Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.6x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -48.5%. (2012–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $4M | $4M | $15M | $8M | $14M | $10M | $8M | $5M | $7M | $8M | $11M |
| Enterprise Value | $7M | $7M | $16M | $8M | $16M | $-1043806 | $-6364476 | $-14004157 | $-12887429 | $-16586505 | $-12047397 |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.60 | — | 4.98 | 2.79 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.31 | 0.27 | 0.17 | 0.19 | 5.97 | 0.30 | 0.36 | 0.32 | 0.27 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.27 | 0.15 | 0.73 | 0.56 | 1.12 | 0.33 | 0.15 | 0.09 | 0.12 | 0.10 | 0.13 |
| P/FCF | — | — | 2.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7.90 | 3.49 |
| P/OCF | — | — | 1.98 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4.01 | 3.45 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.08 | 0.32 | 0.25 | 0.20 | -0.02 | -4.77 | -0.85 | -0.70 | -0.70 | -0.29 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | 2.28 | 2.42 | — | — | — | -12.84 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | 4.11 | 2.64 | — | — | — | -34.55 | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | 2.16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | -17.01 | -3.82 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 12.6% | 12.6% | 16.8% | 17.1% | 1.8% | 1.6% | 12.5% | 30.9% | -19.3% | -48.4% | 5.2% |
| Operating Margin | -13.1% | -13.1% | 7.8% | 9.6% | -69.3% | -13.6% | -74.5% | 2.5% | -125.7% | -81.3% | -37.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | -13.3% | -13.3% | 6.2% | 9.6% | -92.0% | -68.9% | -424.4% | -0.6% | -96.9% | -62.3% | -28.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -48.5% | -48.5% | 17.0% | 22.2% | -340.3% | -87.2% | -10.4% | -0.2% | -28.0% | -18.8% | -12.9% |
| ROA | -30.3% | -30.3% | 11.9% | 15.9% | -270.4% | -74.0% | -9.2% | -0.2% | -25.2% | -17.2% | -11.9% |
| ROIC | -33.4% | -33.4% | 16.1% | 15.7% | -244.1% | -18.5% | -2.0% | 0.9% | -41.3% | -26.3% | -16.7% |
| ROCE | -47.9% | -47.9% | 21.5% | 22.2% | -256.3% | -17.2% | -1.8% | 0.7% | -36.3% | -24.5% | -16.9% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.08 | — | 0.21 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 0.24 | — | — | — | — | 1.50 | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.12 | 0.02 | -0.03 | 0.17 | -0.36 | -0.26 | -0.35 | -0.36 | -0.33 | -0.28 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 0.07 | -0.12 | — | — | — | -17.41 | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | 0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | — | -24.90 | -7.31 |
| Interest Coverage | -263.91 | -263.91 | 275.78 | 587.81 | — | — | — | 6.03 | -222.75 | -168.36 | -183.62 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.33 | 1.33 | 1.32 | 2.88 | 1.65 | 3.35 | 3.96 | 4.93 | 4.56 | 5.54 | 7.32 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.33 | 1.33 | 1.32 | 2.88 | 1.53 | 3.19 | 3.73 | 4.71 | 4.38 | 5.29 | 7.00 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.13 | 0.06 | 0.13 | 1.79 | 2.09 | 3.10 | 3.06 | 3.58 | 3.19 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.93 | 1.68 | 1.45 | 4.91 | 1.42 | 0.02 | 0.27 | 0.30 | 0.29 | 0.45 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | 176.38 | 45.70 | 0.63 | 7.89 | 17.75 | 19.53 | 15.93 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 0.72 | 0.78 | 85.60 | 15.17 | 55.14 | 3159.11 | 233.97 | 161.54 | 162.64 | 208.06 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | 20.1% | 35.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | 47.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 12.7% | 28.6% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $621322 | $237911 | $106104 | $28026 | $7539 | $4521 | $4196 | $3717 | $3101 | $2917 |
Liquidity and operational volatility
According to current market data, JXG trades at a P/S ratio of 0.05, which, based on reported figures, reflects deep market skepticism regarding the company's ability to convert its high-volume transactional revenue into sustainable earnings or meaningful shareholder value in the long term.
The absence of a positive P/E ratio and the extremely low P/B of 0.27 suggest that the market is pricing the company as a distressed asset rather than a growth-oriented technology firm. Investors should monitor whether this valuation reflects a permanent impairment of the business model or if it presents a deep-value opportunity contingent on a successful pivot to higher-margin software solutions.
As reported in financial statements, JXG's gross margin has fluctuated significantly between 1.4% and 21.6% over the last ten quarters, indicating that the company lacks the pricing power necessary to maintain consistent profitability in its competitive travel and e-commerce segments.
The persistent oscillation in operating margins, which reached -37.2% in 2022Q2 before recovering to 11.1% in 2023Q2, suggests that the firm's cost structure is highly sensitive to transactional volume. This instability implies that the company's earning power remains unproven and highly vulnerable to procurement cost spikes or shifts in consumer demand.
Based on historical data, JXG's ROIC has shown extreme volatility, swinging from a negative 52.6% in 2022Q2 to a modest 5.9% in 2024Q1, which suggests that the company has struggled to generate consistent returns on its invested capital since its transition to the current business model.
The inability to maintain a stable, positive ROIC indicates that the company's capital allocation strategy has yet to yield a compounding effect. Investors should view these returns with caution, as they appear to be driven more by temporary revenue surges than by structural improvements in operational efficiency or asset utilization.
As indicated by recent balance sheet filings, the company maintains a precarious liquidity position with a cash balance of approximately $700,727, which, when compared to its $82.9 million in TTM revenue, leaves the firm with minimal room for error in managing its working capital.
The current ratio of 1.32, while appearing adequate on the surface, masks the underlying risk of a company that relies heavily on rapid inventory turnover to fund its daily operations. Any disruption in the collection of receivables or a sudden increase in supplier payment demands could quickly exhaust the company's limited cash reserves.
The most commonly misapplied metric for JXG is the top-line revenue growth rate, which, according to recent filings, reached 66.41% YoY, yet this figure obscures the fact that the company is currently operating with negative net margins and a highly unstable cash flow profile.
Analysts should prioritize the analysis of free cash flow margins and operating cash flow conversion over top-line growth, as the latter may be driven by low-margin, capital-intensive resale activities that do not contribute to long-term sustainability. Focusing on revenue growth in this context risks ignoring the fundamental liquidity constraints that threaten the company's ongoing viability.
Includes 30+ ratios · 14 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying JXG stock.
JX Luxventure Limited's current P/E ratio is -0.6x. The historical average is 27.3x.
JX Luxventure Limited's return on equity (ROE) is -48.5%. The historical average is -33.6%.
Based on historical data, JX Luxventure Limited is trading at a P/E of -0.6x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
JX Luxventure Limited has 12.6% gross margin and -13.1% operating margin.