Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 32.5x · EV/EBITDA 19.8x · ROE 9.3%. (1998–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $78.4B | $69.9B | $80.5B | $99.2B | $92.3B | $93.7B | $84.3B | $80.3B | $59.5B | $65.5B | $69.7B |
| Enterprise Value | $98.7B | $90.1B | $97.5B | $117.4B | $113.9B | $110.1B | $101.2B | $97.8B | $76.8B | $82.4B | $85.2B |
| P/E Ratio → | 32.51 | 28.48 | 17.46 | 20.01 | 34.01 | 21.81 | 23.67 | 20.78 | 17.56 | 22.41 | 42.22 |
| P/S Ratio | 2.03 | 1.81 | 2.21 | 2.76 | 2.93 | 3.26 | 3.17 | 3.10 | 2.29 | 2.53 | 2.69 |
| P/B Ratio | 3.08 | 2.70 | 2.98 | 3.50 | 3.43 | 3.31 | 3.05 | 2.94 | 2.31 | 2.51 | 2.77 |
| P/FCF | 24.24 | 21.60 | 22.84 | 27.55 | 30.75 | 29.50 | 27.17 | 26.42 | 20.85 | 41.50 | 43.20 |
| P/OCF | 17.37 | 15.48 | 16.39 | 21.05 | 23.62 | 22.63 | 21.26 | 20.25 | 15.07 | 25.27 | 24.57 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.34 | 2.67 | 3.26 | 3.62 | 3.83 | 3.81 | 3.78 | 2.96 | 3.18 | 3.29 |
| EV / EBITDA | 19.83 | 18.11 | 12.75 | 17.47 | 24.55 | 19.10 | 20.36 | 20.01 | 18.62 | 19.27 | 25.23 |
| EV / EBIT | 27.26 | 27.35 | 14.40 | 18.25 | 31.16 | 23.26 | 26.58 | 24.89 | 23.23 | 23.41 | 43.27 |
| EV / FCF | — | 27.87 | 27.67 | 32.58 | 37.95 | 34.67 | 32.62 | 32.19 | 26.90 | 52.20 | 52.78 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 28.4% | 28.4% | 39.1% | 38.2% | 35.9% | 39.2% | 39.3% | 40.0% | 39.9% | 38.7% | 39.0% |
| Operating Margin | 9.4% | 9.4% | 17.4% | 15.3% | 11.2% | 16.2% | 14.5% | 14.9% | 12.8% | 13.4% | 9.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | 6.4% | 6.4% | 12.7% | 13.8% | 8.6% | 15.0% | 13.4% | 15.2% | 12.8% | 10.9% | 6.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 9.3% | 9.3% | 16.7% | 17.9% | 9.8% | 15.4% | 12.9% | 14.8% | 12.8% | 11.0% | 6.1% |
| ROA | 3.5% | 3.5% | 6.6% | 7.0% | 3.9% | 6.4% | 5.4% | 6.2% | 5.3% | 4.5% | 2.6% |
| ROIC | 6.0% | 6.0% | 10.5% | 8.7% | 5.7% | 7.8% | 6.5% | 6.6% | 5.8% | 6.2% | 4.7% |
| ROCE | 7.3% | 7.3% | 12.5% | 10.3% | 6.6% | 8.8% | 7.6% | 8.1% | 7.1% | 7.3% | 5.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.87 | 0.87 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.87 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.68 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 4.50 | 4.50 | 2.40 | 2.97 | 5.07 | 3.46 | 4.13 | 3.85 | 4.46 | 4.13 | 5.09 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.78 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.80 | 0.58 | 0.61 | 0.64 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 0.61 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 4.07 | 4.07 | 2.23 | 2.70 | 4.66 | 2.85 | 3.40 | 3.59 | 4.19 | 3.95 | 4.58 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 6.27 | 4.83 | 5.03 | 7.20 | 5.17 | 5.45 | 5.77 | 6.05 | 10.70 | 9.58 |
| Interest Coverage | 5.50 | 5.50 | 13.32 | 11.69 | 8.54 | 12.97 | 9.00 | 8.12 | 7.15 | 8.89 | 3.82 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.59 | 0.59 | 0.68 | 0.62 | 0.60 | 0.74 | 0.66 | 0.50 | 0.45 | 0.48 | 0.59 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.39 | 0.39 | 0.48 | 0.43 | 0.40 | 0.54 | 0.48 | 0.33 | 0.30 | 0.31 | 0.42 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.07 | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.25 | 0.24 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.12 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.54 | 0.53 | 0.50 | 0.44 | 0.43 | 0.39 | 0.40 | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.42 |
| Inventory Turnover | 6.25 | 6.25 | 5.80 | 6.16 | 5.97 | 6.45 | 6.10 | 6.10 | 6.01 | 6.20 | 6.41 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 46.01 | 48.19 | 45.73 | 45.28 | 40.52 | 40.56 | 41.30 | 42.30 | 49.70 | 48.86 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 3.1% | 3.6% | 2.9% | 2.2% | 2.2% | 1.9% | 2.0% | 1.9% | 2.3% | 1.8% | 1.6% |
| Payout Ratio | 101.5% | 101.5% | 50.9% | 43.6% | 73.1% | 42.5% | 47.2% | 39.2% | 41.0% | 42.4% | 66.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 3.1% | 3.5% | 5.7% | 5.0% | 2.9% | 4.6% | 4.2% | 4.8% | 5.7% | 4.5% | 2.4% |
| FCF Yield | 4.1% | 4.6% | 4.4% | 3.6% | 3.3% | 3.4% | 3.7% | 3.8% | 4.8% | 2.4% | 2.3% |
| Buyback Yield | 3.0% | 3.4% | 2.9% | 1.6% | 2.2% | 2.3% | 1.6% | 1.8% | 3.4% | 3.3% | 3.7% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 6.2% | 7.0% | 5.8% | 3.7% | 4.3% | 4.2% | 3.6% | 3.8% | 5.7% | 5.1% | 5.3% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $1.3B | $1.3B | $1.4B | $1.4B | $1.4B | $1.4B | $1.5B | $1.5B | $1.5B | $1.6B |
Includes 30+ ratios · 28 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying MDLZ stock.
