Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -112.6x · EV/EBITDA 7.1x · ROE -1.0%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.1B | $1.9B | $2.5B | $2.3B | $2.0B | $2.5B | $2.1B | $2.0B | $1.8B | $2.5B | $2.7B |
| Enterprise Value | $2.8B | $2.6B | $3.2B | $3.1B | $2.9B | $3.2B | $2.8B | $2.8B | $2.6B | $3.2B | $3.6B |
| P/E Ratio → | -112.59 | — | 14.74 | 27.64 | 16.28 | 15.05 | 18.88 | 15.25 | 10.81 | 12.56 | 20.38 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.99 | 0.92 | 1.16 | 1.07 | 0.94 | 1.33 | 1.33 | 1.13 | 1.01 | 1.46 | 1.66 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.19 | 1.09 | 1.38 | 1.38 | 1.23 | 1.57 | 1.42 | 1.41 | 1.32 | 1.92 | 2.64 |
| P/FCF | 23.79 | 22.10 | 16.76 | 16.59 | 85.11 | 16.89 | 12.91 | 11.67 | 14.48 | 18.72 | 16.71 |
| P/OCF | 10.63 | 9.88 | 10.41 | 9.95 | 18.84 | 10.64 | 8.83 | 8.49 | 9.04 | 11.81 | 12.08 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.27 | 1.49 | 1.42 | 1.35 | 1.75 | 1.73 | 1.54 | 1.46 | 1.91 | 2.21 |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.08 | 6.71 | 8.02 | 7.94 | 8.05 | 9.47 | 8.85 | 8.14 | 7.52 | 9.18 | 10.28 |
| EV / EBIT | 9.67 | 51.89 | 11.03 | 17.99 | 14.04 | 13.38 | 15.45 | 13.64 | 10.54 | 13.70 | 16.08 |
| EV / FCF | — | 30.38 | 21.46 | 21.94 | 122.40 | 22.19 | 16.72 | 15.95 | 20.88 | 24.51 | 22.21 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 24.4% | 24.4% | 25.3% | 22.8% | 21.3% | 23.5% | 24.8% | 24.1% | 25.0% | 27.4% | 27.6% |
| Operating Margin | 13.9% | 13.9% | 13.5% | 12.9% | 11.9% | 13.0% | 13.1% | 13.0% | 14.4% | 15.7% | 15.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | -0.9% | -0.9% | 7.9% | 3.9% | 5.7% | 8.8% | 7.0% | 7.4% | 9.3% | 11.6% | 8.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -1.0% | -1.0% | 9.6% | 5.1% | 7.7% | 10.7% | 7.7% | 9.4% | 12.7% | 16.9% | 13.6% |
| ROA | -0.5% | -0.5% | 5.0% | 2.5% | 3.6% | 5.0% | 3.6% | 4.3% | 5.6% | 6.7% | 4.6% |
| ROIC | 8.7% | 8.7% | 8.7% | 8.5% | 7.8% | 8.1% | 7.3% | 8.0% | 9.2% | 9.9% | 9.9% |
| ROCE | 9.7% | 9.7% | 9.7% | 9.7% | 8.6% | 8.2% | 7.4% | 8.6% | 9.7% | 10.1% | 9.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.57 | 0.63 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 1.05 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.67 | 2.67 | 2.61 | 2.75 | 3.15 | 3.14 | 3.20 | 2.90 | 2.90 | 2.77 | 3.08 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.41 | 0.39 | 0.44 | 0.54 | 0.49 | 0.42 | 0.52 | 0.58 | 0.59 | 0.87 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.83 | 1.83 | 1.76 | 1.93 | 2.45 | 2.26 | 2.02 | 2.18 | 2.30 | 2.17 | 2.54 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 8.28 | 4.71 | 5.34 | 37.29 | 5.30 | 3.81 | 4.28 | 6.40 | 5.79 | 5.50 |
| Interest Coverage | 0.85 | 0.85 | 4.59 | 2.71 | 4.31 | 5.98 | 4.44 | 4.46 | 5.45 | 5.40 | 4.13 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.08 | 2.08 | 2.84 | 2.40 | 2.13 | 2.45 | 3.49 | 2.31 | 2.29 | 2.75 | 2.54 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.45 | 1.45 | 1.98 | 1.69 | 1.44 | 1.74 | 2.66 | 1.67 | 1.67 | 2.04 | 1.91 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.85 | 0.70 | 0.50 | 0.73 | 1.26 | 0.61 | 0.56 | 0.69 | 0.64 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.60 | 0.62 | 0.65 | 0.62 | 0.55 | 0.50 | 0.58 | 0.59 | 0.56 | 0.57 |
| Inventory Turnover | 4.47 | 4.47 | 4.63 | 5.15 | 4.80 | 4.77 | 4.83 | 5.37 | 5.66 | 5.55 | 6.34 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 70.46 | 66.37 | 67.13 | 69.38 | 72.24 | 84.45 | 76.67 | 78.21 | 83.42 | 76.05 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.7% | 0.7% | 0.5% | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | 7.9% | 9.6% | 5.3% | 4.1% | 6.0% | 5.3% | 4.2% | 3.6% | 5.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | 6.8% | 3.6% | 6.1% | 6.6% | 5.3% | 6.6% | 9.3% | 8.0% | 4.9% |
| FCF Yield | 4.2% | 4.5% | 6.0% | 6.0% | 1.2% | 5.9% | 7.7% | 8.6% | 6.9% | 5.3% | 6.0% |
| Buyback Yield | 2.8% | 3.1% | 2.6% | 0.6% | 2.8% | 3.0% | 1.9% | 2.0% | 1.2% | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 3.5% | 3.8% | 3.1% | 1.0% | 3.1% | 3.3% | 2.2% | 2.4% | 1.6% | 0.3% | 0.4% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $31M | $32M | $33M | $33M | $34M | $34M | $35M | $36M | $36M | $35M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying MTX stock.
