Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -97.8x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -5.0%. (2018–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $8.7B | $8.6B | $2.7B | $3.5B | $4.7B | $8.6B | $2.6B | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $8.6B | $8.5B | $3.3B | $4.0B | $5.2B | $8.1B | $2.1B | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -97.78 | — | — | 141.79 | 15.97 | 62.22 | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 31.60 | 31.20 | 13.00 | 13.95 | 8.90 | 25.98 | 19.09 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 3.48 | 3.59 | 2.51 | 2.59 | 3.58 | 8.55 | 3.00 | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | 277.62 | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | 198.53 | 56.40 | 13.67 | 84.56 | 782.32 | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 30.76 | 16.10 | 15.63 | 9.93 | 24.51 | 15.75 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | 104.28 | 15.15 | 42.88 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | 103.36 | 15.10 | 48.11 | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | 309.64 | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | -2.4% | -2.4% | -32.8% | 41.4% | 79.0% | 69.7% | 47.3% | 7.6% | 15.0% |
| Operating Margin | -44.6% | -44.6% | -83.1% | -7.0% | 62.1% | 49.8% | -25.8% | -10.4% | -13.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | -31.2% | -31.2% | -32.1% | 9.6% | 54.8% | 40.7% | -16.2% | -9.2% | -20.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -5.0% | -5.0% | -5.4% | 1.8% | 24.9% | 14.5% | -5.2% | — | — |
| ROA | -2.7% | -2.7% | -2.8% | 1.1% | 14.0% | 9.1% | -3.7% | -6.8% | -14.0% |
| ROIC | -4.7% | -4.7% | -7.3% | -0.7% | 20.7% | 26.8% | -12.9% | -242.2% | -97.6% |
| ROCE | -4.2% | -4.2% | -7.7% | -0.8% | 16.5% | 11.6% | -6.3% | -10.6% | -12.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.87 | 0.50 | 0.52 | 0.69 | 0.08 | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | 18.13 | 1.96 | 3.65 | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.05 | 0.60 | 0.31 | 0.41 | -0.48 | -0.53 | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | 11.20 | 1.57 | -2.57 | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | 32.03 | — | — | — | 1.46 |
| Interest Coverage | -2.74 | -2.74 | -3.06 | 7.30 | 59.96 | 18.99 | -6.88 | -0.98 | -1.77 |
Net cash position: cash ($1.2B) exceeds total debt ($1.0B)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 7.24 | 7.24 | 6.29 | 10.42 | 13.27 | 21.44 | 13.03 | 0.88 | 0.76 |
| Quick Ratio | 6.67 | 6.67 | 5.63 | 9.54 | 12.68 | 20.79 | 12.28 | 0.14 | 0.17 |
| Cash Ratio | 6.12 | 6.12 | 5.19 | 9.19 | 12.13 | 19.81 | 12.07 | 0.09 | 0.12 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.11 | 0.24 | 0.18 | 0.13 | 0.72 | 0.70 |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.64 | 1.64 | 2.51 | 1.56 | 1.92 | 2.60 | 2.19 | 2.94 | 4.25 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 194.37 | 111.63 | 43.44 | 22.73 | 56.09 | 9.75 | 1.84 | 1.22 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | 0.7% | 6.3% | 1.6% | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | 0.4% | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.4% | 0.4% | 8.5% | 0.2% | 0.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.4% | 0.4% | 8.5% | 0.2% | 0.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $170M | $170M | $178M | $193M | $190M | $80M | $69M | $69M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 8 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying MP stock.
MP Materials Corp.'s current P/E ratio is -97.8x. The historical average is 73.3x.
MP Materials Corp.'s return on equity (ROE) is -5.0%. The historical average is 4.3%.
Based on historical data, MP Materials Corp. is trading at a P/E of -97.8x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
MP Materials Corp. has -2.4% gross margin and -44.6% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
NdPr price volatility and technical execution
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Volatility Masks Structural Costs
Gross margin swung from -32.2% in 2025Q4 to 33.4% in 2026Q2, per reported financials, yet the average remains negative, indicating fixed processing costs are not yet covered by current NdPr prices.
