Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 58.4x · EV/EBITDA 42.3x · ROE 71.7%. (1997–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $12.4B | $10.6B | $16.8B | $13.5B | $7.7B | $10.0B | $6.8B | $5.2B | $2.8B | $3.4B | $3.8B |
| Enterprise Value | $12.2B | $10.4B | $16.6B | $13.2B | $7.5B | $9.8B | $6.6B | $5.1B | $2.7B | $3.3B | $3.7B |
| P/E Ratio → | 58.44 | 48.14 | 76.99 | 76.35 | 59.80 | 90.40 | 77.34 | 60.42 | 26.82 | 29.49 | 30.83 |
| P/S Ratio | 11.51 | 9.78 | 16.12 | 14.52 | 10.04 | 15.07 | 11.54 | 8.40 | 5.03 | 5.78 | 6.32 |
| P/B Ratio | 40.80 | 33.62 | 56.18 | 48.44 | 33.94 | 39.90 | 30.91 | 36.49 | 19.13 | 19.66 | 22.56 |
| P/FCF | 33.28 | 28.29 | 58.69 | 55.82 | 44.48 | 55.21 | 48.98 | 39.42 | 21.65 | 21.79 | 28.84 |
| P/OCF | 31.96 | 27.17 | 56.96 | 54.75 | 42.85 | 54.01 | 48.03 | 35.34 | 20.49 | 20.96 | 27.42 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 9.58 | 15.91 | 14.24 | 9.76 | 14.71 | 11.24 | 8.28 | 4.86 | 5.57 | 6.16 |
| EV / EBITDA | 42.31 | 35.86 | 61.91 | 61.34 | 46.98 | 68.62 | 53.57 | 41.27 | 19.06 | 17.02 | 18.32 |
| EV / EBIT | 43.26 | 36.25 | 62.16 | 61.91 | 47.35 | 72.80 | 57.77 | 44.11 | 20.28 | 17.57 | 19.00 |
| EV / FCF | — | 27.71 | 57.93 | 54.78 | 43.26 | 53.88 | 47.70 | 38.82 | 20.88 | 20.99 | 28.12 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 55.7% | 55.7% | 54.2% | 53.0% | 52.4% | 53.9% | 52.4% | 52.6% | 55.4% | 57.1% | 57.2% |
| Operating Margin | 26.1% | 26.1% | 25.1% | 22.6% | 19.9% | 20.2% | 19.5% | 18.8% | 23.9% | 31.2% | 32.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | 20.3% | 20.3% | 20.9% | 19.0% | 16.8% | 16.6% | 14.9% | 13.9% | 18.7% | 19.6% | 20.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 71.7% | 71.7% | 75.6% | 69.9% | 54.0% | 47.1% | 48.3% | 59.3% | 65.0% | 67.7% | 68.1% |
| ROA | 27.5% | 27.5% | 30.5% | 28.4% | 23.2% | 22.0% | 20.8% | 25.2% | 33.7% | 38.1% | 39.1% |
| ROIC | 236.8% | 236.8% | 370.5% | 774.8% | 898.3% | 386.5% | 161.3% | 155.2% | 206.1% | 226.1% | 193.2% |
| ROCE | 76.3% | 76.3% | 78.7% | 74.7% | 56.0% | 48.1% | 49.7% | 65.8% | 75.9% | 100.3% | 99.6% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.16 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.13 | 0.23 | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.39 | 0.39 | 0.18 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.16 | 0.23 | 0.26 | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.69 | -0.73 | -0.91 | -0.93 | -0.96 | -0.81 | -0.55 | -0.67 | -0.72 | -0.56 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.75 | -0.75 | -0.82 | -1.17 | -1.33 | -1.69 | -1.44 | -0.63 | -0.70 | -0.64 | -0.47 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -0.58 | -0.76 | -1.05 | -1.22 | -1.33 | -1.28 | -0.59 | -0.76 | -0.80 | -0.72 |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($329M) exceeds total debt ($112M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.28 | 1.28 | 1.26 | 1.31 | 1.32 | 1.64 | 1.70 | 1.28 | 1.48 | 1.84 | 1.76 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.28 | 1.28 | 1.26 | 1.31 | 1.32 | 1.64 | 1.70 | 1.28 | 1.48 | 1.84 | 1.76 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.67 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.04 | 0.61 | 0.69 | 1.01 | 0.81 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.29 | 1.38 | 1.38 | 1.35 | 1.23 | 1.26 | 1.66 | 1.82 | 1.89 | 2.03 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 72.46 | 73.77 | 71.74 | 79.66 | 69.86 | 67.98 | 59.62 | 65.35 | 56.62 | 60.55 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 1.7% | 2.1% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 1.7% | 1.1% | 1.3% | 1.7% | 3.7% | 3.4% | 3.2% |
