VCP Scanner
Stock Screener
Filter stocks with fundamental & technical criteria
Market Themes
Curated industry baskets & thematic leaders
Earnings Hub
Calendar, EPS surprise stats & earnings transcripts
Market News
Real-time market intelligence & AI overviews
Insider Buying
SEC Form 4 corporate insider purchases
MinerviniVCP SetupsTrend Template
O'NeilCup with HandleFlat BaseDouble BottomCANSLIM Leaders
QullamaggieHigh Tight FlagsFlag BreakoutsEpisodic PivotsMomentum Leaders
KellWedge PopEMA Crossback
LivermorePivotal Points
PatternsFalling Wedge & ChannelBase Breakouts
View All Playbooks...
BreakoutsScanner
FAANG & Tech
AAPL vs MSFTNVDA vs AMDGOOGL vs META
Cloud & Cyber
CRM vs NOWCRWD vs PANWSNOW vs DDOG
Consumer & Auto
TSLA vs FAMZN vs WMTNFLX vs DIS
Finance & Crypto
JPM vs BACV vs MACOIN vs MSTR
Index & ETFs
SPY vs QQQVTI vs VOOSPY vs IWM
Compare Any Stocks...
DCF ValuationCalculate intrinsic value of US stocks
Market ValuationBuffett indicator, CAPE & macro gauges
Total ReturnSee dividends + price return history
DCA CalculatorSimulate recurring buys & compounding
VisualizeInteractive multi-year financial charts
Watchlist
BreakoutsScanner
WatchlistPricing
Ctrl K
Pricing
MSDL
← Back to Screener
VCP ScannerFree US Stock Screener & Financial Analysis

Find stocks. Analyze deeply. Research with clarity.

Data updated daily

Product

  • Screener
  • Scanner
  • Themes
  • Valuation
  • Total Return
  • DCA Calculator
  • Pricing
  • News
  • Earnings

Resources

  • Market Valuation
  • Compare
  • Insider Activity
  • Methodology
  • How It Works
  • Glossary
  • Learn

Get Ideas

Get weekly market insights — free

© 2026 VCP Scanner
AboutPrivacyTermsRefund Policy
Not financial advice. Do your own research.
ScreenerBreakoutsScannerWatchlist
MSDLMorgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund
$13.62$1.2B
Overview & Tools
OverviewChart Terminal ↗Visualize
Valuation & Forecasts
Valuation ModelsEstimatesDCF Model
Price & Analyst Data
Analyst TargetsPrice History
Financial Statements
Income StatementBalance SheetCash FlowRatios & Margins
Performance
P/E HistoryRevenue HistoryEarnings HistoryDividend HistoryTotal Return
Discovery & Screens
Live BreakoutsStock ScreenerOwnership
HomeStocksMSDLFinancials

Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund (MSDL) Income Statement

6Y historyFree accessUpdated daily

Net interest income has declined for six consecutive quarters to $50.6M in 2026Q2, while the net interest margin has compressed to 1.4%, indicating significant spread pressure from the rate cycle turn.

Income StatementBalance SheetCash FlowRatios

MSDL Income Statement

Annual statement

MSDL Income Statement

Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund (MSDL) annual income statement — 6-year revenue, gross profit & net income history

AnnualQuarterly
MetricTTMDec'25Dec'24Dec'23Dec'22Dec'21Dec'20
Net Interest Income163.35M235.68M284.2M246.92M157.56M88.28M16.55M
NII Growth %-149.32%-17.07%15.1%56.71%78.47%433.34%-
Net Interest Margin %4.55%6.01%7.26%7.47%5.28%3.54%2.52%
Interest Income335.56M371.81M407.13M359.81M224.75M109.3M20.28M
Interest Expense129.21M136.13M122.93M112.88M67.18M21.02M3.73M
Loan Loss Provision-34.3M-62.71M00000
Non-Interest Income25.85M15.18M-74.61M-31.68M-124.53M-10.68M3.19M
Non-Interest Income %13.66%6.05%-35.6%-14.72%-376.97%-13.76%16.16%
Total Net Revenue189.2M250.86M209.59M215.25M33.03M77.61M19.74M
Revenue Growth %25.13%19.69%-2.63%551.59%-57.43%293.06%-
Non-Interest Expense45.8M55.48M-8.41M-17.29M-15.84M-5.73M1.45M
Efficiency Ratio24.21%22.12%-4.01%-8.03%-47.96%-7.38%7.33%
Operating Income136.74M258.09M218M232.53M48.88M83.33M18.3M
Operating Margin %72.28%102.88%104.01%108.03%147.96%107.38%92.67%
Operating Income Growth %-18.39%-6.25%375.76%-41.35%355.46%-
Pretax Income73.96M122.09M218M232.53M48.88M83.33M18.3M
Pretax Margin %39.09%48.67%104.01%108.03%147.96%107.38%92.67%
Income Tax800K02.44M1.52M334K80K0
Effective Tax Rate %1.08%0%1.12%0.65%0.68%0.1%0%
Net Income73.16M122.09M215.56M231.01M48.54M83.25M18.3M
Net Margin %38.67%48.67%102.85%107.33%146.95%107.28%92.67%
Net Income Growth %-49.55%-43.36%-6.69%375.91%-41.69%355.02%-
Net Income (Continuing)73.16M122.09M215.56M231.01M48.54M83.25M18.3M
EPS (Diluted)0.871.402.432.620.550.940.21
EPS Growth %-97.13%-42.39%-7.25%376.36%-41.49%347.62%-
EPS (Basic)-1.402.432.620.550.940.21
Diluted Shares Outstanding84.03M87.27M89.26M88.28M88.28M88.28M88.28M

Key Metrics

Growth RegimeDecelerating
ProfitabilityStrained
Balance SheetAdequate
Cash FlowMixed
Top Statement Risk

NIM compression and earnings volatility

Verified Source

Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.

