Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 9.8x · EV/EBITDA 7.1x · ROE 9.6%. (2000–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $5.9B | $7.7B | $9.7B | $12.8B | $14.8B | $17.9B | $10.7B | $11.1B | $7.5B | $12.6B | $9.5B |
| Enterprise Value | $10.6B | $12.5B | $15.1B | $18.2B | $18.5B | $21.8B | $14.7B | $16.0B | $11.5B | $15.8B | $12.6B |
| P/E Ratio → | 9.79 | 12.85 | 13.97 | 13.62 | 12.93 | 16.40 | 16.86 | 20.52 | 15.61 | 23.78 | 20.43 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.42 | 0.56 | 0.68 | 0.92 | 1.16 | 1.37 | 0.92 | 0.89 | 0.63 | 1.30 | 1.11 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.90 | 1.18 | 1.61 | 2.07 | 2.70 | 3.08 | 1.89 | 2.20 | 1.55 | 3.00 | 2.76 |
| P/FCF | 6.92 | 9.13 | 11.97 | 12.85 | 14.44 | 16.65 | 8.46 | 13.91 | 16.27 | 37.18 | 22.19 |
| P/OCF | 5.51 | 7.27 | 8.65 | 9.46 | 11.88 | 13.07 | 7.44 | 10.43 | 10.55 | 24.35 | 14.95 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.90 | 1.05 | 1.31 | 1.45 | 1.67 | 1.27 | 1.28 | 0.97 | 1.62 | 1.47 |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.10 | 8.35 | 9.39 | 10.84 | 10.03 | 12.41 | 11.46 | 13.19 | 9.75 | 14.66 | 13.01 |
| EV / EBIT | 9.75 | 11.89 | 12.36 | 12.53 | 11.59 | 14.83 | 14.54 | 17.60 | 13.14 | 18.15 | 16.47 |
| EV / FCF | — | 14.73 | 18.61 | 18.20 | 18.00 | 20.33 | 11.59 | 20.02 | 24.90 | 46.37 | 29.46 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 38.0% | 38.0% | 39.1% | 40.2% | 40.8% | 40.7% | 39.5% | 38.8% | 38.5% | 39.0% | 39.0% |
| Operating Margin | 7.8% | 7.8% | 8.4% | 9.8% | 12.4% | 11.3% | 8.5% | 7.2% | 7.4% | 8.7% | 8.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | 4.4% | 4.4% | 4.8% | 6.8% | 9.0% | 8.3% | 5.5% | 4.3% | 4.0% | 5.5% | 5.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 9.6% | 9.6% | 11.3% | 16.0% | 20.3% | 19.0% | 11.9% | 10.9% | 10.6% | 14.0% | 14.2% |
| ROA | 4.0% | 4.0% | 4.6% | 6.9% | 9.3% | 8.7% | 5.1% | 4.5% | 4.6% | 6.0% | 6.7% |
| ROIC | 7.2% | 7.2% | 7.8% | 9.8% | 12.5% | 11.4% | 7.5% | 7.2% | 8.2% | 9.1% | 10.3% |
| ROCE | 9.0% | 9.0% | 10.1% | 12.6% | 15.6% | 14.2% | 9.4% | 8.8% | 9.9% | 11.2% | 12.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.93 | 0.91 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 1.07 | 0.89 | 0.81 | 0.97 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.39 | 3.39 | 3.49 | 3.36 | 2.13 | 2.40 | 3.34 | 4.46 | 3.66 | 3.17 | 3.45 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.72 | 0.89 | 0.86 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.97 | 0.82 | 0.74 | 0.90 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.18 | 3.18 | 3.35 | 3.19 | 1.98 | 2.25 | 3.10 | 4.03 | 3.38 | 2.91 | 3.21 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 5.60 | 6.64 | 5.35 | 3.56 | 3.68 | 3.13 | 6.11 | 8.64 | 9.19 | 7.28 |
| Interest Coverage | 4.68 | 4.68 | 4.66 | 6.77 | 20.46 | 20.59 | 9.14 | 5.67 | 5.38 | 7.99 | 8.85 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.67 | 1.67 | 1.71 | 1.47 | 1.87 | 1.96 | 2.03 | 2.15 | 2.67 | 2.89 | 2.95 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.59 | 0.53 | 0.66 | 0.76 | 0.81 | 0.88 | 1.00 | 1.09 | 1.35 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.16 | 0.24 | 0.20 | 0.21 | 0.19 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.92 | 0.96 | 0.92 | 1.06 | 1.04 | 0.94 | 0.98 | 1.04 | 1.04 | 1.03 |
| Inventory Turnover | 2.52 | 2.52 | 2.72 | 2.66 | 2.75 | 2.97 | 2.91 | 2.76 | 2.57 | 2.49 | 2.70 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 31.58 | 28.53 | 30.67 | 28.47 | 29.92 | 33.69 | 33.01 | 35.47 | 38.50 | 36.59 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 5.3% | 4.0% | 3.3% | 2.4% | 1.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | 51.1% | 51.1% | 46.1% | 32.3% | 24.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 10.2% | 7.8% | 7.2% | 7.3% | 7.7% | 6.1% | 5.9% | 4.9% | 6.4% | 4.2% | 4.9% |
| FCF Yield | 14.5% | 11.0% | 8.4% | 7.8% | 6.9% | 6.0% | 11.8% | 7.2% | 6.1% | 2.7% | 4.5% |
| Buyback Yield | 2.7% | 2.1% | 3.7% | 0.3% | 7.0% | 4.9% | 1.1% | 2.6% | 0.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 8.0% | 6.1% | 7.0% | 2.7% | 8.9% | 4.9% | 1.1% | 2.6% | 0.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $256M | $264M | $268M | $278M | $298M | $305M | $311M | $316M | $311M | $310M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 26 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying LKQ stock.
