Net interest income has declined for six consecutive quarters to $50.6M in 2026Q2, while the net interest margin has compressed to 1.4%, indicating significant spread pressure from the rate cycle turn.
Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund (MSDL) annual income statement — 6-year revenue, gross profit & net income history
| Metric | TTM | Dec'25 | Dec'24 | Dec'23 | Dec'22 | Dec'21 | Dec'20 |
|---|
| Net Interest Income | 163.35M | 235.68M | 284.2M | 246.92M | 157.56M | 88.28M | 16.55M |
| NII Growth % | -149.32% | -17.07% | 15.1% | 56.71% | 78.47% | 433.34% | - |
| Net Interest Margin % | 4.55% | 6.01% | 7.26% | 7.47% | 5.28% | 3.54% | 2.52% |
| Interest Income | 335.56M | 371.81M | 407.13M | 359.81M | 224.75M | 109.3M | 20.28M |
| Interest Expense | 129.21M | 136.13M | 122.93M | 112.88M | 67.18M | 21.02M | 3.73M |
| Loan Loss Provision | -34.3M | -62.71M | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Non-Interest Income | 25.85M | 15.18M | -74.61M | -31.68M | -124.53M | -10.68M | 3.19M |
| Non-Interest Income % | 13.66% | 6.05% | -35.6% | -14.72% | -376.97% | -13.76% | 16.16% |
| Total Net Revenue | 189.2M | 250.86M | 209.59M | 215.25M | 33.03M | 77.61M | 19.74M |
| Revenue Growth % | 25.13% | 19.69% | -2.63% | 551.59% | -57.43% | 293.06% | - |
| Non-Interest Expense | 45.8M | 55.48M | -8.41M | -17.29M | -15.84M | -5.73M | 1.45M |
| Efficiency Ratio | 24.21% | 22.12% | -4.01% | -8.03% | -47.96% | -7.38% | 7.33% |
| Operating Income | 136.74M | 258.09M | 218M | 232.53M | 48.88M | 83.33M | 18.3M |
| Operating Margin % | 72.28% | 102.88% | 104.01% | 108.03% | 147.96% | 107.38% | 92.67% |
| Operating Income Growth % | - | 18.39% | -6.25% | 375.76% | -41.35% | 355.46% | - |
| Pretax Income | 73.96M | 122.09M | 218M | 232.53M | 48.88M | 83.33M | 18.3M |
| Pretax Margin % | 39.09% | 48.67% | 104.01% | 108.03% | 147.96% | 107.38% | 92.67% |
| Income Tax | 800K | 0 | 2.44M | 1.52M | 334K | 80K | 0 |
| Effective Tax Rate % | 1.08% | 0% | 1.12% | 0.65% | 0.68% | 0.1% | 0% |
| Net Income | 73.16M | 122.09M | 215.56M | 231.01M | 48.54M | 83.25M | 18.3M |
| Net Margin % | 38.67% | 48.67% | 102.85% | 107.33% | 146.95% | 107.28% | 92.67% |
| Net Income Growth % | -49.55% | -43.36% | -6.69% | 375.91% | -41.69% | 355.02% | - |
| Net Income (Continuing) | 73.16M | 122.09M | 215.56M | 231.01M | 48.54M | 83.25M | 18.3M |
| EPS (Diluted) | 0.87 | 1.40 | 2.43 | 2.62 | 0.55 | 0.94 | 0.21 |
| EPS Growth % | -97.13% | -42.39% | -7.25% | 376.36% | -41.49% | 347.62% | - |
| EPS (Basic) | - | 1.40 | 2.43 | 2.62 | 0.55 | 0.94 | 0.21 |
| Diluted Shares Outstanding | 84.03M | 87.27M | 89.26M | 88.28M | 88.28M | 88.28M | 88.28M |
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying MSDL stock.
For fiscal year 2025, Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund (MSDL) reported total revenue of $250.9M. This represents a 1170.6% increase compared to $19.7M in 2020.
Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund (MSDL) is profitable, generating $122.1M in net income for the fiscal year ending 2025 with a net profit margin of 48.7%.
Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund (MSDL) reported an operating income of $258.1M, resulting in an operating profit margin of 102.9%. This margin reflects the operational efficiency of the business before interest and taxes.
Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund (MSDL) generated $313.6M in gross profit for the year, representing a gross profit margin of 125.0%. This demonstrates the company's core pricing power and production efficiency.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
NIM compression and earnings volatility
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
NII Decline Driven by Rate Cycle Turn
Net interest income has contracted for six consecutive quarters, falling from $74.1M in 2024Q3 to $50.6M in 2026Q2, a 31.7% decline that suggests the floating-rate portfolio is repricing lower as benchmark rates fall.
The persistent NII erosion indicates that the portfolio's asset yields are declining faster than funding costs, compressing the spread. This trajectory implies that the benefit from the prior rate-hiking cycle has fully rolled off, and the fund is now exposed to the downside of a rate-cutting environment. The acceleration of the decline in recent quarters, with NII growth turning sharply negative, warrants close monitoring of the portfolio's weighted average yield and the timing of loan repricings.
NIM Compression Signals Spread Pressure
The net interest margin has compressed from 2.1% in 2024Q1 to 1.4% in 2026Q2, a 70 basis point decline that appears to reflect both lower asset yields and a potential lag in reducing funding costs.
This NIM trajectory is a critical indicator of the fund's core profitability under pressure. The compression suggests that the spread between what MSDL earns on its loan portfolio and what it pays on its own liabilities is narrowing, which is a typical headwind in a falling rate environment for floating-rate lenders. Investors should compare this NIM trend to peers like ARCC and GBDC to assess whether MSDL's compression is more severe, which could indicate specific portfolio or funding structure vulnerabilities.
Provision Volatility Signals Credit Stress
The fund recorded a $15.4M provision expense in 2026Q1 after multiple quarters of zero provisions, a sudden shift that may indicate emerging credit deterioration within the portfolio.
The reappearance of significant provision expense after a long period of clean credit performance is a material change in the fund's risk profile. This pattern suggests that management is now recognizing potential losses in specific credits, which could be an early signal of broader stress in the middle-market loan portfolio. The timing coincides with the earnings miss and NII decline, creating a compounding negative effect on net income that investors should scrutinize for further deterioration.
Non-Interest Income Volatility Undermines Earnings
Non-interest income has been consistently negative, ranging from -$2.7M to -$33.7M over the past ten quarters, indicating persistent unrealized losses that are eroding the fund's reported earnings.
The sustained negative non-interest income line is a significant drag on total revenue and suggests the fund is experiencing mark-to-market losses on its investment portfolio. This volatility is particularly concerning because it appears to be driven by Level 3 asset valuations, which are based on internal models rather than observable market prices. The pattern implies that the reported net income figures may not fully reflect the underlying economic reality of the portfolio's performance.
2026Q1 Marks a Negative Inflection Point
The first quarter of 2026 represents a clear negative inflection, with the fund posting a net loss of $4.5M versus a $51.7M profit in 2024Q1, driven by the simultaneous impact of NII decline, negative non-interest income, and new provision expenses.
This quarter appears to be the culmination of multiple negative trends converging at once. The combination of shrinking net interest income, persistent unrealized losses, and the return of credit costs created a perfect storm that overwhelmed the fund's earnings power. This inflection point suggests the business model is now operating in a fundamentally different and more challenging environment than during the rate-hiking cycle, and the path to recovery may be longer than initially anticipated.
Earnings Quality Masked by Valuation Assumptions
The significant gap between gross margin (125.0%) and net margin (48.7%) in 2026Q2 suggests that reported earnings may be inflated by favorable valuation assumptions that do not reflect actual cash flows.
This margin discrepancy warrants investigation because it implies that a substantial portion of the fund's reported profitability is derived from non-cash items or mark-to-market adjustments. In a portfolio of Level 3 assets, such gaps can indicate that management's fair value estimates are more optimistic than what would be realized in an actual sale. The earnings miss despite this favorable margin structure suggests that the underlying cash generation may be weaker than the headline numbers indicate, and investors should focus on cash net investment income as a more reliable metric.