Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 37.7x · EV/EBITDA 16.2x · ROE 12.6%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $15.1B | $17.1B | $10.7B | $5.9B | $6.5B | $6.8B | $5.0B | $4.9B | $3.2B | $4.0B | $3.1B |
| Enterprise Value | $17.5B | $19.5B | $13.0B | $8.8B | $9.6B | $8.7B | $6.1B | $6.5B | $4.6B | $5.4B | $4.1B |
| P/E Ratio → | 37.68 | 42.87 | 66.09 | — | 203.17 | 20.74 | 15.57 | 12.41 | 12.44 | 11.60 | 23.76 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.06 | 1.20 | 0.87 | 0.49 | 0.66 | 0.86 | 0.80 | 0.68 | 0.47 | 0.61 | 0.61 |
| P/B Ratio | 4.51 | 5.13 | 3.59 | 2.16 | 2.37 | 2.68 | 2.50 | 2.71 | 2.32 | 2.81 | 2.80 |
| P/FCF | 52.83 | 59.87 | 11.04 | 11.88 | 73.09 | 10.95 | 6.95 | 11.48 | 9.26 | 122.67 | 35.19 |
| P/OCF | 27.66 | 31.35 | 9.57 | 8.54 | 18.45 | 8.60 | 5.36 | 8.84 | 6.11 | 25.79 | 15.14 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.36 | 1.05 | 0.74 | 0.99 | 1.10 | 0.96 | 0.90 | 0.67 | 0.81 | 0.80 |
| EV / EBITDA | 16.21 | 18.07 | 13.75 | 11.70 | 15.25 | 10.43 | 7.79 | 7.95 | 6.51 | 9.13 | 9.29 |
| EV / EBIT | 26.81 | 28.34 | 29.20 | 58.25 | 62.10 | 18.09 | 12.57 | 10.99 | 9.82 | 12.38 | 14.83 |
| EV / FCF | — | 68.28 | 13.33 | 17.88 | 108.44 | 14.04 | 8.42 | 15.25 | 13.20 | 163.10 | 46.34 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 9.6% | 9.6% | 13.2% | 6.6% | 12.2% | 14.4% | 16.6% | 12.2% | 14.0% | 13.0% | 13.5% |
| Operating Margin | 4.6% | 4.6% | 3.5% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 5.2% | — | 8.0% | 7.2% | 6.0% | 5.4% |
| Net Profit Margin | 2.8% | 2.8% | 1.3% | -0.4% | 0.3% | 4.1% | 5.1% | 5.5% | 3.8% | 5.3% | 2.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 12.6% | 12.6% | 5.7% | -1.8% | 1.3% | 14.4% | 17.0% | 24.6% | 18.4% | 27.3% | 12.8% |
| ROA | 4.2% | 4.2% | 1.8% | -0.5% | 0.4% | 5.3% | 6.3% | 8.3% | 6.1% | 9.6% | 4.3% |
| ROIC | 8.9% | 8.9% | 6.0% | 2.0% | 1.8% | 8.3% | — | 14.1% | 13.4% | 12.3% | 10.2% |
| ROCE | 10.2% | 10.2% | 7.0% | 2.3% | 2.1% | 9.1% | — | 16.7% | 15.8% | 14.6% | 12.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.88 | 1.28 | 1.28 | 0.90 | 0.74 | 0.93 | 1.01 | 0.95 | 0.92 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.59 | 2.59 | 2.79 | 4.63 | 5.56 | 2.72 | 1.91 | 2.05 | 1.99 | 2.33 | 2.32 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.72 | 0.75 | 1.09 | 1.15 | 0.76 | 0.53 | 0.89 | 0.99 | 0.93 | 0.89 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.23 | 2.23 | 2.37 | 3.93 | 4.97 | 2.29 | 1.37 | 1.96 | 1.95 | 2.26 | 2.24 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 8.41 | 2.29 | 6.00 | 35.35 | 3.09 | 1.48 | 3.77 | 3.95 | 40.43 | 11.16 |
| Interest Coverage | 3.98 | 3.98 | 2.30 | 0.65 | 1.38 | 9.05 | 8.13 | 7.63 | 5.69 | 7.09 | 5.45 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.32 | 1.32 | 1.22 | 1.40 | 1.55 | 1.61 | 1.67 | 1.78 | 1.69 | 1.92 | 1.67 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.29 | 1.29 | 1.18 | 1.36 | 1.50 | 1.56 | 1.60 | 1.70 | 1.60 | 1.84 | 1.54 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.19 | 0.15 | 0.20 | 0.30 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.05 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.41 | 1.37 | 1.28 | 1.05 | 1.12 | 1.21 | 1.44 | 1.56 | 1.62 | 1.61 |
