Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 56.5x · EV/EBITDA 11.1x · ROE 2.5%. (1998–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $12.5B | $14.4B | $17.4B | $23.4B | $16.0B | $21.1B | $10.4B | $9.4B | $7.1B | $6.2B | $4.2B |
| Enterprise Value | $15.5B | $17.3B | $20.5B | $27.0B | $20.6B | $26.0B | $10.0B | $9.3B | $7.0B | $6.2B | $4.4B |
| P/E Ratio → | 56.52 | 62.83 | 22.01 | 38.25 | 31.69 | 137.64 | 31.25 | 25.37 | 21.90 | 21.86 | 16.17 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.52 | 1.74 | 2.10 | 2.88 | 2.07 | 3.85 | 3.71 | 3.34 | 2.72 | 3.50 | 2.55 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.41 | 1.57 | 1.83 | 2.53 | 1.89 | 2.61 | 5.62 | 5.78 | 5.22 | 5.00 | 4.49 |
| P/FCF | 14.56 | 16.69 | 15.57 | 22.95 | 38.04 | 28.67 | 19.11 | 25.86 | 32.80 | 126.32 | 19.58 |
| P/OCF | 12.11 | 13.89 | 13.53 | 20.17 | 28.44 | 25.42 | 17.47 | 22.68 | 26.79 | 126.25 | 16.36 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.10 | 2.47 | 3.32 | 2.66 | 4.74 | 3.57 | 3.31 | 2.71 | 3.54 | 2.64 |
| EV / EBITDA | 11.08 | 12.40 | 12.91 | 17.49 | 14.58 | 35.15 | 20.54 | 17.69 | 16.00 | 15.57 | 11.85 |
| EV / EBIT | 15.27 | 39.26 | 19.04 | 28.84 | 25.78 | 68.52 | 25.32 | 21.11 | 18.58 | 18.26 | 13.75 |
| EV / FCF | — | 20.07 | 18.31 | 26.44 | 48.82 | 35.32 | 18.36 | 25.68 | 32.59 | 127.68 | 20.30 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 26.4% | 26.4% | 29.4% | 29.6% | 28.6% | 27.5% | 28.9% | 29.6% | 29.6% | 41.3% | 42.3% |
| Operating Margin | 12.3% | 12.3% | 13.3% | 11.8% | 10.3% | 6.9% | 14.0% | 15.4% | 14.4% | 19.2% | 18.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | 2.8% | 2.8% | 9.6% | 7.5% | 6.5% | 2.8% | 11.7% | 13.3% | 12.4% | 16.0% | 15.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 2.5% | 2.5% | 8.4% | 6.9% | 6.1% | 3.1% | 18.9% | 25.2% | 25.0% | 25.9% | 30.7% |
| ROA | 1.4% | 1.4% | 4.7% | 3.6% | 2.9% | 1.5% | 10.3% | 14.2% | 14.2% | 14.0% | 14.8% |
| ROIC | 6.2% | 6.2% | 6.5% | 5.6% | 4.6% | 3.9% | 19.6% | 22.7% | 21.5% | 21.2% | 22.1% |
| ROCE | 7.5% | 7.5% | 7.8% | 6.7% | 5.4% | 4.4% | 19.2% | 24.6% | 22.2% | 22.9% | 25.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.39 | 0.39 | 0.38 | 0.43 | 0.57 | 0.70 | 0.23 | 0.28 | 0.26 | 0.28 | 0.37 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.55 | 2.55 | 2.27 | 2.55 | 3.43 | 7.64 | 0.89 | 0.87 | 0.80 | 0.87 | 0.94 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.32 | 0.32 | 0.39 | 0.53 | 0.61 | -0.22 | -0.04 | -0.03 | 0.05 | 0.17 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.08 | 2.08 | 1.93 | 2.31 | 3.22 | 6.62 | -0.84 | -0.13 | -0.11 | 0.17 | 0.42 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 3.37 | 2.74 | 3.49 | 10.78 | 6.65 | -0.75 | -0.18 | -0.22 | 1.36 | 0.72 |
| Interest Coverage | 2.34 | 2.34 | 4.53 | 2.78 | 3.47 | 2.08 | 30.28 | 33.16 | 28.00 | 26.98 | 24.59 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.10 | 1.10 | 1.26 | 1.21 | 1.20 | 1.19 | 1.87 | 1.44 | 2.18 | 1.95 | 1.94 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.10 | 1.10 | 1.26 | 1.21 | 1.20 | 1.19 | 1.87 | 1.43 | 2.17 | 1.94 | 1.93 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.19 | 0.13 | 0.11 | 0.30 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.75 | 0.64 | 0.53 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.51 | 0.49 | 0.48 | 0.45 | 0.32 | 0.81 | 0.97 | 1.10 | 0.80 | 0.91 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | 782.54 | — | — | 616.92 | 794.04 | 468.85 | 400.56 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 121.61 | 125.66 | 130.32 | 132.09 | 138.05 | 157.55 | 131.85 | 117.78 | 146.58 | 145.04 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 1.8% | 1.6% | 4.5% | 2.6% | 3.2% | 0.7% | 3.2% | 3.9% | 4.6% | 4.6% | 6.2% |
| FCF Yield | 6.9% | 6.0% | 6.4% | 4.4% | 2.6% | 3.5% | 5.2% | 3.9% | 3.0% | 0.8% | 5.1% |
| Buyback Yield | 6.0% | 5.2% | 2.9% | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.0% | 1.7% | 1.6% | 1.8% | 2.2% | 2.6% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 6.0% | 5.2% | 2.9% | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.0% | 1.7% | 1.6% | 1.8% | 2.2% | 2.6% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $79M | $83M | $83M | $82M | $68M | $53M | $54M | $55M | $55M | $56M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 28 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ICLR stock.
