Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 24.4x · EV/EBITDA 16.4x · ROE 76.9%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $121.1B | $112.2B | $116.2B | $113.9B | $128.7B | $98.6B | $99.8B | $110.5B | $75.1B | $93.3B | $75.8B |
| Enterprise Value | $138.7B | $129.7B | $134.0B | $129.9B | $141.7B | $106.7B | $108.8B | $121.6B | $88.4B | $104.7B | $88.2B |
| P/E Ratio → | 24.42 | 22.51 | 21.78 | 16.45 | 22.46 | 15.61 | 14.61 | 17.74 | 14.89 | 46.60 | 14.29 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.61 | 1.49 | 1.64 | 1.68 | 1.95 | 1.47 | 1.53 | 1.85 | 1.40 | 1.87 | 1.60 |
| P/B Ratio | 18.10 | 16.69 | 18.35 | 16.66 | 13.89 | 9.00 | 16.53 | 34.85 | 51.83 | — | 47.17 |
| P/FCF | 17.53 | 16.24 | 21.99 | 18.28 | 20.99 | 12.81 | 15.56 | 18.96 | 40.37 | 17.61 | 18.36 |
| P/OCF | 14.15 | 13.11 | 16.67 | 14.38 | 16.50 | 10.69 | 12.20 | 15.12 | 23.93 | 14.41 | 14.60 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.73 | 1.89 | 1.92 | 2.15 | 1.59 | 1.66 | 2.03 | 1.64 | 2.10 | 1.87 |
| EV / EBITDA | 16.42 | 15.36 | 15.63 | 13.07 | 14.53 | 10.17 | 10.96 | 12.50 | 10.41 | 13.19 | 12.42 |
| EV / EBIT | 17.94 | 18.43 | 18.47 | 14.41 | 19.41 | 13.14 | 12.33 | 15.41 | 13.59 | 17.75 | 16.28 |
| EV / FCF | — | 18.78 | 25.35 | 20.85 | 23.11 | 13.85 | 16.96 | 20.88 | 47.54 | 19.76 | 21.38 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 10.2% | 10.2% | 9.8% | 12.5% | 12.6% | 13.5% | 13.2% | 14.0% | 13.7% | 12.8% | 11.4% |
| Operating Margin | 10.3% | 10.3% | 9.9% | 12.6% | 12.7% | 13.6% | 13.2% | 14.3% | 13.6% | 13.5% | 12.5% |
| Net Profit Margin | 6.7% | 6.7% | 7.5% | 10.2% | 8.7% | 9.4% | 10.4% | 10.4% | 9.4% | 4.0% | 11.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 76.9% | 76.9% | 81.0% | 86.0% | 56.7% | 74.3% | 148.4% | 269.7% | 1201.4% | 401.6% | 225.5% |
| ROA | 8.7% | 8.7% | 9.9% | 13.1% | 11.0% | 12.4% | 13.9% | 13.5% | 11.0% | 4.2% | 10.9% |
| ROIC | 23.9% | 23.9% | 22.4% | 28.3% | 30.3% | 40.2% | 44.2% | 44.1% | 43.0% | 40.7% | 28.2% |
| ROCE | 21.3% | 21.3% | 19.6% | 23.5% | 22.6% | 24.8% | 24.6% | 26.7% | 22.8% | 19.5% | 16.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 3.23 | 3.23 | 3.20 | 2.55 | 1.68 | 1.07 | 2.02 | 3.99 | 9.73 | — | 8.89 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.57 | 2.57 | 2.36 | 1.76 | 1.59 | 1.11 | 1.22 | 1.30 | 1.66 | 1.80 | 2.01 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 2.62 | 2.81 | 2.34 | 1.40 | 0.74 | 1.49 | 3.51 | 9.20 | — | 7.75 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.08 | 2.08 | 2.07 | 1.61 | 1.33 | 0.77 | 0.91 | 1.14 | 1.57 | 1.44 | 1.75 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 2.54 | 3.36 | 2.57 | 2.12 | 1.05 | 1.40 | 1.91 | 7.17 | 2.15 | 3.02 |
| Interest Coverage | 6.30 | 6.30 | 7.00 | 9.84 | 11.72 | 14.27 | 14.93 | 12.09 | 9.74 | 9.06 | 8.17 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.09 | 1.09 | 1.13 | 1.21 | 1.32 | 1.42 | 1.39 | 1.22 | 1.12 | 1.38 | 1.20 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.95 | 1.03 | 1.13 | 1.20 | 1.14 | 0.96 | 0.91 | 1.03 | 0.83 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.13 | 0.09 | 0.16 | 0.26 | 0.23 | 0.11 | 0.05 | 0.23 | 0.15 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.25 | 1.28 | 1.29 | 1.25 | 1.32 | 1.29 | 1.26 | 1.20 | 1.07 | 0.99 |
