Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 16.1x · EV/EBITDA 12.6x · ROE 153.9%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $32.4B | $33.6B | $44.2B | $41.2B | $45.9B | $48.4B | $46.2B | $47.5B | $39.8B | $42.9B | $41.3B |
| Enterprise Value | $39.0B | $40.2B | $51.1B | $48.2B | $54.0B | $56.9B | $54.4B | $55.0B | $46.7B | $49.8B | $47.9B |
| P/E Ratio → | 16.10 | 16.62 | 17.36 | 23.32 | 23.73 | 26.71 | 19.63 | 22.04 | 28.27 | 18.85 | 19.05 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.88 | 1.95 | 2.20 | 2.01 | 2.28 | 2.49 | 2.41 | 2.58 | 2.15 | 2.35 | 2.27 |
| P/B Ratio | 19.70 | 20.34 | 45.29 | 38.55 | 65.61 | 65.70 | 53.14 | 245.04 | — | 48.69 | 352.80 |
| P/FCF | 19.79 | 20.50 | 17.57 | 14.83 | 24.73 | 28.10 | 18.38 | 31.13 | 19.03 | 20.03 | 16.77 |
| P/OCF | 11.68 | 12.10 | 13.66 | 11.62 | 16.80 | 17.74 | 12.38 | 17.37 | 13.41 | 14.66 | 12.77 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.34 | 2.55 | 2.36 | 2.68 | 2.92 | 2.84 | 2.98 | 2.53 | 2.72 | 2.63 |
| EV / EBITDA | 12.57 | 12.95 | 12.79 | 15.56 | 15.73 | 17.09 | 13.46 | 14.07 | 15.03 | 12.19 | 11.72 |
| EV / EBIT | 15.68 | 16.14 | 15.97 | 20.82 | 20.61 | 22.92 | 17.09 | 18.88 | 22.52 | 15.04 | 14.40 |
| EV / FCF | — | 24.54 | 20.32 | 17.36 | 29.10 | 33.00 | 21.65 | 36.00 | 22.34 | 23.21 | 19.47 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 35.6% | 35.6% | 35.8% | 34.4% | 30.8% | 30.8% | 35.6% | 32.7% | 30.3% | 36.1% | 36.8% |
| Operating Margin | 14.5% | 14.5% | 16.0% | 11.5% | 13.3% | 13.2% | 16.9% | 16.2% | 12.1% | 18.4% | 18.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | 11.7% | 11.7% | 12.7% | 8.6% | 9.6% | 9.3% | 12.3% | 11.7% | 7.6% | 12.5% | 11.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 153.9% | 153.9% | 249.1% | 199.5% | 269.2% | 225.9% | 442.5% | 2914.9% | 337.3% | 456.1% | 2759.2% |
| ROA | 12.0% | 12.0% | 15.0% | 10.0% | 10.8% | 10.3% | 14.3% | 14.5% | 9.5% | 15.3% | 14.7% |
| ROIC | 23.1% | 23.1% | 30.2% | 20.8% | 22.4% | 21.1% | 29.2% | 30.9% | 23.0% | 34.8% | 36.3% |
| ROCE | 25.3% | 25.3% | 32.2% | 22.3% | 24.7% | 23.1% | 33.4% | 36.6% | 25.8% | 37.2% | 39.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 4.42 | 4.42 | 8.12 | 7.60 | 12.21 | 11.81 | 9.78 | 40.60 | — | 8.42 | 64.72 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.35 | 2.35 | 1.98 | 2.62 | 2.49 | 2.62 | 2.10 | 2.02 | 2.40 | 1.82 | 1.85 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 4.00 | 7.07 | 6.57 | 11.60 | 11.44 | 9.43 | 38.32 | — | 7.72 | 56.83 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.13 | 2.13 | 1.73 | 2.27 | 2.36 | 2.54 | 2.03 | 1.90 | 2.22 | 1.67 | 1.63 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 4.03 | 2.74 | 2.53 | 4.37 | 4.89 | 3.26 | 4.87 | 3.30 | 3.18 | 2.70 |
| Interest Coverage | 9.73 | 9.73 | 11.84 | 7.90 | 9.30 | 9.69 | 12.63 | 11.15 | 7.89 | 10.41 | 10.43 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.80 | 0.82 | 0.78 | 0.82 | 0.80 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 0.89 | 0.87 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.47 | 0.49 | 0.51 | 0.47 | 0.49 | 0.58 | 0.59 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.15 | 0.16 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.11 | 0.16 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.00 | 1.21 | 1.18 | 1.12 | 1.09 | 1.09 | 1.21 | 1.27 | 1.21 | 1.25 |
| Inventory Turnover | 7.52 | 7.52 | 7.07 | 6.85 | 6.15 | 6.01 | 6.47 | 6.94 | 7.11 | 6.54 | 6.88 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 40.11 | 36.56 | 38.14 | 41.25 | 41.44 | 42.62 | 44.77 | 42.73 | 46.28 | 43.63 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 5.1% | 4.9% | 3.7% | 3.9% | 3.4% | 3.1% | 3.1% | 3.0% | 3.5% | 3.2% | 3.2% |
