Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -111.6x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE N/A. (2021–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $9.7B | $7.6B | $6.3B | $3.4B | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $10.4B | $8.2B | $7.5B | $4.4B | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -111.59 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 25.51 | 20.00 | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 21.60 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 13.3% | 13.3% | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -12.7% | -12.7% | — | — | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | -22.8% | -22.8% | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ROA | -5.6% | -5.6% | -2.6% | -15.5% | 0.2% | -0.1% |
| ROIC | -4.9% | -4.9% | -0.9% | -1.1% | — | — |
| ROCE | -8.0% | -8.0% | -1.0% | -1.3% | — | — |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -2.58 | -2.58 | -0.41 | -17.00 | — | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.33 | 0.33 | 108.33 | 3.81 | — | — |
| Quick Ratio | 0.33 | 0.33 | 108.33 | 3.81 | — | — |
| Cash Ratio | 0.56 | 0.56 | 108.33 | 3.81 | — | — |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.20 | — | — | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 30.27 | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $92M | $92M | $92M | $92M | $92M |
Regulatory Antitrust Litigation Exposure
Based on reported figures, LLYVK trades at a price-to-sales ratio of 24.99, which appears to reflect the market's skepticism toward the tracking stock structure rather than the underlying fundamental value of its dominant Live Nation equity stake, warranting a cautious approach to traditional multiple-based valuation metrics.
The negative P/E of -109.28 is largely an accounting artifact of the tracking stock's corporate overhead and non-operating adjustments, rendering it useless for assessing the company's true earning power. Investors should instead focus on a Sum-of-the-Parts (SOTP) valuation to account for the persistent 'Liberty discount' that separates the market price from the net asset value of its entertainment holdings.
As reported in financial statements, the company's ROIC has fluctuated between -3.4% and 2.6% over the last ten quarters, suggesting that the firm is currently struggling to generate consistent returns on its invested capital amidst the integration of new acquisitions like the Quint hospitality platform.
The volatility in ROIC appears to be driven by the lumpy nature of event-based revenue and the significant goodwill associated with recent asset acquisitions. This trend suggests that management's capital allocation strategy is currently in a phase of heavy investment, and investors should monitor whether these outlays eventually translate into sustained margin expansion or remain a drag on capital efficiency.
According to recent SEC filings, the company's asset turnover ratio of 0.08 in 2026Q1 highlights a business model that is highly capital-intensive and sensitive to the timing of major global events, which complicates the assessment of operational efficiency compared to more traditional, steady-state entertainment service providers.
The lack of consistent DSO and CCC data suggests that the company's working capital cycle is heavily influenced by the specific contractual terms of its event-based hospitality business. This irregularity implies that the company may face periodic liquidity pressure during off-peak quarters, necessitating a close watch on cash management practices as the Quint integration matures.
Based on reported financial data, the interest coverage ratio has swung from a high of 25.29 in 2024Q2 to a negative -27.38 in 2025Q2, indicating that the company's ability to service its debt obligations is highly susceptible to the volatility of its quarterly operating performance.
While the D/E ratio remains relatively low at 0.01, the extreme swings in interest coverage suggest that the company's financial health is more dependent on the performance of its underlying equity stakes than on its own consolidated cash flow. Investors should monitor whether future debt-funded acquisitions further compress this coverage, potentially increasing the risk profile of the tracking stock.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for LLYVK is the P/E multiple, which fails to account for the non-operating nature of the company's primary asset and the significant corporate overhead allocations inherent in the Liberty Media tracking stock structure, leading to a distorted view of profitability.
Analysts should prioritize SOTP analysis over P/E or EV/EBITDA, as the latter metrics ignore the 'look-through' value of the Live Nation stake and the tax-efficient asset shuffling that defines the Liberty ecosystem. Relying on traditional earnings multiples risks misinterpreting the company's strategic optionality as mere operational failure.
Includes 30+ ratios · 5 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying LLYVK stock.
Liberty Live Group's current P/E ratio is -111.6x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Based on historical data, Liberty Live Group is trading at a P/E of -111.6x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Liberty Live Group has 13.3% gross margin and -12.7% operating margin.