Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 13.5x · EV/EBITDA 10.4x · ROE 27.2%. (2000–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $7.7B | $8.8B | $7.0B | $6.2B | $6.7B | $10.5B | $7.3B | $6.9B | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $9.2B | $10.4B | $8.5B | $8.0B | $8.3B | $11.9B | $8.5B | $6.9B | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 13.54 | 15.19 | 33.58 | 24.98 | 11.72 | 18.94 | — | 17.30 | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.22 | 1.40 | 1.11 | 1.01 | 1.08 | 1.82 | 1.64 | 1.19 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 3.44 | 3.86 | 3.57 | 3.04 | 3.51 | 6.29 | 5.62 | 4.36 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | 23.68 | 27.16 | 10.47 | 51.05 | — | 18.37 | 21.54 | 28.93 | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 14.07 | 16.14 | 7.82 | 14.29 | 29.27 | 14.21 | 15.56 | 16.62 | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.65 | 1.35 | 1.30 | 1.35 | 2.07 | 1.90 | 1.20 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.44 | 11.71 | 18.69 | 15.43 | 10.35 | 14.36 | 149.43 | 10.04 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 13.62 | 15.17 | 32.78 | 25.73 | 12.35 | 18.23 | — | 12.75 | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 31.93 | 12.74 | 65.66 | — | 20.88 | 24.97 | 29.27 | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 61.7% | 61.7% | 60.0% | 56.9% | 57.5% | 58.1% | 52.8% | 53.8% | 53.8% | 52.3% | 51.2% |
| Operating Margin | 10.8% | 10.8% | 4.2% | 5.7% | 10.5% | 11.9% | -1.9% | 9.8% | 9.7% | 9.8% | 10.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | 9.2% | 9.2% | 3.3% | 4.0% | 9.2% | 9.6% | -2.9% | 6.8% | 5.1% | 5.7% | 6.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 27.2% | 27.2% | 10.5% | 12.6% | 31.9% | 37.3% | -8.9% | 32.5% | 33.6% | 39.6% | 58.7% |
| ROA | 8.7% | 8.7% | 3.4% | 4.1% | 9.5% | 9.6% | -2.6% | 10.2% | 8.2% | 8.9% | 9.9% |
| ROIC | 13.9% | 13.9% | 5.4% | 7.2% | 14.6% | 18.5% | -3.1% | 29.9% | 32.6% | 28.1% | 27.5% |
| ROCE | 14.8% | 14.8% | 6.1% | 8.5% | 16.0% | 16.9% | -2.4% | 20.8% | 22.3% | 20.4% | 21.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.01 | 1.01 | 1.12 | 1.07 | 1.10 | 1.35 | 2.05 | 0.65 | 1.23 | 1.32 | 1.79 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.61 | 2.61 | 4.84 | 4.20 | 2.60 | 2.70 | 46.93 | 1.47 | 1.59 | 1.83 | 1.87 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.68 | 0.77 | 0.87 | 0.87 | 0.86 | 0.89 | 0.05 | 0.40 | 0.55 | 1.16 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.75 | 1.75 | 3.33 | 3.44 | 2.06 | 1.73 | 20.51 | 0.12 | 0.51 | 0.77 | 1.21 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 4.77 | 2.27 | 14.62 | — | 2.51 | 3.43 | 0.34 | 1.30 | 1.13 | 3.36 |
| Interest Coverage | 14.05 | 14.05 | 6.24 | 6.78 | 26.28 | 8.96 | -1.31 | 8.21 | 10.04 | 6.08 | 6.57 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.55 | 1.55 | 1.42 | 1.48 | 1.43 | 1.45 | 2.02 | 2.46 | 1.97 | 2.27 | 2.21 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.86 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.97 | 1.49 | 1.70 | 1.21 | 1.41 | 1.27 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.42 | 0.42 | 0.34 | 0.22 | 0.25 | 0.48 | 1.03 | 0.87 | 0.61 | 0.72 | 0.49 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.92 | 1.00 | 1.02 | 1.02 | 0.98 | 0.79 | 1.36 | 1.57 | 1.46 | 1.52 |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.94 | 1.94 | 2.24 | 2.06 | 1.85 | 2.69 | 2.57 | 3.01 | 2.92 | 3.08 | 3.10 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 45.01 | 40.78 | 44.46 | 41.24 | 44.81 | 44.28 | 49.58 | 34.97 | 36.13 | 38.40 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.7% | 2.4% | 2.8% | 3.1% | 2.6% | 1.0% | 0.9% | 1.7% | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | 36.8% | 36.8% | 94.3% | 76.3% | 30.6% | 18.9% | — | 28.9% | 31.8% | 24.9% | 20.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 7.4% | 6.6% | 3.0% | 4.0% | 8.5% | 5.3% | — | 5.8% | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 4.2% | 3.7% | 9.5% | 2.0% | — | 5.4% | 4.6% | 3.5% | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 2.0% | 1.7% | 1.3% | 0.1% | 2.6% | 0.8% | 0.8% | 0.6% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 4.7% | 4.1% | 4.1% | 3.2% | 5.2% | 1.8% | 1.6% | 2.3% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $400M | $402M | $402M | $404M | $410M | $397M | $408M | $393M | $393M | $385M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 26 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying LEVI stock.