| Inventory Turnover | 19.13 | 19.13 | 18.46 | 18.87 | 18.68 | 19.45 | 16.01 | 14.22 | 15.48 | 9.71 | 8.97 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 82.19 | 78.65 | 82.73 | 82.00 | 68.28 | 64.31 | 69.76 | 80.90 | 74.94 | 63.31 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.6% | 2.8% | 2.6% | 2.7% | 2.3% | 3.0% | 2.8% | 2.3% | 3.1% | 2.3% | 2.7% |
| Payout Ratio | 62.4% | 62.4% | 57.3% | 44.2% | 52.6% | 46.6% | 40.5% | 41.0% | 46.5% | 108.0% | 38.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 4.1% | 4.4% | 4.6% | 6.1% | 4.5% | 6.4% | 6.8% | 5.6% | 6.7% | 2.1% | 7.0% |
| FCF Yield | 5.7% | 6.2% | 4.5% | 5.5% | 4.8% | 7.8% | 6.4% | 5.3% | 2.5% | 5.7% | 5.4% |
| Buyback Yield | 2.5% | 2.7% | 3.2% | 5.3% | 6.1% | 4.1% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 2.0% | 2.1% | 2.8% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 5.1% | 5.5% | 5.8% | 8.0% | 8.5% | 7.1% | 3.9% | 3.4% | 5.1% | 4.5% | 5.5% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $232M | $239M | $251M | $265M | $277M | $281M | $284M | $287M | $291M | $303M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying LMT stock.
Lockheed Martin Corporation's current P/E ratio is 24.4x. The historical average is 18.5x. This places it at the 93th percentile of its historical range.
Lockheed Martin Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 16.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 10.2x.
Lockheed Martin Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 76.9%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 80.1%.
Based on historical data, Lockheed Martin Corporation is trading at a P/E of 24.4x. This is at the 93th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Lockheed Martin Corporation's current dividend yield is 2.57% with a payout ratio of 62.4%.
Lockheed Martin Corporation has 10.2% gross margin and 10.3% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Lockheed Martin Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.6x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Government concentration and leverage
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Volatility Masks Core Earning Power
Gross margin swung from 4.0% in Q2 2025 to 12.2% in Q2 2026, reflecting program charges and catch-up adjustments. According to recent SEC filings, operating margin averaged 12.4% in Q2 2026, suggesting underlying profitability is stronger than quarterly swings imply.
The wide quarterly swings in gross margin—from 3.7% in Q4 2024 to 12.9% in Q1 2025—are characteristic of percentage-of-completion accounting, where cumulative catch-up adjustments can distort a single period. The normalized operating margin, hovering around 12% in most quarters, appears to be the truer measure of earning power, as it smooths out the noise from program estimate changes. Investors should focus on the trend in operating margin excluding these adjustments, as the reported figures may overstate or understate the underlying profitability in any given quarter.
ROIC Stable Despite Leverage Distortions
ROIC has remained remarkably stable between 6.1% and 7.2% over the past ten quarters, as reported in financial statements. This consistency suggests that the company's returns on invested capital are not improving, even as revenue accelerates, indicating that growth is not translating into higher capital efficiency.
