Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 11.9x · EV/EBITDA 8.3x · ROE 26.2%. (1993–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $4.7B | $5.0B | $2.8B | $2.2B | $1.6B | $2.3B | $3.1B | $3.9B | $3.2B | $2.3B | — |
| Enterprise Value | $5.1B | $5.4B | $3.2B | $2.7B | $2.2B | $2.6B | $3.7B | $5.5B | $5.6B | $5.1B | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 11.94 | 17.81 | 9.53 | 18.53 | 26.00 | — | — | 285.41 | 8.76 | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 2.46 | 2.94 | 1.80 | 1.46 | 1.30 | 2.14 | 2.98 | 3.22 | 2.83 | 0.70 | — |
| P/B Ratio | 4.20 | 4.21 | 2.94 | 2.28 | 2.09 | 2.03 | 1.35 | 1.39 | 1.57 | 1.46 | — |
| P/FCF | 16.34 | 19.02 | 17.50 | 11.14 | 12.91 | — | 16.51 | 22.33 | 20.41 | — | — |
| P/OCF | 12.84 | 13.67 | 12.09 | 8.63 | 9.08 | — | 11.76 | 11.82 | 8.17 | 17.88 | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.16 | 2.01 | 1.79 | 1.76 | 2.36 | 3.61 | 4.56 | 4.85 | 1.53 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 8.28 | 9.92 | 6.58 | 6.02 | 6.08 | 18.25 | — | 15.69 | 26.03 | 10.23 | — |
| EV / EBIT | 11.76 | 13.05 | 7.28 | 9.65 | 8.32 | — | — | 1026.19 | 81.25 | 19.81 | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 20.42 | 19.59 | 13.68 | 17.40 | — | 20.01 | 31.55 | 34.93 | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 28.3% | 28.3% | 26.8% | 26.6% | 27.0% | 25.0% | 21.7% | 21.7% | 21.0% | 16.7% | 15.5% |
| Operating Margin | 25.3% | 25.3% | 23.9% | 22.8% | 21.7% | -0.4% | -32.1% | 3.0% | -2.3% | 7.1% | 8.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | 16.5% | 16.5% | 18.9% | 7.2% | 5.6% | 17.7% | -59.8% | 77.4% | 32.3% | 2.7% | 11.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 26.2% | 26.2% | 31.1% | 12.5% | 7.3% | 11.3% | -24.1% | 38.4% | 20.2% | 8.0% | 67.9% |
| ROA | 13.8% | 13.8% | 14.9% | 5.3% | 3.3% | 5.4% | -10.7% | 14.1% | 5.2% | 1.3% | 5.1% |
| ROIC | 22.7% | 22.7% | 20.5% | 18.3% | 14.9% | -0.2% | -6.7% | 0.6% | -0.5% | 4.2% | 5.1% |
| ROCE | 26.7% | 26.7% | 23.6% | 20.8% | 15.7% | -0.2% | -6.8% | 0.6% | -0.4% | 3.9% | 4.9% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.43 | 0.43 | 0.45 | 0.61 | 0.84 | 0.50 | 0.67 | 0.61 | 1.31 | 1.93 | 5.53 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.89 | 1.32 | 1.81 | 4.05 | — | 4.86 | 12.64 | 6.19 | 6.86 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.31 | 0.35 | 0.52 | 0.73 | 0.21 | 0.29 | 0.57 | 1.12 | 1.73 | 4.86 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 1.12 | 1.57 | 1.74 | — | 4.58 | 10.82 | 5.55 | 6.02 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 1.40 | 2.09 | 2.54 | 4.49 | — | 3.50 | 9.22 | 14.52 | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 38.63 | 38.63 | 23.90 | 13.13 | 15.97 | -1.97 | -3.47 | 0.04 | 0.36 | 0.77 | 1.94 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.62 | 0.50 | 0.59 | 1.46 | 1.79 | 0.88 | 1.78 | 0.94 | 1.05 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.62 | 0.48 | 0.59 | 1.46 | 1.79 | 0.88 | 1.33 | 0.75 | 1.05 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.25 | 0.20 | 0.22 | 0.87 | 1.08 | 0.09 | 0.57 | 0.23 | 0.44 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.77 | 0.84 | 0.70 | 0.63 | 0.49 | 0.21 | 0.19 | 0.17 | 0.45 | 0.46 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | 129.83 | — | — | — | — | 2.95 | 10.71 | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 29.45 | 23.04 | 26.40 | 33.19 | 61.29 | 45.03 | 24.66 | 77.75 | 38.25 | 40.27 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 5.2% | 15.6% | — | — | — | 0.3% | 0.8% | — |
| Payout Ratio | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.6% | 104.5% | 363.9% | — | — | — | 3.0% | — | 0.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 8.4% | 5.6% | 10.5% | 5.4% | 3.8% | — | — | 0.4% | 11.4% | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 6.1% | 5.3% | 5.7% | 9.0% | 7.7% | — | 6.1% | 4.5% | 4.9% | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 4.6% | 4.3% | 3.6% | 0.0% | 17.4% | 16.4% | 3.3% | 6.8% | 0.1% | 0.0% | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 4.6% | 4.3% | 3.7% | 5.2% | 33.1% | 16.4% | 3.3% | 6.8% | 0.4% | 0.8% | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $149M | $154M | $158M | $168M | $190M | $210M | $222M | $213M | $172M | $133M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 27 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying LAUR stock.
