Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.2x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -52.8%. (2001–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3M | $3M | $2M | $2M | $263435 | $21M | $32M | $44M | $82M | $25M | $5M |
| Enterprise Value | $-11292895 | $-10908230 | $-5647574 | $-9018352 | $-6667682 | $13M | $27M | $34M | $64M | $20M | $5M |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.56 | 0.64 | 0.44 | 0.55 | 0.24 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.08 | 0.17 | 0.16 | 0.14 | 0.02 | 2.34 | 5.48 | 3.18 | 3.97 | 4.05 | 5.72 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | -2.21 | -1.23 | -2.18 | -6.12 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 34.5% | 34.5% | 23.9% | 33.9% | 49.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -160.2% | -160.2% | -176.9% | -202.6% | -1266.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | -165.1% | -165.1% | -166.9% | -192.2% | -1707.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -52.8% | -52.8% | -53.7% | -57.4% | -178.7% | -168.6% | -90.5% | -58.0% | -50.2% | -99.0% | -175.3% |
| ROA | -43.7% | -43.7% | -44.0% | -45.2% | -130.2% | -127.1% | -78.2% | -55.0% | -48.4% | -89.5% | -140.5% |
| ROIC | -129.9% | -129.9% | -126.5% | -132.5% | -405.0% | -2468.0% | -307.3% | -244.7% | -313.6% | -295.4% | -143.6% |
| ROCE | -49.2% | -49.2% | -55.1% | -59.4% | -128.0% | -157.2% | -91.5% | -60.0% | -50.7% | -99.0% | -175.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.03 | 0.09 | 0.04 | 0.05 | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.77 | -0.61 | -0.70 | -0.59 | -0.96 | -0.93 | -0.71 | -0.89 | -0.84 | -0.05 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -20.88 | -20.88 | — | — | — | -34.19 | -480.19 | — | — | -6945.47 | -38340.48 |
Net cash position: cash ($15M) exceeds total debt ($1M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 6.99 | 6.99 | 4.41 | 5.66 | 2.89 | 3.78 | 3.77 | 11.87 | 28.51 | 18.79 | 0.32 |
| Quick Ratio | 6.47 | 6.47 | 3.78 | 4.86 | 2.14 | 3.78 | 3.77 | 11.87 | 28.51 | 18.79 | 0.32 |
| Cash Ratio | 6.02 | 6.02 | 3.33 | 4.45 | 1.87 | 3.34 | 3.49 | 11.54 | 28.23 | 18.15 | 0.09 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.23 | 0.28 | 0.22 | 0.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | 2.47 | 2.47 | 2.05 | 1.28 | 0.17 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 46.79 | 38.31 | 30.45 | 37.97 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $975985 | $381053 | $122422 | $1121 | $13439 | $10441 | $10384 | $8633 | $5866 | $3648 |
Persistent capital dilution risk
Based on reported figures, InMed trades at a price-to-sales ratio of 0.56, which appears to reflect the market's skepticism regarding the sustainability of its revenue streams and the significant clinical risks inherent in its pharmaceutical pipeline compared to more established biotechnology peers in the cannabinoid space.
The low P/S multiple suggests that investors are heavily discounting the company's future growth prospects, likely due to the persistent negative operating margins and the lack of a clear path to profitability. This valuation level warrants further investigation into whether the market is pricing the firm as a distressed asset or merely reflecting the high cost of equity capital for pre-revenue biotech entities.
According to historical financial data, InMed's ROIC has remained deeply negative, reaching -65.0% in 2026Q3, which indicates that the company is currently destroying shareholder value rather than compounding it through its investments in the IntegraSyn biosynthesis platform and the BayMedica commercial ingredient business segment.
The consistent decay in returns on invested capital suggests that the firm's R&D and acquisition costs are not being offset by commensurate returns from its commercial activities. Investors should monitor whether future clinical milestones can reverse this trend, as the current trajectory appears unsustainable without significant improvements in operational efficiency.
As reported in financial statements, InMed's asset turnover ratio has remained stagnant at approximately 0.06 to 0.10 over the last ten quarters, highlighting a structural inability to generate meaningful revenue from its existing asset base despite the integration of the BayMedica commercial subsidiary.
The erratic nature of the cash conversion cycle, which has seen extreme volatility in recent periods, suggests that the company struggles with inventory management and the timing of its B2B ingredient sales. This inefficiency may indicate that the firm lacks the necessary scale to optimize its supply chain and working capital requirements effectively.
Based on recent SEC filings, InMed's current ratio has fluctuated significantly, dropping to 3.11 in 2026Q3 from a peak of 7.03 in 2024Q2, which indicates a tightening liquidity position as the company continues to fund its ongoing research and development initiatives through its dwindling cash reserves.
While the current ratio remains above 1.0, the rapid depletion of liquid assets suggests that the company may face significant pressure to raise additional capital in the near term. This vulnerability warrants further investigation into the firm's ability to maintain its operations without resorting to further dilutive equity financing.
The most commonly misapplied metric for InMed is the price-to-sales ratio, which obscures the company's underlying clinical risk and the high probability that current revenue is non-recurring, thereby failing to account for the fundamental disconnect between transactional ingredient sales and the firm's long-term pharmaceutical R&D objectives.
Investors should instead focus on the cash burn rate and the clinical trial progression of INM-755, as these metrics provide a more accurate assessment of the company's viability than revenue multiples. Relying on P/S ratios in this context may lead to an overestimation of the firm's commercial maturity and a misunderstanding of its true economic value.
Includes 30+ ratios · 25 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying INM stock.
InMed Pharmaceuticals Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.2x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
InMed Pharmaceuticals Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -52.8%. The historical average is -123.3%.
Based on historical data, InMed Pharmaceuticals Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.2x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
InMed Pharmaceuticals Inc. has 34.5% gross margin and -160.2% operating margin.