| Inventory Turnover | 115.00 | 115.00 | 99.45 | 103.65 | 72.78 | 73.50 | 58.80 | 63.01 | 52.23 | 74.62 | 40.01 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 90.49 | 87.14 | 95.13 | 116.82 | 103.15 | 101.30 | 95.27 | 101.64 | 88.28 | 82.17 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 2.7% | 2.3% | 1.5% | — | 0.5% | 4.8% | 6.4% | 8.1% | 8.0% | 8.6% | 4.2% |
| FCF Yield | 1.9% | 1.7% | 9.1% | 8.4% | 1.4% | 9.1% | 14.4% | 8.7% | 10.8% | 0.8% | 2.8% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.3% | 0.0% | 2.4% | 0.1% | 9.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.3% | 0.0% | 2.4% | 0.1% | 9.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $79M | $79M | $78M | $76M | $74M | $74M | $76M | $80M | $82M | $81M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying MTZ stock.
MasTec, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 37.7x. The historical average is 21.3x. This places it at the 89th percentile of its historical range.
MasTec, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 16.2x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 11.1x.
MasTec, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 12.6%. The historical average is 6.3%.
Based on historical data, MasTec, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 37.7x. This is at the 89th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
MasTec, Inc. has 9.6% gross margin and 4.6% operating margin.
MasTec, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.6x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Acquisition-driven leverage and integration risk
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Pricing for Cyclical Recovery
MasTec trades at 52.9x trailing earnings and 21.9x EV/EBITDA, per reported data, versus peers like Primoris at 16.1x P/E, suggesting the market prices in sustained margin expansion.
The forward P/E of 29.2x implies investors expect earnings to nearly double from current levels, a bold assumption given the historical volatility in margins. The PEG of 17.8x is distorted by near-term earnings troughs, but even on forward EV/EBITDA of 16.1x, MasTec commands a premium to most engineering and construction peers, reflecting its exposure to high-growth infrastructure and energy transition end markets. This valuation appears to price in a successful execution of the current backlog and continued acquisition-driven growth, leaving little room for disappointment.
Margin Recovery Still in Early Stages
Gross margin improved to 12.7% in 2026Q2 from 9.3% in 2026Q1, per financial statements, yet operating margin at 5.2% remains below the 9.0% peak seen in 2025Q3, indicating uneven execution.
The sequential jump in gross margin suggests better project mix and pricing, but the wide swings—from 6.2% to 14.2% over the past year—highlight the inherent volatility of large-scale construction projects. Net margin of 3.0% in 2026Q2 is still thin relative to the 4.0% achieved in 2025Q3, and the company's profitability remains sensitive to cost overruns and project delays. Investors should monitor whether the recent margin improvement can be sustained as revenue growth accelerates, or if it reflects a one-time favorable project settlement.
Returns Trapped by Acquisition Cycle
ROIC improved to 2.7% in 2026Q2 from 1.8% in 2026Q1, per reported figures, but remains well below the 4.8% seen in 2025Q3 and far below peers like MYR Group's 18.3%.
