Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 101.6x · EV/EBITDA 30.1x · ROE 9.0%. (2009–2026 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $4.5B | $4.1B | $11.2B | $8.4B | $2.7B | $2.9B | $3.4B | $1.3B | $2.9B | $3.5B | $1.8B |
| Enterprise Value | $5.5B | $5.1B | $11.0B | $8.3B | $2.7B | $2.9B | $3.3B | $1.2B | $2.7B | $3.3B | $1.7B |
| P/E Ratio → | 101.60 | 79.34 | 118.06 | 38.83 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 4.30 | 3.92 | 11.47 | 10.74 | 4.58 | 9.58 | 20.64 | 2.46 | 5.91 | 5.16 | 4.07 |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | 9.29 | 7.52 | 3.10 | 3.25 | 3.78 | 1.46 | 2.11 | 2.23 | 1.30 |
| P/FCF | — | — | 64.68 | 74.40 | 177.55 | — | 50.12 | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 24.60 | 22.40 | 60.57 | 66.81 | 84.40 | 485.21 | 49.65 | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 4.86 | 11.19 | 10.60 | 4.50 | 9.59 | 20.08 | 2.25 | 5.54 | 4.88 | 3.84 |
| EV / EBITDA | 30.11 | 27.90 | 74.49 | 89.72 | 52.50 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 35.55 | 27.69 | 82.45 | 74.94 | 596.33 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | 63.11 | 73.46 | 174.36 | — | 48.77 | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 55.9% | 55.9% | 72.0% | 72.5% | 70.1% | 80.7% | 86.4% | 69.8% | 64.3% | 74.0% | 61.1% |
| Operating Margin | 14.7% | 14.7% | 12.3% | 8.3% | 4.0% | -10.0% | -41.4% | -83.9% | -31.5% | -32.5% | -30.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | 5.0% | 5.0% | 9.7% | 27.7% | -1.9% | -14.9% | -34.0% | -87.5% | -34.5% | -32.3% | -24.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 9.0% | 9.0% | 8.2% | 21.8% | -1.3% | -5.1% | -6.3% | -40.3% | -11.5% | -14.7% | -14.9% |
| ROA | 2.9% | 2.9% | 5.5% | 14.4% | -0.8% | -3.5% | -4.7% | -33.8% | -10.1% | -13.2% | -11.3% |
| ROIC | 12.4% | 12.4% | 9.2% | 5.3% | 2.1% | -2.7% | -6.5% | -33.2% | -9.0% | -12.3% | -13.2% |
| ROCE | 11.6% | 11.6% | 9.2% | 5.7% | 2.3% | -2.7% | -6.7% | -37.8% | -10.4% | -14.7% | -16.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.27 | 0.24 | 0.23 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 7.74 | 7.74 | 1.61 | 2.40 | 4.62 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | -0.23 | -0.09 | -0.06 | 0.00 | -0.10 | -0.12 | -0.13 | -0.12 | -0.07 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 5.40 | 5.40 | -1.85 | -1.14 | -0.96 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | -1.57 | -0.93 | -3.19 | — | -1.35 | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 1.75 | 1.75 | 7.52 | 6.24 | 0.26 | -2.05 | -12.76 | -72.47 | -230.58 | -241.19 | -6.84 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 3.05 | 3.05 | 1.85 | 2.88 | 1.48 | 3.09 | 2.58 | 1.55 | 2.15 | 2.70 | 1.96 |
| Quick Ratio | 3.05 | 3.05 | 1.85 | 2.88 | 1.48 | 3.09 | 2.58 | 1.55 | 2.15 | 2.70 | 1.96 |
| Cash Ratio | 2.23 | 2.23 | 1.32 | 2.04 | 1.06 | 2.50 | 2.19 | 0.93 | 1.53 | 1.95 | 1.32 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.59 | 0.54 | 0.47 | 0.44 | 0.23 | 0.12 | 0.47 | 0.31 | 0.38 | 0.29 |
| Inventory Turnover | 752.50 | 752.50 | 755.78 | 986.65 | 7102.68 | 5340.91 | 557.70 | 4286.67 | 286.16 | 295.10 | 692.90 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 57.02 | 56.26 | 45.33 | 42.40 | 43.13 | 56.23 | 41.28 | 41.25 | 39.74 | 28.69 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 1.0% | 1.3% | 0.8% | 2.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | 1.5% | 1.3% | 0.6% | — | 2.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $110M | $115M | $118M | $111M | $108M | $107M | $105M | $104M | $100M | $53M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 18 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying MMYT stock.
