Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 36.1x · EV/EBITDA 25.1x · ROE 103.9%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $76.4B | $64.4B | $78.9B | $53.9B | $44.3B | $47.2B | $29.6B | $28.3B | $19.8B | $14.7B | $14.3B |
| Enterprise Value | $85.0B | $73.0B | $83.4B | $58.7B | $49.5B | $51.4B | $34.1B | $33.0B | $23.8B | $18.0B | $17.7B |
| P/E Ratio → | 36.08 | 30.04 | 50.08 | 31.53 | 32.50 | 37.89 | 31.20 | 32.62 | 20.47 | — | 25.58 |
| P/S Ratio | 6.54 | 5.52 | 7.30 | 5.40 | 4.86 | 5.77 | 3.99 | 3.59 | 2.69 | 2.31 | 2.38 |
| P/B Ratio | 31.89 | 26.55 | 45.93 | 72.91 | 338.17 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | 29.72 | 25.05 | 37.00 | 30.09 | 28.27 | 29.59 | 21.21 | 17.97 | 22.54 | 13.15 | 16.05 |
| P/OCF | 26.94 | 22.71 | 33.02 | 26.36 | 24.30 | 25.68 | 18.36 | 15.52 | 18.41 | 10.93 | 12.32 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 6.25 | 7.71 | 5.89 | 5.44 | 6.29 | 4.59 | 4.19 | 3.25 | 2.82 | 2.93 |
| EV / EBITDA | 25.11 | 21.57 | 27.58 | 22.16 | 23.57 | 24.43 | 19.00 | 16.73 | 14.77 | 11.05 | 13.19 |
| EV / EBIT | 28.97 | 23.76 | 36.79 | 24.52 | 28.22 | 29.10 | 24.21 | 26.69 | 17.77 | 13.93 | 16.57 |
| EV / FCF | — | 28.40 | 39.08 | 32.79 | 31.61 | 32.26 | 24.40 | 20.98 | 27.16 | 16.07 | 19.81 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 50.2% | 50.2% | 51.0% | 49.8% | 46.4% | 49.4% | 48.7% | 49.8% | 47.4% | 47.4% | 47.5% |
| Operating Margin | 25.1% | 25.1% | 24.8% | 23.0% | 18.2% | 20.4% | 18.7% | 20.0% | 17.1% | 20.1% | 17.4% |
| Net Profit Margin | 18.4% | 18.4% | 14.6% | 17.1% | 15.0% | 15.2% | 12.8% | 11.0% | 13.2% | -2.4% | 9.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 103.9% | 103.9% | 128.3% | 392.9% | 2524.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ROA | 12.7% | 12.7% | 11.3% | 13.1% | 10.9% | 10.8% | 8.8% | 8.7% | 11.0% | -1.9% | 6.7% |
| ROIC | 25.6% | 25.6% | 34.3% | 31.5% | 26.0% | 30.7% | 26.0% | 34.6% | 43.4% | 48.7% | 33.2% |
| ROCE | 25.7% | 25.7% | 31.4% | 28.9% | 20.3% | 21.5% | 19.0% | 23.4% | 21.7% | 23.2% | 17.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 4.02 | 4.02 | 3.81 | 8.86 | 50.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.88 | 2.88 | 2.17 | 2.47 | 3.12 | 2.91 | 3.18 | 2.91 | 3.29 | 2.75 | 3.27 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 3.54 | 2.59 | 6.56 | 39.89 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.54 | 2.54 | 1.47 | 1.83 | 2.49 | 2.02 | 2.48 | 2.40 | 2.52 | 2.01 | 2.51 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 3.34 | 2.08 | 2.71 | 3.34 | 2.67 | 3.19 | 3.01 | 4.63 | 2.92 | 3.77 |
| Interest Coverage | 8.42 | 8.42 | 7.68 | 9.62 | 7.31 | 8.22 | 6.04 | 5.22 | 5.59 | 6.00 | 4.75 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.04 | 1.04 | 1.28 | 1.00 | 1.15 | 1.33 | 1.24 | 1.21 | 1.38 | 1.35 | 1.30 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.87 | 0.87 | 1.13 | 0.85 | 0.92 | 1.14 | 1.09 | 1.08 | 1.26 | 1.24 | 1.20 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.42 | 0.30 | 0.29 | 0.46 | 0.36 | 0.29 | 0.40 | 0.41 | 0.39 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.60 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.72 |
| Inventory Turnover | 5.92 | 5.92 | 6.93 | 6.06 | 4.63 | 5.24 | 7.49 | 8.85 | 10.85 | 10.26 | 11.61 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 117.92 | 107.37 | 102.86 | 99.82 | 111.27 | 114.36 | 113.75 | 114.58 | 118.54 | 114.01 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.9% | 1.1% | 0.8% | 1.1% | 1.2% | 1.0% | 1.5% | 1.3% | 1.7% | 2.1% | 2.0% |
