Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 16.8x · EV/EBITDA 13.3x · ROE 78.1%. (1998–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $12.9B | $17.0B | $21.8B | $16.0B | $8.6B | $12.2B | $10.6B | $9.6B | $9.0B | $8.9B | $6.7B |
| Enterprise Value | $14.9B | $19.1B | $22.9B | $17.4B | $10.3B | $13.6B | $11.6B | $10.9B | $10.0B | $9.8B | $7.6B |
| P/E Ratio → | 16.76 | 21.85 | 27.03 | 27.07 | 17.22 | 26.22 | 29.68 | 23.53 | 25.07 | 29.17 | 24.24 |
| P/S Ratio | 2.48 | 3.28 | 4.08 | 3.21 | 1.82 | 2.90 | 2.91 | 2.52 | 2.32 | 2.32 | 1.85 |
| P/B Ratio | 11.24 | 14.65 | 25.66 | 56.00 | — | — | — | — | — | 177.91 | 177.35 |
| P/FCF | 20.14 | 26.68 | 27.89 | 32.87 | 42.57 | 29.76 | 19.81 | 33.09 | 22.47 | 39.30 | 24.94 |
| P/OCF | 16.99 | 22.50 | 23.07 | 21.70 | 28.33 | 23.60 | 17.27 | 24.27 | 18.15 | 27.42 | 19.01 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.67 | 4.28 | 3.50 | 2.17 | 3.24 | 3.20 | 2.87 | 2.57 | 2.57 | 2.08 |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.30 | 17.02 | 20.26 | 19.91 | 13.98 | 20.48 | 21.10 | 15.01 | 17.35 | 17.62 | 15.50 |
| EV / EBIT | 14.67 | 18.85 | 22.05 | 21.98 | 15.65 | 23.15 | 24.49 | 19.64 | 19.70 | 19.85 | 17.54 |
| EV / FCF | — | 29.86 | 29.26 | 35.89 | 51.00 | 33.20 | 21.78 | 37.62 | 24.96 | 43.43 | 27.97 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 33.0% | 33.0% | 33.2% | 31.1% | 27.2% | 28.3% | 28.6% | 28.4% | 28.6% | 29.3% | 29.6% |
| Operating Margin | 19.5% | 19.5% | 19.4% | 15.9% | 13.9% | 14.1% | 13.2% | 17.3% | 13.1% | 12.9% | 11.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | 15.1% | 15.1% | 15.1% | 11.8% | 10.5% | 11.1% | 9.8% | 10.7% | 9.2% | 8.0% | 7.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 78.1% | 78.1% | 142.1% | 1435.8% | — | — | — | — | — | 694.0% | 398.0% |
| ROA | 20.8% | 20.8% | 25.7% | 22.0% | 21.0% | 22.1% | 17.5% | 21.2% | 19.4% | 16.7% | 16.1% |
| ROIC | 29.8% | 29.8% | 42.2% | 36.5% | 37.4% | 40.7% | 32.9% | 49.4% | 41.8% | 40.3% | 38.7% |
| ROCE | 40.2% | 40.2% | 52.5% | 57.3% | 56.6% | 44.1% | 40.5% | 71.4% | 49.9% | 46.9% | 49.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.77 | 1.77 | 1.75 | 5.35 | — | — | — | — | — | 20.04 | 22.85 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.84 | 1.84 | 1.32 | 1.74 | 2.38 | 2.17 | 2.14 | 1.86 | 1.81 | 1.80 | 1.78 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.75 | 1.26 | 5.14 | — | — | — | — | — | 18.68 | 21.53 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.81 | 1.81 | 0.95 | 1.67 | 2.31 | 2.12 | 1.91 | 1.81 | 1.73 | 1.67 | 1.68 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 3.18 | 1.37 | 3.02 | 8.44 | 3.44 | 1.98 | 4.54 | 2.49 | 4.13 | 3.03 |
| Interest Coverage | 24.74 | 24.74 | 23.54 | 14.17 | 16.47 | 22.54 | 15.99 | 11.45 | 12.97 | 15.45 | 15.33 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.60 | 1.60 | 1.43 | 1.41 | 0.94 | 1.42 | 1.55 | 1.12 | 1.08 | 1.74 | 1.13 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.90 | 0.72 | 0.47 | 0.80 | 0.92 | 0.58 | 0.57 | 1.00 | 0.66 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.32 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.18 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.10 | 0.06 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.27 | 1.54 | 1.78 | 1.84 | 1.93 | 1.79 | 1.87 | 2.14 | 2.03 | 2.07 |
| Inventory Turnover | 3.02 | 3.02 | 5.06 | 4.91 | 4.56 | 5.88 | 5.90 | 5.01 | 5.44 | 5.61 | 6.13 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 40.66 | 45.18 | 43.56 | 47.07 | 44.24 | 45.03 | 45.81 | 44.42 | 48.15 | 47.09 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.3% | 1.0% | 0.7% | 1.0% | 1.7% | 1.0% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 1.0% | 0.9% | 1.0% |