| FCF Yield | 3.0% | 3.5% | 1.7% | 1.8% | 2.2% | 1.8% | 2.0% | 2.5% | 4.6% | 4.6% | 3.5% |
| Buyback Yield | 2.5% | 3.0% | 1.7% | 1.5% | 2.7% | 1.2% | 0.6% | 2.3% | 5.3% | 3.8% | 4.4% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 2.5% | 3.0% | 1.7% | 1.5% | 2.7% | 1.2% | 0.6% | 2.3% | 5.3% | 3.8% | 4.4% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $61M | $62M | $63M | $63M | $64M | $64M | $65M | $66M | $69M | $72M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 29 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying MANH stock.
Manhattan Associates, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 58.4x. The historical average is 50.9x. This places it at the 68th percentile of its historical range.
Manhattan Associates, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 42.3x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 28.5x.
Manhattan Associates, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 71.7%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 37.3%.
Based on historical data, Manhattan Associates, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 58.4x. This is at the 68th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Manhattan Associates, Inc. has 55.7% gross margin and 26.1% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Manhattan Associates, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.4x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Services labor constraints
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Pricing for Reacceleration
MANH trades at 53.2x trailing earnings and 38.4x EV/EBITDA, a premium to software peers like Veeva (37.5x P/E) and Paylocity (34.3x P/E), per recent market data. This suggests the market is pricing in sustained double-digit growth and margin recovery.
The forward P/E of 34.8x implies the market expects earnings to grow roughly 53% over the next year, a steep assumption given the recent EPS miss and margin compression. The PEG of 2.47 indicates that the current valuation is not cheap relative to expected growth, suggesting investors are paying up for the reacceleration in revenue and the potential for operating leverage once the cloud transition matures. Compared to its own history, the forward multiple is below its five-year average, but still at a premium to the broader software group, reflecting the market's confidence in MANH's competitive position.
Margin Compression Amidst Cloud Shift
Gross margin fell to 53.2% in 2026Q2, the lowest in ten quarters, while operating margin contracted to 22.2% from 27.1% a year earlier, according to recent SEC filings. This reflects a higher mix of lower-margin services and increased SG&A investment.
The decline in gross margin is primarily due to the revenue mix shifting toward professional services, which carry lower margins than software subscriptions. Operating margin compression is more pronounced, as SG&A expenses grew 24.8% year-over-year, indicating heavy investment in sales and marketing to capture cloud demand. While this investment may be necessary to drive the reacceleration in growth, it temporarily suppresses profitability. The net margin of 16.9% is still respectable, but the trend is concerning; investors should monitor whether the company can return to the 28% operating margin seen in 2024Q3 as the cloud mix increases and services scale.
Exceptional ROIC, But Volatile
ROIC spiked to 165.6% in 2026Q2, up from 73.2% in the prior quarter, based on reported figures, driven by a shrinking equity base from aggressive buybacks. This metric is highly sensitive to capital structure changes and may overstate underlying returns.