Mondelez International, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 32.5x. The historical average is 18.1x. This places it at the 92th percentile of its historical range.
Mondelez International, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 19.8x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 14.3x.
Mondelez International, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 9.3%. The historical average is 12.2%.
Based on historical data, Mondelez International, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 32.5x. This is at the 92th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Mondelez International, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 3.12% with a payout ratio of 101.5%.
Mondelez International, Inc. has 28.4% gross margin and 9.4% operating margin.
Mondelez International, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 4.5x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Cocoa cost pressure and FX volatility
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Recovery Amidst Cocoa Volatility
Gross margin rebounded to 42.6% in Q2 2026 from a 2025 average of 28.5%, but cocoa price spikes may test sustainability. According to quarterly data, operating margin improved to 20.8%.
The sharp recovery in gross margin from the depressed 2025 levels suggests that pricing actions and cost controls are gaining traction, yet the historic surge in cocoa prices could reverse this trend if not fully offset. Operating margin expansion to 20.8% in Q2 2026 indicates operating leverage is being captured, but the volatility across quarters—ranging from 7.3% to 29.4%—implies that the current level may not be the new norm. Investors should monitor whether the margin improvement is driven by one-time gains or sustainable operational efficiency.
ROIC Recovery Still Below Historical Peaks
ROIC improved to 3.1% in Q2 2026 from 1.2% in Q1 2025, but remains below the 4.4% seen in Q1 2024. Based on reported figures, returns are recovering but not yet compounding.
The sequential improvement in ROIC suggests that the company is emerging from a period of margin compression, yet the absolute level remains modest for a company with Mondelez's brand portfolio. The gap between ROIC and cost of capital may indicate that recent acquisitions and elevated capital returns are not yet generating sufficient returns. The trend over the past two years shows a cyclical pattern rather than a clear upward trajectory, implying that management's capital allocation decisions have yet to demonstrate consistent value creation.
Working Capital Efficiency Shows Mixed Signals
Cash conversion cycle improved to -40 days in Q2 2026 from -25 days a year earlier, driven by extended payables. As reported in financial statements, DPO rose to 162 days, while DSO and DIO remained stable.
The negative cash conversion cycle indicates that Mondelez is effectively using supplier financing to fund its operations, a common feature in the consumer staples industry. The extension of DPO to 162 days suggests increased bargaining power with suppliers, but it may also reflect stretched payment terms that could strain supplier relationships. The stable DSO and DIO imply that inventory and receivables management are not the primary drivers of working capital changes; rather, the company is relying on payables to boost cash flow, which may not be sustainable indefinitely.
Leverage Creep Tests Interest Coverage
Debt-to-EBITDA rose to 9.61x in Q2 2026 from 6.42x in Q1 2024, while interest coverage improved to 14.19x. According to recent filings, total debt reached $22.1B, pressuring the balance sheet.
The increase in leverage, as measured by D/EBITDA, reflects both higher debt levels and the volatility in EBITDA, which dipped in 2025. Despite the higher leverage, interest coverage remains comfortable at 14.19x, suggesting that the company can service its debt with current earnings. However, the thin liquidity position—current ratio of 0.60—indicates that near-term obligations are not fully covered by current assets, raising refinancing risk if credit markets tighten. The reliance on operating cash flow to service debt is a key risk, especially if cocoa costs continue to pressure margins.
Thin Liquidity Buffer Raises Refinancing Concerns
Current ratio deteriorated to 0.60 in Q2 2026 from 0.77 in Q1 2024, with cash at $1.7B against total debt of $22.1B. Based on reported figures, the liquidity cushion appears narrow.
The declining current ratio suggests that Mondelez's short-term assets are increasingly insufficient to cover short-term liabilities, a common characteristic for companies with strong cash flow generation but heavy debt loads. The quick ratio of 0.40 indicates that even excluding inventory, the company would struggle to meet immediate obligations without relying on operating cash flow or refinancing. While the negative cash conversion cycle provides some relief, the thin liquidity buffer could become a constraint if access to capital markets tightens or if operating cash flow deteriorates due to commodity shocks.
Misapplied P/E Overlooks Equity Stakes
The trailing P/E of 34.10 appears elevated, but it ignores the value of stakes in JDE Peet's and Keurig Dr Pepper. According to recent filings, these equity method investments contribute to net income but not operating profit.
The market often values Mondelez on a simple P/E basis, which can be misleading because the company's net income includes contributions from equity method investments that are not part of its core operations. These stakes, particularly in JDE Peet's and Keurig Dr Pepper, may hold significant intrinsic value that is not captured in the P/E multiple. A sum-of-the-parts analysis or an EV/EBITDA that adjusts for these investments would provide a clearer picture of the core snacking business's valuation. Investors should consider the potential hidden value in these minority stakes when assessing whether the current multiple is justified.