| Payout Ratio | 33.8% | 33.8% | 41.5% | 34.5% | 38.9% | 38.7% | 45.9% | 43.7% | 34.9% | — | 50.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 2.8% | 3.3% | 2.0% | 3.2% | 3.1% | 2.6% | 3.2% | 3.1% | 4.9% | — | 3.9% |
| FCF Yield | 3.4% | 4.0% | 2.7% | 3.3% | 3.5% | 3.4% | 4.7% | 5.6% | 4.4% | 7.6% | 6.2% |
| Buyback Yield | 1.5% | 1.8% | 0.3% | 1.5% | 1.9% | 1.1% | 2.1% | 1.1% | 0.7% | 3.3% | 5.9% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 2.5% | 2.9% | 1.1% | 2.6% | 3.1% | 2.1% | 3.5% | 2.5% | 2.4% | 5.4% | 7.8% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $168M | $171M | $172M | $172M | $174M | $174M | $176M | $172M | $163M | $173M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying MSI stock.
Motorola Solutions, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 36.1x. The historical average is 24.4x. This places it at the 87th percentile of its historical range.
Motorola Solutions, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 25.1x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 19.1x.
Motorola Solutions, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 103.9%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 34.9%.
Based on historical data, Motorola Solutions, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 36.1x. This is at the 87th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Motorola Solutions, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 0.94% with a payout ratio of 33.8%.
Motorola Solutions, Inc. has 50.2% gross margin and 25.1% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Motorola Solutions, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.9x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
High leverage and goodwill
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Expansion Masks Underlying Mix
Gross margin reached 53.6% in 2026Q2, up 250 bps year-over-year, per the latest financials, while operating margin held at 25.8%, suggesting pricing power and mix benefits are driving profitability.
The sequential improvement in gross margin from 47.4% in 2026Q1 to 53.6% in 2026Q2, as reported in the quarterly data, indicates a favorable product mix shift, likely toward higher-margin software and services. However, operating margin expansion has been more modest, with 2026Q2 operating margin of 25.8% only slightly above the 25.0% reported in 2025Q2, implying that incremental gross margin gains are being partially offset by increased operating expenses, including R&D and SBC. Net margin of 17.8% in 2026Q2 remains robust, but investors should monitor whether the gross margin level is sustainable given competitive dynamics and potential mix normalization.
ROIC Trails ROE on Thin Equity Base
ROIC improved to 5.3% in 2026Q2 from 4.0% in 2026Q1, per the ratio data, yet remains well below ROE of 21.2%, reflecting the company's high financial leverage and acquisition-driven asset base.
The wide gap between ROE and ROIC—21.2% versus 5.3% in 2026Q2—underscores that reported equity returns are amplified by a debt-heavy capital structure, with D/E at 3.58. ROIC has been volatile, ranging from 4.0% to 9.6% over the past ten quarters, and the recent level suggests that organic capital deployment is generating modest returns relative to the cost of capital. The goodwill-heavy balance sheet, with goodwill at $6.9B representing 36% of total assets, may be depressing ROIC, as acquisition premiums are not yet generating proportional operating income. Investors should assess whether ROIC can sustainably improve through operational efficiencies or if the current level reflects structural challenges in integrating acquisitions.
