Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 73.7x · EV/EBITDA 11.2x · ROE -8.5%. (2005–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $14.7B | $10.4B | $8.1B | $8.9B | $10.0B | $7.6B | $9.3B | $8.6B | $7.6B | $8.3B | $6.7B |
| Enterprise Value | $18.8B | $14.4B | $11.9B | $13.1B | $14.9B | $13.2B | $10.5B | $9.7B | $8.9B | $9.5B | $8.4B |
| P/E Ratio → | 73.75 | — | 14.24 | 20.16 | — | — | 39.11 | 16.42 | 16.98 | 16.92 | 17.01 |
| P/S Ratio | 3.13 | 2.43 | 2.00 | 2.31 | 2.72 | 2.46 | 3.95 | 3.97 | 4.01 | 5.10 | 4.53 |
| P/B Ratio | 3.32 | 2.40 | 1.99 | 2.37 | 3.23 | 1.92 | 2.55 | 2.76 | 2.75 | 3.04 | 3.59 |
| P/FCF | 9.38 | 9.05 | 6.03 | 8.30 | 12.88 | 10.38 | 17.93 | 14.46 | 11.37 | 14.26 | 16.49 |
| P/OCF | 10.88 | 7.65 | 5.82 | 8.12 | 7.83 | 9.77 | 10.37 | 11.07 | 9.50 | 11.91 | 11.42 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.37 | 2.92 | 3.43 | 4.07 | 4.26 | 4.45 | 4.50 | 4.69 | 5.84 | 5.65 |
| EV / EBITDA | 11.20 | 15.64 | 8.63 | 10.80 | 26.41 | 18.22 | 16.03 | 10.78 | 10.67 | 13.62 | 11.92 |
| EV / EBIT | 83.68 | — | 13.79 | 16.22 | 17.75 | 27.70 | 13.74 | 15.14 | 12.40 | 15.40 | 13.14 |
| EV / FCF | — | 12.56 | 8.81 | 12.31 | 19.25 | 17.96 | 20.21 | 16.37 | 13.30 | 16.32 | 20.56 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 88.2% | 88.2% | 89.0% | 88.6% | 85.2% | 85.8% | 93.7% | 94.1% | 93.6% | 93.2% | 92.9% |
| Operating Margin | 5.3% | 5.3% | 17.6% | 15.1% | -1.8% | 5.5% | 16.0% | 24.6% | 32.5% | 32.7% | 39.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | -8.3% | -8.3% | 13.8% | 10.8% | -6.1% | -10.6% | 10.1% | 24.2% | 23.6% | 30.1% | 26.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -8.5% | -8.5% | 14.3% | 12.2% | -6.4% | -8.6% | 7.0% | 17.8% | 16.3% | 21.3% | 22.8% |
| ROA | -3.0% | -3.0% | 4.8% | 3.7% | -1.9% | -3.5% | 4.0% | 9.7% | 8.7% | 9.8% | 9.7% |
| ROIC | 2.1% | 2.1% | 6.8% | 5.4% | -0.6% | 1.8% | 6.2% | 9.6% | 11.6% | 10.6% | 16.6% |
| ROCE | 2.2% | 2.2% | 6.9% | 5.9% | -0.6% | 2.0% | 6.8% | 10.6% | 12.7% | 11.3% | 15.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.26 | 1.26 | 1.51 | 1.55 | 1.88 | 1.55 | 0.61 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 1.08 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 5.89 | 5.89 | 4.48 | 4.76 | 10.31 | 8.51 | 3.43 | 1.96 | 1.92 | 2.28 | 2.88 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.93 | 0.92 | 1.15 | 1.60 | 1.40 | 0.33 | 0.36 | 0.47 | 0.44 | 0.89 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 4.38 | 4.38 | 2.72 | 3.52 | 8.74 | 7.69 | 1.82 | 1.26 | 1.55 | 1.72 | 2.36 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 3.52 | 2.78 | 4.01 | 6.37 | 7.59 | 2.29 | 1.91 | 1.93 | 2.06 | 4.07 |
| Interest Coverage | -2.22 | -2.22 | 3.62 | 2.80 | 2.91 | 1.70 | 7.68 | 8.89 | 9.12 | 7.89 | 10.33 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.86 | 1.86 | 4.46 | 2.24 | 2.79 | 3.23 | 4.34 | 4.47 | 3.57 | 3.29 | 2.91 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.67 | 1.67 | 3.99 | 1.85 | 2.03 | 1.90 | 4.20 | 4.26 | 3.42 | 3.15 | 2.77 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.09 | 1.09 | 2.88 | 1.06 | 0.94 | 0.73 | 3.26 | 2.96 | 2.39 | 2.04 | 1.65 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.37 | 0.34 | 0.34 | 0.34 | 0.25 | 0.36 | 0.39 | 0.36 | 0.32 | 0.31 |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.21 | 1.21 | 0.93 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.41 | 1.56 | 1.63 | 2.30 | 2.55 | 3.09 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 71.05 | 64.30 | 67.19 | 64.98 | 66.45 | 61.23 | 60.11 | 50.93 | 50.54 | 57.46 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 1.4% | — | 7.0% | 5.0% | — | — | 2.6% | 6.1% | 5.9% | 5.9% | 5.9% |
| FCF Yield | 10.7% | 11.1% | 16.6% | 12.0% | 7.8% | 9.6% | 5.6% | 6.9% | 8.8% | 7.0% | 6.1% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.8% | 1.2% | 3.8% | 3.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.6% | 3.5% | 6.9% | 1.2% | 4.1% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.8% | 1.2% | 3.8% | 3.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.6% | 3.5% | 6.9% | 1.2% | 4.1% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $61M | $66M | $72M | $63M | $60M | $57M | $58M | $61M | $61M | $62M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 21 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying JAZZ stock.
Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc's current P/E ratio is 73.7x. The historical average is 33.0x. This places it at the 92th percentile of its historical range.
Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc's current EV/EBITDA is 11.2x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 15.2x.
Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc's return on equity (ROE) is -8.5%. The historical average is 8.4%.
Based on historical data, Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc is trading at a P/E of 73.7x. This is at the 92th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc has 88.2% gross margin and 5.3% operating margin.
Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 5.9x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Acquisition-driven leverage and amortization
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Forward Multiples Imply Recovery Priced In
Based on reported figures, JAZZ trades at a forward P/E of 16.15 against a trailing P/E of -38.92, and a forward EV/EBITDA of 9.57 versus 23.89 trailing, suggesting the market is pricing earnings normalization rather than current reported results.
The gap between trailing and forward multiples is wide, which indicates that reported trailing earnings are depressed by non-cash amortization from the GW Pharmaceuticals acquisition rather than by a collapse in operating economics. A forward P/E near 16 is not demanding for a franchise with recurring neuroscience revenue, but the valuation depends on consensus earnings that have already missed in the most recent quarter. Investors should monitor whether forward estimates are revised as amortization and integration costs are clarified.
Gross Margin Strength Masked Below the Line
According to reported quarterly figures, gross margin held near 88% to 91% across most periods, while operating margin swung from 75.9% in 2025Q4 to -33.3% in 2026Q3, indicating large below-gross-profit charges distort earnings power.
A stable gross margin in this range is consistent with high-price orphan therapeutics whose marginal production cost is low relative to net pricing. The volatility in operating margin, however, points to amortization, SG&A, and integration items absorbing most of the gross profit, which limits the reliability of headline net margin as a measure of earning power. Adjusted or cash-based earnings appear more representative, though these should be reconciled to GAAP before being relied upon.
Leverage Easing Then Re-Levering on Acquisitions
Based on reported figures, debt-to-equity fell from 1.51 in 2024Q4 to 0.92 in 2026Q2 before rising to 1.35 in 2026Q3, while interest coverage of -9.09 in the latest quarter reflects operating losses rather than a clean debt-service read.
The leverage trajectory is volatile rather than steadily deleveraging, and the rebound in D/E tracks with equity swings from reported net losses as much as with new borrowing. Negative interest coverage in 2026Q3 and 2025Q2 means the coverage ratio is not informative in those quarters, so debt service has to be judged from operating cash flow instead. Refinancing exposure and the pace of deleveraging warrant monitoring given the size of acquisition-related debt.
Premium Returns Undercut by Valuation Discount
Compared with the peer group, JAZZ's reported net margin of -8.3% and ROE of -8.5% lag Innoviva's 63.8% net margin and 30.0% ROE, yet JAZZ's forward P/E of 16.15 sits well below its peer multiples on a trailing basis.
JAZZ's profitability trails the stronger peers on a GAAP basis, while its D/E of 1.26 is higher than most of the group, so the market discount appears tied to balance-sheet and earnings-quality concerns. The peer set is heterogeneous, with Innoviva's royalty model not directly comparable, so the gap is partly structural and partly a reflection of acquisition accounting. Whether the discount narrows depends on evidence that amortization-adjusted earnings converge toward the sector.
Trailing Metrics Mislead on Debt Capacity
The reported debt-to-equity ratio of 1.26 appears moderate in isolation, but it may understate risk when goodwill and acquisition-related intangibles are considered, since tangible equity is materially lower than book equity.
Price-to-book of 3.21 and D/E near 1.3 can suggest a manageable balance sheet, yet a large share of the equity base consists of goodwill and intangibles that would not support lenders in a stress scenario. Debt/EBITDA is also distorted by negative and volatile EBITDA quarters, which makes headline leverage ratios less reliable than cash-flow-based coverage. Analysts should weight free cash flow to debt rather than book leverage when assessing financial flexibility.