MakeMyTrip Limited's current P/E ratio is 101.6x. The historical average is 110.5x. This places it at the 40th percentile of its historical range.
MakeMyTrip Limited's current EV/EBITDA is 30.1x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 61.2x.
MakeMyTrip Limited's return on equity (ROE) is 9.0%. The historical average is -9.8%.
Based on historical data, MakeMyTrip Limited is trading at a P/E of 101.6x. This is at the 40th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
MakeMyTrip Limited has 55.9% gross margin and 14.7% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
MakeMyTrip Limited's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 7.7x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Airline capacity constraints
Margin Expansion Masks Mix Volatility
Operating margin expanded to 15.3% in 2027Q1 from 8.2% in 2024Q4, per reported financials, yet gross margin swung between 58.3% and 77.5%, indicating mix-driven instability beneath the surface.
The operating margin improvement appears driven by disciplined SG&A spending, which fell sharply in 2027Q1, rather than by a stable gross margin profile. Gross margin volatility reflects the shifting mix between high-margin hotels and lower-margin air ticketing, suggesting that the reported operating margin may not be sustainable if the mix reverts. Investors should monitor whether the margin expansion is a structural shift or a temporary result of reduced competitive intensity.
ROIC Remains Thin Despite Margin Gains
ROIC hovered near 3% over the last five quarters, per balance sheet data, despite operating margin expansion, implying that capital efficiency is not improving in tandem with profitability.
With ROIC at 3.4% in 2027Q1, the company is earning only modest returns on its invested capital, which includes a significant debt-funded base. The low ROIC relative to operating margins suggests that the asset base, including intangibles from acquisitions, is not generating commensurate returns. This may indicate that the company's growth investments are not yet yielding adequate returns, or that the capital structure is diluting returns.
Negative CCC Reflects Supplier Leverage
Cash conversion cycle remained deeply negative at -105 days in 2027Q1, per reported figures, driven by DPO of 162 days, indicating MMYT holds supplier cash for over five months before payment.
The negative CCC is a structural feature of the OTA model, where customer collections occur upfront while supplier payments are deferred. DPO of 162 days in 2027Q1, up from 120 days in 2025Q1, suggests MMYT is extending payment terms with suppliers, which may indicate increasing bargaining power. However, the volatility in DPO, ranging from 120 to 282 days, warrants monitoring as it could reflect seasonal or contractual changes rather than a stable trend.
Debt Surge Strains Coverage Ratios
Interest coverage fell to 1.44x in 2027Q1 from 6.33x in 2025Q1, per financial statements, as debt climbed to $1.7B, signaling a marked deterioration in debt service comfort.
The sharp increase in debt, from $221.6M in 2024Q4 to $1.7B in 2027Q1, has outpaced operating income growth, compressing interest coverage to levels that may raise refinancing concerns. D/EBITDA of 34.01 in 2027Q1, though distorted by negative equity, underscores the elevated leverage. Investors should monitor whether the debt was used for buybacks or acquisitions, and whether the company can generate sufficient cash flow to service this debt without straining liquidity.
Liquidity Buffer Holds Despite Negative Equity
Current ratio improved to 3.13 in 2027Q1 from 1.15 in 2026Q1, per balance sheet data, with cash of $380.3M, suggesting adequate short-term liquidity despite negative equity of -$341.5M.
The current ratio of 3.13 indicates that current assets comfortably cover current liabilities, providing a cushion against short-term shocks. However, the negative equity position, driven by accumulated losses, may limit financial flexibility and access to additional debt. The liquidity position appears resilient, but the reliance on short-term assets to cover obligations warrants monitoring if cash flows deteriorate.
Misapplied ROE in Negative Equity Context
ROE is commonly misapplied to MMYT because negative equity distorts the metric, as seen in 2027Q1 when equity was -$341.5M, making ROE meaningless or misleading.
With negative equity, ROE becomes non-calculable or artificially inflated, obscuring the company's true return generation. Analysts should instead focus on ROIC, which uses invested capital and is less distorted by capital structure, or on cash flow returns such as FCF yield. The reported ROE of 16.7% in 2024Q4 is not comparable to later quarters due to the equity erosion, highlighting the need for alternative metrics.