Levi Strauss & Co.'s current P/E ratio is 13.5x. The historical average is 20.3x. This places it at the 17th percentile of its historical range.
Levi Strauss & Co.'s current EV/EBITDA is 10.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 13.4x.
Levi Strauss & Co.'s return on equity (ROE) is 27.2%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 34.6%.
Based on historical data, Levi Strauss & Co. is trading at a P/E of 13.5x. This is at the 17th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Levi Strauss & Co.'s current dividend yield is 2.71% with a payout ratio of 36.8%.
Levi Strauss & Co. has 61.7% gross margin and 10.8% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Levi Strauss & Co.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.6x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Revenue volatility and margin pressure
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Expansion Masks Earnings Volatility
Gross margin improved 390 bps to 62.7% by 2026Q2, yet net margin swung from -0.7% to 14.1% over ten quarters, per financial statements, indicating earnings quality is uneven.
The gross margin expansion to 62.7% in 2026Q2 from 58.8% in 2024Q1 suggests successful pricing or cost management, but operating margin volatility—from 0.0% to 15.3%—implies that SG&A leverage is not yet stable. Net margin spikes, such as 14.1% in 2025Q3, appear to be influenced by tax benefits or non-operating gains, as noted in prior income statement analysis, which may not be recurring. Investors should focus on operating margin as the truer measure of earning power, given its recent improvement to 15.3% but historical inconsistency.
ROIC Recovery Still Below Cost of Capital
ROIC improved from 0.0% in 2024Q1 to 5.7% in 2026Q2, but remains below the cost of capital, per reported figures, suggesting value creation is still nascent.
The upward trajectory in ROIC from 0.0% to 5.7% over ten quarters indicates a cyclical recovery, but the absolute level remains low relative to apparel peers like Ralph Lauren (24.7% ROIC). The improvement is driven by margin expansion rather than asset efficiency, as asset turnover has stayed flat around 0.24-0.26. This suggests that Levi's is not yet compounding returns on invested capital at a rate that would justify its current valuation, and investors should monitor whether ROIC can sustain above its cost of capital.
Working Capital Drag Persists with High DIO
Cash conversion cycle lengthened to 131 days in 2026Q2 from 110 days in 2024Q4, driven by inventory days of 178, per financial statements, indicating ongoing working capital inefficiency.
The CCC expansion to 131 days reflects a rise in DIO to 178 days, which is high for apparel and suggests potential inventory build-up or slower sell-through. DSO has remained stable around 38-42 days, while DPO has increased to 85 days, indicating some supplier leverage, but not enough to offset inventory drag. This working capital inefficiency may explain the volatility in free cash flow, as seen in the -2.6% FCF margin in 2025Q3, and warrants close monitoring of inventory management.
Debt Spikes Mask Underlying Leverage
D/E swung from 0.48 in 2026Q1 to 1.01 in 2026Q2, with D/EBITDA at 7.76, per reported figures, indicating leverage is higher than the temporary dip suggested.
The 2026Q1 debt reduction to $1.0B appears temporary, as debt rebounded to $2.3B in 2026Q2, restoring D/E to 1.01. Interest coverage improved to 10.47 in 2026Q2 from 2.07 in 2024Q2, but D/EBITDA remains elevated at 7.76, which is high relative to peers like Ralph Lauren (not disclosed) and suggests refinancing risk if earnings weaken. The volatility in debt levels may indicate a reliance on short-term financing, and investors should assess the sustainability of this leverage.
Liquidity Buffer Strengthens but Inventory Heavy
Current ratio improved to 1.60 in 2026Q2, but quick ratio of 0.98, per financial statements, indicates reliance on inventory to meet short-term obligations.
The current ratio of 1.60 is the highest in the ten-quarter period, reflecting increased cash to $849.3M, but the quick ratio of 0.98 suggests that excluding inventory, current assets barely cover current liabilities. This implies that under a severe demand shock, Levi's could face liquidity pressure if inventory cannot be converted to cash quickly. The improvement in liquidity is positive, but the inventory dependence remains a vulnerability.
P/E Misleads on Cyclical Earnings
P/E of 16.27 appears reasonable, but earnings volatility—net margin ranging from -0.7% to 14.1%—makes trailing P/E unreliable, per reported figures, warranting a normalized earnings approach.
The trailing P/E of 16.27 is based on volatile earnings that have swung from losses to gains, making it a misleading indicator of value. For a cyclical apparel company like Levi's, EV/EBITDA of 12.19 may be more appropriate, but even that is distorted by fluctuating EBITDA. Investors should use a mid-cycle earnings estimate or EV/Sales (1.47) to assess valuation, as the current P/E may understate or overstate the true cost of equity depending on where we are in the cycle.