Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 36.0x · EV/EBITDA 19.1x · ROE 7.9%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $6.1B | $5.9B | $5.2B | $6.3B | $5.0B | $4.4B | $4.1B | $6.3B | $5.1B | $5.7B | $4.8B |
| Enterprise Value | $7.0B | $6.8B | $5.8B | $6.8B | $5.7B | $5.1B | $5.0B | $7.4B | $6.0B | $6.4B | $5.5B |
| P/E Ratio → | 35.96 | 53.94 | 39.43 | 59.48 | 39.50 | 272.63 | 127.61 | 20.54 | 18.44 | 20.02 | 19.41 |
| P/S Ratio | 3.02 | 3.12 | 2.73 | 3.52 | 3.17 | 3.31 | 2.71 | 2.67 | 2.33 | 2.88 | 2.42 |
| P/B Ratio | 5.14 | 4.73 | 3.41 | 3.67 | 3.22 | 2.95 | 2.70 | 4.35 | 3.86 | 3.80 | 3.89 |
| P/FCF | 23.81 | 19.24 | 25.65 | 42.35 | 51.68 | 35.40 | 19.06 | 21.92 | 21.51 | 37.74 | 65.93 |
| P/OCF | 26.38 | 25.65 | 17.95 | 24.53 | 28.90 | 28.89 | 15.41 | 12.81 | 12.11 | 13.26 | 12.07 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.61 | 3.05 | 3.81 | 3.59 | 3.83 | 3.30 | 3.12 | 2.75 | 3.26 | 2.74 |
| EV / EBITDA | 19.09 | 23.25 | 18.72 | 20.02 | 18.79 | 26.75 | 31.97 | 12.97 | 12.19 | 14.14 | 12.13 |
| EV / EBIT | 40.80 | 39.57 | 24.59 | 47.37 | 30.45 | 84.21 | 351.47 | 17.29 | 16.24 | 18.35 | 15.29 |
| EV / FCF | — | 22.25 | 28.61 | 45.72 | 58.51 | 41.02 | 23.19 | 25.62 | 25.40 | 42.72 | 74.82 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 23.0% | 23.0% | 24.7% | 24.2% | 22.6% | 18.9% | 16.0% | 27.2% | 26.5% | 28.0% | 28.2% |
| Operating Margin | 9.1% | 9.1% | 9.8% | 12.0% | 11.1% | 3.9% | 0.9% | 18.0% | 17.0% | 17.8% | 18.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | 5.8% | 5.8% | 6.9% | 5.9% | 8.0% | 1.2% | 2.1% | 13.0% | 12.6% | 14.4% | 12.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 7.9% | 7.9% | 8.1% | 6.5% | 8.3% | 1.1% | 2.1% | 22.2% | 19.6% | 20.7% | 20.6% |
| ROA | 4.0% | 4.0% | 4.7% | 3.7% | 4.5% | 0.6% | 1.0% | 10.3% | 9.9% | 11.0% | 10.9% |
| ROIC | 6.0% | 6.0% | 6.4% | 7.3% | 6.0% | 1.7% | 0.4% | 13.4% | 12.4% | 12.7% | 15.0% |
| ROCE | 7.2% | 7.2% | 7.5% | 8.4% | 6.9% | 2.0% | 0.5% | 16.0% | 14.8% | 15.1% | 17.9% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.48 | 0.42 | 0.50 | 0.55 | 0.65 | 0.78 | 0.72 | 0.54 | 0.55 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.38 | 3.38 | 2.34 | 2.14 | 2.57 | 4.34 | 6.36 | 1.99 | 1.94 | 1.78 | 1.52 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.74 | 0.39 | 0.29 | 0.43 | 0.47 | 0.58 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.50 | 0.52 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.14 | 3.14 | 1.94 | 1.48 | 2.19 | 3.66 | 5.69 | 1.87 | 1.87 | 1.65 | 1.44 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 3.00 | 2.96 | 3.37 | 6.83 | 5.62 | 4.13 | 3.70 | 3.89 | 4.98 | 8.89 |
| Interest Coverage | 4.58 | 4.58 | 7.57 | 4.23 | 5.14 | 1.57 | 0.34 | 9.35 | 9.85 | 12.80 | 16.28 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.26 | 2.26 | 2.21 | 2.74 | 2.23 | 2.49 | 2.93 | 2.19 | 2.07 | 2.51 | 2.23 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.25 | 1.25 | 1.20 | 1.68 | 1.26 | 1.50 | 1.76 | 1.15 | 1.16 | 1.31 | 1.16 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.35 | 0.72 | 0.34 | 0.52 | 0.56 | 0.20 | 0.10 | 0.23 | 0.13 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.61 | 0.56 | 0.47 | 0.51 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.71 | 0.83 |
