Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 14.5x · EV/EBITDA 10.6x · ROE 21.6%. (2020–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $29.9B | $37.8B | $35.9B | $35.4B | $26.5B | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $35.3B | $43.2B | $42.4B | $42.8B | $33.7B | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 14.53 | 18.03 | 18.01 | 25.60 | 13.83 | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.45 | 1.83 | 1.82 | 1.81 | 1.44 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 2.87 | 3.56 | 4.15 | 4.84 | 2.76 | — | — |
| P/FCF | 19.82 | 25.07 | 23.15 | 20.66 | 14.70 | — | — |
| P/OCF | 15.02 | 18.99 | 18.39 | 16.86 | 12.54 | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.10 | 2.15 | 2.19 | 1.84 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.58 | 12.95 | 13.22 | 14.05 | 10.68 | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 12.80 | 13.48 | 13.73 | 14.73 | 13.31 | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 28.71 | 27.34 | 24.95 | 18.69 | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 40.0% | 40.0% | 41.7% | 40.5% | 39.1% | 40.8% | 39.4% |
| Operating Margin | 13.4% | 13.4% | 13.3% | 12.5% | 13.8% | 15.9% | 15.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | 10.1% | 10.1% | 10.1% | 8.0% | 10.4% | 12.8% | 80.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 21.6% | 21.6% | 25.0% | 18.6% | 14.5% | 14.1% | 92.5% |
| ROA | 6.0% | 6.0% | 6.1% | 5.2% | 7.1% | 8.9% | 57.1% |
| ROIC | 13.3% | 13.3% | 13.2% | 11.6% | 11.3% | 13.4% | 14.1% |
| ROCE | 10.8% | 10.8% | 11.2% | 11.1% | 12.6% | 15.0% | 15.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.94 | 0.94 | 1.08 | 1.35 | 0.90 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.99 | 2.99 | 2.93 | 3.24 | 2.74 | 0.13 | 0.14 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.52 | 0.75 | 1.01 | 0.75 | -0.01 | -0.04 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.64 | 1.64 | 2.02 | 2.42 | 2.28 | -0.03 | -0.16 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 3.65 | 4.18 | 4.29 | 3.99 | -0.09 | -0.38 |
| Interest Coverage | 7.13 | 7.13 | 6.11 | 5.36 | 29.44 | 72.88 | 42.06 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.18 | 1.18 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.09 | 0.97 | 0.84 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.79 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.68 | 0.59 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.30 | 0.28 | 0.20 | 0.08 | 0.15 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.56 | 0.59 | 0.60 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.71 |
| Inventory Turnover | 5.54 | 5.54 | 5.91 | 5.93 | 5.18 | 5.35 | 6.52 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 69.99 | 81.19 | 80.55 | 79.46 | 78.69 | 56.50 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.1% | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | 3.1% | 3.1% | 2.8% | 2.6% | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 6.9% | 5.5% | 5.6% | 3.9% | 7.2% | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 5.0% | 4.0% | 4.3% | 4.8% | 6.8% | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.7% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.9% | 0.7% | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $460M | $459M | $458M | $454M | $455M | $455M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 6 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying GEHC stock.
GE HealthCare Technologies Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 14.5x. The historical average is 18.9x. This places it at the 25th percentile of its historical range.
GE HealthCare Technologies Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 10.6x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 12.7x.
GE HealthCare Technologies Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 21.6%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 31.0%.
Based on historical data, GE HealthCare Technologies Inc. is trading at a P/E of 14.5x. This is at the 25th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
GE HealthCare Technologies Inc.'s current dividend yield is 0.21% with a payout ratio of 3.1%.
GE HealthCare Technologies Inc. has 40.0% gross margin and 13.4% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
GE HealthCare Technologies Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.0x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Goodwill impairment risk
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Discounted Relative to MedTech Peers
GEHC trades at 16.0x trailing earnings and 11.5x EV/EBITDA, a substantial discount to Stryker's 41.2x and Boston Scientific's 26.0x, as per market data, suggesting the market prices in lower growth and margin risk.
The forward P/E of 14.8x implies the market expects earnings growth of roughly 8% annually, which aligns with recent revenue acceleration but remains below the double-digit growth of peers like BSX and SYK. The EV/EBITDA discount of roughly 50% versus Stryker may reflect GEHC's lower gross margins and higher leverage, but it also suggests that if the company can sustain its recent 5.8% revenue growth, the valuation could re-rate upward. Investors should monitor whether the discount narrows as free cash flow volatility subsides.
Margin Volatility Masks Underlying Stability
Gross margin swung from 54.3% in 2025Q4 to 38.5% in 2026Q1, a 15.8-point swing, while operating margin held near 13-14%, as per quarterly filings, indicating that one-time items distort the gross margin trend.
