Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 75.1x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE 17.1%. (2013–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $722M | $912M | $671M | $629M | $639M | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $750M | $940M | $682M | $633M | $718M | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 75.09 | 71.21 | — | 53.75 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 44.25 | 55.91 | 37.63 | 72.65 | 141.45 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 11.92 | 11.31 | 9.56 | 9.86 | 15.12 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | 22.45 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | 21.82 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 57.63 | 38.23 | 73.03 | 159.08 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | 25.25 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | -0.7% | -0.7% | 5.5% | -17.7% | -46.5% | 55.1% | 15.9% | 10.2% | -63.5% | -3.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | -49.0% | -49.0% | -43.9% | -129.4% | -193.6% | -6.1% | 6.4% | -4.2% | -176.4% | -93.5% | — |
| Net Profit Margin | 79.0% | 79.0% | -7.8% | 320.1% | -329.8% | -12.0% | -22.0% | -13.0% | -186.5% | -308.6% | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 17.1% | 17.1% | -2.1% | 52.3% | -30.5% | -11.7% | -18.9% | -9.9% | -16.9% | -29.5% | -50.6% |
| ROA | 8.8% | 8.8% | -1.0% | 18.2% | -9.0% | -4.1% | -6.9% | -4.2% | -10.5% | -19.2% | -17.9% |
| ROIC | -4.4% | -4.4% | -4.5% | -6.2% | -4.8% | -2.2% | 1.9% | -1.1% | -7.9% | -4.8% | -11.8% |
| ROCE | -5.8% | -5.8% | -6.0% | -8.1% | -6.3% | -2.5% | 2.3% | -1.5% | -10.7% | -8.5% | -17.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.87 | 0.99 | 2.41 | 1.38 | 0.83 | 1.48 | 0.97 | 0.08 | 0.94 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | 15.49 | 3.93 | 14.47 | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.35 | 0.15 | 0.05 | 1.88 | 0.94 | 0.24 | 1.31 | 0.30 | -0.61 | -1.25 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | 10.55 | 1.14 | 12.75 | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | 2.80 | — | 3.79 | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -1.93 | -1.93 | — | -1.85 | -1.58 | -1.62 | -1.91 | -0.28 | — | — | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 14.34 | 14.34 | 15.26 | 16.69 | 4.29 | 2.68 | 2.09 | 2.35 | 7.47 | 11.87 | 1.80 |
| Quick Ratio | 14.34 | 14.34 | 15.26 | 16.69 | 4.29 | 2.68 | 2.09 | 2.35 | 7.47 | 11.87 | 1.80 |
| Cash Ratio | 3.59 | 3.59 | 6.04 | 8.16 | 1.13 | 0.74 | 1.38 | 0.67 | 5.05 | 8.01 | 1.80 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.11 | 0.13 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.38 | 0.30 | 0.28 | 0.04 | 0.06 | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 1.3% | 1.4% | — | 1.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | 4.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 1.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 1.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $39M | $30M | $29M | $27M | $26M | $25M | $25M | $24M | $23M | $9M |
Persistent operating cash burn
Based on current market data, GEGGL trades at a P/S ratio of 44.25, which appears disconnected from the firm's underlying operational performance and suggests that investors are pricing the entity as a liquidation vehicle rather than a high-growth asset management platform with sustainable fee-based revenue streams.
The elevated P/S multiple relative to the broader financial services sector implies that the market is assigning value to the company's cash and investment holdings rather than its core business operations. This valuation approach warrants caution, as the lack of a forward P/E or meaningful FCF yield suggests that the current price may not be supported by fundamental earnings power.
As reported in recent financial statements, the company's operating margin of -49.05% highlights a structural inability to cover corporate overhead, while the 79.01% net margin suggests that bottom-line profitability is entirely dependent on non-recurring investment gains rather than the core fee-generating business model.
The extreme divergence between operating and net margins indicates that the firm's earning power is highly volatile and decoupled from its primary management activities. Investors should monitor whether the company can achieve scale, as the current negative gross margin of -0.66% suggests that direct costs of service delivery are currently exceeding fee revenue.
According to historical quarterly data, the company's asset turnover remains exceptionally low at 0.03, indicating that the firm's capital base is not being efficiently utilized to generate revenue, which is further compounded by erratic DSO figures that fluctuate significantly between 20 and 109 days.
The lack of a consistent cash conversion cycle suggests that the company's working capital management is secondary to its investment activities. This inefficiency appears to be a structural feature of the business model, where the focus remains on holding assets rather than optimizing the velocity of fee-based operations.
Based on reported figures, the company maintains a D/E ratio of 0.93, which, while appearing moderate in isolation, presents significant refinancing risk given the persistent negative interest coverage ratio of -3.84 observed in the most recent quarter, indicating that operating income is insufficient to service debt obligations.
The reliance on non-operating income to maintain liquidity suggests that the company's ability to meet its debt obligations is precarious. Investors should be wary of the firm's dependence on asset appreciation to cover interest costs, as any downturn in the underlying portfolio could rapidly impair the company's solvency.
The most commonly misapplied metric for this business model is the P/E ratio, which obscures the firm's true economic reality by including non-cash unrealized gains in the denominator, thereby creating an illusion of profitability that is not supported by the company's actual cash-generating capacity.
Analysts should instead focus on the fee-related earnings (FRE) and the sustainability of the management fee base, adjusting for the volatility of investment income. Relying on standard P/E multiples for a firm with such high non-operating income components may lead to a significant overestimation of the company's fundamental value.
Includes 30+ ratios · 13 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying GEGGL stock.
Great Elm Group, Inc. 7.25% Notes due 2027's current P/E ratio is 75.1x. The historical average is 62.5x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
Great Elm Group, Inc. 7.25% Notes due 2027's return on equity (ROE) is 17.1%. The historical average is -17.7%.
Based on historical data, Great Elm Group, Inc. 7.25% Notes due 2027 is trading at a P/E of 75.1x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Great Elm Group, Inc. 7.25% Notes due 2027 has -0.7% gross margin and -49.0% operating margin.