Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 17.5x · EV/EBITDA 9.5x · ROE 5.8%. (1997–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $54.7B | $34.9B | $18.3B | $24.0B | $24.0B | $35.3B | $26.1B | $17.8B | $21.1B | $33.1B | $20.9B |
| Enterprise Value | $62.7B | $42.8B | $23.5B | $27.0B | $26.3B | $39.5B | $33.7B | $27.4B | $31.2B | $43.2B | $32.0B |
| P/E Ratio → | 17.50 | 11.09 | 13.69 | 26.05 | 2.58 | 1.72 | — | — | 4.10 | 7.24 | 11.77 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.89 | 0.57 | 0.29 | 0.35 | 0.30 | 0.46 | 0.49 | 0.25 | 0.28 | 0.48 | 0.37 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.97 | 0.62 | 0.36 | 0.43 | 0.43 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.44 | 0.48 | 0.81 | 0.65 |
| P/FCF | 116.22 | 74.11 | 40.93 | 7.91 | 3.56 | 5.11 | 15.89 | 7.27 | 23.69 | 18.97 | 79.22 |
| P/OCF | 11.38 | 7.26 | 3.77 | 3.14 | 2.35 | 3.56 | 6.40 | 2.95 | 5.03 | 7.25 | 7.72 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.70 | 0.38 | 0.40 | 0.33 | 0.52 | 0.63 | 0.39 | 0.41 | 0.63 | 0.56 |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.53 | 6.52 | 3.95 | 5.65 | 2.05 | 2.02 | 6.65 | 11.21 | 3.34 | 5.27 | 4.65 |
| EV / EBIT | 17.27 | 14.47 | 6.85 | 8.60 | 2.26 | 2.37 | 14.66 | 30.57 | 5.51 | 7.34 | 8.22 |
| EV / FCF | — | 90.96 | 52.48 | 8.90 | 3.91 | 5.72 | 20.51 | 11.19 | 35.05 | 24.79 | 121.11 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 9.6% | 9.6% | 9.3% | 8.5% | 17.5% | 24.9% | 8.7% | 5.2% | 11.8% | 11.4% | 11.2% |
| Operating Margin | 5.9% | 5.9% | 5.3% | 3.4% | 12.9% | 22.2% | 4.0% | -0.9% | 8.6% | 7.9% | 7.3% |
| Net Profit Margin | 5.1% | 5.1% | 2.1% | 1.3% | 11.7% | 19.5% | -1.4% | -3.5% | 6.8% | 6.7% | 3.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 5.8% | 5.8% | 2.5% | 1.6% | 17.4% | 33.0% | -1.8% | -5.8% | 12.1% | 12.5% | 5.9% |
| ROA | 3.4% | 3.4% | 1.5% | 1.0% | 10.1% | 17.3% | -0.9% | -2.7% | 5.8% | 5.7% | 2.3% |
| ROIC | 4.5% | 4.5% | 4.3% | 3.0% | 13.6% | 24.8% | 3.3% | -0.9% | 9.3% | 8.6% | 7.2% |
| ROCE | 5.1% | 5.1% | 4.7% | 3.2% | 14.8% | 27.0% | 3.3% | -0.9% | 9.9% | 9.0% | 7.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.23 | 0.19 | 0.21 | 0.16 | 0.33 | 0.35 | 0.28 | 0.32 | 0.42 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.04 | 2.04 | 1.95 | 2.23 | 0.91 | 0.43 | 2.60 | 5.88 | 1.34 | 1.58 | 1.99 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.14 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.19 | 0.24 | 0.23 | 0.25 | 0.34 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.21 | 1.21 | 0.87 | 0.63 | 0.18 | 0.21 | 1.50 | 3.93 | 1.08 | 1.24 | 1.61 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 16.85 | 11.55 | 0.99 | 0.35 | 0.61 | 4.62 | 3.92 | 11.37 | 5.82 | 41.89 |
| Interest Coverage | 9.97 | 9.97 | 6.72 | 4.39 | 29.06 | 46.57 | 4.82 | 1.29 | 8.25 | 6.70 | 3.32 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.36 | 1.36 | 1.35 | 1.53 | 1.66 | 1.45 | 1.23 | 1.34 | 1.38 | 1.25 | 1.23 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.53 | 0.53 | 0.59 | 0.67 | 0.76 | 0.62 | 0.69 | 0.53 | 0.50 | 0.41 | 0.41 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.29 | 0.35 | 0.42 | 0.17 | 0.26 | 0.23 | 0.10 | 0.13 | 0.14 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.63 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.84 | 0.85 | 0.65 | 0.80 | 0.83 | 0.81 | 0.76 |