Working Capital Drag Intensifies
Cash conversion cycle lengthened to 103 days in 2026Q2 from 91 days in 2025Q2, per the ratio data, driven by a sharp rise in DSO to 89 days, indicating slower collections and potential customer payment strain.
The increase in DSO from 104 days in 2025Q1 to 126 days in 2026Q1, before settling at 89 days in 2026Q2, suggests significant volatility in receivables collection, possibly due to large contract timing or customer mix. Meanwhile, DPO has remained relatively stable around 65-80 days, indicating that MSI is not stretching supplier payments to offset the receivables drag. The resulting CCC of 103 days in 2026Q2 is elevated compared to the 78-day level in 2024Q4, implying that working capital is absorbing more cash, which may pressure free cash flow if not reversed. Asset turnover of 0.16 in 2026Q2 is low, consistent with a capital-intensive, acquisition-heavy model, but the efficiency of working capital management appears to be deteriorating.
Leverage Eases but Debt Burden Persists
Debt-to-equity fell to 3.58 in 2026Q2 from 12.80 in 2024Q1, per the ratio data, yet D/EBITDA remains elevated at 10.05, indicating that absolute debt levels are still high relative to cash flow.
The dramatic reduction in D/E from 12.80 to 3.58 over ten quarters reflects both equity growth and debt repayment, but the absolute debt of $9.6B remains substantial. Interest coverage improved to 7.81 in 2026Q2 from 4.97 in 2026Q1, suggesting that operating income is increasingly sufficient to cover interest expenses, though the coverage ratio is still below the 11.65 seen in 2024Q4. The D/EBITDA of 10.05 is high, indicating that debt is roughly ten times annual EBITDA, which may constrain financial flexibility and increase refinancing risk, especially if interest rates remain elevated. Investors should monitor the trajectory of debt reduction and the company's ability to generate excess cash flow to service this leverage.
Liquidity Buffer Thins Rapidly
Current ratio fell to 1.10 in 2026Q2 from 1.73 in 2025Q2, per the ratio data, while cash dropped to $710M from $3.2B, indicating a significantly reduced short-term liquidity cushion.
The quick ratio of 0.86 in 2026Q2, down from 1.54 in 2025Q2, suggests that excluding inventory, current assets barely cover current liabilities, which could be a concern if cash flows were to deteriorate. The decline in cash reserves from $3.2B to $710M over the same period, as noted in the balance sheet analysis, indicates that the company has been deploying cash toward acquisitions, dividends, and buybacks, potentially at the expense of liquidity. While the current ratio remains above 1.0, the thin margin of safety suggests that MSI may have limited ability to absorb unexpected working capital needs or economic shocks without accessing capital markets. This warrants close monitoring, especially given the high debt load.
P/E Misleads on Leveraged Returns
The P/E of 36.21, per current valuation data, is commonly misapplied to MSI because it fails to account for the company's high leverage and goodwill, which inflate ROE and distort earnings-based multiples.
For a company with a D/E of 3.58 and goodwill representing 36% of total assets, the P/E ratio can be misleading because it reflects earnings that are amplified by financial leverage and potentially subject to impairment charges. A more appropriate metric is EV/EBITDA, which at 25.19 is still elevated but provides a clearer picture of the company's operating value relative to its debt-inclusive enterprise value. Additionally, investors should consider the impact of stock-based compensation, which surged to $204 million in 2026Q2, as it reduces economic earnings and may not be fully captured in reported net income. Using a P/E that ignores these factors could overstate the attractiveness of the stock, especially given the forward P/E of 26.42 implies significant growth expectations that may already be priced in.