Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -7.7x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -10.9%. (2017–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.7B | $3.1B | $2.1B | $2.0B | $753M | $833M | $346M | $152M | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $2.7B | $3.0B | $2.0B | $1.9B | $688M | $747M | $281M | $124M | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -7.66 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 75.13 | 13.99 | 299.88 | 87.52 | 14.79 | 29.83 | 17.71 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 2.70 | 2.99 | 1.98 | 3.30 | 2.15 | 2.76 | 1.75 | 1.51 | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6.30 | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6.24 | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 13.60 | 290.56 | 80.92 | 13.51 | 26.72 | 14.37 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5.11 | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | -43.9% | -43.9% | 45.2% | 82.9% | 95.9% | 93.8% | 92.9% | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -72.8% | -72.8% | -4671.1% | -574.9% | -122.7% | -179.9% | -180.9% | — | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | -52.0% | -52.0% | -3921.1% | -483.0% | -115.2% | -178.1% | -176.6% | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -10.9% | -10.9% | -32.7% | -23.3% | -18.0% | -19.9% | -23.1% | -163.2% | — | — |
| ROA | -10.2% | -10.2% | -31.0% | -21.8% | -15.2% | -14.6% | -16.8% | -40.1% | -60.2% | -67.9% |
| ROIC | -12.4% | -12.4% | -33.6% | -26.8% | -18.8% | -21.7% | -25.7% | -1818.4% | — | — |
| ROCE | -15.0% | -15.0% | -38.5% | -27.5% | -18.1% | -16.9% | -19.3% | -44.9% | -68.6% | -96.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.07 | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.08 | -0.06 | -0.25 | -0.19 | -0.29 | -0.33 | -0.27 | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | -1.19 | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($113M) exceeds total debt ($28M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 11.34 | 11.34 | 14.97 | 19.65 | 11.68 | 5.56 | 7.47 | 14.65 | 16.75 | 5.58 |
| Quick Ratio | 11.34 | 11.34 | 14.97 | 19.65 | 11.68 | 5.56 | 7.47 | 14.65 | 16.75 | 5.58 |
| Cash Ratio | 10.87 | 10.87 | 14.68 | 19.38 | 11.50 | 5.46 | 7.34 | 14.26 | 16.62 | 5.41 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.20 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.13 | 0.07 | 0.07 | — | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 9.97 | 0.16 | 0.28 | 1.51 | 14.41 | 35.07 | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | 15.9% | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $88M | $82M | $58M | $41M | $35M | $25M | $20M | $14M | $14M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 9 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying IDYA stock.
IDEAYA Biosciences, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -7.7x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
IDEAYA Biosciences, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -10.9%. The historical average is -41.6%.
Based on historical data, IDEAYA Biosciences, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -7.7x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
IDEAYA Biosciences, Inc. has -43.9% gross margin and -72.8% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Cash runway and milestone dependence
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Milestone-Driven Margins Mask Underlying Burn
Gross margin hit 100% in 2026Q2, yet operating margin remained deeply negative at -13.8%, reflecting collaboration revenue's minimal direct costs against heavy R&D investment, as reported in financial statements.
The extreme gross margin is an accounting artifact of collaboration revenue, which carries negligible cost of goods sold, but it obscures the true earning power of the business. Operating margin swung from a positive 52.2% in 2025Q3, when a one-time milestone was recognized, to -13.8% in 2026Q2, indicating that the underlying operations are heavily loss-making. Net margin of -12.7% in 2026Q2, despite the 100% gross margin, underscores that R&D and SG&A expenses consume all revenue and more, a pattern typical of a pre-commercial biotech prioritizing clinical advancement over profitability.
Negative Returns Reflect Pre-Commercial Investment
ROIC deteriorated from -6.5% in 2024Q3 to -10.4% in 2026Q2, while ROE remained negative at -10.5%, indicating that invested capital is not yet generating positive returns, per reported figures.
The persistent negative ROIC and ROE across the ten quarters, with only a brief positive spike in 2025Q3 (ROIC 9.6%) driven by the milestone, suggests that the company is in a heavy investment phase where capital is being consumed to build clinical assets. The slight improvement in ROIC from -12.1% in 2024Q4 to -10.4% in 2026Q2 may indicate that the capital base is growing faster than losses, but this is not evidence of value creation. Investors should monitor whether the MAT2A and PARG programs can translate into commercial products that eventually generate returns above the cost of capital, as the current negative returns are expected for a clinical-stage biotech.
Working Capital Efficiency Distorted by Milestones
DSO spiked to 113 days in 2026Q2 from 51 days in 2025Q4, while DPO data is sparse, suggesting that collaboration receivables are slow to convert to cash, based on reported financials.
The sharp increase in DSO to 113 days in 2026Q2, following the milestone-driven revenue in 2025Q3, indicates that a significant portion of revenue is recognized before cash is received, a common feature of collaboration agreements with milestone payments. The absence of DIO data and the minimal DPO figures (18-19 days in early 2026) suggest that the company has little inventory and limited supplier leverage, consistent with an asset-light R&D model. The cash conversion cycle cannot be fully computed due to missing DIO, but the high DSO and low DPO imply that working capital is a net use of cash, which may pressure liquidity if milestone payments are delayed.
Minimal Debt Masks Equity Dependence
Debt-to-equity remains negligible at 0.02 as of 2026Q2, with total debt of $29.3 million against $1.2 billion equity, indicating a conservative capital structure, per SEC filings.
The near-zero leverage suggests that IDEAYA is funding its operations almost entirely through equity, which reduces near-term solvency risk but exposes shareholders to dilution as the company continues to burn cash. Interest coverage is not reported, but with minimal debt, interest expense is likely immaterial; however, the lack of debt also means the company cannot rely on borrowing to bridge funding gaps. The high current ratio of 10.45 provides a comfortable liquidity buffer, but the negative operating cash flow of $163.4 million in 2026Q2 implies that the company will need to raise additional equity or secure new milestones within the next 12-18 months, based on the reported cash position of $272.6 million.
Strong Liquidity Buffer with Limited Runway
Current ratio stands at 10.45 with cash of $272.6 million as of 2026Q2, but given the TTM operating loss of $163.4 million, the cash runway appears limited to under two years, based on reported data.
The current ratio of 10.45 and quick ratio of 10.45 indicate that IDEAYA has ample short-term assets to cover liabilities, but this is largely due to the cash raised from equity offerings and milestone payments. The absence of inventory in the quick ratio is not a concern for a biotech with no commercial products, but the rapid cash burn of $163.4 million in a single quarter suggests that the runway could be shorter than the current ratio implies. If the company fails to secure additional milestones or financing, it may face a liquidity shortfall, though the strong balance sheet provides some cushion for negotiating new partnerships.
Misapplied Gross Margin in Valuation
The 100% gross margin is commonly misapplied as a sign of profitability, but it obscures the true cost structure, as operating margin remains deeply negative at -13.8%, per reported financials.
For a clinical-stage biotech like IDEAYA, gross margin is a misleading metric because collaboration revenue carries minimal direct costs, making it appear highly profitable when the underlying business is burning cash. Analysts should instead focus on operating margin and cash burn, which reflect the heavy R&D investment required to advance the pipeline. The 2025Q3 revenue spike of $207.8 million, likely from a one-time milestone, further distorts gross margin and revenue growth, leading quantitative models to overstate the company's fundamental growth. A more appropriate metric is the cash runway to next milestone, which measures whether the company can fund operations without dilutive financing.