LKQ Corporation's current P/E ratio is 9.8x. The historical average is 21.0x.
LKQ Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 7.1x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 12.7x.
LKQ Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 9.6%. The historical average is 10.6%.
Based on historical data, LKQ Corporation is trading at a P/E of 9.8x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
LKQ Corporation's current dividend yield is 5.26% with a payout ratio of 51.1%.
LKQ Corporation has 38.0% gross margin and 7.8% operating margin.
LKQ Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.4x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Margin compression from used car pricing
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Compression from Salvage Spread
Gross margin fell to 38.8% in 2026Q2 from 39.8% a year earlier, per reported figures, as used car price declines narrow the spread between salvage acquisition costs and part resale values.
The sequential deterioration in gross margin from 38.8% in 2026Q1 to 38.8% in 2026Q2 masks a more concerning year-over-year decline, with operating margin contracting to 6.6% from 8.6% in the prior year. This suggests that the company's pricing power in recycled parts is being eroded by higher input costs, which may indicate a structural shift in the salvage economics rather than a temporary blip. Investors should monitor whether the record alternative-parts utilization of over 40% can offset further spread compression.
ROIC Decay Signals Capital Allocation Concerns
ROIC fell to 1.5% in 2026Q2 from 2.1% in 2024Q2, per quarterly data, indicating that returns on invested capital are decaying as margins compress and asset turnover remains stagnant.
The decline in ROIC from 2.1% to 1.5% over eight quarters, despite a stable asset turnover of 0.23, points to margin erosion as the primary driver. This suggests that the company's acquisition-heavy model is generating diminishing returns, possibly due to integration costs or a less favorable mix of lower-margin European operations. The gap between ROIC and the cost of capital may be narrowing, which could limit future value creation from M&A.
Working Capital Drag Intensifies
Cash conversion cycle lengthened to 102 days in 2026Q2 from 87 days in 2024Q1, per reported figures, driven by a rise in days inventory outstanding to 145 from 126, indicating slower inventory turnover.
The 15-day increase in DIO suggests that LKQ is holding more inventory relative to sales, which may reflect either a deliberate build to support alternative-parts utilization or an inability to move slower-moving parts. DSO also ticked up to 38 days from 31, while DPO remained relatively stable, indicating that the company is not extending supplier terms to offset the cash drag. This working capital deterioration is a key reason why free cash flow margin contracted to 1.8% in 2026Q2 from 11.1% in 2025Q3.
Leverage Creeps Higher as EBITDA Falters
Debt-to-EBITDA rose to 16.76 in 2026Q2 from 13.32 in 2024Q2, per reported data, while interest coverage slipped to 4.09 from 5.03, indicating a less comfortable debt service position.
The sharp increase in D/EBITDA is driven by both a modest rise in debt and a significant decline in EBITDA, as operating margins compress. Interest coverage of 4.09 remains adequate but is trending downward, and if margins continue to deteriorate, coverage could approach levels that constrain financial flexibility. The company's history of debt-funded acquisitions suggests that leverage could rise further if management pursues new deals, though the recent divestiture of GSF Car Parts may provide some offset.
Liquidity Adequate but Cash Thin
Current ratio improved to 1.58 in 2026Q2 from 1.52 a year earlier, per reported figures, but cash of $301M is only 1.1% of total assets, indicating a tight cash position.
The current ratio of 1.58 suggests that LKQ can cover short-term obligations, but the quick ratio of 0.61 reveals a heavy reliance on inventory, which may be difficult to liquidate quickly in a downturn. With cash representing a minimal share of assets, the company may have limited buffer to absorb an operational shock, such as a further decline in used car prices or a sudden drop in demand. This thin cash position, combined with rising leverage, could constrain management's ability to invest in growth or maintain dividends if cash flow deteriorates further.
EV/EBITDA Misleads on LKQ's True Value
EV/EBITDA of 7.57 appears cheap versus peers like GPC at 14.90, but this metric understates LKQ's capital intensity and acquisition-driven growth, per reported figures, warranting a focus on ROIC and FCF yield.
The market often compares LKQ to auto parts retailers like ORLY and AZO, which trade at much higher EV/EBITDA multiples, but LKQ's business model is fundamentally different, with a heavy salvage network and significant working capital needs. EV/EBITDA ignores the cash tied up in inventory and the ongoing capex required to maintain dismantling yards, making LKQ appear cheaper than it is. A more appropriate valuation metric would be EV/EBIT or EV/FCF, which better capture the capital intensity and the recent deterioration in free cash flow, as evidenced by the FCF margin falling to 1.8% in 2026Q2.