Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.0x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -101.2%. (2018–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1M | $111726 | $79M | $632M | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $-2343961 | $-3601041 | $80M | $626M | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.04 | — | — | 781.15 | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.47 | 0.04 | 12.71 | 66.30 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.03 | 0.01 | 12.99 | 28.32 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | -1.25 | 12.91 | 65.60 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | 442.87 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 0.7% | 0.7% | -3.9% | 48.5% | 73.3% | 60.9% | 50.7% |
| Operating Margin | -46.2% | -46.2% | -275.9% | 13.8% | 53.2% | 46.6% | 14.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | -353.5% | -353.5% | -270.3% | 8.5% | 42.0% | 40.6% | 14.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -101.2% | -101.2% | -118.3% | 5.3% | 53.6% | 107.8% | 46.9% |
| ROA | -62.7% | -62.7% | -77.3% | 4.1% | 36.4% | 44.1% | 8.3% |
| ROIC | -11.3% | -11.3% | -112.0% | 8.6% | 56.2% | 104.3% | 41.9% |
| ROCE | -12.5% | -12.5% | -110.2% | 8.1% | 67.9% | 123.8% | 46.9% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.59 | 0.03 | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | 0.50 | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.26 | 0.20 | -0.30 | -0.09 | -0.09 | -0.16 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | -4.72 | -0.17 | -0.12 | -0.34 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | -1.56 | — | -12.87 |
| Interest Coverage | -93.96 | -93.96 | -12.82 | — | — | 2107.53 | 580.50 |
Net cash position: cash ($5M) exceeds total debt ($856516)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 5.79 | 5.79 | 1.47 | 5.52 | 1.76 | 2.51 | 0.88 |
| Quick Ratio | 5.79 | 5.79 | 1.35 | 5.06 | 1.56 | 2.42 | 0.84 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.60 | 1.60 | 0.38 | 2.13 | 0.21 | 0.18 | 0.03 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.17 | 0.41 | 0.34 | 0.69 | 1.13 | 0.56 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | 6.33 | 2.64 | 3.03 | 14.87 | 8.23 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 103.96 | 416.16 | 404.82 | 209.21 | 53.51 | 257.71 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | 0.1% | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $346866 | $1M | $1M | $833334 | $833334 | $833334 |
Existential Revenue Collapse
According to recent market data, JZXN trades at a price-to-sales multiple of 0.50, which, when viewed alongside a negative trailing P/E of -0.04, suggests that investors are pricing the entity as a distressed shell rather than a viable growth-oriented automotive platform.
The low P/S multiple appears to be a direct consequence of the company's inability to generate positive earnings, rendering traditional valuation metrics like P/E or PEG largely irrelevant. This pricing implies that the market has largely abandoned the growth narrative, focusing instead on the company's limited remaining asset value relative to its ongoing cash burn.
Based on reported figures, JZXN's ROIC has remained consistently negative, reaching -6.0% in 2025Q4, which indicates that the company is failing to generate any meaningful return on the capital deployed into its franchise-based distribution network.
The persistent decay in ROIC, which previously peaked at 55.2% in 2020Q4, highlights a structural failure to maintain efficiency as the business model has scaled down. This trend suggests that the company's capital allocation strategy has been value-destructive, as the returns on invested capital have failed to cover the cost of maintaining the business.
As reported in financial statements, JZXN's asset turnover ratio has plummeted to 0.14 in 2025Q4, a significant decline from the 0.73 observed in 2020Q4, signaling a severe deterioration in the company's ability to utilize its asset base to drive revenue.
The sharp decline in asset turnover suggests that the company's franchise model is no longer effectively converting its limited asset base into sales. Investors should monitor the DSO and CCC trends, as the current inability to optimize working capital cycles further exacerbates the liquidity pressure caused by the ongoing revenue contraction.
According to recent SEC filings, JZXN maintains a current ratio of 5.79, yet this figure appears misleading as it does not account for the company's inability to generate positive operating cash flow to sustain its ongoing corporate overhead.
While the high current ratio might suggest a comfortable liquidity position, the lack of meaningful revenue and the persistent net losses indicate that this liquidity is likely being consumed by operational burn rather than being deployed for growth. This warrants further investigation into the quality of current assets, as they may not be as liquid or recoverable as the headline ratio implies.
As evidenced by the company's financial disclosures, the most commonly misapplied metric for JZXN is the revenue growth rate, which obscures the fact that the company lacks the gross margin profile necessary to achieve operating leverage even if volume were to stabilize.
Analysts often focus on top-line growth in the NEV sector, but for JZXN, a 0.70% gross margin means that revenue growth is essentially a pass-through activity that does not contribute to bottom-line profitability. A more appropriate metric for this business model would be 'Contribution Margin per Franchisee,' which would better reflect the actual value being extracted from the network.
Includes 30+ ratios · 6 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying JZXN stock.
Jiuzi Holdings, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.0x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Jiuzi Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -101.2%. The historical average is -1.0%.
Based on historical data, Jiuzi Holdings, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.0x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Jiuzi Holdings, Inc. has 0.7% gross margin and -46.2% operating margin.