| Payout Ratio | 82.1% | 82.1% | 64.0% | 90.0% | 80.6% | 83.6% | 61.7% | 65.3% | 98.3% | 59.7% | 60.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 6.2% | 6.0% | 5.8% | 4.3% | 4.2% | 3.7% | 5.1% | 4.5% | 3.5% | 5.3% | 5.2% |
| FCF Yield | 5.1% | 4.9% | 5.7% | 6.7% | 4.0% | 3.6% | 5.4% | 3.2% | 5.3% | 5.0% | 6.0% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.4% | 0.4% | 2.3% | 0.5% | 0.2% | 0.8% | 1.5% | 1.7% | 2.0% | 2.1% | 1.8% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 5.5% | 5.4% | 6.0% | 4.4% | 3.6% | 4.0% | 4.7% | 4.6% | 5.5% | 5.3% | 5.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $333M | $337M | $339M | $338M | $339M | $343M | $346M | $350M | $356M | $362M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying KMB stock.
Kimberly-Clark Corporation's current P/E ratio is 16.1x. The historical average is 20.7x. This places it at the 13th percentile of its historical range.
Kimberly-Clark Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 12.6x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 12.1x.
Kimberly-Clark Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 153.9%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 111.0%.
Based on historical data, Kimberly-Clark Corporation is trading at a P/E of 16.1x. This is at the 13th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Kimberly-Clark Corporation's current dividend yield is 5.10% with a payout ratio of 82.1%.
Kimberly-Clark Corporation has 35.6% gross margin and 14.5% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Kimberly-Clark Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.3x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Raw material cost inflation
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Discount Pricing Reflects Shrinking Base
KMB trades at 18.1x trailing earnings versus PG's 22.0x, per recent market data, suggesting the market discounts its revenue contraction and margin pressure, yet forward P/E of 14.7x implies expectations of earnings recovery.
The forward P/E of 14.72 is notably below the trailing multiple, indicating that analysts expect earnings to rebound as the company laps divestitures and realizes cost savings. However, the EV/EBITDA of 13.85 is only modestly below PG's 17.11, suggesting that the market still assigns a premium to KMB's cash generation. The 4.5% dividend yield, nearly double PG's, compensates for the lower growth but may signal limited capital appreciation prospects. Investors should monitor whether the forward multiple compresses further if guidance cuts persist.
Margin Mix Shift Masks Underlying Pressure
Gross margin improved to 38.3% in 2026Q2 from 35.0% a year earlier, as reported in financial statements, but operating margin fell to 10.7% from 14.2%, indicating that SG&A increases are eroding gross profit gains.
The gross margin expansion likely reflects a favorable mix shift toward higher-margin Personal Care and K-C Professional segments, as well as the exit of lower-margin tissue businesses. However, the operating margin compression suggests that the company is reinvesting in brand support and supply chain modernization, which may not yet be yielding efficiency gains. Net margin of 8.2% in 2026Q2 is below the 12.2% reported in 2025Q2, highlighting the impact of one-time items and higher interest expense. The sustainability of gross margin gains is questionable given the commodity-linked cost structure, and investors should watch for further input cost inflation.
