 'earning power' looks non-operating in nature and should be excluded from any sustainable margin assessment.
Returns on Capital Remain Sub-Zero
ROIC improved to -0.7% in 2026Q2 from -9.7% in 2024Q1, yet fuboTV has not recorded a positive ROIC quarter in the ten periods shown, per quarterly ratio disclosures, implying capital deployed is still being destroyed rather than compounded.
The improvement tracks the goodwill-driven asset base expansion rather than profit generation, since ROA moved only to -0.6% despite total assets tripling to $4.1B after 2025Q4. ROE readings are unusable as a return signal here: the 66.2% print in 2025Q1 alongside a -4.5% ROIC indicates the equity base, not operations, moved. Investors should treat negative ROIC against a 67%-goodwill balance sheet as an impairment-risk indicator, not a normalization trajectory.
Payables Stretch Reverses Working Capital
DPO collapsed to 3 days in 2026Q2 from 15 days in 2025Q1 while DSO rose to 37 days from 14, meaning fuboTV is collecting slower and paying suppliers far faster, a working-capital posture consistent with the $485.1M cash absorption noted in cash flow statements.
Asset turnover of 0.37 sits below the 0.59 peak reached in 2025Q4, confirming that the acquisition-inflated asset base is generating less revenue per dollar of assets than the legacy model did. The payables compression appears to reflect post-acquisition supplier terms rather than liquidity strength, and if it persists alongside rising DSO, it compounds the negative FCF margin of -28.8%.
Deleveraging Masks Coverage Weakness
Debt-to-equity fell to 0.15 in 2026Q2 from 2.09 in 2024Q4, but interest coverage remained negative at -7.36, and as reported in fuboTV's filings, total debt of $402.7M still generates no operating earnings to service it.
The low headline leverage compares favorably to Warner Bros. Discovery's 0.88, but that comparison obscures the difference: WBD earns positive operating income, while FUBO's coverage has been negative in eight of ten quarters. Debt reduction appears funded by cash reserves rather than earnings, with cash down 49% to $230.3M since 2025Q4, so the refinancing risk is modest but the cash-burn dependency is not.
Deep Discount Reflects Earned Skepticism
FUBO trades at 0.08x sales and 0.09x book versus Fox at 2.42x book and WBD at 2.11x, with a forward EV/EBITDA of 2.48, and this discount appears less a value opportunity than the market pricing goodwill impairment probability.
The P/E of -32.50 is analytically meaningless given negative trailing earnings, and the absence of a forward P/E or TTM EV/EBITDA suggests consensus does not model positive EBITDA on a reported basis. P/B of 0.09 is the more telling figure: with goodwill at ~67% of assets, the market appears to be pricing the tangible residue of the balance sheet rather than a going-concern earnings stream.
P/B Misleads on Acquisition Balance Sheets
The price-to-book ratio of 0.09 is the most commonly misapplied multiple for fuboTV, because roughly $2.6B of the $3.9B asset base is goodwill; as filed, even a 25% write-down would eliminate ~80% of book value, making the apparent discount misleading rather than protective.
Investors anchoring on P/B will treat 0.09x as extreme cheapness comparable to distressed financials, but fuboTV's book value lacks the tangible asset backing that makes P/B meaningful for banks or insurers. The appropriate adjustment is EV/Sales against peer broadcasters, where FUBO's 0.08x sits below both WBD and FOXA despite a 7.9% gross margin versus their 28-37%, confirming the discount reflects margin structure, not market inefficiency.