Equity of ~$302.5M against a reported $344.0B asset base yields an anomalously low 0.88 equity-to-assets ratio (down from 0.96 in 2025Q1), a figure whose scale inconsistency versus the equity base warrants further investigation.
Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc. (LIEN) balance sheet — 6-year assets, liabilities & shareholders' equity history
| Metric | TTM | Dec'25 | Dec'24 | Dec'23 | Dec'22 | Mar'22 | Mar'21 |
|---|
| Cash & Short Term Investments | 17.67M | 2.93M | 23.93M | 32.61M | 35.13M | 84.77M | 0 |
| Cash & Due from Banks | 925.53K | 2.93M | 23.93M | 32.61M | 35.13M | 84.77M | 0 |
| Short Term Investments | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total Investments | 0 | 0 | 275.24M | 54.12M | 50.25M | 0 | 0 |
| Investments Growth % | -300% | -100% | 408.58% | 7.69% | - | - | - |
| Long-Term Investments | 0 | 0 | 275.24M | 54.12M | 50.25M | 0 | 0 |
| Accounts Receivables | 0 | 0 | 10.07M | 1.76M | 1.56M | 9.21K | 0 |
| Goodwill & Intangibles | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Goodwill | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Intangible Assets | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| PP&E (Net) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Other Assets | 343.04M | 339.06M | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9.21K | 0 |
| Total Current Assets | 925.53K | 2.93M | 23.93M | 34.46M | 36.72M | 85.03M | 0 |
| Total Non-Current Assets | 343.04M | 339.06M | 275.24M | 54.12M | 50.25M | 9.21K | 0 |
| Total Assets | 343.96M | 342M | 309.56M | 88.58M | 86.97M | 85.03M | 276.26K |
| Asset Growth % | 299.66% | 10.48% | 249.49% | 1.85% | 2.28% | 30680.07% | - |
| Return on Assets (ROA) | 9.14% | 10.22% | 4.83% | 8.36% | 1.99% | -1.32% | -346.88% |
| Accounts Payable | 7.76M | 7.78M | 37.75K | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total Debt | 27M | 25M | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Net Debt | 26.07M | 22.07M | -23.93M | -32.61M | -35.13M | -84.77M | 0 |
| Long-Term Debt | 27M | 25M | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Short-Term Debt | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Other Liabilities | 0 | 0 | 8.36M | 13.82K | 33.66K | 479.7K | 0 |
| Total Current Liabilities | 14.47M | 13.59M | 37.75K | 3.01M | 461.88K | 479.7K | 0 |
| Total Non-Current Liabilities | 27M | 25M | 8.36M | 13.82K | 33.66K | 479.7K | 0 |
| Total Liabilities | 41.47M | 38.59M | 8.4M | 3.02M | 495.55K | 479.7K | 435.97K |
| Total Equity | 302.49M | 303.41M | 301.16M | 85.55M | 86.48M | 84.55M | -159.72K |
| Equity Growth % | 269.01% | 0.75% | 252.02% | -1.07% | 2.28% | 53039.35% | - |
| Equity / Assets (Capital Ratio) | 87.94% | 88.72% | 97.29% | 96.59% | 99.43% | 99.44% | -57.81% |
| Return on Equity (ROE) | 10.45% | 11.01% | 4.98% | 8.53% | 2% | -1.34% | - |
| Book Value per Share | 13.25 | 13.30 | 29.12 | 13.77 | 15.58 | 96.37 | -0.18 |
| Tangible BV per Share | 13.25 | 13.30 | 29.12 | 13.77 | 15.58 | 96.37 | -0.18 |
| Common Stock | 228.21K | 228.21K | 228.2K | 62.15K | 62.15K | 62.15K | 0 |
| Additional Paid-in Capital | 303.08M | 303.15M | 303.27M | 85.04M | 84.92M | 84.92M | 0 |
| Retained Earnings | -817.75K | 25.65K | -2.34M | 449.27K | 1.5M | -427.85K | -159.72K |
| Accumulated OCI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Treasury Stock | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Preferred Stock | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying LIEN stock.
As of 2025, Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc. (LIEN) had total assets of $342.0M including $2.9M in current assets.
Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc. (LIEN) carries total debt of $25.0M. Comparing total debt to cash helps evaluate the company's debt burden and net leverage.
Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc. (LIEN) has total shareholders' equity (book value) of $303.4M ($13.30 book value per share). Book value represents the net worth of the company belonging to common stock holders.
Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc. (LIEN) reported a current ratio of 0.22x. A current ratio above 1.0x indicates that the company has more current assets than current liabilities, suggesting sufficient short-term liquidity.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Anomalous balance sheet expansion amid vanishing spread economics
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Balance Sheet Expansion Loses Economic Substance
Total assets surged from $90.4 million in 2024Q1 to $344 billion in 2026Q2 per reported financial statements, but NIM simultaneously collapsed to 0.0% and equity shrank as a proportion of assets to 0.88, suggesting the balance sheet expanded without generating commensurate economic value for shareholders.
The tripling of the balance sheet between 2024Q3 and 2024Q4 followed by the leap to $344 billion in 2026Q2 reflects rapid scaling, yet NIM compression from 4.2% in 2025Q3 to 0.0% in 2026Q2 indicates the incremental assets are not earning meaningful spread. Investors should question whether the asset base is being built for yield or for scale optics, given that ROE has fallen from 4.2% in 2024Q4 to effectively zero.
Provisions Erupt After Extended Clean Period
After eight consecutive quarters of zero provisions, Chicago Atlantic recognized $3.1 million in 2026Q1 and $2.6 million in 2026Q2 per disclosed financials, representing a sudden credit-cost inflection that warrants scrutiny of underwriting quality during the rapid loan-book expansion phase.
The sequential recognition of loan loss provisions totaling $5.7 million over two quarters suggests that credit risk embedded during the high-growth origination period is now crystallizing. The fact that provisions remained at zero through balance sheet expansion from $90 million to over $300 million may indicate conservative initial reserving rather than genuinely clean assets. Analysts should evaluate whether the provision trajectory is just beginning to reflect the full vintage risk of loans originated in 2024-2025.
Equity Buffer Erodes Against Explosive Asset Growth
The equity-to-assets ratio declined from 0.96 in 2025Q1 to 0.88 in 2026Q2 as total liabilities expanded from $12.7 million to $41.5 billion, based on Chicago Atlantic's balance sheet, implying that leverage increased dramatically even as absolute equity remained nearly flat around $302-304 million.
While the equity base has been stable in absolute dollar terms near $302 million for ten quarters, the explosive growth in liabilities means the leverage profile has shifted materially. The equity/assets ratio compression from near-total equity financing to 88% suggests meaningful reliance on external funding — likely SPV structures, credit facilities, or securitizations — that introduces refinancing and covenant risk not present in the earlier capital-light phase. Whether this leverage is sustainable depends on the cost and tenor of the underlying facilities, which warrants further investigation.
Cash Position Whipsaws Across Quarters
Cash and bank balances swung from $33.2 million in 2024Q1 to a trough of $2.9 million in 2025Q4 before spiking to $925.5 million in 2026Q2 per reported figures, indicating extreme quarter-to-quarter liquidity volatility that complicates reliable assessment of near-term funding adequacy.
The near-total depletion of cash in 2025Q4 and 2026Q1 — periods when the balance sheet exceeded $340 million — suggests tight working-capital management or potentially strained access to contingent funding lines. The subsequent recovery to $925.5 million appears to coincide with the appearance of $334.8 million in investment securities and the massive liability expansion, possibly reflecting new facility drawdowns or SPV consolidations. This pattern of cash volatility makes dividend coverage from balance-sheet liquidity uncertain.
Securities Portfolio Vanishes Then Reappears at Scale
Investment securities stood at $289.3 million in 2025Q1, dropped to zero for three consecutive quarters, and re-emerged at $334.8 million in 2026Q2 per Chicago Atlantic's reported balance sheets, a pattern that may indicate reclassification, off-balance-sheet structuring, or significant portfolio turnover that obscures the true composition of earning assets.
The disappearance of a $289 million securities book for three quarters — during which total assets continued to grow — suggests these assets were either sold, reclassified into loan categories, or moved into consolidated SPVs. This is material because it directly affects the reliability of reported asset composition and could mask concentration or liquidity risks. Combined with the $95 billion in securities purchases and sales noted in 2026Q2 cash flows, investors should treat the current balance sheet composition with caution until the structural rationale is clarified in filings.
Zero NIM Signals Structural Spread Destruction
The 0.0% NIM print in 2026Q2, down from a 4.2% peak in 2025Q3 per Chicago Atlantic's disclosures, combined with a 25.6% efficiency ratio, suggests the current asset base may be structurally unable to generate positive spread income without a material repricing of either assets or liabilities.
A zero NIM implies that interest expense has fully consumed interest income — a condition that, if sustained, renders the loan origination model economically unviable regardless of scale. The 25.6% efficiency ratio, while modest in absolute terms for a BDC, compounds the problem when there is no spread to absorb operating costs. If the liability cost structure reprices upward while asset yields remain fixed on a $300+ million loan book, further margin compression appears possible; however, the anomalous 2026Q2 data makes directional forecasting unreliable.