Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -24.0x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -24.3%. (2019–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $16.3B | $12.6B | $8.9B | $2.5B | $682M | $3.2B | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $15.3B | $11.6B | $8.9B | $2.5B | $642M | $2.8B | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -24.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 125.66 | 96.75 | 206.58 | 113.87 | 61.28 | 1543.96 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 3.22 | 3.30 | 23.18 | 5.18 | 1.20 | 5.48 | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 89.05 | 205.73 | 112.62 | 57.66 | 1355.86 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 40.4% | 40.4% | 52.2% | 63.2% | 23.2% | -70.9% | — | 56.0% |
| Operating Margin | -487.4% | -487.4% | -539.7% | -715.7% | -770.3% | -1843.1% | — | -4627.5% |
| Net Profit Margin | -392.6% | -392.6% | -770.0% | -715.8% | -435.8% | -5058.9% | — | -4467.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -24.3% | -24.3% | -76.3% | -30.0% | -8.4% | -32.9% | -26.2% | -14.0% |
| ROA | -14.4% | -14.4% | -62.5% | -27.4% | -7.8% | -30.2% | -24.5% | -13.7% |
| ROIC | -30.1% | -30.1% | -43.3% | -24.0% | -17.8% | -26.6% | -87.4% | — |
| ROCE | -18.4% | -18.4% | -47.0% | -28.8% | -14.2% | -11.2% | -25.6% | -14.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.08 | 0.01 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.26 | -0.10 | -0.06 | -0.07 | -0.67 | -0.59 | -0.92 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($1.0B) exceeds total debt ($30M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 15.50 | 15.50 | 10.50 | 10.49 | 18.43 | 54.65 | 20.51 | 74.77 |
| Quick Ratio | 15.16 | 15.16 | 9.98 | 10.16 | 18.18 | 54.65 | 20.51 | 74.77 |
| Cash Ratio | 14.34 | 14.34 | 9.43 | 9.56 | 17.65 | 53.91 | 19.20 | 73.67 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.02 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.00 | — | 0.00 |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.34 | 1.34 | 1.10 | 0.65 | 1.66 | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 238.70 | 105.15 | 224.81 | 107.95 | 122.94 | — | 182.50 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $280M | $213M | $203M | $198M | $194M | $192M | $4M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 7 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying IONQ stock.
IonQ, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -24.0x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
IonQ, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -24.3%. The historical average is -30.3%.
Based on historical data, IonQ, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -24.0x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
IonQ, Inc. has 40.4% gross margin and -487.4% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Profitability gap widens despite growth
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Pricing for Future Quantum Utility
IonQ trades at a P/S of 129x TTM revenue of $130M, implying the market capitalizes a decade of hypergrowth. According to the provided financial snapshot, this multiple far exceeds pure-play peers, suggesting expectations of sustained triple-digit revenue expansion.
The P/S multiple of 129x is extreme even for a high-growth technology company, reflecting a market cap that implies revenue scaling to billions within a few years. Compared to peers like Rigetti (P/S ~? ) and D-Wave (P/S ~? ), IonQ's premium likely stems from its trapped-ion technology and $1B cash buffer, but it leaves little room for execution missteps. Investors should monitor whether the 201.9% YoY growth can persist, as any deceleration would compress the multiple sharply.
Gross Margin Volatility Masks Underlying Economics
Gross margin swung from -43.7% in 2025Q1 to 56.5% in 2025Q4, settling at 24.9% in 2026Q2, per reported figures. This instability suggests product mix shifts between hardware sales and cloud services, obscuring the true unit economics of IonQ's quantum platform.
The wide swings in gross margin indicate that IonQ's revenue mix is not yet stable, with hardware sales likely carrying lower margins than recurring cloud access. Operating margin has remained near -4% despite revenue tripling, implying that R&D and SG&A costs are scaling proportionally, and no operating leverage has emerged. The net margin of -23.3% in 2026Q2, distorted by non-cash warrant revaluations, underscores that underlying profitability remains elusive.
