Revenue grew 18.6% year-over-year to $199.2M in 2026Q2, but gross margin contracted to 39.2% from 45.6% in 2025Q2, and net income remained negative at -$1.4M, indicating that cost pressures are offsetting operational gains.
Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. (LIND) annual income statement — 15-year revenue, gross profit & net income history
| Metric | TTM | Dec'25 | Dec'24 | Dec'23 | Dec'22 | Dec'21 | Dec'20 | Dec'19 | Dec'18 | Dec'17 | Dec'16 | Dec'15 | Dec'14 | Dec'13 | Dec'12 | Dec'11 |
|---|
| Sales/Revenue | 830.61M | 771.02M | 644.73M | 569.54M | 421.5M | 147.11M | 82.36M | 343.09M | 309.73M | 266.5M | 242.35M | 209.99M | 198.46M | 192.24M | 153.98M | 0 |
| Revenue Growth % | 18.27% | 19.59% | 13.2% | 35.12% | 186.53% | 78.62% | -76% | 10.77% | 16.22% | 9.97% | 15.41% | 5.81% | 3.24% | 24.84% | - | - |
| Cost of Goods Sold | 542.12M | 480.84M | 343.67M | 322.38M | 283.22M | 124.48M | 72.93M | 166.61M | 153.74M | 135.53M | 118.98M | 95.42M | 90M | 96.66M | 71.5M | 0 |
| COGS % of Revenue | - | 62.36% | 53.31% | 56.6% | 67.19% | 84.62% | 88.56% | 48.56% | 49.64% | 50.85% | 49.09% | 45.44% | 45.35% | 50.28% | 46.43% | - |
| Gross Profit | 288.5M | 290.18M | 301.05M | 247.17M | 138.28M | 22.62M | 9.43M | 176.48M | 155.99M | 130.98M | 123.37M | 114.57M | 108.46M | 95.58M | 82.48M | 0 |
| Gross Margin % | 34.73% | 37.64% | 46.69% | 43.4% | 32.81% | 15.38% | 11.44% | 51.44% | 50.36% | 49.15% | 50.91% | 54.56% | 54.65% | 49.72% | 53.57% | - |
| Gross Profit Growth % | - | -3.61% | 21.8% | 78.74% | 511.25% | 140.03% | -94.66% | 13.14% | 19.1% | 6.17% | 7.68% | 5.63% | 13.47% | 15.88% | - | - |
| Operating Expenses | 230.46M | 244.69M | 279.5M | 236.57M | 201.33M | 133.45M | 97.82M | 143.28M | 130.65M | 120.23M | 109.39M | 85.72M | 1.05M | 748.65K | 4.77K | 2.48K |
| OpEx % of Revenue | - | 31.74% | 43.35% | 41.54% | 47.76% | 90.72% | 118.78% | 41.76% | 42.18% | 45.12% | 45.14% | 40.82% | 0.53% | 0.39% | 0% | - |
| Selling, General & Admin | 260.43M | 244.69M | 226.94M | 189.86M | 157.29M | 93.93M | 65.74M | 117.52M | 109.89M | 102.88M | 90.97M | 74.08M | 66.77M | 60.41M | 57.84M | 0 |
| SG&A % of Revenue | - | 31.74% | 35.2% | 33.34% | 37.32% | 63.85% | 79.82% | 34.25% | 35.48% | 38.6% | 37.54% | 35.28% | 33.64% | 31.43% | 37.56% | - |
| Research & Development | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| R&D % of Revenue | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Other Operating Expenses | -1000K | 0 | 52.56M | 46.71M | 44.04M | 39.52M | 32.08M | 25.77M | -165K | -133K | -1.17M | 5.03M | 1.05M | 748.65K | 4.77K | 2.48K |
| Operating Income | 58.03M | 45.49M | 21.55M | 10.6M | -63.05M | -110.83M | -88.4M | 33.2M | 25.34M | 10.74M | 13.98M | 15.5M | -1.05M | -748.65K | -4.77K | -2.48K |
| Operating Margin % | 6.99% | 5.9% | 3.34% | 1.86% | -14.96% | -75.34% | -107.34% | 9.68% | 8.18% | 4.03% | 5.77% | 7.38% | -0.53% | -0.39% | -0% | - |
| Operating Income Growth % | - | 111.05% | 103.35% | 116.81% | 43.12% | -25.38% | -366.28% | 31.02% | 135.83% | -23.15% | -9.81% | 1572.59% | -40.61% | -15601.64% | -92.49% | - |
| EBITDA | 127.66M | 108.31M | 75.05M | 58.11M | -18.4M | -71.31M | -56.31M | 59.23M | 46.11M | 28.09M | 32.4M | 27.15M | -970.62K | -710.76K | 8.09M | -2.48K |
| EBITDA Margin % | 15.37% | 14.05% | 11.64% | 10.2% | -4.36% | -48.47% | -68.38% | 17.26% | 14.89% | 10.54% | 13.37% | 12.93% | -0.49% | -0.37% | 5.26% | - |
