Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.8x · EV/EBITDA 8.6x · ROE -104.2%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.3B | $1.6B | $4.8B | $2.1B | $2.3B | $2.8B | $2.2B | $3.2B | $2.7B | $3.7B | $3.6B |
| Enterprise Value | $6.6B | $6.9B | $9.9B | $4.3B | $4.6B | $5.3B | $4.8B | $5.1B | $4.2B | $5.2B | $5.0B |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.78 | — | — | 16.45 | 7.59 | — | — | 18.30 | 21.21 | 17.15 | 20.45 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.41 | 0.50 | 1.79 | 1.14 | 1.28 | 2.12 | 12.24 | 2.14 | 1.99 | 2.79 | 2.82 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.61 | 1.98 | 2.12 | — | — | — | — | — | 101.22 | 2720.27 | 441.17 |
| P/FCF | — | — | 91.95 | 19.48 | 10.40 | 19.95 | — | 43.60 | 16.71 | 25.81 | 18.51 |
| P/OCF | 3.88 | 4.75 | 12.95 | 6.29 | 5.72 | 14.08 | — | 7.83 | 7.67 | 11.15 | 10.16 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.21 | 3.66 | 2.42 | 2.53 | 3.97 | 26.50 | 3.48 | 3.15 | 3.92 | 3.92 |
| EV / EBITDA | 8.61 | 8.98 | 15.77 | 9.36 | 6.82 | 17.86 | — | 10.71 | 9.52 | 11.56 | 11.24 |
| EV / EBIT | 23.67 | — | 36.87 | 13.82 | 8.83 | 34.12 | — | 16.29 | 17.19 | 17.16 | 15.15 |
| EV / FCF | — | — | 188.55 | 41.28 | 20.47 | 37.36 | — | 71.01 | 26.39 | 36.26 | 25.72 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 20.1% | 20.1% | 91.4% | 43.3% | 91.0% | 91.6% | 84.6% | 91.4% | 91.5% | 91.6% | 91.7% |
| Operating Margin | 9.0% | 9.0% | 11.5% | 17.0% | 28.6% | 11.1% | -315.1% | 21.0% | 21.5% | 22.3% | 24.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | -51.6% | -51.6% | -8.5% | 6.9% | 16.9% | -3.6% | -325.1% | 11.7% | 9.4% | 16.3% | 13.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -104.2% | -104.2% | -27.2% | — | — | — | — | 2076.1% | 907.0% | 4494.7% | 111.9% |
| ROA | -18.9% | -18.9% | -4.1% | 5.5% | 13.3% | -1.9% | -22.1% | 7.4% | 6.2% | 10.7% | 9.0% |
| ROIC | 3.1% | 3.1% | 5.1% | 13.6% | 22.6% | 6.0% | -22.0% | 13.0% | 14.1% | 15.2% | 15.0% |
| ROCE | 3.6% | 3.6% | 6.2% | 16.4% | 27.0% | 6.7% | -24.2% | 15.2% | 16.0% | 16.5% | 18.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 6.88 | 6.88 | 2.26 | — | — | — | — | — | 62.59 | 1223.67 | 186.73 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 7.06 | 7.06 | 8.21 | 5.09 | 3.51 | 8.53 | — | 4.51 | 3.73 | 3.70 | 3.42 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 6.77 | 2.22 | — | — | — | — | — | 58.63 | 1101.16 | 171.82 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 6.95 | 6.95 | 8.08 | 4.94 | 3.36 | 8.32 | — | 4.13 | 3.49 | 3.33 | 3.15 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | 96.60 | 21.81 | 10.08 | 17.41 | — | 27.41 | 9.68 | 10.45 | 7.21 |
| Interest Coverage | -3.76 | -3.76 | 1.15 | 2.22 | 3.51 | 0.85 | -3.83 | 3.14 | 2.88 | 3.53 | 3.97 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.43 | 0.52 | 0.61 | 0.69 | 1.85 | 0.91 | 0.85 | 1.10 | 0.81 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.59 | 0.59 | 0.35 | 0.42 | 0.50 | 0.61 | 1.69 | 0.81 | 0.72 | 0.96 | 0.70 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.09 | 0.16 | 0.26 | 0.16 | 1.26 | 0.56 | 0.45 | 0.74 | 0.51 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.40 | 0.30 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.57 | 0.07 | 0.56 | 0.67 | 0.64 | 0.65 |
| Inventory Turnover | 36.13 | 36.13 | 3.27 | 24.85 | 3.63 | 3.50 | 0.59 | 3.84 | 3.73 | 3.73 | 4.06 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 18.87 | 22.21 | 16.14 | 14.24 | 39.87 | 208.18 | 15.62 | 13.94 | 10.42 | 10.03 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | 0.6% | 3.0% | 1.4% | — | 2.4% | 6.7% | 7.6% | 5.3% | 5.2% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | 49.1% | 10.9% | — | — | 121.8% | 160.4% | 90.4% | 105.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | 6.1% | 13.2% | — | — | 5.5% | 4.7% | 5.8% | 4.9% |
| FCF Yield | — | — | 1.1% | 5.1% | 9.6% | 5.0% | — | 2.3% | 6.0% | 3.9% | 5.4% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 3.8% | 7.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.3% | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.6% | 6.8% | 9.4% | 0.0% | 2.4% | 6.8% | 7.9% | 5.4% | 5.2% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $101M | $100M | $52M | $56M | $57M | $56M | $57M | $57M | $57M | $57M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying FUN stock.