The dramatic increase in ROIC is largely a function of the denominator: equity has been reduced by $127.1M in buybacks in 2026Q2 alone, causing the invested capital base to shrink. While the company's asset-light model and high margins do generate strong returns, the reported ROIC of 165.6% is not sustainable and should be viewed with caution. Over the past ten quarters, ROIC has ranged from 47% to 165%, indicating that the metric is heavily influenced by capital allocation decisions rather than operational improvements. Investors should focus on the underlying profitability and cash generation rather than the absolute ROIC figure.
Working Capital Efficiency Steady
DSO has remained stable around 68-74 days over the past ten quarters, while DPO has hovered near 17-20 days, according to recent financial statements. This suggests consistent collection practices and supplier payment terms, with no significant deterioration in working capital management.
The cash conversion cycle is not fully calculable due to missing DIO data, but the stability in DSO and DPO indicates that MANH is not experiencing any material shift in its working capital dynamics. The asset turnover of 0.41x is typical for a software company with a large cash balance and minimal fixed assets, but it is lower than some peers due to the high cash position. The company's ability to maintain DSO in the high 60s to low 70s despite a growing cloud subscription base is a positive sign, as it suggests that billing and collections are keeping pace with revenue growth. However, the lack of DIO data limits a full assessment of inventory efficiency, though inventory is likely minimal given the software business model.
Leverage Creeps Higher, Still Manageable
Debt-to-equity rose to 0.34 in 2026Q2 from 0.15 a year earlier, while D/EBITDA increased to 0.79, according to recent SEC filings. This reflects a modest increase in debt and a shrinking equity base from buybacks, but interest coverage remains ample.
The increase in leverage is more a function of equity depletion than a significant rise in absolute debt, as total debt stands at $53.9M, which is modest relative to EBITDA. The D/EBITDA of 0.79x is low and indicates that the company has substantial capacity to service its debt, even if interest coverage data is unavailable. However, the trend is worth monitoring: if buybacks continue at this pace, equity could erode further, pushing leverage ratios higher. The company's near-zero debt profile historically provided significant financial flexibility, and while the current leverage is still conservative, investors should watch whether management maintains this discipline or allows leverage to creep higher.
Liquidity Buffer Thins
Current ratio fell to 0.98 in 2026Q2 from 1.28 in 2025Q4, while cash dropped to $186.1M from $328.7M, according to recent financial statements. This indicates a tighter liquidity position, though the company retains a strong cash flow generation.
The current ratio dipping below 1.0 suggests that current liabilities exceed current assets, which could be a concern if the company faced a sudden cash crunch. However, the company's robust operating cash flow, which exceeded net income by 1.8x in 2026Q2, provides a cushion. The decline in cash is largely due to aggressive share repurchases, which totaled $127.1M in the quarter, rather than operational weakness. The quick ratio of 0.98 is nearly identical to the current ratio, indicating that inventory is not a significant factor. While the liquidity position is tighter than in prior quarters, it remains adequate given the company's consistent cash generation and low debt levels.
ROIC Misleading Due to Buybacks
The most commonly misapplied ratio for MANH is ROIC, which is distorted by aggressive share repurchases that shrink the equity base, inflating returns. According to recent financial disclosures, ROIC jumped to 165.6% in 2026Q2, but this overstates operational performance.
ROIC is calculated using invested capital, which includes equity; when a company buys back shares aggressively, the equity base shrinks, mechanically boosting ROIC even if operating performance is unchanged. In MANH's case, the $127.1M in buybacks in 2026Q2 reduced equity by nearly 50% year-over-year, causing ROIC to spike. This makes ROIC an unreliable measure of the company's true return on capital. A better metric would be ROIC adjusted for buybacks, or simply the operating margin and asset turnover, which provide a clearer picture of operational efficiency. Investors should focus on the sustainability of margins and cash flow rather than the headline ROIC figure.