Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 60.7x · EV/EBITDA 38.3x · ROE 30.4%. (2014–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $90.2B | $83.2B | $44.8B | $22.5B | $16.6B | $13.8B | $12.5B | $14.2B | $8.5B | $12.3B | $8.1B |
| Enterprise Value | $92.5B | $85.5B | $47.7B | $25.7B | $20.1B | $17.5B | $16.1B | $18.9B | $12.5B | $17.0B | $14.3B |
| P/E Ratio → | 60.74 | 55.26 | 38.92 | 29.57 | 35.50 | 53.95 | 59.46 | 30.17 | 13.17 | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 10.93 | 10.09 | 6.04 | 3.39 | 2.93 | 2.78 | 2.38 | 2.01 | 0.60 | 0.95 | 0.66 |
| P/B Ratio | 17.09 | 15.55 | 9.85 | 5.58 | 4.61 | 3.95 | 3.50 | 3.08 | 1.52 | 2.50 | 1.57 |
| P/FCF | 63.01 | 58.17 | 45.90 | 33.01 | 30.73 | 55.38 | — | — | — | 117.05 | — |
| P/OCF | 47.86 | 44.18 | 34.55 | 24.99 | 22.64 | 30.84 | 1392.12 | 35.09 | 39.08 | 17.53 | 9.30 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 10.37 | 6.43 | 3.88 | 3.55 | 3.51 | 3.07 | 2.66 | 0.89 | 1.31 | 1.16 |
| EV / EBITDA | 38.32 | 35.45 | 24.50 | 16.97 | 15.46 | 15.38 | 14.30 | 12.74 | 6.52 | 8.85 | 8.20 |
| EV / EBIT | 43.42 | 42.97 | 30.51 | 21.57 | 24.05 | 29.97 | 29.22 | 34.44 | 10.08 | 17.58 | 15.55 |
| EV / FCF | — | 59.78 | 48.87 | 37.74 | 37.18 | 69.89 | — | — | — | 161.75 | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 30.7% | 30.7% | 27.6% | 24.3% | 23.9% | 22.8% | 21.7% | 22.8% | 14.6% | 16.9% | 16.9% |
| Operating Margin | 25.8% | 25.8% | 22.5% | 18.8% | 18.3% | 17.4% | 16.1% | 16.7% | 9.6% | 10.5% | 9.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | 18.3% | 18.3% | 15.5% | 11.5% | 8.3% | 5.2% | 4.0% | 6.6% | 4.6% | -0.6% | -7.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 30.4% | 30.4% | 26.9% | 20.0% | 13.2% | 7.3% | 5.1% | 9.2% | 12.2% | -1.5% | -9.8% |
| ROA | 13.9% | 13.9% | 11.0% | 7.4% | 4.6% | 2.4% | 1.5% | 2.6% | 3.4% | -0.4% | -3.3% |
| ROIC | 21.1% | 21.1% | 17.0% | 13.0% | 10.9% | 9.1% | 7.8% | 9.4% | 10.5% | 9.8% | 5.5% |
| ROCE | 23.2% | 23.2% | 19.0% | 14.3% | 11.7% | 9.2% | 7.3% | 8.3% | 8.7% | 8.2% | 5.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.76 | 0.95 | 1.19 | 1.24 | 1.46 | 1.34 | 1.13 | 1.39 | 1.57 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.26 | 1.26 | 1.78 | 2.53 | 3.29 | 3.83 | 4.62 | 4.19 | 3.29 | 3.57 | 4.62 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.43 | 0.64 | 0.80 | 0.97 | 1.03 | 1.01 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.95 | 1.21 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.96 | 0.96 | 1.49 | 2.13 | 2.68 | 3.19 | 3.19 | 3.12 | 2.11 | 2.45 | 3.56 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 1.61 | 2.98 | 4.73 | 6.46 | 14.50 | — | — | — | 44.70 | — |
| Interest Coverage | 13.19 | 13.19 | 8.60 | 5.47 | 3.65 | 2.25 | 1.45 | 1.62 | 3.31 | 1.95 | 1.81 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.13 | 2.13 | 2.17 | 1.86 | 2.12 | 2.18 | 2.21 | 1.42 | 1.87 | 2.26 | 2.14 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.09 | 1.09 | 0.98 | 0.87 | 1.04 | 1.07 | 1.32 | 1.03 | 1.16 | 1.38 | 1.32 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.42 | 0.42 | 0.36 | 0.34 | 0.53 | 0.57 | 0.97 | 0.38 | 0.65 | 0.76 | 0.68 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.64 | 0.55 | 0.49 | 0.46 | 0.40 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 0.62 |
| Inventory Turnover | 3.09 | 3.09 | 2.92 | 2.85 | 2.68 | 2.74 | 2.77 | 3.41 | 4.80 | 4.34 | 4.57 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 35.21 | 34.83 | 38.04 | 34.61 | 30.83 | 24.78 | 47.93 | 38.99 | 38.69 | 42.73 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.4% | 1.4% | 1.3% | 2.8% |
| Payout Ratio | 12.0% | 12.0% | 9.3% | 9.3% | 9.0% | 6.6% | 5.2% | 12.1% | 18.5% | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 1.6% | 1.8% | 2.6% | 3.4% | 2.8% | 1.9% | 1.7% | 3.3% | 7.6% | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 1.6% | 1.7% | 2.2% | 3.0% | 3.3% | 1.8% | — | — | — | 0.9% | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.8% | 0.9% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 2.4% | 3.1% | 0.6% | 8.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 1.0% | 1.1% | 1.4% | 1.4% | 2.7% | 3.2% | 0.7% | 8.5% | 1.4% | 1.3% | 2.8% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $406M | $410M | $416M | $421M | $435M | $439M | $463M | $503M | $451M | $438M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 12 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying HWM stock.