Excluding the 2025Q4 anomaly, gross margin has been remarkably stable around 40-42%, and operating margin has hovered between 11.6% and 15.1% over the past ten quarters. This suggests that the underlying profitability is more consistent than the headline numbers imply, and the 2025Q4 spike likely reflects a one-time benefit such as a favorable product mix or a settlement. Net margin, however, has been more volatile due to tax items, as seen in 2025Q4's 3.9% versus 2024Q4's 13.5%, so investors should focus on operating margin as the cleaner measure of earning power.
ROIC Stagnant Despite Equity Growth
ROIC has remained flat at roughly 3% over the past ten quarters, while ROE has fluctuated between 1.8% and 8.4%, as per financial statements, indicating that capital deployment is not generating incremental returns.
The stability of ROIC around 3% suggests that the company is not compounding returns on invested capital, despite a growing equity base from retained earnings. The low ROIC relative to peers like Stryker (11.1%) and Boston Scientific (8.8%) may reflect the heavy goodwill load from acquisitions, which inflates the capital base without correspondingly higher operating income. The recent uptick in revenue growth has not yet translated into higher ROIC, so investors should watch whether operating margin expansion can drive returns higher over the next few quarters.
Working Capital Drags on Cash Flow
Cash conversion cycle has ranged from 47 to 62 days over the past ten quarters, with DSO near 80 days and DPO near 95 days, as per quarterly data, indicating that working capital management is a persistent source of cash flow volatility.
The CCC has been relatively stable, but the components show that GEHC extends payment terms to suppliers (DPO ~95 days) while collecting from customers in about 80 days, which is typical for medical equipment makers. However, the swings in working capital, such as the $478 million outflow in 2024Q2, have caused free cash flow to be highly uneven, with FCF margin ranging from -11.7% to 19.6%. This suggests that the company's cash conversion is not as efficient as its asset turnover of 0.14x implies, and investors should monitor whether management can smooth these swings through better inventory and receivables management.
Leverage Elevated but Coverage Adequate
Debt-to-EBITDA has ranged from 8.3x to 15.8x over the past ten quarters, while interest coverage has stayed above 3x, as per reported figures, indicating that debt service is manageable but leaves little room for shocks.
The D/EBITDA ratio is high, but it is distorted by the low EBITDA in certain quarters, such as 2026Q1 when it hit 15.8x. On a trailing basis, the ratio is likely closer to 8-10x, which is still elevated compared to peers like Stryker (0.73x D/E) and Boston Scientific (0.51x). Interest coverage of 7.1x in 2026Q2 provides a comfortable cushion, but the company's thin liquidity buffer (current ratio near 1.0) and high goodwill suggest that refinancing risk could emerge if earnings deteriorate. Investors should monitor the trajectory of EBITDA and debt levels to ensure coverage remains stable.
Thin Liquidity Cushion
Current ratio has hovered near 1.0, with quick ratio around 0.8, and cash of $2.1 billion against total debt of $10.1 billion as of 2026Q2, as per balance sheet data, indicating a modest liquidity buffer.
The current ratio of 1.02 in 2026Q2 suggests that current assets barely cover current liabilities, and the quick ratio of 0.72 indicates that inventory is a significant component of current assets. This leaves little room for a sudden cash crunch, especially given the volatility in free cash flow. However, the company has access to credit markets, as evidenced by its debt levels, and its interest coverage remains adequate. Investors should monitor whether the company can maintain its dividend and buyback program without straining liquidity, particularly if working capital outflows persist.
Trading at a Discount to Peers
GEHC's P/E of 16.0x and EV/EBITDA of 11.5x are roughly half of Stryker's and Boston Scientific's multiples, while its ROE of 5.2% lags the peer average, as per market data, suggesting the market prices in lower growth and profitability.
The valuation discount is justified by GEHC's lower ROIC (2.9% vs. peers' 6-15%) and higher leverage (D/E 0.92 vs. peers' 0.07-0.73). However, GEHC's net margin of 10.8% is comparable to Stryker's 12.9% and Boston Scientific's 14.4%, indicating that the profitability gap is not as wide as the valuation gap suggests. The discount may also reflect the market's concern about the company's ability to grow revenue at the same pace as its more innovative peers, given its mature product portfolio. If GEHC can sustain its recent growth acceleration and improve working capital efficiency, the valuation gap could narrow.
Misapplied ROE in a Goodwill-Heavy Model
ROE is commonly used to assess GEHC, but with goodwill representing 41% of assets, ROE understates true operating performance, as per balance sheet data, so investors should use ROIC or return on tangible assets instead.
ROE is distorted by the large goodwill balance from acquisitions, which inflates equity without contributing to operating income. As a result, ROE of 5.2% in 2026Q2 appears weak, but the underlying business may be generating healthier returns on tangible capital. A more appropriate metric is return on tangible invested capital (ROTIC), which excludes goodwill and would likely show a higher return. Investors should also consider the sustainability of the goodwill, as an impairment could erode equity and further distort ROE. Therefore, when comparing GEHC to peers, it is essential to adjust for goodwill to get a true picture of capital efficiency.