Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 11.7x · EV/EBITDA 9.5x · ROE 17.7%. (2013–2026 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.3B | $1.5B | $941M | $1.6B | $802M | $585M | $654M | $471M | $350M | $405M | $506M |
| Enterprise Value | $2.7B | $1.8B | $1.3B | $2.1B | $1.5B | $1.0B | $1.2B | $1.1B | $1.0B | $1.1B | $1.2B |
| P/E Ratio → | 11.68 | 7.52 | 10.44 | 5.06 | 4.65 | 8.14 | 7.06 | 4.21 | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 4.72 | 3.03 | 2.66 | 2.77 | 2.06 | 2.13 | 2.07 | 1.41 | 2.21 | 2.54 | 3.02 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.99 | 1.28 | 0.90 | 1.52 | 0.92 | 0.64 | 0.69 | 0.48 | 0.38 | 0.42 | 0.52 |
| P/FCF | 19.56 | 12.53 | 6.11 | 4.38 | 5.16 | 6.12 | 4.06 | 3.16 | 71.97 | 7.12 | 10.08 |
| P/OCF | 10.82 | 6.93 | 5.44 | 4.00 | 3.58 | 4.93 | 3.83 | 2.79 | 39.40 | 7.07 | 9.71 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.82 | 3.79 | 3.69 | 3.77 | 3.72 | 3.75 | 3.25 | 6.42 | 6.65 | 7.40 |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.51 | 6.59 | 7.34 | 5.21 | 5.61 | 6.42 | 6.11 | 4.73 | 17.74 | 15.33 | 15.67 |
| EV / EBIT | 12.80 | 8.25 | 10.84 | 5.99 | 7.26 | 11.11 | 10.37 | 7.52 | — | 151.00 | 53.28 |
| EV / FCF | — | 15.81 | 8.68 | 5.82 | 9.46 | 10.67 | 7.35 | 7.28 | 208.77 | 18.66 | 24.69 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 54.1% | 54.1% | 43.2% | 65.1% | 58.5% | 41.2% | 46.8% | 54.8% | 15.2% | 17.2% | 19.9% |
| Operating Margin | 43.1% | 43.1% | 31.9% | 58.6% | 50.9% | 33.7% | 36.7% | 48.3% | -5.0% | 2.4% | 8.4% |
| Net Profit Margin | 40.2% | 40.2% | 25.5% | 54.8% | 44.2% | 26.2% | 29.3% | 33.5% | -32.2% | -12.8% | -0.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 17.7% | 17.7% | 8.7% | 32.4% | 19.2% | 7.7% | 9.6% | 11.8% | -5.4% | -2.1% | -0.1% |
| ROA | 10.6% | 10.6% | 5.0% | 17.3% | 10.4% | 4.5% | 5.7% | 6.8% | -3.0% | -1.2% | -0.1% |
| ROIC | 10.5% | 10.5% | 5.7% | 16.0% | 10.3% | 4.9% | 5.7% | 7.6% | -0.4% | 0.2% | 0.6% |
| ROCE | 12.3% | 12.3% | 6.6% | 19.6% | 12.7% | 6.1% | 7.5% | 10.3% | -0.5% | 0.2% | 0.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.68 | 0.78 | 0.93 | 0.73 | 0.64 | 0.68 | 0.76 | 0.79 | 0.77 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.54 | 2.54 | 3.91 | 2.01 | 3.12 | 4.22 | 3.14 | 2.89 | 12.16 | 10.97 | 9.49 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.34 | 0.38 | 0.50 | 0.76 | 0.47 | 0.56 | 0.63 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.75 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.37 | 1.37 | 2.17 | 1.30 | 2.55 | 2.73 | 2.74 | 2.68 | 11.62 | 9.48 | 9.27 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 3.29 | 2.57 | 1.45 | 4.30 | 4.55 | 3.29 | 4.12 | 136.80 | 11.54 | 14.61 |
| Interest Coverage | 7.62 | 7.62 | 3.45 | 8.53 | 5.36 | 3.39 | 4.14 | 3.99 | -0.35 | 0.20 | 0.80 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.67 | 2.67 | 3.54 | 3.62 | 2.50 | 3.25 | 1.87 | 1.64 | 1.04 | 1.26 | 0.75 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.65 | 2.65 | 3.52 | 3.60 | 2.47 | 3.22 | 1.84 | 1.62 | 1.01 | 1.24 | 0.72 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.94 | 1.94 | 2.94 | 2.89 | 1.57 | 2.50 | 0.97 | 0.74 | 0.39 | 1.26 | 0.20 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.26 | 0.20 | 0.31 | 0.23 | 0.17 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.10 | 0.09 | 0.10 |
| Inventory Turnover | 90.52 | 90.52 | 79.98 | 81.67 | 61.20 | 71.14 | 83.80 | 75.57 | 63.47 | 65.51 | 51.97 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 75.10 | 51.08 | 34.51 | 71.50 | 78.05 | 65.15 | 74.08 | 105.87 | 62.35 | 92.57 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 4.6% | 7.2% | 16.6% | 10.4% | 27.5% | 13.7% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | 54.2% | 54.2% | 173.4% | 52.8% | 127.9% | 111.3% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 8.6% | 13.3% | 9.6% | 19.8% | 21.5% | 12.3% | 14.2% | 23.8% | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 5.1% | 8.0% | 16.4% | 22.9% | 19.4% | 16.3% | 24.6% | 31.6% | 1.4% | 14.0% | 9.9% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.3% | 0.5% | 0.7% | 0.3% | 0.2% | 3.7% | 19.3% | 10.7% | 0.4% | 0.3% | 2.6% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 4.9% | 7.7% | 17.3% | 10.7% | 27.7% | 17.3% | 19.3% | 10.7% | 0.4% | 0.3% | 2.6% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $43M | $42M | $40M | $40M | $40M | $50M | $54M | $55M | $54M | $48M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 14 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying LPG stock.
