Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 19.9x · EV/EBITDA 8.8x · ROE 9.6%. (2000–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $5.1B | $7.7B | $9.7B | $12.8B | $14.8B | $17.9B | $10.7B | $11.1B | $7.5B | $12.6B | $9.5B |
| Enterprise Value | $9.9B | $12.5B | $15.1B | $18.2B | $18.5B | $21.8B | $14.7B | $16.0B | $11.5B | $15.8B | $12.6B |
| P/E Ratio → | 19.89 | 12.85 | 13.97 | 13.62 | 12.93 | 16.40 | 16.86 | 20.52 | 15.61 | 23.78 | 20.43 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.38 | 0.56 | 0.68 | 0.92 | 1.16 | 1.37 | 0.92 | 0.89 | 0.63 | 1.30 | 1.11 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.78 | 1.18 | 1.61 | 2.07 | 2.70 | 3.08 | 1.89 | 2.20 | 1.55 | 3.00 | 2.76 |
| P/FCF | 8.37 | 9.13 | 11.97 | 12.85 | 14.44 | 16.65 | 8.46 | 13.91 | 16.27 | 37.18 | 22.19 |
| P/OCF | 4.81 | 7.27 | 8.65 | 9.46 | 11.88 | 13.07 | 7.44 | 10.43 | 10.55 | 24.35 | 14.95 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.90 | 1.05 | 1.31 | 1.45 | 1.67 | 1.27 | 1.28 | 0.97 | 1.62 | 1.47 |
| EV / EBITDA | 8.80 | 8.29 | 9.39 | 10.84 | 10.03 | 12.41 | 11.46 | 13.19 | 9.75 | 14.66 | 13.01 |
| EV / EBIT | 9.06 | 11.89 | 12.36 | 12.53 | 11.59 | 14.83 | 14.54 | 17.60 | 13.14 | 18.15 | 16.47 |
| EV / FCF | — | 14.73 | 18.61 | 18.20 | 18.00 | 20.33 | 11.59 | 20.02 | 24.90 | 46.37 | 29.46 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 38.0% | 38.0% | 39.1% | 40.2% | 40.8% | 40.7% | 39.5% | 38.8% | 38.5% | 39.0% | 39.0% |
| Operating Margin | 7.8% | 7.8% | 8.4% | 9.8% | 12.4% | 11.3% | 8.5% | 7.2% | 7.4% | 8.7% | 8.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | 4.4% | 4.4% | 4.8% | 6.8% | 9.0% | 8.3% | 5.5% | 4.3% | 4.0% | 5.5% | 5.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 9.6% | 9.6% | 11.3% | 16.0% | 20.3% | 19.0% | 11.9% | 10.9% | 10.6% | 14.0% | 14.2% |
| ROA | 4.0% | 4.0% | 4.6% | 6.9% | 9.3% | 8.7% | 5.1% | 4.5% | 4.6% | 6.0% | 6.7% |
| ROIC | 7.2% | 7.2% | 7.8% | 9.8% | 12.5% | 11.4% | 7.5% | 7.2% | 8.2% | 9.1% | 10.3% |
| ROCE | 9.0% | 9.0% | 10.1% | 12.6% | 15.6% | 14.2% | 9.4% | 8.8% | 9.9% | 11.2% | 12.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.93 | 0.91 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 1.07 | 0.89 | 0.81 | 0.97 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.36 | 3.36 | 3.49 | 3.36 | 2.13 | 2.40 | 3.34 | 4.46 | 3.66 | 3.17 | 3.45 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.72 | 0.89 | 0.86 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.97 | 0.82 | 0.74 | 0.90 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.15 | 3.15 | 3.35 | 3.19 | 1.98 | 2.25 | 3.10 | 4.03 | 3.38 | 2.91 | 3.21 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 5.60 | 6.64 | 5.35 | 3.56 | 3.68 | 3.13 | 6.11 | 8.64 | 9.19 | 7.28 |
| Interest Coverage | 4.68 | 4.68 | 4.66 | 6.77 | 20.46 | 20.59 | 9.14 | 5.67 | 5.38 | 7.99 | 8.85 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.67 | 1.67 | 1.71 | 1.47 | 1.87 | 1.96 | 2.03 | 2.15 | 2.67 | 2.89 | 2.95 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.59 | 0.53 | 0.66 | 0.76 | 0.81 | 0.88 | 1.00 | 1.09 | 1.35 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.16 | 0.24 | 0.20 | 0.21 | 0.19 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.92 | 0.96 | 0.92 | 1.06 | 1.04 | 0.94 | 0.98 | 1.04 | 1.04 | 1.03 |
| Inventory Turnover | 2.52 | 2.52 | 2.72 | 2.66 | 2.75 | 2.97 | 2.91 | 2.76 | 2.57 | 2.49 | 2.70 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 31.58 | 28.53 | 30.67 | 28.47 | 29.92 | 33.69 | 33.01 | 35.47 | 38.50 | 36.59 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 6.0% | 4.0% | 3.3% | 2.4% | 1.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | 51.1% | 51.1% | 46.1% | 32.3% | 24.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 5.0% | 7.8% | 7.2% | 7.3% | 7.7% | 6.1% | 5.9% | 4.9% | 6.4% | 4.2% | 4.9% |
| FCF Yield | 11.9% | 11.0% | 8.4% | 7.8% | 6.9% | 6.0% | 11.8% | 7.2% | 6.1% | 2.7% | 4.5% |
| Buyback Yield | 3.1% | 2.1% | 3.7% | 0.3% | 7.0% | 4.9% | 1.1% | 2.6% | 0.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 9.2% | 6.1% | 7.0% | 2.7% | 8.9% | 4.9% | 1.1% | 2.6% | 0.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $256M | $264M | $268M | $278M | $298M | $305M | $311M | $316M | $311M | $310M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 26 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying LKQ stock.