| Inventory Turnover | 2.98 | 2.98 | 3.43 | 3.33 | 3.28 | 2.90 | 3.94 | 3.87 | 3.23 | 3.38 | 3.42 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 20.68 | 33.06 | 27.78 | 28.41 | 33.77 | 28.71 | 27.15 | 26.05 | 24.81 | 22.89 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.8% | 1.2% | 2.1% | 1.5% | 1.4% | 0.9% | 0.7% | 1.1% | 1.0% | 0.4% | 0.3% |
| Payout Ratio | 13.4% | 13.4% | 29.4% | 40.2% | 3.6% | 2.1% | — | — | 4.3% | 3.1% | 3.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 5.7% | 9.0% | 7.3% | 3.8% | 38.8% | 58.1% | — | — | 24.4% | 13.8% | 8.5% |
| FCF Yield | 0.9% | 1.3% | 2.4% | 12.6% | 28.1% | 19.6% | 6.3% | 13.8% | 4.2% | 5.3% | 1.3% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.5% | 0.8% | 7.1% | 5.0% | 12.3% | 14.7% | 1.9% | 0.5% | 1.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 1.2% | 2.0% | 9.3% | 6.6% | 13.6% | 15.5% | 2.6% | 1.6% | 2.1% | 0.4% | 0.3% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $766M | $791M | $845M | $914M | $1.1B | $1.1B | $1.0B | $1.0B | $1.0B | $955M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 29 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying MT stock.
ArcelorMittal S.A.'s current P/E ratio is 17.5x. The historical average is 11.4x. This places it at the 76th percentile of its historical range.
ArcelorMittal S.A.'s current EV/EBITDA is 9.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 7.2x.
ArcelorMittal S.A.'s return on equity (ROE) is 5.8%. The historical average is 11.2%.
Based on historical data, ArcelorMittal S.A. is trading at a P/E of 17.5x. This is at the 76th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
ArcelorMittal S.A.'s current dividend yield is 0.76% with a payout ratio of 13.4%.
ArcelorMittal S.A. has 9.6% gross margin and 5.9% operating margin.
ArcelorMittal S.A.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.0x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
European energy and carbon costs
Margin Compression Signals Pricing Weakness
Gross margin fell to 6.3% in 2026Q2 from 10.5% in 2024Q1, per reported figures, indicating that cost inflation and softer steel spreads are eroding profitability despite vertical integration.
The 6.3% gross margin in 2026Q2 is the lowest in the observed period, down from a peak of 10.5% in 2024Q1, suggesting that the company's cost advantages from captive iron ore are insufficient to offset weaker steel pricing and elevated energy costs. Operating margin followed a similar trajectory, compressing to 6.3% from 12.1% in 2025Q2, which underscores the high fixed-cost nature of integrated steelmaking and the rapid deleveraging of operating leverage when volumes soften. The net margin of 4.1% in 2026Q2 appears flattered by a tax benefit, as noted in prior analysis, so investors should focus on pre-tax operating profitability to gauge true earning power.
Return on Capital Remains Cyclically Depressed
ROIC averaged only 1.1% over the last ten quarters, per financial statements, with 2026Q2 at 1.2%, indicating that returns are far below the cost of capital and have not recovered from cyclical lows.