Dorian LPG Ltd.'s current P/E ratio is 11.7x. The historical average is 8.9x. This places it at the 89th percentile of its historical range.
Dorian LPG Ltd.'s current EV/EBITDA is 9.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 9.5x.
Dorian LPG Ltd.'s return on equity (ROE) is 17.7%. The historical average is 5.7%.
Based on historical data, Dorian LPG Ltd. is trading at a P/E of 11.7x. This is at the 89th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Dorian LPG Ltd.'s current dividend yield is 4.64% with a payout ratio of 54.2%.
Dorian LPG Ltd. has 54.1% gross margin and 43.1% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Dorian LPG Ltd.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.5x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Cyclical Freight Rate Volatility
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Market Pricing Reflects Cyclical Caution
Based on current market data, Dorian LPG trades at a P/E of 7.93, which appears to discount the company's recent earnings performance and suggests that investors remain skeptical regarding the sustainability of current freight rates given the industry's historical susceptibility to extreme cyclicality and vessel oversupply.
The forward P/E of 8.42 implies that the market anticipates a potential moderation in earnings, likely reflecting concerns over the heavy VLGC orderbook scheduled for delivery in the coming years. While the PEG ratio of 0.40 suggests the stock may be undervalued relative to its growth trajectory, this metric should be interpreted with caution as it assumes current high-margin conditions will persist indefinitely.
Capital Efficiency Driven by Utilization
According to reported financial statements, Dorian LPG's ROIC has fluctuated significantly, peaking at 5.2% in 2024Q3 before moderating to 4.0% in 2026Q4, a trend that highlights the company's reliance on high vessel utilization rates to generate returns above its cost of capital in a capital-intensive industry.
The variance in ROIC suggests that the company's ability to compound capital is highly sensitive to the spot market arbitrage spreads between the US and Asia. Investors should monitor whether the company can maintain these returns as new vessel supply enters the market, which may exert downward pressure on TCE rates and compress margins.
Working Capital Dynamics Impact Liquidity
As reported in recent quarterly filings, Dorian LPG's cash conversion cycle has shown notable volatility, ranging from 32 days in 2024Q3 to 66 days in 2025Q2, which indicates that the company's operational efficiency is frequently disrupted by the timing of voyage-related receivables and port-related payables.
The fluctuation in DSO suggests that the company's ability to collect on its services is tied to the specific chartering arrangements and the geographic complexity of its trade routes. While the current CCC remains manageable, the periodic spikes in working capital requirements warrant further investigation into the credit quality of the company's chartering counterparties.
Conservative Capital Structure Enhances Resilience
Based on the latest balance sheet data, Dorian LPG maintains a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.62, which is exceptionally low for the midstream energy shipping sector and provides the company with a significant buffer against the interest rate volatility and refinancing risks that often plague more levered industry peers.
This fortress-like balance sheet appears to be a strategic choice by management to navigate the inherent volatility of the LPG shipping cycle without the burden of heavy debt service. The interest coverage ratio of 12.11 in 2026Q4 further suggests that the company is well-positioned to meet its obligations even if freight rates experience a sharp, sustained correction.
P/E Ratio Obscures Operational Reality
The P/E ratio is frequently misapplied to Dorian LPG because it fails to account for the lumpy nature of dry-docking expenses and the non-cash impact of depreciation on a capital-intensive fleet, which can significantly distort the company's true earning power during different phases of the shipping cycle.
Investors should instead prioritize the Time Charter Equivalent (TCE) and EV/EBITDA multiples, as these metrics better reflect the underlying cash-generating capacity of the vessels before accounting for accounting-driven depreciation. Relying solely on P/E may lead to an inaccurate assessment of the company's valuation during periods of high maintenance-related capital expenditure.