| Payout Ratio | 22.0% | 22.0% | 19.9% | 26.0% | 28.6% | 27.3% | 33.1% | 27.0% | 26.2% | 26.1% | 24.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 6.0% | 4.6% | 3.7% | 3.7% | 5.8% | 3.8% | 3.4% | 4.3% | 4.0% | 3.4% | 4.1% |
| FCF Yield | 5.0% | 3.7% | 3.6% | 3.0% | 2.3% | 3.4% | 5.0% | 3.0% | 4.5% | 2.5% | 4.0% |
| Buyback Yield | 3.9% | 2.9% | 0.3% | 0.1% | 3.6% | 5.1% | 1.1% | 4.4% | 5.3% | 3.1% | 4.9% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 5.2% | 4.0% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 5.3% | 6.2% | 2.2% | 5.6% | 6.3% | 4.0% | 6.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $35M | $36M | $36M | $36M | $38M | $39M | $39M | $41M | $43M | $44M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 28 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying LII stock.
Lennox International Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 16.8x. The historical average is 22.2x. This places it at the 25th percentile of its historical range.
Lennox International Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 13.3x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 13.0x.
Lennox International Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 78.1%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 57.6%.
Based on historical data, Lennox International Inc. is trading at a P/E of 16.8x. This is at the 25th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Lennox International Inc.'s current dividend yield is 1.32% with a payout ratio of 22.0%.
Lennox International Inc. has 33.0% gross margin and 19.5% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Lennox International Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.8x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Residential demand softness persists
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Resilience Amid Volume Decline
LII's gross margin expanded to 34.9% in 2026Q2 from 33.6% a year earlier, while operating margin reached 23.0%, indicating pricing power and mix benefits despite lower volumes, as per financial statements.
The sequential improvement from 30.9% gross margin in 2026Q1 to 34.9% in 2026Q2 suggests strong seasonal pricing and cost discipline, likely aided by the direct-to-dealer model that captures distributor margins. However, with revenue contracting 2.7% year-over-year, the margin expansion appears driven by mix and price rather than volume, raising questions about sustainability if residential weakness persists. Net margin of 17.4% in 2026Q2 is near the peak of the last ten quarters, but the reliance on cost control and acquisitions to offset organic softness warrants monitoring.
ROIC Cyclicality Masks Underlying Strength
ROIC swung from 11.8% in 2024Q2 to 3.9% in 2026Q1, then rebounded to 8.3% in 2026Q2, reflecting seasonal and demand-driven volatility, while ROE remains elevated at 21.4%, as reported in quarterly data.
The wide quarterly swings in ROIC (from 3.9% to 11.8%) highlight the business's sensitivity to seasonal working capital and residential demand, but the average ROIC over the period appears to exceed the cost of capital, suggesting value creation. The recent rebound to 8.3% in 2026Q2, up from 3.9% in 2026Q1, indicates that margin expansion and asset efficiency are recovering, though the trend is not linear. Investors should focus on the full-year ROIC trajectory rather than quarterly noise, as the company's high-margin replacement business and asset-light model support long-term returns.