The dramatic swing in gross margin, from -32.2% to 33.4% within two quarters, suggests that the company's profitability is highly sensitive to both product mix and NdPr pricing, but the underlying cost structure remains heavy. Operating margin improved to -13.5% in 2026Q2 from -125.2% in 2025Q3, yet it remains deeply negative, implying that SG&A and other operating costs are scaling with revenue, preventing operating leverage. The persistence of negative margins despite revenue growth of 89% year-over-year indicates that the company is still in a ramp-up phase where commissioning costs and fixed overheads outpace the contribution from higher volumes.
Capital Intensity Depresses Returns
ROIC has remained negative for ten consecutive quarters, per reported data, with 2026Q2 at -0.4%, indicating that the massive capital invested in Stage II and III is not yet generating returns above the cost of capital.
ROIC has hovered near zero or negative over the past ten quarters, with the best quarter at -0.1% in 2025Q4, suggesting that the company is not compounding returns on its invested capital. The asset base has grown significantly, with net PPE up 33% year-over-year to $1.6B, but the negative ROIC implies that the incremental capital is not yet productive. The transition from a pure concentrate seller to a refined products and magnetics producer requires substantial upfront investment, and the current returns suggest that the market is pricing in future success rather than current profitability.
Working Capital Cycle Stretches with Growth
Cash conversion cycle extended to 256 days in 2026Q2, per reported figures, up from 192 days in 2024Q1, driven by inventory days of 216, indicating that working capital is absorbing cash as volumes scale.
The cash conversion cycle has lengthened from 192 days in 2024Q1 to 256 days in 2026Q2, primarily due to a rise in days inventory outstanding from 172 to 216, which suggests that the company is building inventory ahead of sales or facing slower inventory turnover. Days sales outstanding also increased to 91 days in 2026Q2 from 66 days in 2024Q1, indicating that customers are taking longer to pay, possibly due to the mix of customers or contractual terms. The negative free cash flow margin of -2.1% in 2026Q2, despite a positive operating cash flow, underscores that working capital and capex are consuming cash faster than operations generate it.
Leverage Eases but Debt Burden Grows
Debt-to-equity improved to 0.48 in 2026Q2 from 0.83 a year earlier, per reported balance sheets, yet total debt rose to $934.6M, indicating that leverage is manageable but absolute obligations are increasing.
The improvement in debt-to-equity from 0.83 to 0.48 is largely due to equity doubling to $2.0B, driven by external capital raises, rather than debt reduction. Interest coverage turned negative in 2026Q2 at -2.02, down from 2.07 in 2025Q4, indicating that operating income is insufficient to cover interest expenses, which may raise refinancing risk if cash reserves deplete. The high cash balance of $1.16B provides a buffer, but the rapid drawdown to $429.1M in 2026Q2 suggests that the company is relying on debt and equity markets to fund its expansion, which could become more costly in a rising rate environment.
Liquidity Cushion Thins as Cash Burns
Current ratio improved to 9.51 in 2026Q2, per the latest balance sheet, but cash dropped to $429.1M from $1.2B in 2025Q4, indicating a rapid drawdown to fund operations and capex.
The current ratio of 9.51 appears robust, but it is inflated by the large cash balance that is being consumed at an accelerating pace. The quick ratio of 8.56 suggests that inventory is not a major liquidity concern, but the negative free cash flow of -$223.5M in 2026Q2 indicates that the company is burning through its cash reserves to fund capital expenditures. If NdPr prices remain weak and the Stage II and III facilities continue to require heavy investment, the liquidity position could deteriorate quickly, potentially forcing the company to raise additional capital or slow its expansion plans.
Misapplied EV/EBITDA in Ramp-Up Phase
EV/EBITDA is often used to value MP, but with negative EBITDA in most quarters, the metric is meaningless; instead, investors should focus on gross margin per ton and progress toward positive operating cash flow.
The EV/EBITDA multiple is commonly applied to mining companies, but for MP, EBITDA has been negative in nine of the last ten quarters, making the multiple either negative or undefined. This obscures the fact that the company is in a heavy investment phase where EBITDA is depressed by commissioning costs and depreciation, not necessarily by poor operational performance. A more appropriate metric would be gross profit per ton of rare earth oxide produced, which captures the unit economics of the separation process, and the trajectory of operating cash flow, which reflects the company's ability to fund its own growth. Investors should also monitor the recovery rate of the separation circuit, as it directly impacts the cost per kilogram of refined product.