| EBITDA Growth % | 33.53% | 44.32% | 29.14% | 415.88% | 74.2% | -26.62% | -195.08% | 28.46% | 64.11% | -13.29% | 19.35% | 2896.88% | -36.56% | -108.78% | 326872.51% | - |
| D&A (Non-Cash Add-back) | 69.62M | 62.82M | 53.49M | 47.51M | 44.65M | 39.52M | 32.08M | 26.03M | 20.77M | 17.35M | 18.42M | 11.64M | 82.08K | 37.89K | 8.1M | 0 |
| EBIT | 34.12M | 23.48M | 20.65M | 7.28M | -64.59M | -96.61M | -93.25M | 33.23M | 25.34M | 12.21M | 12.01M | 27.99M | -970.62K | -710.76K | -4.77K | -2.48K |
| Net Interest Income | -43.06M | -45.23M | -45.74M | -45.01M | -37.49M | -24.58M | -16.69M | -12.29M | -10.83M | -9.74M | -10.15M | -10.9M | 40.39K | 27.63K | 0 | 0 |
| Interest Income | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 82.08K | 37.89K | 0 | 0 |
| Interest Expense | 43.06M | 45.23M | 45.74M | 45.01M | 37.49M | 24.58M | 16.69M | 12.29M | 10.83M | 9.74M | 10.15M | 10.9M | 41.69K | 10.26K | 0 | 0 |
| Other Income/Expense | -66.97M | -67.24M | -46.64M | -48.33M | -39.04M | -10.36M | -21.55M | -12.26M | -13.17M | -8.27M | -12.12M | 1.59M | 40.39K | 27.63K | 0 | 0 |
| Pretax Income | -8.93M | -21.75M | -25.09M | -37.73M | -102.08M | -121.19M | -109.94M | 20.94M | 12.17M | 2.47M | 1.86M | 17.09M | -1.01M | -721.02K | -4.77K | -2.48K |
| Pretax Margin % | -1.08% | -2.82% | -3.89% | -6.62% | -24.22% | -82.38% | -133.5% | 6.1% | 3.93% | 0.93% | 0.77% | 8.14% | -0.51% | -0.38% | -0% | - |
| Income Tax | 3.63M | 2.48M | 3.1M | 3.15M | 6.08M | -2.02M | -9.8M | 2.19M | 616K | 10M | -3.2M | -2.65M | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Effective Tax Rate % | -40.6% | -11.38% | -12.37% | -8.34% | -5.95% | 1.67% | 8.92% | 10.46% | 5.06% | 404.45% | -172.14% | -15.5% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Net Income | -17.27M | -29.72M | -31.18M | -45.61M | -111.38M | -119.21M | -98.74M | 16.35M | 11.35M | -8.66M | 4.86M | 19.74M | -1.01M | -721.02K | -4.77K | -2.48K |
| Net Margin % | -2.08% | -3.85% | -4.84% | -8.01% | -26.42% | -81.03% | -119.89% | 4.77% | 3.67% | -3.25% | 2.01% | 9.4% | -0.51% | -0.38% | -0% | - |
| Net Income Growth % | -74.6% | 4.68% | 31.64% | 59.05% | 6.56% | -20.73% | -703.79% | 44.05% | 231.07% | -278.06% | -75.36% | 2050.2% | -40.4% | -15022.06% | -92.49% | - |
| Net Income (Continuing) | -12.56M | -24.23M | -28.2M | -40.88M | -108.16M | -119.17M | -100.14M | 18.75M | 11.55M | -7.53M | 5.06M | 19.74M | -1.01M | -721.02K | -4.77K | -2.48K |
| Discontinued Operations | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Minority Interest | 33.37M | 47.95M | 29.42M | 37.78M | 27.89M | 10.63M | 7.49M | 16.11M | 6.5M | 6.3M | 5.17M | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| EPS (Diluted) | -0.26 | -0.63 | -0.67 | -0.94 | -2.23 | -2.41 | -2.01 | 0.28 | 0.24 | -0.19 | 0.10 | 0.43 | -0.16 | -0.12 | -0.00 | -0.00 |
| EPS Growth % | -15.74% | 5.97% | 28.72% | 57.85% | 7.47% | -19.9% | -817.86% | 16.67% | 226.32% | -290% | -76.74% | 368.75% | -33.33% | - | - | - |
| EPS (Basic) | - | -0.63 | -0.67 | -0.94 | -2.23 | -2.41 | -2.01 | 0.29 | 0.25 | -0.19 | 0.11 | 0.44 | -0.16 | -0.12 | -0.00 | -0.00 |
| Diluted Shares Outstanding | 65.47M | 54.97M | 53.82M | 53.26M | 52.02M | 50.11M | 49.74M | 49.43M | 46.34M | 44.58M | 46.46M | 45.58M | 6.2M | 5.82M | 18M | 18M |
| Basic Shares Outstanding | 65.47M | 54.97M | 53.82M | 53.26M | 52.02M | 50.11M | 49.74M | 47.44M | 45.38M | 44.58M | 45.65M | 44.92M | 6.2M | 5.82M | 18M | 18M |
| Dividend Payout Ratio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying LIND stock.