Six Flags Entertainment Corporation's current P/E ratio is -0.8x. The historical average is 22.4x.
Six Flags Entertainment Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 8.6x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 10.4x.
Six Flags Entertainment Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is -104.2%. The historical average is 21.8%.
Based on historical data, Six Flags Entertainment Corporation is trading at a P/E of -0.8x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Six Flags Entertainment Corporation has 20.1% gross margin and 9.0% operating margin.
Six Flags Entertainment Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 7.1x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Extreme leverage and integration costs
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Leverage Spikes to 45x Equity
Debt-to-equity surged to 44.95 in 2026Q2 from 2.26 in 2024Q4, per reported balance sheet data, with interest coverage at 0.80, indicating severe strain on debt service capacity.
The dramatic increase in leverage reflects the merger financing and the erosion of equity base, which fell to $114.7M. Interest coverage of 0.80 suggests operating income is insufficient to cover interest expenses, implying reliance on cash reserves or refinancing. Investors should monitor covenant compliance and refinancing risk, especially if interest rates remain elevated.
Thin Liquidity Amid Seasonal Cash Needs
Current ratio fell to 0.42 in 2026Q2 from 0.68 in 2026Q1, with cash at $134.5M, per the latest balance sheet, indicating a tight liquidity position that could strain operations.
The quick ratio of 0.36 underscores minimal inventory cushion, typical for a service-oriented business. The seasonal nature of the business means cash flows are concentrated in Q2 and Q3, but the thin current ratio suggests limited buffer for off-season obligations. Under a severe stress scenario, such as an unexpected drop in attendance, the company may need to draw on credit lines or delay capex, which could impact long-term asset quality.
Net Losses Mask Underlying Park Profitability
Net margin was -38.4% in 2026Q2 despite a 16.8% operating margin, per reported figures, indicating that non-operating charges such as interest and impairments are overwhelming operational earnings.
The gross margin of 100% in 2026Q2 is likely distorted by accounting reclassifications, as prior quarters showed negative gross margins. The operating margin of 16.8% suggests the core park operations are generating positive returns, but the net loss of -$202.6M points to heavy interest expenses and one-time merger costs. This divergence implies that underlying profitability is better than reported net income suggests, but the sustainability of these adjustments warrants close monitoring.
ROIC Positive but Equity Returns Deeply Negative
ROIC turned positive at 1.2% in 2026Q2 while ROE was -64.4%, per reported data, indicating that operating returns are positive but the equity base is being eroded by losses.
The positive ROIC, albeit modest, suggests that the company is generating returns above its cost of capital on an operating basis, which is a positive sign for the underlying business. However, the deeply negative ROE reflects the impact of high leverage and non-operating charges on shareholder equity. This divergence implies that the company is creating value at the operational level but destroying shareholder value due to financial structure, a trend that must reverse for long-term viability.
Working Capital Efficiency Distorted by Seasonality
Cash conversion cycle swung from -29 days in 2024Q4 to 60 days in 2026Q1, per reported figures, reflecting seasonal shifts in deferred revenue and inventory, complicating trend analysis.
The negative CCC in 2024Q4 indicates that the company was collecting cash from season pass sales before paying suppliers, a favorable position. However, the positive CCC in 2026Q1 suggests a reversal, possibly due to timing of payments and inventory builds. Asset turnover of 0.07 in 2026Q2 is low, reflecting the capital-intensive nature of the business and the seasonal revenue pattern. Investors should focus on the full-year trend rather than quarterly fluctuations to assess true working capital efficiency.
Misapplied EV/EBITDA in a Leveraged Merger
EV/EBITDA of 9.14 appears reasonable, but with EBITDA likely inflated by one-time items and leverage at 26.26x D/EBITDA, per reported data, this multiple may understate risk.
The EV/EBITDA multiple is commonly used for capital-intensive leisure companies, but in this case, EBITDA may be distorted by merger-related adjustments and non-cash charges. The high debt-to-EBITDA ratio of 26.26x indicates that the company's earnings are insufficient to service debt, making the EV/EBITDA multiple misleading. A more appropriate metric would be EV/EBITDAR (adding back rent) or a levered cash flow multiple, which would better capture the true earnings power and leverage burden.