Negative Returns on Invested Capital Persist
ROIC has hovered between -5% and -15% over the past ten quarters, with 2026Q2 at -7.6%, as reported in the financial data. Despite a massive equity base, IonQ is not yet generating positive returns, indicating that capital deployment is still in an investment phase.
The negative ROIC, despite a $3.3B equity base, suggests that IonQ's investments in R&D and acquisitions have not yet produced profitable operations. The improvement from -15.1% in 2024Q4 to -7.6% in 2026Q2 is modest and may reflect revenue growth outpacing cost growth, but the absolute level remains far from acceptable. Investors should watch for a sustained trend toward positive ROIC as a sign that the business model is becoming self-sustaining.
Working Capital Cycle Lengthens with Scale
The cash conversion cycle extended from 177 days in 2024Q2 to 199 days in 2026Q1, with DSO at 127 days in 2026Q2, based on the provided ratios. This suggests that IonQ is tying up more cash in receivables as revenue grows, potentially straining liquidity despite a strong cash position.
The rising DSO, from 70 days in 2024Q2 to 127 days in 2026Q2, indicates that customers are taking longer to pay, possibly due to large government or enterprise contracts with milestone-based billing. The CCC, though volatile, remains elevated, reflecting the project-based nature of revenue. While the current ratio of 10.66 provides ample buffer, the trend in working capital efficiency warrants monitoring as it could pressure cash flow if revenue growth continues.
Minimal Debt Masks Equity-Funded Growth
IonQ's debt-to-equity ratio stands at 0.02, with total debt of $54.5M against $3.3B equity, as per the balance sheet data. This indicates that growth is almost entirely equity-funded, providing significant financial flexibility but also diluting shareholders.
The negligible leverage means IonQ faces no near-term refinancing risk, and interest coverage is not a concern. However, the reliance on equity financing, evidenced by the $6.8B asset base built from raises, suggests that future dilution may be necessary to fund ongoing losses. The $1B cash pile provides a multi-year runway, but the absence of debt also implies that IonQ is not using leverage to enhance returns, which is appropriate given its pre-profit status.
Fortress Liquidity Supports Long Runway
With a current ratio of 10.66 and cash of $1.2B, IonQ's liquidity position is robust, as reported in the latest quarter. This buffer can sustain operating losses of roughly $80M per quarter for over three years, even without additional funding.
The high current ratio, driven by a large cash balance and minimal current liabilities, provides IonQ with exceptional resilience against operational shocks. Even under a severe stress scenario where revenue stagnates and losses persist, the cash pile offers a significant cushion. However, the negative FCF margin of -142% in 2026Q2 indicates that cash burn is accelerating, so the runway could shorten if losses widen further.
Premium Valuation vs. Pure-Play Peers
IonQ's P/S of 129x far exceeds Rigetti's and D-Wave's multiples, while its ROIC of -7.6% is less negative than D-Wave's -82.1%, according to the peer data. This suggests the market rewards IonQ's trapped-ion approach and commercial traction, but the gap may be unsustainable.
Compared to Rigetti and D-Wave, IonQ shows superior revenue growth and a less severe ROIC, but its valuation premium is substantial. The peer group's negative margins and returns indicate that the entire sector is pre-profit, so valuation is driven by narrative and cash runway. IonQ's $1B cash position and higher revenue base justify some premium, but the 129x P/S implies that IonQ must maintain its growth leadership to avoid a de-rating.
Misapplied Metric: P/S on Reported Revenue
The most misapplied ratio for IonQ is the price-to-sales multiple, given the $130M TTM revenue figure may include one-time hardware sales or non-recurring engineering fees. As reported in the financial snapshot, this revenue is not purely recurring, so P/S overstates the value of IonQ's cloud business.
Investors often use P/S to value high-growth tech, but for IonQ, the revenue mix is critical. If a significant portion of the $130M comes from system sales or government contracts, the recurring revenue base is much smaller, making the 129x P/S even more extreme. A better metric would be EV/Bookings or a multiple on recurring cloud revenue, which would provide a clearer picture of the sustainable business. Additionally, adjusting for stock-based compensation is essential, as SBC of $141.8M in 2026Q2 exceeds operating cash flow, making reported earnings and cash flow appear less costly than they are.