Minerals Technologies Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -112.6x. The historical average is 18.5x.
Minerals Technologies Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 7.1x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 8.1x.
Minerals Technologies Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -1.0%. The historical average is 8.5%.
Based on historical data, Minerals Technologies Inc. is trading at a P/E of -112.6x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Minerals Technologies Inc.'s current dividend yield is 0.68%.
Minerals Technologies Inc. has 24.4% gross margin and 13.9% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Minerals Technologies Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.7x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Impairment charges distorting earnings
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Impairment Distorts Underlying Margin Stability
According to quarterly financials, MTX's operating margin swung from 14.9% in 2025Q2 to -39.3% in 2026Q2, driven by a one-time impairment, while gross margin held near 24.4%.
Excluding the 2026Q2 impairment, operating margins have remained relatively stable in the 12-15% range over the past year, suggesting the underlying business is not deteriorating as sharply as the headline numbers imply. However, the persistent gross margin compression from 26.6% in 2024Q2 to 24.4% in 2026Q2 indicates ongoing pricing or input cost pressures that warrant monitoring. Net margin volatility, swinging from 8.6% to -33.5%, underscores the need to adjust for non-recurring items when assessing true earning power.
Return on Capital Compressed by Asset Write-Downs
Based on reported figures, MTX's ROIC fell to -49.7% in 2026Q2 from 2.5% in 2025Q3, reflecting the impairment charge, while pre-impairment ROIC remained modestly positive around 2%.
The sharp decline in ROIC is primarily a function of the non-cash impairment reducing net income, not a collapse in operational efficiency. Even before the impairment, ROIC has hovered in the 2-2.5% range over the past year, which is low relative to specialty chemical peers like Ecolab (12.7%) and Hawkins (12.3%). This suggests that MTX's capital base is generating subpar returns, possibly due to high goodwill and intangibles from past acquisitions, which may continue to weigh on future returns if not addressed.
Working Capital Cycle Lengthens Amid Slower Turnover
As reported in financial statements, MTX's cash conversion cycle extended from 98 days in 2024Q1 to 107 days in 2026Q1, driven by a rise in days sales outstanding from 68 to 71.
The lengthening CCC indicates that MTX is taking longer to convert sales into cash, which may reflect softer demand or less favorable payment terms from customers. Asset turnover has remained flat at 0.15-0.16, suggesting that the company is not generating additional sales from its asset base, a concern given its capital-intensive operations. The stable DPO around 44-46 days implies that MTX is not stretching supplier payments to offset the slower collection cycle, which could pressure liquidity if the trend persists.
Leverage Elevated but Interest Coverage Remains Manageable
According to SEC filings, MTX's D/EBITDA rose to 10.46 in 2026Q1 from 9.28 in 2024Q3, while interest coverage dropped to 4.23 from 5.25, reflecting lower EBITDA due to the impairment.
The D/EBITDA ratio is distorted by the impairment's impact on trailing EBITDA, but even excluding that, leverage appears elevated relative to peers like Innospec (0.04 D/E) and Balchem (0.15 D/E). Interest coverage of 4.23 in 2026Q1, while lower than prior quarters, still provides a reasonable cushion for debt service, though investors should monitor whether EBITDA recovers to pre-impairment levels. The stable D/E ratio around 0.55-0.60 suggests the company is not taking on additional debt, but the high D/EBITDA warrants caution if earnings remain depressed.
Liquidity Buffer Strengthens Despite Earnings Volatility
Based on quarterly financials, MTX's current ratio improved to 2.13 in 2026Q1 from 1.89 a year earlier, with quick ratio at 1.47, indicating a solid short-term liquidity position.
The improvement in the current ratio is partly due to a reduction in current liabilities or an increase in current assets, providing a comfortable cushion against operational shocks. The quick ratio of 1.47 suggests that even without selling inventory, MTX can cover its short-term obligations, which is reassuring given the earnings volatility. However, the reliance on inventory (DIO of 81 days) means that if demand weakens further, inventory liquidation could pressure liquidity, though the current buffer appears adequate for now.
EV/EBITDA Misleading Amid Impairment Distortions
The most commonly misapplied ratio for MTX is EV/EBITDA, which at 7.60 appears cheap but is distorted by the 2026Q2 impairment that depressed trailing EBITDA, making the multiple artificially low.
Investors may be tempted to view MTX's EV/EBITDA as a value signal, but the impairment charge has reduced EBITDA, inflating the multiple's attractiveness. A more appropriate metric would be EV/EBIT or EV/EBITDA adjusted for non-recurring items, which would provide a clearer picture of the company's ongoing earnings power. Additionally, given the capital-intensive nature of the business and the importance of working capital, EV/FCF may be a more reliable valuation metric, though FCF has also been volatile. Investors should adjust for the impairment to avoid misinterpreting the company's true valuation.