| Inventory Turnover | 4.44 | 4.44 | 4.02 | 4.05 | 3.82 | 4.37 | 5.91 | 5.15 | 5.40 | 4.53 | 4.95 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 54.96 | 46.38 | 53.01 | 58.92 | 52.57 | 40.94 | 43.43 | 51.92 | 46.00 | 44.73 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.8% | 0.9% | 0.9% | 0.7% | 0.7% | — | 0.3% | 0.9% | 0.9% | 0.7% | 0.8% |
| Payout Ratio | 49.3% | 49.3% | 37.3% | 39.9% | 26.7% | — | 44.8% | 17.7% | 17.5% | 15.0% | 15.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 2.8% | 1.9% | 2.5% | 1.7% | 2.5% | 0.4% | 0.8% | 4.9% | 5.4% | 5.0% | 5.2% |
| FCF Yield | 4.2% | 5.2% | 3.9% | 2.4% | 1.9% | 2.8% | 5.2% | 4.6% | 4.6% | 2.6% | 1.5% |
| Buyback Yield | 7.5% | 7.7% | 4.8% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.6% | 2.3% | 7.0% | 2.6% | 2.3% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 8.3% | 8.6% | 5.8% | 1.1% | 0.7% | 0.0% | 1.0% | 3.1% | 8.0% | 3.4% | 3.1% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $80M | $83M | $86M | $85M | $85M | $84M | $86M | $89M | $92M | $94M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying HXL stock.
Hexcel Corporation's current P/E ratio is 36.0x. The historical average is 29.1x. This places it at the 71th percentile of its historical range.
Hexcel Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 19.1x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 14.0x.
Hexcel Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 7.9%. The historical average is 0.9%.
Based on historical data, Hexcel Corporation is trading at a P/E of 36.0x. This is at the 71th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Hexcel Corporation's current dividend yield is 0.84% with a payout ratio of 49.3%.
Hexcel Corporation has 23.0% gross margin and 9.1% operating margin.
Hexcel Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.4x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Leverage rising into cyclical widebody peak
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Multiple Demands Operating Leverage Delivery
Hexcel trades at 33.0x forward earnings and 18.1x forward EV/EBITDA versus a trailing P/E of 58.1x, per current market data, implying analysts expect a sharp earnings inflection that recent quarterly margin compression has yet to validate.
The gap between trailing (58.1x) and forward (33.0x) P/E suggests consensus is pricing in a substantial earnings ramp from the widebody build-rate recovery, yet the PEG of 1.99 indicates the market is already paying nearly two turns per unit of expected growth. Against the peer group, Hexcel's 5.09x P/B and 23.6x EV/EBITDA sit above diversified materials names like Materion (4.90x P/B, 28.0x EV/EBITDA) and Teledyne (2.82x P/B, 21.1x EV/EBITDA), which arguably already reflects the pure-play composite premium. If the projected margin recovery does not materialize in coming quarters, the valuation appears vulnerable to a de-rating toward more diversified comparables.
Margin Recovery Remains Volatile, Not Structural
Gross margin has oscillured between 21.9% and 26.1% over ten quarters, closing at 23.3% in 2026Q3 per SEC-reported financials, a range that suggests the high-fixed-cost carbon fiber base is still absorbing overhead inconsistently rather than achieving durable expansion.