Laureate Education, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 11.9x. The historical average is 16.1x. This places it at the 40th percentile of its historical range.
Laureate Education, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 8.3x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 12.3x.
Laureate Education, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 26.2%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 9.2%.
Based on historical data, Laureate Education, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 11.9x. This is at the 40th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Laureate Education, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 0.01% with a payout ratio of 0.2%.
Laureate Education, Inc. has 28.3% gross margin and 25.3% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Laureate Education, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.0x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Concentrated two-country regulatory exposure
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Modest Multiple Against Recent Earnings Momentum
Based on the supplied multiples, LAUR trades at 17.77x trailing P/E and 9.97x EV/EBITDA, a discount to the growth-oriented LOPE and APEI but a premium to the low-multiple STRA and PRDO peers, suggesting the market is pricing in only partial durability of recent earnings gains.
The forward P/E of 15.72x sits below the trailing multiple, which implies consensus expects earnings to rise, but the 4.20x price-to-book ratio is elevated relative to the sector and reflects a return-on-equity profile that is not yet consistently high. Without a PEG figure, the growth-adjusted case cannot be confirmed, so the valuation rests on whether the Q2 2026 EPS beat proves repeatable. Investors should monitor whether quarterly margin volatility compresses the multiple further.
Margins Swing Too Widely to Anchor Earning Power
As reported in the quarterly ratio series, LAUR's operating margin ranged from negative 10.1% in Q1 2026 to 36.9% in Q2 2025, a spread that appears too wide to represent a stable underlying earnings base.
The seasonal pattern concentrates profit in the second and fourth quarters, while the first quarter reliably produces losses, which suggests that trailing or single-quarter margins can materially misstate normalized profitability. Net margin of 16.55% on a trailing basis is closer to the peer median than the operating margin peaks imply, indicating that interest and tax drag absorb a meaningful share of operating profit. Operating margin should be evaluated on a rolling four-quarter basis to isolate true earning power.
Returns Recovering but Not Yet Compounding
Based on the reported ratio history, LAUR's ROIC moved from 4.1% in Q3 2024 to a peak of 11.2% in Q2 2025 before settling at 5.2% in Q3 2026, below the 32.4% achieved by LOPE and near the 12.4% of APEI.
The return profile is driven primarily by margin swings rather than asset efficiency, since asset turnover remains low and the asset base is weighted toward campus infrastructure and acquired goodwill. The ROE of 26.2% trailing reflects a shrinking denominator from leverage management as much as operating improvement, which means it overstates the quality of compounding. Investors should watch whether ROIC can hold above 10% through a full seasonal cycle.
Low Reported Leverage Masks Debt Growth
According to the reported figures, LAUR's debt-to-equity ratio sits near 0.67 and interest coverage recovered to 26.07x in Q3 2026, yet total debt rose roughly 83% from Q4 2024, a trend the headline ratio does not fully capture.
The stable D/E ratio appears to reflect equity expansion through retained earnings more than any reduction in borrowing, which suggests that leverage risk has not truly declined. Coverage ratios are distorted by quarters where operating income is near zero, producing interest coverage readings as low as 1.1x in the seasonal trough, so the reported metric is volatile rather than reassuring. Debt service comfort should be assessed against trailing four-quarter EBITDA rather than any single period.
Current Ratio Below One Relies on Operating Inflows
Based on EDBL's reported balance sheet figures, LAUR's current ratio of 0.71 and quick ratio of 0.71 indicate current liabilities exceed liquid assets, with cash of $189.9M against $782.6M of total debt leaving a thin cash buffer.
Because deferred tuition revenue is typically recorded as a current liability, a current ratio below one is common for education businesses and does not by itself signal distress. However, the lack of a meaningful cash reserve means near-term obligations depend on continued enrollment cash receipts, which is vulnerable to a weak intake. Under a severe enrollment shock, the company would likely need to draw on operating inflows or external financing, and the analysis cannot confirm the availability of such financing from the supplied data.
Ratio Signals Hinge on Seasonal Timing
Based on the reported quarterly series, ROE and ROIC of 26.2% and 5.2% appear to be the most misleading headline figures for LAUR, since the seasonal pattern makes any single-period return ratio a poor guide to sustainable earning power.
Return on equity is especially distorted for an education business because the denominator contracts through leverage management and retained earnings build while the numerator swings with enrollment timing, so a strong trailing ROE can coexist with a weak underlying return on invested campus capital. A four-quarter rolling ROIC normalized for the first-quarter loss pattern and for goodwill from acquisitions would give a more defensible read. Investors should treat headline ROE as a reflection of capital structure rather than proof of compounding.