ROIC has been consistently below 2.5% for the past ten quarters, with the peak at 2.3% in 2025Q2, which suggests that the company is not generating economic profits in the current environment. The low returns are driven by both compressed margins and a heavy asset base, as asset turnover has remained flat at 0.16-0.18, indicating that efficiency gains have not offset margin declines. ROE has also been weak, averaging around 1.0% over the period, and while the balance sheet is conservatively leveraged, the returns do not yet justify the capital employed, implying that the market's forward P/E of 14.97 may be pricing in a cyclical recovery that has not materialized.
Working Capital Efficiency Deteriorates
Cash conversion cycle lengthened to 60 days in 2026Q2 from 61 days in 2024Q1, per reported data, as DIO rose to 110 days, indicating slower inventory turnover and potential demand weakness.
The cash conversion cycle has remained elevated, hovering around 60-70 days, with inventory days on hand increasing from 116 days in 2024Q1 to 110 days in 2026Q2, though the latest quarter shows a slight improvement from 127 days in 2025Q4. DSO has improved modestly to 23 days from 27 days, but DPO has declined to 73 days from 82 days, suggesting that the company is paying suppliers faster while collecting receivables slower, which may strain liquidity. The high DIO reflects the difficulty of managing inventory in a softening demand environment, and the negative FCF margins in several quarters (e.g., -8.3% in 2026Q1) indicate that working capital swings are a major source of cash flow volatility.
Leverage Creeps Higher but Remains Manageable
Debt-to-equity rose to 0.25 in 2026Q2 from 0.18 in 2024Q1, per financial statements, while interest coverage fell to 2.49x, indicating reduced but still adequate debt service capacity.
The D/E ratio has increased steadily over the observed period, from 0.18 in 2024Q1 to 0.25 in 2026Q2, and total debt has risen by $4.2B, yet leverage remains conservative relative to peers like Cleveland-Cliffs (D/E 1.29). However, interest coverage has deteriorated sharply, falling from 19.59x in 2024Q1 to 2.49x in 2026Q2, which suggests that earnings before interest and taxes are barely covering interest expenses, a sign of reduced financial flexibility. The reported D/E may understate true leverage if it excludes environmental and pension liabilities, as noted in prior analysis, so investors should monitor the full debt picture, but the current level appears manageable given the company's cash flow generation.
Liquidity Buffer Thins as Cash Declines
Current ratio improved to 1.43 in 2026Q2 from 1.35 in 2024Q4, per reported figures, but cash fell from $6.4B to $4.9B, suggesting a tighter cushion against operational shocks.
The current ratio has remained above 1.3 throughout the period, but the quick ratio has consistently been below 0.6, indicating that the company relies heavily on inventory to meet short-term obligations, which could be problematic if inventory values decline. Cash balances have decreased by $1.5B over the period, and with negative free cash flow in several quarters, the liquidity position may be more strained than the current ratio suggests. The company continues to pay dividends and buy back shares even when FCF is negative, which could further erode the cash buffer, but the conservative debt levels provide some flexibility to access capital markets if needed.
Misapplied Metric: Debt-to-Equity
The reported D/E of 0.25 may mislead investors, as per financial statements, because it likely excludes environmental remediation and pension obligations, understating true leverage for a capital-intensive steelmaker.
Debt-to-equity is commonly used to assess financial risk, but for ArcelorMittal, this metric may not capture the full extent of its obligations, particularly the long-term environmental liabilities and pension deficits associated with its legacy European operations. A more appropriate measure would be net debt to EBITDA or enterprise value to EBITDA, which incorporate cash and operating earnings, and the EV/EBITDA of 9.57 suggests that the market is already pricing in some of these risks. Investors should also consider the off-balance-sheet commitments and the potential for carbon-related costs, which could increase future liabilities, making the reported D/E an incomplete indicator of financial health.