Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -1.8x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE N/A. (2011–2026 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $23M | $62M | $63M | $149M | $123M | $314M | $353M | $333M | $327M | $400M | — |
| Enterprise Value | $24M | $63M | $53M | $146M | $97M | $274M | $320M | $302M | $329M | $393M | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -1.83 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 44.72 | 121.30 | 5.81 | 975.30 | 713.32 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | 172.46 | 10.55 | 3.65 | 6.83 | 10.75 | 8.66 | 124.69 | 38.76 | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 122.62 | 4.90 | 951.52 | 561.22 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | -48.8% | -48.8% | 95.2% | -249.7% | -218.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -1970.4% | -1970.4% | -52.6% | -14215.0% | -22074.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | -2392.8% | -2392.8% | -138.3% | -13782.4% | -12324.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | — | -207.6% | -88.1% | -53.4% | -114.0% | -102.0% | -70.6% | -270.8% | -225.3% | -231.4% |
| ROA | -90.6% | -90.6% | -77.0% | -69.0% | -42.7% | -87.5% | -84.3% | -52.8% | -137.3% | -170.7% | -148.7% |
| ROIC | — | — | -873.9% | -181.7% | -448.5% | -1147.7% | -661.1% | -186.0% | -285.8% | -428.5% | -200.0% |
| ROCE | -99.2% | -99.2% | -35.0% | -78.9% | -88.4% | -98.1% | -83.3% | -58.6% | -170.9% | -206.4% | -232.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | 8.41 | 0.23 | 0.10 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 2.53 | 0.11 | 0.18 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | -26.94 | -0.26 | -0.78 | -0.88 | -1.00 | -0.82 | 0.39 | -0.68 | -0.25 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -5.95 | -5.95 | -23.36 | -106.04 | -111.85 | -290.09 | -442.25 | -5.08 | -36.54 | — | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.31 | 1.31 | 3.50 | 3.30 | 10.16 | 5.29 | 4.15 | 16.17 | 0.78 | 4.43 | 1.29 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.31 | 1.31 | 3.48 | 3.26 | 9.96 | 5.29 | 4.15 | 16.17 | 0.78 | 4.61 | 1.57 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.86 | 0.86 | 3.28 | 2.87 | 8.26 | 4.47 | 3.89 | 15.79 | 0.68 | 4.00 | 1.00 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.06 | 0.59 | 0.01 | 0.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | 6.39 | 5.25 | 0.76 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 536.14 | 21.42 | 837.35 | 1297.26 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $48M | $48M | $48M | $47M | $45M | $41M | $38M | $34M | $33M | $31M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 16 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying LOOP stock.
Loop Industries, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -1.8x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Based on historical data, Loop Industries, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -1.8x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Loop Industries, Inc. has -48.8% gross margin and -1970.4% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Imminent liquidity depletion risk
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Speculative Valuation Lacks Fundamental Support
According to current market data, the company trades at a P/S multiple of 78.12, which appears disconnected from its negligible revenue base and suggests investors are pricing in a highly speculative option value on intellectual property rather than any tangible, near-term cash flow generation capabilities.
The absence of meaningful earnings or EBITDA multiples renders traditional valuation metrics ineffective for assessing the company's current worth. This extreme premium implies that the market is discounting a successful transition to commercial-scale production, a scenario that remains unproven given the company's history of operational delays.
Capital Efficiency Remains Deeply Negative
As reported in recent financial statements, the company's ROIC of -96.6% in 2025Q3 underscores a persistent inability to generate returns on invested capital, reflecting a fundamental disconnect between the firm's heavy capital allocation and its current inability to achieve profitable, industrial-scale output.
The consistent decay in return metrics suggests that the company is currently destroying shareholder value rather than compounding it. Without a clear path to positive margins, the capital invested in research and development appears to be failing to translate into a sustainable competitive advantage or operational efficiency.
Working Capital Cycles Indicate Inefficiency
Based on the provided financial data, the company's cash conversion cycle remains highly erratic, with DSO reaching 270 days in 2025Q4, which suggests significant challenges in collecting payments and managing the operational flow necessary for a mature, revenue-generating specialty chemical business model.
The extreme volatility in days sales outstanding and days payable outstanding highlights a lack of leverage over both customers and suppliers. This inefficiency in working capital management further exacerbates the firm's liquidity constraints, as cash remains tied up in non-productive operational cycles.
Liquidity Buffer Nearing Critical Threshold
As indicated by the 2025Q4 current ratio of 1.31 and a cash balance of only $2.4 million, the company's liquidity position appears increasingly vulnerable, leaving little room for error as it attempts to fund ongoing operations without a stable, recurring revenue stream.
The rapid depletion of cash reserves relative to the historical burn rate warrants close monitoring, as the firm may soon face a requirement for dilutive financing to maintain its R&D and facility maintenance. The current liquidity profile suggests that the company is operating with minimal financial flexibility.
Misapplication of Revenue-Based Valuation Multiples
Investors frequently misapply P/S multiples to this business model, which obscures the reality that current revenue is largely non-recurring and project-based, failing to reflect the true economic potential or the massive, ongoing cash burn required to reach commercial viability.
Using revenue multiples for a pre-commercial firm ignores the underlying cost structure and the high probability of future equity dilution. A more appropriate analytical framework would focus on cash burn rates and the achievement of specific operational milestones rather than top-line sales figures that do not represent sustainable commercial activity.