Operating margin of 11.0% and net margin of 7.8% in 2026Q3 represent meaningful improvement from the 2025Q2 trough of 6.1% and 2.8% respectively, consistent with the reported 8.8% YoY revenue growth translating into genuine, if modest, operating leverage. However, the sequential decline in gross margin from 26.1% in 2026Q2 to 23.3% in 2026Q3 — despite record A350 and 787 program sales — indicates that volume leverage is being partially offset by input costs or mix effects, making the current 11.0% operating margin an unreliable run-rate for earnings power. Investors should treat 7.8% net margin as closer to normalized earning capacity than any peak-quarter figure until at least two to three consecutive quarters of margin expansion confirm the trend.
Returns on Capital Trail Costs of Capital Decisively
ROIC has remained stuck between 0.3% and 2.5% across all ten reported quarters, ending at 1.9% in 2026Q3 per the ratio data, a level that appears well below any reasonable estimate of Hexcel's weighted average cost of capital and signals capital destruction rather than compounding.
Asset turnover of 0.18x is the structural culprit — every dollar of assets generates only 18 cents of annual sales — meaning Hexcel's returns are constrained far more by asset intensity than by its 7.8% net margin. ROE of 2.9% versus ROIC of 1.9% shows modest financial leverage enhancement, but the widening gap between the two as debt has risen 33% suggests the leverage is amplifying returns only marginally while adding risk. Compared to peer Carpenter Technology's 21.8% ROIC, Hexcel's sub-2% returns appear to reflect the utilization-driven nature of its capacity rather than a fading moat, but sustained ROIC below 3% will be difficult to justify at a 5.09x book multiple.
Working Capital Cycle Slowly Tightening
Hexcel's cash conversion cycle improved from 125 days in 2024Q3 to 103 days in 2026Q3 per the reported ratio data, driven primarily by a 13-day reduction in days inventory outstanding to 85 days, indicating better alignment of precursor stockpiling with actual OEM pull rates.
The DIO improvement from the 94-96 day range in 2024-2025 to 80-85 days in 2026 suggests management is tightening inventory pre-positioning ahead of Airbus and Boeing build schedules, which is directionally consistent with the reported recovery in widebody production. However, DSO remains elevated at 53 days and DPO at 34 days, meaning Hexcel funds roughly 19 days of the cycle on its own balance sheet — a structural feature of its position upstream of cash-rich OEMs that caps free cash flow conversion even as revenue grows. The lingering 103-day cycle versus typical industrials in the 60-80 day range warrants monitoring, since a further inventory build in anticipation of higher build rates could reverse the recent cash generation trend.
Debt Build Outpaces Earnings Cushion
Debt-to-equity rose from 0.46 to 0.71 over ten quarters as total debt climbed 33% to $934.9M per SEC balance sheet data, while EBITDA-based leverage sits near 11x and interest coverage has fallen from 8.9x to 4.5x, signaling a materially thinner earnings buffer against downturns.
The simultaneous decline in cash reserves from $125.4M to $77.8M alongside rising debt indicates the leverage increase was driven substantially by the $606M share repurchase program rather than operational investment, meaning the balance sheet absorbed capital return risk at a point when the widebody recovery was still unproven. Coverage of 4.5x in 2026Q3 remains serviceable for an investment-grade industrial, but the swing to 1.1x coverage and 17.6x leverage in 2024Q4 demonstrates how quickly these ratios can deteriorate when widebody volumes dip. With D/E now at 0.71 versus the prior 0.46 baseline, the company has less capacity to fund the capacity expansions its low asset turnover requires without either issuing equity or compressing buybacks further.
EBITDA Leverage Misreads This Balance Sheet
The D/EBITDA ratio reading above 11x is the single most misleading metric for Hexcel, because quarterly EBITDA denominators in a utilization-driven business with 23% gross margins mechanically inflate leverage readings independent of actual debt service risk.
Standard leverage analysis misapplies here in two ways: first, D/EBITDA computed on a quarterly, depressed-margin EBITDA base overstates distress when interest coverage of 4.5x confirms debt service remains manageable through the current cycle; second, and more importantly, the low headline D/E of 0.71 compared with peers masks the fact that Hexcel's 0.18x asset turnover means each incremental dollar of debt funds far less revenue-generating capacity than at a typical industrial. Analysts should instead focus on net debt to normalized EBITDA at mid-cycle margins and on the ROIC-to-WACC spread, both of which paint a more accurate picture of whether the debt-funded buyback program created or destroyed value at a 5.09x book multiple.