ICON Public Limited Company's current P/E ratio is 56.5x. The historical average is 25.7x. This places it at the 93th percentile of its historical range.
ICON Public Limited Company's current EV/EBITDA is 11.1x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 11.2x.
ICON Public Limited Company's return on equity (ROE) is 2.5%. The historical average is 14.2%.
Based on historical data, ICON Public Limited Company is trading at a P/E of 56.5x. This is at the 93th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
ICON Public Limited Company has 26.4% gross margin and 12.3% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
ICON Public Limited Company's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.5x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Severe gross margin compression
Valuation Disconnect From Near-Term Earnings
ICON's current P/E of 58.24 is dramatically elevated versus its forward P/E of 15.94, a disparity that appears driven by significant non-cash charges suppressing trailing earnings rather than an expectation of explosive near-term growth.
The EV/EBITDA multiple of 11.35 sits below the peer average, suggesting the market is pricing ICON more cheaply on an operational basis than on a GAAP earnings basis. However, the P/B ratio of 1.45 is notably low, reflecting the significant goodwill on the balance sheet and the market's skepticism about the tangible value backing the equity. This valuation profile implies the market expects current earnings pressure to be temporary, yet the low P/B indicates limited confidence in the quality of the asset base.
Gross Margin Collapse Erodes Operating Core
ICON's gross margin has contracted dramatically to 18.8% in Q2 2026 from a peak of 29.6% in early 2024, a severe deterioration that directly threatens the company's core operating profitability.
The operating margin has fallen to 9.4%, but the net margin of 3.5% reveals that non-operating expenses continue to consume a large portion of operating profits. This margin profile suggests the company's high variable cost structure, dominated by professional labor, is currently misaligned with project mix and pricing power. The most critical metric for true earning power is the operating margin, as it excludes volatile financing and tax effects, and its current level indicates the core business model is under significant strain.
Capital Returns Fall Below Cost of Equity
ICON's return on invested capital has trended down to 1.2% in the latest quarter, a level that appears well below its estimated cost of capital and suggests the business is destroying value on a marginal basis.
The ROIC has declined from 1.8% in late 2024, driven by both margin compression and declining asset efficiency. The ROE of 0.8% is particularly concerning given the company's low leverage, indicating that the earnings base is insufficient to generate meaningful returns for shareholders. This trend implies the capital deployed through acquisitions and operations is not generating adequate returns, warranting investigation into whether the issue is cyclical or structural.
Conservative Leverage Obscures Asset Quality Risk
A debt-to-equity ratio of 0.37 and interest coverage of 3.98x suggest comfortable leverage, but this view is distorted by an asset base where goodwill represents over 53% of total assets.
While the leverage ratios are technically adequate, the tangible equity base is shrinking due to share repurchases outpacing earnings. The interest coverage trend is stable, but the low ROIC relative to the cost of debt raises questions about long-term debt sustainability if profitability does not recover. Investors should monitor the tangible equity ratio closely, as a potential goodwill impairment could rapidly alter this favorable leverage picture.
Net Margin Misreads Underlying Cash Power
The most commonly misapplied ratio is the net margin of 2.78%, which dramatically understates ICON's cash-generative capacity due to significant non-cash charges from acquisition amortization.
As reported in financial statements, operating cash flow consistently exceeds net income by a substantial margin, indicating that the reported net margin is not reflective of the business's ability to generate cash. For a capital-light, project-based CRO like ICON, the FCF margin (averaging 14.8% TTM) and operating cash flow conversion are more meaningful measures of financial health than the GAAP net margin. Analysts should use EBITDA or operating cash flow as the primary profitability anchors rather than net income, which is heavily distorted by the PRA integration accounting.