The stability of ROIC around 7% contrasts with the volatile ROE, which ranged from 5.7% to 28.1% over the same period. The ROE swings are largely driven by the thin equity base and leverage, not by changes in operating performance. The fact that ROIC has not expanded despite record backlog and revenue growth suggests that the company is investing heavily in working capital and fixed assets to support the F-35 ramp, which may be diluting returns. This warrants monitoring: if ROIC remains flat while revenue grows, it implies that incremental capital is not generating incremental returns, a potential sign of diminishing returns on growth.
Working Capital Swings Signal Program Timing
Cash conversion cycle deteriorated from 46 days in Q2 2026 to 84 days in Q1 2026, driven by a spike in DSO to 86 days. Based on reported figures, this volatility appears tied to milestone billing and government payment cycles, not a structural change in efficiency.
The CCC has oscillated between 46 and 88 days over the past ten quarters, with DSO ranging from 49 to 88 days. The Q2 2026 improvement to 46 days is notable, but it follows a quarter where DSO was 86 days, suggesting that the company's working capital is heavily influenced by the timing of large contract payments. The DPO has remained relatively stable around 20 days, indicating that Lockheed Martin does not have significant leverage over its suppliers, likely due to the specialized nature of its supply chain. Investors should not read too much into a single quarter's CCC, but the trend suggests that cash flow will remain lumpy as program milestones are met.
Leverage Easing but Still Above Peers
Debt-to-equity improved to 2.34 in Q2 2026 from 4.06 a year earlier, yet remains significantly higher than peers like RTX (0.59) and GD (0.38). As reported in financial statements, interest coverage of 9.32x appears comfortable, but the elevated leverage warrants monitoring.
The deleveraging trend is positive, but the absolute level of debt remains high relative to the equity base, which is thin due to aggressive share repurchases. Interest coverage of 9.32x in Q2 2026 is up from 2.52x in Q2 2025, reflecting both higher operating income and lower debt levels. However, the D/E ratio of 2.34 is still more than three times that of RTX and GD, suggesting that Lockheed Martin is more levered than its peers. This leverage is partly a result of a shareholder-first capital allocation strategy, but it also increases sensitivity to interest rate changes and any downturn in defense spending. The improvement in coverage is reassuring, but the structural leverage remains a key risk.
Liquidity Buffer Strengthens but Remains Thin
Current ratio improved to 1.19 in Q2 2026 from 0.98 a year earlier, with quick ratio at 1.01. According to recent SEC filings, cash rose to $3.8B, but the buffer remains modest relative to the company's scale and working capital needs.
The improvement in the current ratio is a positive sign, but a ratio of 1.19 is still low for an industrial company, indicating that Lockheed Martin relies heavily on operating cash flow to meet short-term obligations. The quick ratio of 1.01 suggests that inventory is not a major liquidity concern, but the company's heavy reliance on government contracts means that any delay in payments could strain liquidity. The $3.8B cash balance provides some cushion, but it is small relative to the $20.5B in total debt. While the liquidity position appears adequate under normal conditions, it could be vulnerable to a severe disruption in government funding or a major program charge.
ROE Misleads Due to Thin Equity Base
ROE of 22.6% in Q2 2026 appears strong, but it is inflated by a leveraged balance sheet with D/E of 2.34. As reported in financial statements, ROIC of 7.2% provides a clearer picture of underlying returns, suggesting that ROE overstates true economic profitability.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for Lockheed Martin is ROE, because the company's aggressive share repurchases have shrunk the equity base, making ROE artificially high. For example, ROE swung from 5.7% in Q2 2025 to 28.1% in Q3 2025, driven by changes in net income and equity, not by a fundamental shift in profitability. ROIC, which is less affected by capital structure, has remained stable around 7%, indicating that the company's returns on invested capital are modest. Investors should use ROIC or even pre-tax return on capital employed (ROCE) to evaluate Lockheed Martin's performance, as ROE can be misleading in a highly levered company with a thin equity base.