Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -140.0x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -6.0%. (2020–2026 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $8.3B | $5.8B | $11.7B | $11.0B | $7.3B | $9.3B | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $8.0B | $5.6B | $11.5B | $10.7B | $7.0B | $8.4B | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -140.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 8.67 | 6.07 | 15.39 | 18.92 | 17.28 | 36.67 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 7.84 | 5.60 | 14.23 | 18.09 | 8.89 | 11.59 | — | — |
| P/FCF | 37.28 | 26.12 | — | 328.06 | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 35.55 | 24.91 | — | 313.10 | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 5.83 | 15.09 | 18.42 | 16.59 | 33.17 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 25.09 | — | 319.46 | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 87.4% | 87.4% | 88.8% | 89.7% | 87.8% | 88.1% | 87.9% | 88.5% |
| Operating Margin | -7.4% | -7.4% | -18.8% | -32.3% | -49.8% | -51.0% | -140.6% | -158.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | -5.9% | -5.9% | -0.8% | -73.4% | -40.9% | -61.4% | -126.3% | -161.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -6.0% | -6.0% | -0.9% | -59.5% | -21.4% | -54.6% | — | — |
| ROA | -3.6% | -3.6% | -0.5% | -34.2% | -15.3% | -21.3% | -51.0% | -33.4% |
| ROIC | -7.5% | -7.5% | -23.5% | -33.1% | -71.3% | — | — | — |
| ROCE | -7.3% | -7.3% | -19.0% | -24.9% | -24.7% | -23.8% | -77.9% | -40.9% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.22 | -0.28 | -0.47 | -0.36 | -1.11 | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | -1.03 | — | -8.60 | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($230M) exceeds total debt ($0)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.54 | 2.54 | 2.45 | 1.90 | 3.65 | 4.35 | 2.74 | 4.94 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.54 | 2.54 | 2.45 | 1.90 | 3.49 | 4.19 | 2.74 | 4.94 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.93 | 1.93 | 1.82 | 1.53 | 3.06 | 3.87 | 2.22 | 4.41 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.55 | 0.54 | 0.44 | 0.36 | 0.23 | 0.42 | 0.21 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | 1.05 | 0.76 | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 116.28 | 133.90 | 112.33 | 115.54 | 111.58 | 95.10 | 111.33 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 2.7% | 3.8% | — | 0.3% | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $166M | $161M | $154M | $148M | $145M | $132M | $132M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 7 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying GTLB stock.
GitLab Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -140.0x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
GitLab Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -6.0%. The historical average is -28.5%.
Based on historical data, GitLab Inc. is trading at a P/E of -140.0x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
GitLab Inc. has 87.4% gross margin and -7.4% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Operating leverage not yet proven
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Valuation Hinges on Profitability Inflection
GitLab's forward P/E of 57.63 and P/S of 8.81 reflect a significant growth premium over peers like Atlassian, pricing in a successful transition to sustained profitability that has yet to materialize in its operating margins.
The valuation multiples are detached from current earnings, as evidenced by the negative TTM P/E, and are instead anchored to future cash flow expectations. The forward P/E of 57.63 implies the market anticipates a rapid margin expansion, a narrative that appears fragile given the recent Q2 2027 operating margin deterioration to -19.9%. Compared to the peer group, GitLab trades at a substantial premium to Atlassian's P/B of 45.39, suggesting investors are paying for a superior growth and margin trajectory that must be delivered to justify the multiple.
Gross Margin Erosion Signals Structural Shift
Gross margins have contracted by over 470 basis points from 88.9% to 84.1% over ten quarters, a trend that, when combined with persistently negative operating margins, suggests the cost of revenue is rising faster than the company can scale its operating leverage.
The compression in gross margin is a critical development, as it likely reflects the strategic shift toward higher-cost SaaS delivery and away from the more profitable self-managed model. This structural change is undermining the company's core profitability engine before it has achieved sufficient scale to cover its heavy SG&A burden, which consistently consumes over 70% of revenue. The widening gap between gross and operating margins indicates that operating expenses are not being controlled in proportion to revenue growth, making the path to GAAP profitability appear longer and more uncertain.
Negative ROIC Reflects Unfunded Growth Phase
Return on Invested Capital has remained negative across all ten quarters, with the most recent reading of -5.9% in Q2 2027, indicating that the company's investments in growth are currently destroying value rather than generating returns for shareholders.
The persistent negative ROIC, despite consistent revenue growth, highlights a fundamental disconnect between capital deployment and value creation. The company is investing heavily in sales, marketing, and R&D, but these investments have not yet translated into positive operating income. The trend shows no sustained improvement, with ROIC fluctuating between -0.5% and -15.7%, suggesting that the business model has not yet reached the inflection point where incremental revenue generates meaningful returns on the capital employed.
Working Capital Volatility Masks Underlying Cash Conversion
Days Sales Outstanding (DSO) has been highly volatile, ranging from 74 to 104 days over the period, indicating inconsistent cash collection cycles that are a primary driver of the erratic free cash flow generation observed in recent quarters.
The lack of a stable or improving trend in DSO suggests that GitLab may be offering extended payment terms to secure larger enterprise deals, which can pressure short-term liquidity. This volatility in receivables, combined with the absence of inventory data, makes the cash conversion cycle an unreliable metric for assessing operational efficiency. The swings in working capital are the dominant factor behind the FCF margin's dramatic shifts from -90.8% to 55.6%, obscuring the true cash generation capability of the core subscription business.
Strong Liquidity Position Provides Strategic Flexibility
A current ratio consistently above 2.4 indicates a robust liquidity position, providing a substantial buffer to fund operations and strategic initiatives despite the ongoing cash burn from negative free cash flow.
The company's liquidity appears more than adequate to navigate its current growth phase, with the current ratio of 2.41 in Q2 2027 reflecting a healthy balance of current assets to liabilities. This strong position is likely supported by the significant deferred revenue balance, which represents cash collected in advance for future services. However, the prior analysis notes a decline in the cash balance, suggesting that this liquidity is being actively deployed for operations and share repurchases, a trend that warrants monitoring to ensure the buffer remains sufficient.
The Misleading Signal of High Gross Margins
The most commonly misapplied ratio for GitLab is its gross margin, which at 84.1% appears exceptionally strong but obscures the company's inability to convert this gross profit into operating income due to its cost structure.
Investors often focus on the high gross margin as a sign of a superior business model, but for GitLab, this metric is misleading because it does not reflect the true cost of running the business. The company's operating margin is deeply negative, meaning that the gross profit is entirely consumed by sales, marketing, and R&D expenses. A more appropriate metric to assess true earning power is the operating margin or the ratio of operating expenses to revenue, which reveals that the company has not yet achieved the scale necessary to cover its fixed-cost investments.