SEC 10-K (2026Q2)

NII Decline Driven by Rate Cycle Turn

Net interest income has contracted for six consecutive quarters, falling from $74.1M in 2024Q3 to $50.6M in 2026Q2, a 31.7% decline that suggests the floating-rate portfolio is repricing lower as benchmark rates fall.

The persistent NII erosion indicates that the portfolio's asset yields are declining faster than funding costs, compressing the spread. This trajectory implies that the benefit from the prior rate-hiking cycle has fully rolled off, and the fund is now exposed to the downside of a rate-cutting environment. The acceleration of the decline in recent quarters, with NII growth turning sharply negative, warrants close monitoring of the portfolio's weighted average yield and the timing of loan repricings.

NIM Compression Signals Spread Pressure

The net interest margin has compressed from 2.1% in 2024Q1 to 1.4% in 2026Q2, a 70 basis point decline that appears to reflect both lower asset yields and a potential lag in reducing funding costs.

This NIM trajectory is a critical indicator of the fund's core profitability under pressure. The compression suggests that the spread between what MSDL earns on its loan portfolio and what it pays on its own liabilities is narrowing, which is a typical headwind in a falling rate environment for floating-rate lenders. Investors should compare this NIM trend to peers like ARCC and GBDC to assess whether MSDL's compression is more severe, which could indicate specific portfolio or funding structure vulnerabilities.

Provision Volatility Signals Credit Stress

The fund recorded a $15.4M provision expense in 2026Q1 after multiple quarters of zero provisions, a sudden shift that may indicate emerging credit deterioration within the portfolio.

The reappearance of significant provision expense after a long period of clean credit performance is a material change in the fund's risk profile. This pattern suggests that management is now recognizing potential losses in specific credits, which could be an early signal of broader stress in the middle-market loan portfolio. The timing coincides with the earnings miss and NII decline, creating a compounding negative effect on net income that investors should scrutinize for further deterioration.

Non-Interest Income Volatility Undermines Earnings

Non-interest income has been consistently negative, ranging from -$2.7M to -$33.7M over the past ten quarters, indicating persistent unrealized losses that are eroding the fund's reported earnings.

The sustained negative non-interest income line is a significant drag on total revenue and suggests the fund is experiencing mark-to-market losses on its investment portfolio. This volatility is particularly concerning because it appears to be driven by Level 3 asset valuations, which are based on internal models rather than observable market prices. The pattern implies that the reported net income figures may not fully reflect the underlying economic reality of the portfolio's performance.

2026Q1 Marks a Negative Inflection Point

The first quarter of 2026 represents a clear negative inflection, with the fund posting a net loss of $4.5M versus a $51.7M profit in 2024Q1, driven by the simultaneous impact of NII decline, negative non-interest income, and new provision expenses.

This quarter appears to be the culmination of multiple negative trends converging at once. The combination of shrinking net interest income, persistent unrealized losses, and the return of credit costs created a perfect storm that overwhelmed the fund's earnings power. This inflection point suggests the business model is now operating in a fundamentally different and more challenging environment than during the rate-hiking cycle, and the path to recovery may be longer than initially anticipated.

Earnings Quality Masked by Valuation Assumptions

The significant gap between gross margin (125.0%) and net margin (48.7%) in 2026Q2 suggests that reported earnings may be inflated by favorable valuation assumptions that do not reflect actual cash flows.

This margin discrepancy warrants investigation because it implies that a substantial portion of the fund's reported profitability is derived from non-cash items or mark-to-market adjustments. In a portfolio of Level 3 assets, such gaps can indicate that management's fair value estimates are more optimistic than what would be realized in an actual sale. The earnings miss despite this favorable margin structure suggests that the underlying cash generation may be weaker than the headline numbers indicate, and investors should focus on cash net investment income as a more reliable metric.

MSDL — Frequently Asked Questions

Quick answers to the most common questions about buying MSDL stock.

What was Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund's (MSDL) revenue in 2025?

For fiscal year 2025, Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund (MSDL) reported total revenue of $250.9M. This represents a 1170.6% increase compared to $19.7M in 2020.

Is Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund (MSDL) profitable?

Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund (MSDL) is profitable, generating $122.1M in net income for the fiscal year ending 2025 with a net profit margin of 48.7%.

What is Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund's operating profit margin?

Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund (MSDL) reported an operating income of $258.1M, resulting in an operating profit margin of 102.9%. This margin reflects the operational efficiency of the business before interest and taxes.

What is Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund's gross profit and gross margin?

Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund (MSDL) generated $313.6M in gross profit for the year, representing a gross profit margin of 125.0%. This demonstrates the company's core pricing power and production efficiency.