Working Capital Drag Intensifies Seasonally
Cash conversion cycle lengthened to 108 days in 2026Q2 from 81 days a year earlier, driven by DIO rising to 107 days, indicating inventory build-up that may reflect pre-buy activity or demand softness, per reported figures.
The CCC deterioration from 81 days in 2025Q2 to 108 days in 2026Q2 is primarily due to a 18-day increase in days inventory outstanding, which could signal either strategic inventory positioning ahead of refrigerant transitions or slower sell-through. DSO remained stable at 46 days, while DPO improved slightly to 45 days, suggesting limited supplier leverage. The working capital drag contributed to the weak operating cash flow conversion in 2026Q2 (64% of net income), and investors should monitor whether inventory levels normalize as residential demand stabilizes.
Leverage Elevated but Coverage Comfortable
Debt-to-equity improved to 1.56 in 2026Q2 from 4.49 in 2024Q1, while interest coverage rose to 24.15x, indicating a more comfortable debt service position despite total debt of $2.0B, as per balance sheet data.
The dramatic reduction in D/E from 4.49 to 1.56 over two years reflects both equity growth from retained earnings and debt reduction, though the ratio remains higher than peers like TT (0.54) and CARR (0.90). Interest coverage of 24.15x in 2026Q2 is robust, up from 14.07x in 2024Q1, suggesting that earnings comfortably cover interest expenses even in a downturn. However, the D/EBITDA of 5.70x in 2026Q2 is elevated relative to the 3.34x seen in 2025Q3, indicating that leverage has increased recently, possibly due to acquisition funding, which warrants monitoring for covenant headroom.
Liquidity Adequate but Cash Buffer Thin
Current ratio improved to 1.57 in 2026Q2 from 1.43 in 2024Q1, but quick ratio of 0.77 indicates reliance on inventory, while cash of $51.5M is minimal relative to $2.0B debt, per reported figures.
The current ratio of 1.57 suggests adequate short-term liquidity, but the quick ratio of 0.77 reveals that a significant portion of current assets is tied up in inventory, which could be harder to liquidate in a downturn. With cash of only $51.5M against $2.0B in total debt, the company appears to rely on operating cash flow and credit facilities for near-term obligations. The seasonal working capital swings, as seen in the negative FCF in 2026Q1, could strain liquidity if demand weakens further, though the strong interest coverage provides a cushion.
Valuation Discount Reflects Residential Tilt
LII trades at 18.13x P/E and 14.24x EV/EBITDA, a significant discount to TT's 34.75x and CARR's 35.38x, likely due to its North American residential focus and lower growth, as per peer data.
LII's valuation multiples are well below those of TT and CARR, which command premium multiples due to their higher international exposure and commercial mix. The PEG of 0.94 suggests the market is pricing in modest growth, but the forward EV/EBITDA of 9.79 implies an expectation of EBITDA expansion, possibly from margin recovery and acquisitions. While LII's ROE of 21.4% is lower than TT's 34.5%, its net margin of 17.4% is higher than CARR's 6.8%, indicating superior profitability that may justify a narrower discount. The gap may narrow if residential demand stabilizes and the company demonstrates that its direct-to-dealer model sustains margins.
Misapplied P/E Overstates Cyclicality
The P/E ratio is commonly misapplied to LII because it fails to capture the non-discretionary nature of HVAC replacements, which provide earnings stability that the multiple may understate, as per industry analysis.
Investors often compare LII's P/E to broader industrials, but the replacement-driven revenue stream behaves more like an essential service, with price-inelastic demand during extreme weather. The trailing P/E of 18.13 appears low relative to peers, but this may reflect the market's overestimation of cyclicality rather than a value trap. A more appropriate metric is EV/EBITDA, which at 14.24x is still below peers, but the forward EV/EBITDA of 9.79 suggests the market expects margin expansion. Alternatively, P/FCF of 21.80x may be more telling, as it captures the company's ability to convert earnings into cash, though FCF is volatile due to working capital swings.