The low and volatile ROIC reflects the heavy capital deployed in acquisitions and the lumpy earnings from large projects. While the recent uptick is encouraging, the return on invested capital is still below the cost of capital, suggesting that value creation is not yet evident. The company's growth strategy relies on acquisitions that bring in revenue but also goodwill and intangibles, which dilute returns until the acquired operations are fully integrated and generate synergies. Until ROIC consistently exceeds the cost of capital, the market's premium valuation may be difficult to justify.
Working Capital Drag Intensifies
Cash conversion cycle lengthened to 54 days in 2026Q2 from 50 days in 2025Q3, per reported data, driven by DSO rising to 84 days, indicating slower collections on large projects.
The increase in days sales outstanding suggests that customers are taking longer to pay, possibly due to the scale and complexity of projects, which ties up cash and increases financing needs. Inventory days remain minimal, typical for a services business, but the extended DSO and a DPO of only 33 days mean MasTec is financing its customers while paying suppliers relatively quickly. This working capital strain is a key reason why free cash flow turned negative in 2026Q2, and it may persist as revenue grows unless collection processes improve.
Debt Load Grows with Acquisition Spree
Debt-to-EBITDA rose to 9.25x in 2026Q2 from 6.00x in 2025Q3, per reported figures, while interest coverage fell to 5.11x, signaling increased financial risk from acquisition financing.
The sharp increase in leverage reflects the $266.9M spent on acquisitions in 2026Q2, which has pushed debt to $3.2B. Although interest coverage remains above 5x, the trend is concerning: it was as low as 1.23x in 2025Q1 when earnings were depressed. The company's ability to service debt depends on maintaining the recent margin recovery and generating consistent cash flow, which has been volatile. Investors should monitor whether the acquired businesses generate sufficient EBITDA to bring leverage back down to historical levels, or if further acquisitions will keep the balance sheet stretched.
Thin Buffer Despite Improved Current Ratio
Current ratio improved to 1.40 in 2026Q2 from 1.22 a year earlier, per balance sheet data, but cash of $315.6M is minimal against $3.2B debt, leaving limited liquidity cushion.
The current ratio is adequate, but the quality of current assets is a concern: receivables make up a large portion, and with DSO rising, their convertibility to cash is uncertain. The quick ratio of 1.37 suggests that even without inventory, current assets cover current liabilities, but the company's reliance on external financing for acquisitions and working capital needs is evident. Under a severe downturn, the thin cash position and high debt load could force asset sales or equity issuance, which would be dilutive to shareholders.
Lagging Returns, Premium Valuation
MasTec's ROE of 3.7% and ROIC of 2.7% in 2026Q2, per reported data, trail peers like MYR Group (24.2% ROE) and Dycom (18.9% ROE), yet its P/E is higher than most.
The peer comparison reveals a disconnect: MasTec's profitability metrics are among the weakest in the group, yet its valuation multiples are at the higher end. This suggests the market is pricing in a future recovery that has not yet materialized in the financials. The company's larger scale and diversified end markets may justify some premium, but the gap in returns is stark. If the margin recovery stalls, the stock could be vulnerable to a de-rating as investors reassess the growth narrative.
Misapplied EV/EBITDA in Acquisition-Heavy Model
EV/EBITDA is commonly used for MasTec, but with heavy acquisition activity and volatile EBITDA, this multiple can mislead; adjusted earnings or EV/IC may be more appropriate.
The EV/EBITDA multiple is distorted by the company's acquisition strategy, which adds debt and goodwill while EBITDA may not yet reflect the full earnings power of acquired businesses. Additionally, EBITDA excludes the significant depreciation and amortization from the acquired assets, which are real costs. A more appropriate metric might be EV/EBIT or EV/IC, which better capture the return on the capital employed. Investors should also consider the quality of EBITDA by examining cash conversion, which has been volatile, to avoid overpaying for a multiple that may be inflated by non-cash items.