For fiscal year 2025, Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. (LIND) reported total revenue of $771.0M.
Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. (LIND) reported a net loss of $29.7M for the fiscal year ending 2025.
Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. (LIND) reported an operating income of $45.5M, resulting in an operating profit margin of 5.9%. This margin reflects the operational efficiency of the business before interest and taxes.
Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. (LIND) generated $290.2M in gross profit for the year, representing a gross profit margin of 37.6%. This demonstrates the company's core pricing power and production efficiency.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Persistent net losses despite growth
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Revenue Momentum Amid Capacity Expansion
LIND's revenue grew 18.6% year-over-year in 2026Q2 to $199.2M, with 12% capacity growth and record net yield of $1,294, according to recent SEC filings, indicating accelerating demand.
The 18.6% revenue growth in 2026Q2, up from 23.0% in 2025Q2, suggests a slight deceleration but remains robust, driven by both capacity additions and pricing power. The record net yield of $1,294 and 91% occupancy, the strongest Q2 in a decade, as reported by management, indicate that demand is absorbing the new polar-class vessels. However, the growth is heavily dependent on the successful deployment of new ships, and any softening in the luxury expedition market could quickly reverse this trend.
Gross Margin Volatility Signals Cost Pressures
Gross margin swung from 45.6% in 2025Q2 to 39.2% in 2026Q2, reflecting higher operating costs and depreciation from new vessels, as per financial statements, indicating structural margin pressure.
The 640 basis point year-over-year decline in gross margin to 39.2% in 2026Q2, despite higher revenue, suggests that cost inflation and the fixed-cost nature of new ship deployments are eroding profitability. The 2025Q4 gross margin of 14.1% was an anomaly, likely due to dry-docking or seasonal factors, but the overall trend shows margins are below the 45-49% range seen in 2024. This implies that LIND's pricing power may not be sufficient to offset rising costs, and investors should monitor whether the new vessels can achieve the scale efficiencies needed to restore margins.
Operating Leverage Fails to Reach Bottom Line
Despite 18.6% revenue growth, operating income rose only 173% to $12.0M in 2026Q2, but net income remained negative at -$1.4M, as reported, indicating that operating leverage is being offset by interest and depreciation.
The 2026Q2 operating margin of 6.0% improved from 2.6% a year earlier, but the company still posted a net loss, highlighting that SG&A and interest expenses are absorbing the incremental gross profit. The SG&A-to-revenue ratio remained relatively stable at around 33%, suggesting that overhead is not scaling down, while depreciation and interest from the new polar-class vessels are likely the primary drags. This indicates that the company's operating leverage is insufficient to overcome its capital structure, and achieving net profitability may require either higher occupancy or debt restructuring.
Negative EPS Despite Operational Gains
LIND reported Q2 EPS of -$0.02, a significant miss versus the $0.40 consensus, despite record net yield and occupancy, according to recent earnings reports, suggesting cost pressures are outweighing demand strength.
The gap between the strong operational metrics and the EPS miss indicates that either consensus estimates were overly optimistic or that cost inflation and capacity-related expenses are more severe than anticipated. The TTM net margin of -3.9% and persistent net losses, despite 19.6% revenue growth, suggest that the company's earnings quality is low, with non-operating items like interest expense and depreciation dominating. Investors should monitor whether the maintained full-year guidance is achievable, as the Q2 miss may signal a structural issue rather than a timing difference.
Cost Structure Weighs on Profitability
COGS and SG&A combined consumed 94% of revenue in 2026Q2, leaving a thin 6% operating margin, as per financial statements, indicating high fixed costs and limited expense flexibility.
The cost structure is heavily fixed, with ship maintenance, crew, and fuel costs remaining constant regardless of occupancy, making the business highly sensitive to load factors. The 2026Q2 gross margin of 39.2% is below the 45.6% in the prior year, suggesting that input costs, particularly labor and fuel, are rising faster than ticket prices. Management's ability to control SG&A, which has remained around $60-68M per quarter, will be critical, but the recent fleet expansion has likely increased depreciation, further pressuring margins.
What Could Invalidate the Growth Story
Despite record occupancy and net yield, LIND's persistent net losses and negative EPS, as reported, suggest that the market may be overvaluing the company's growth potential without evidence of bottom-line improvement.
Short-sellers could argue that the company's revenue growth is not translating into profitability due to a high fixed-cost base and heavy debt load, as evidenced by the -3.9% TTM net margin. The Q2 EPS miss of -$0.02 versus $0.40 consensus, despite strong demand, may indicate that cost inflation is eroding the benefits of higher occupancy. Additionally, the potential saturation in the expedition cruise market, with competitors like Viking and Silversea adding capacity, could lead to pricing pressure and increased guest acquisition costs, challenging LIND's premium positioning. If the company cannot achieve net profitability in the near term, its ability to service debt and fund future growth may be compromised.