LKQ Corporation's current P/E ratio is 19.9x. The historical average is 21.0x. This places it at the 39th percentile of its historical range.
LKQ Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 8.8x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 12.7x.
LKQ Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 9.6%. The historical average is 10.6%.
Based on historical data, LKQ Corporation is trading at a P/E of 19.9x. This is at the 39th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
LKQ Corporation's current dividend yield is 6.04% with a payout ratio of 51.1%.
LKQ Corporation has 38.0% gross margin and 7.8% operating margin.
LKQ Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.4x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Operating margin compression and thin coverage
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Discount Multiples Reflect Earnings Trough Risk
Based on LKQ's reported figures, the trailing P/E of 8.74 and EV/EBITDA of 6.68 sit far below GPC's 14.24x EV/EBITDA and ORLY's 21.18x, a discount that appears to price in a sustained contraction in earnings power rather than a temporary dip.
The forward P/E of 8.83 sitting slightly above trailing suggests the market does not expect near-term earnings recovery to be meaningful. The PEG of 3.68 is elevated, which implies investors are not paying for growth and are instead valuing the equity on depressed, possibly cyclical, earnings. The P/B of 0.80 and P/FCF of 6.18 point to a valuation anchored on cash generation rather than book value, given that goodwill comprises a large share of assets.
Gross Margin Holds While Operating Margin Collapses
As reported in LKQ's quarterly statements, gross margin of 37.2% in 2026Q3 remained near its historical band, yet operating margin fell from 8.6% in 2024Q3 to 1.6%, indicating erosion sits in operating cost absorption rather than procurement spread alone.
A gross margin that has held within roughly 37 to 40 percent suggests the salvage procurement spread is largely intact, which argues against a structural pricing failure. The sharp operating margin compression implies SG&A and fixed logistics costs are absorbing a shrinking gross profit base, consistent with the revenue contraction seen in recent quarters. Net margin of -0.8% in 2026Q3 means earning power is currently measured off a depressed base, so operating margin is the more reliable indicator of underlying recovery potential.
ROIC Decay Signals Eroding Capital Efficiency
Based on LKQ's reported figures, ROIC declined from 2.1% in 2024Q2 to 0.4% in 2026Q3, a trajectory suggesting the invested capital base is compounding at a diminishing rate, particularly given the $5.3B goodwill balance.
Compared with its own 2024 history and with GPC's 8.3% and MPAA's 9.5% ROIC, LKQ's current 0.4% reading is markedly weak, which may indicate that capital deployed through roll-up acquisitions is not earning acceptable returns. The ROE decline from roughly 3.0% to -0.4% reflects both margin compression and a modest equity base, so the decay is not solely a balance-sheet artifact. Investors should monitor whether European acquisition returns improve, since persistently low ROIC would challenge the value-creation thesis behind the consolidation strategy.
Working Capital Cycle Lengthens Modestly
As reported in financial statements, LKQ's cash conversion cycle expanded from 86 days in 2024Q2 to 101 days in 2026Q3, driven mainly by rising days inventory outstanding that appears to tie up capital in salvage stock.
DIO moved from 124 to 145 days over this period while DPO compressed from 72 to 82 days after an earlier rise, meaning the lengthening cycle stems largely from inventory build rather than supplier leverage loss. Asset turnover of 0.22 is stable, suggesting the cycle lengthening has not yet eroded overall asset productivity but may reflect slower-moving salvage inventory during weak used-car pricing. Investors should monitor whether inventory days normalize, since sustained elevation would pressure free cash flow conversion.
Leverage Improving but Coverage Remains Thin
According to recent SEC filings, LKQ's debt-to-equity ratio fell from 0.93 to 0.80 over the period, yet interest coverage of 1.09 in 2026Q3 versus 4.82 in 2024Q3 indicates debt service has become considerably less comfortable despite deleveraging.
The improvement in D/E reflects both debt reduction and equity stagnation, so the ratio alone overstates balance sheet progress. Interest coverage approaching 1.1x while D/EBITDA is elevated at 32.55 on depressed quarterly EBITDA suggests limited cushion if operating earnings do not recover. This may warrant further investigation into refinancing profile and covenant headroom, as the reported figures alone do not reveal the maturity schedule.
Ratio Misapplication Risk in Auto Parts
Based on LKQ's reported figures, P/E and EV/EBITDA comparisons against pure-play retailers such as AZO and ORLY may mislead, since LKQ's goodwill-heavy, salvage-dependent model differs structurally from their inventory-light retail economics.
The most commonly misapplied metric here is the peer EV/EBITDA multiple, because EBITDA excludes the acquisition-related amortization and restructuring costs that a roll-up like LKQ continuously incurs, flattering its apparent earnings base. A more informative adjustment would be to pair EV/EBITDA with cash-based measures such as P/FCF and free cash flow conversion, which currently show volatility rather than stability. Investors should treat the valuation discount as partly reflecting these structural differences rather than assuming mean reversion to retailer multiples.