Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.1x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -48.1%. (2014–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $173793 | $423873 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $-356262 | $-106182 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 315.99 | 770.68 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.03 | 0.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | -193.06 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | -565106.0% | -565106.0% | -532039.2% | -708260.1% | -14077.0% | -66565.8% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -998192.4% | -998192.4% | -1211216.3% | -1307147.5% | -26456.8% | -243836.9% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | -474049.5% | -474049.5% | -972284.4% | -1250739.6% | -26266.0% | -243622.8% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -48.1% | -48.1% | -78.2% | -90.1% | -74.4% | -104.8% | -808.0% | — | — | — | -1814.2% |
| ROA | -41.5% | -41.5% | -71.4% | -85.7% | -71.6% | -100.5% | -201.2% | -3017.6% | -3566.3% | -2082.3% | -910.6% |
| ROIC | -90.3% | -90.3% | -90.3% | -81.3% | -165.8% | -68711.5% | — | — | — | — | -1102.3% |
| ROCE | -99.7% | -99.7% | -97.4% | -93.7% | -74.4% | -104.1% | -794.2% | — | — | — | -1841.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.04 | 0.04 | — | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.07 | — | — | — | 0.85 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.09 | -0.25 | -0.14 | -0.13 | -1.00 | -1.11 | — | — | — | -0.30 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | — | -85266.98 | -23.83 | -36.21 | -16.02 | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($749030) exceeds total debt ($218975)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 4.29 | 4.29 | 6.80 | 15.68 | 27.20 | 35.48 | 4.47 | 0.33 | 0.50 | 0.13 | 0.97 |
| Quick Ratio | 4.29 | 4.29 | 6.80 | 15.68 | 27.20 | 35.48 | 4.47 | 0.33 | 0.50 | 0.13 | 0.97 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.81 | 0.81 | 6.58 | 15.23 | 26.91 | 34.83 | 4.32 | 0.13 | 0.48 | 0.13 | 0.97 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 55.08 | 173.29 | 99.40 | 3.03 | 22.83 | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $4M | $3M | $2M | $2M | $2M | $2M | $2M | $1M | $1M | $882308 |
Imminent capital exhaustion risk
Based on reported financial statements, Myseum's P/S ratio of 315.99x appears entirely untethered from its negligible revenue base, suggesting that market pricing reflects speculative interest in intellectual property rather than any fundamental valuation of the company's current, non-existent commercial software application business model or earnings potential.
The extreme P/S multiple indicates that investors are not pricing the company based on its TTM revenue of $550, but rather on the potential value of its privacy patents. This valuation approach is highly speculative and warrants caution, as the lack of a clear path to monetization makes traditional software valuation metrics largely irrelevant for this entity.
As reported in recent financial statements, Myseum's gross margin of -225% in 2026Q1 highlights a fundamental inability to cover basic hosting and security costs, reflecting a cost structure that is entirely disconnected from the company's current, highly limited revenue generation capabilities and lack of commercial scale.
The negative gross margins suggest that every dollar of revenue generated actually increases the company's net loss, indicating that the platform's core infrastructure is not yet optimized for commercial use. Investors should monitor whether management can achieve any economies of scale, though current trends suggest that operating expenses continue to outpace any nominal revenue growth.
According to the provided quarterly data, Myseum's asset turnover remains at 0.00, which, based on reported figures, confirms that the company's capital base is not being utilized to generate any meaningful revenue, further underscoring the lack of operational efficiency within its current software application business model.
The inability to generate revenue from its asset base suggests that the company is currently in a pre-commercial phase where capital is being consumed rather than deployed for growth. The erratic nature of the cash conversion cycle, with DSO figures fluctuating significantly, implies that the company lacks a stable customer base or a predictable billing process.
Based on the latest quarterly filings, Myseum's cash position has fallen significantly, which highlights the company's precarious liquidity position as it continues to burn through its remaining capital without achieving a self-sustaining revenue stream to offset its ongoing, unmitigated operational losses in the competitive technology sector.
While the current ratio of 3.09 might appear healthy in isolation, it is misleading given the company's massive cash burn and lack of revenue. The liquidity position is essentially a countdown clock, and the company will likely require additional external financing in the near term to avoid a total cessation of operations.
The P/E ratio is the most commonly misapplied metric for Myseum, as the company's negative earnings render the multiple mathematically meaningless and obscure the reality that the business is currently a distressed R&D lab rather than a functioning software company with a viable path to profitability.
Investors should instead focus on the cash burn rate and the remaining runway, as these metrics provide a more accurate assessment of the company's survival prospects. Relying on traditional valuation multiples like P/E or EV/EBITDA for a company with $550 in revenue is fundamentally flawed and ignores the existential risk posed by the current capital structure.
Includes 30+ ratios · 12 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying MYSEW stock.
Myseum Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.1x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Myseum Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -48.1%. The historical average is -79.1%.
Based on historical data, Myseum Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.1x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Myseum Inc. has -565106.0% gross margin and -998192.4% operating margin.