Howmet Aerospace Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 60.7x. The historical average is 41.8x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
Howmet Aerospace Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 38.3x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 15.0x.
Howmet Aerospace Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 30.4%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 9.4%.
Based on historical data, Howmet Aerospace Inc. is trading at a P/E of 60.7x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Howmet Aerospace Inc.'s current dividend yield is 0.20% with a payout ratio of 12.0%.
Howmet Aerospace Inc. has 30.7% gross margin and 25.8% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Howmet Aerospace Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.3x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Boeing production bottlenecks
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Expansion Reflects Pricing Power
Gross margin expanded to 37.3% in 2026Q2 from 30.2% a year earlier, per quarterly filings, indicating successful cost pass-through and favorable mix shift toward high-margin aftermarket and wide-body content.
The 700 basis point gross margin expansion over four quarters suggests that Howmet is not merely a volume story; it is capturing pricing power and mix benefits from wide-body engine content and aftermarket spares. Operating margin at 27.9% in 2026Q2, up from 25.4% in 2025Q2, implies that incremental revenue is flowing through at high incremental margins, consistent with a high-fixed-cost model. Net margin of 21.0% in 2026Q2, up from 19.8% a year earlier, confirms that the margin expansion is not being offset by higher interest or tax burdens, though investors should monitor whether this pace is sustainable as raw material costs normalize.
ROIC Inflection Signals Compounding
ROIC improved to 6.1% in 2026Q2 from 3.8% in 2024Q1, as reported in quarterly data, suggesting that the company is beginning to earn a return above its cost of capital after years of investment.
The steady climb in ROIC from 3.8% in 2024Q1 to 6.1% in 2026Q2, alongside ROE rising to 9.5% from 6.0%, indicates that the asset base is becoming more productive. This improvement is driven by both margin expansion and better asset turnover, which has held at 0.19x, implying that revenue growth is outpacing asset growth. However, the absolute ROIC remains modest relative to peers like TransDigm (20.9%), reflecting Howmet's higher capital intensity; the trend, not the level, is what suggests a compounding trajectory.
Working Capital Drag Eases
Cash conversion cycle improved to 91 days in 2026Q2 from 104 days in 2024Q3, per quarterly data, driven by faster collections and lower inventory days, though DIO remains elevated at 119 days.
The reduction in CCC from 104 days in 2024Q3 to 91 days in 2026Q2 is a positive sign, but the improvement is modest and largely due to a slight reduction in DSO (from 39 to 35 days) and DIO (from 131 to 119 days). DPO has remained relatively stable around 63 days, suggesting that Howmet is not stretching suppliers further. The high DIO of 119 days reflects the long lead times inherent in aerospace manufacturing, but investors should watch for inventory build-up if Boeing's production issues persist, as flagged in recent context.
Leverage Creeps Higher on Deal
Debt-to-equity rose to 0.79 in 2026Q2 from 0.57 in 2025Q4, per balance sheet data, as total debt increased to $4.5B following a $1.8B acquisition, though interest coverage remains comfortable at 13.7x.
The acquisition-driven increase in leverage is notable, but interest coverage of 13.7x in 2026Q2, up from 7.2x in 2024Q1, indicates that debt service is not yet a strain. D/EBITDA of 5.67x is elevated, but this is partly due to the trailing EBITDA not yet reflecting the acquisition's full contribution. The company's ability to generate strong cash flow (FCF margin of 18.8%) provides a cushion, but investors should monitor whether the leverage ratio stabilizes or continues to climb if further acquisitions are pursued.
Liquidity Adequate Despite Cash Dip
Current ratio improved to 1.82 in 2026Q2 from 1.53 a year earlier, per quarterly data, though quick ratio fell to 0.87, indicating reliance on inventory to meet short-term obligations.
The current ratio of 1.82 suggests adequate short-term liquidity, but the quick ratio of 0.87 highlights that a significant portion of current assets is tied up in inventory, which may be slow to convert to cash if demand falters. Cash balances dropped to $563M, but the company's robust operating cash flow (cumulative $4.2B over ten quarters) provides a buffer. Under a severe stress scenario, such as a prolonged Boeing production halt, the inventory-heavy balance sheet could pressure liquidity, though the current ratio suggests some resilience.
Misapplied EV/EBITDA Multiple
EV/EBITDA of 48.9x appears extreme, but this metric understates Howmet's value because it ignores the high-margin aftermarket spares stream and the capital intensity of the casting business, as per reported figures.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for Howmet is EV/EBITDA, which at 48.9x TTM seems to imply an unsustainable premium. However, EBITDA does not capture the full economics of the aftermarket spares business, which carries minimal incremental capex and generates high cash conversion. A more appropriate metric would be EV/EBIT or EV/FCF, which better reflect the company's ability to convert earnings into cash after maintenance capex. Additionally, the market may be pricing in a multi-year upcycle in wide-body production, which could justify a higher multiple if realized; investors should compare EV/EBITDA to the forward EV/EBITDA of 31.2x to gauge the implied growth.