ROIC Volatility Signals Distorted Returns
ROIC fell to 4.2% in 2026Q2 from 9.7% in 2024Q3, based on reported figures, reflecting both lower operating income and a growing capital base, suggesting that returns on invested capital are not compounding consistently.
The sharp decline in ROIC from 9.7% to 4.2% over eight quarters is concerning, as it indicates that the company is generating less profit per dollar of invested capital. This could be due to increased capital expenditure relative to a shrinking revenue base, as well as the impact of divestitures that reduced earnings power. ROE has also been volatile, swinging from 66.6% in 2024Q3 to 18.1% in 2026Q2, which may reflect one-time gains and the thin equity base. The trend suggests that KMB is not efficiently deploying capital, and investors should monitor whether the new segment structure improves capital allocation.
Negative CCC Masks Working Capital Leverage
KMB's cash conversion cycle improved to -21 days in 2026Q2, as per SEC filings, driven by extended payables of 116 days, indicating that the company is effectively using supplier financing to fund operations.
The negative CCC is a sign of operational efficiency, as KMB collects cash from customers before paying suppliers. However, the extended DPO of 116 days may indicate reliance on supplier credit, which could become a risk if suppliers tighten terms. DSO has remained stable around 42 days, while DIO has decreased slightly, suggesting better inventory management. The improvement in CCC from -7 days in 2024Q1 to -21 days in 2026Q2 is notable, but it may be partly due to the shrinking revenue base. Investors should assess whether this efficiency is sustainable or a result of temporary working capital timing.
Leverage Eases but Coverage Remains Thin
Debt-to-equity fell to 3.44 in 2026Q2 from 8.12 in 2024Q4, as reported in financial statements, but interest coverage of 11.79 remains below the 15.36 peak in 2024Q3, indicating reduced but still manageable debt service.
The significant deleveraging, with D/E dropping from 8.12 to 3.44, suggests that management has prioritized debt reduction, possibly through asset sales and retained earnings. However, the absolute debt level of $6.5 billion remains substantial, and the interest coverage ratio, while adequate, has declined from its peak. The D/EBITDA ratio of 10.60 in 2026Q2 is elevated, indicating that EBITDA has not kept pace with debt reduction. This suggests that the company's earnings power has weakened, and investors should monitor whether coverage deteriorates further if operating margins remain under pressure.
Thin Liquidity Buffer Raises Concern
Current ratio of 0.91 in 2026Q2, as per balance sheet data, remains below 1.0, indicating that current liabilities exceed current assets, though cash improved to $956 million from $542 million in the prior quarter.
The sub-1.0 current ratio suggests that KMB relies on ongoing cash flow and access to credit markets to meet short-term obligations. The quick ratio of 0.69 further highlights the limited buffer, as inventory is not easily convertible to cash. While the company has a strong credit profile and generates stable cash flow, the thin liquidity position could be vulnerable to a sudden disruption in cash generation or a tightening of credit markets. Investors should monitor whether management builds a larger cash cushion or extends debt maturities to reduce refinancing risk.
P/E Misleads on Cyclical Earnings
The trailing P/E of 18.07, based on recent market data, is commonly misapplied to KMB because earnings are distorted by one-time items and divestitures, obscuring the underlying earnings power.
KMB's earnings have been volatile due to restructuring charges, divestitures, and hyperinflationary accounting, making the P/E ratio unreliable as a standalone valuation metric. For example, the 2024Q3 net margin of 21.9% was inflated by a one-time gain, while the 2026Q2 margin of 8.2% reflects ongoing operational pressures. A more appropriate metric would be EV/EBITDA, which normalizes for capital structure and non-cash charges, or a normalized P/E based on mid-cycle earnings. Investors should also consider the dividend yield and free cash flow yield, which provide a clearer picture of shareholder returns.