Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 16.0x · EV/EBITDA 10.9x · ROE 9.2%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $841M | $621M | $486M | $305M | $337M | $316M | $279M | $326M | $227M | $184M | $165M |
| Enterprise Value | $942M | $721M | $617M | $464M | $522M | $505M | $287M | $303M | $233M | $141M | $144M |
| P/E Ratio → | 16.01 | 17.55 | 14.19 | 14.48 | 10.84 | 27.41 | 14.66 | 11.69 | 11.14 | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.40 | 1.18 | 0.99 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.95 | 0.98 | 1.17 | 1.32 | 1.39 | 1.06 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.20 | 1.57 | 1.30 | 0.90 | 1.06 | 1.11 | 1.04 | 1.31 | 1.04 | 0.92 | 0.79 |
| P/FCF | 9.69 | 13.18 | 14.18 | 8.68 | — | — | 6.69 | 9.50 | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 12.51 | 9.23 | 8.82 | 5.71 | 19.24 | — | 4.98 | 7.60 | — | — | 108.69 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.37 | 1.25 | 1.04 | 1.14 | 1.51 | 1.00 | 1.08 | 1.35 | 1.06 | 0.92 |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.89 | 10.24 | 9.17 | 9.34 | 8.44 | 17.02 | — | — | 36.67 | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 18.46 | 14.68 | 12.86 | 13.59 | 11.60 | 30.85 | 10.80 | 9.15 | 13.19 | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 15.32 | 18.03 | 13.19 | — | — | 6.87 | 8.83 | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 19.7% | 19.7% | 19.4% | 17.5% | 18.8% | 13.3% | 17.7% | 16.9% | 7.0% | 4.4% | -2.1% |
| Operating Margin | 9.7% | 9.7% | 9.8% | 7.6% | 9.8% | 4.8% | -8.9% | -10.3% | -1.7% | -6.9% | -8.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | 6.7% | 6.7% | 6.9% | 4.7% | 6.8% | 3.5% | 6.7% | 10.0% | 11.8% | -7.7% | -5.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 9.2% | 9.2% | 9.6% | 6.4% | 10.4% | 4.2% | 7.4% | 12.0% | 9.7% | -5.0% | -4.3% |
| ROA | 6.1% | 6.1% | 5.8% | 3.5% | 5.4% | 2.5% | 5.6% | 9.6% | 8.1% | -4.3% | -3.7% |
| ROIC | 7.6% | 7.6% | 7.2% | 5.1% | 6.9% | 3.2% | -7.6% | -9.6% | -1.2% | -4.0% | -5.1% |
| ROCE | 9.9% | 9.9% | 9.5% | 6.7% | 9.0% | 4.0% | -8.6% | -11.3% | -1.3% | -4.2% | -5.9% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.37 | 0.48 | 0.59 | 0.68 | 0.17 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.00 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.46 | 1.46 | 2.03 | 3.28 | 3.05 | 6.48 | — | — | 2.00 | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.25 | 0.35 | 0.47 | 0.58 | 0.67 | 0.03 | -0.09 | 0.03 | -0.21 | -0.10 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.43 | 1.43 | 1.96 | 3.20 | 2.99 | 6.38 | — | — | 0.95 | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | 2.13 | 3.84 | 4.52 | — | — | 0.18 | -0.66 | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 18.51 | 18.51 | 8.49 | 7.03 | 12.63 | 13.61 | 28.47 | 70.15 | 30.26 | -18.37 | -20.29 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 3.78 | 3.78 | 3.49 | 2.83 | 3.07 | 3.56 | 4.18 | 4.69 | 5.07 | 8.28 | 6.05 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.66 | 2.66 | 2.43 | 1.88 | 2.29 | 2.63 | 3.55 | 3.95 | 3.81 | 7.28 | 5.02 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.83 | 0.75 | 0.21 | 2.57 | 1.18 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.91 | 0.84 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.61 | 0.77 | 0.90 | 0.63 | 0.58 | 0.65 |
| Inventory Turnover | 5.69 | 5.69 | 4.98 | 4.02 | 5.23 | 4.85 | 8.07 | 7.57 | 4.06 | 7.44 | 8.38 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 117.38 | 126.25 | 138.13 | 154.19 | 175.03 | 152.77 | 168.85 | 230.40 | 202.02 | 161.69 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 6.2% | 5.7% | 7.0% | 6.9% | 9.2% | 3.6% | 6.8% | 8.6% | 9.0% | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 10.3% | 7.6% | 7.1% | 11.5% | — | — | 14.9% | 10.5% | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 2.2% | 3.0% | 0.9% | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 2.2% | 3.0% | 0.9% | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $10M | $10M | $10M | $10M | $10M | $10M | $10M | $10M | $10M | $10M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying NWPX stock.
NWPX Infrastructure, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 16.0x. The historical average is 13.6x. This places it at the 78th percentile of its historical range.
NWPX Infrastructure, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 10.9x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 11.9x.
NWPX Infrastructure, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 9.2%. The historical average is 6.6%.
Based on historical data, NWPX Infrastructure, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 16.0x. This is at the 78th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
NWPX Infrastructure, Inc. has 19.7% gross margin and 9.7% operating margin.
NWPX Infrastructure, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.5x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Thin cash and working capital swings
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Multiple Prices Cyclical Earnings Recovery
Based on reported figures, NWPX trades at 24.5x trailing earnings and 13.4x EV/EBITDA, a premium to the sector-typical 7.2x EV/EBITDA of UFPI, suggesting investors are paying for continued margin recovery rather than current earnings power.
The gap between the 24.5x trailing P/E and the 15.6x forward P/E implies the market expects roughly 57% earnings growth over the next year, which is demanding for a steel-exposed fabricator. A PEG of 1.88 indicates the growth premium is only partially justified by the reported trajectory. Investors should monitor whether the 21% gross margin proves durable, since a reversion would compress the forward multiple materially.
Margin Recovery Outpaces Return Generation
As reported in quarterly statements, NWPX's gross margin rose from 16.7% in 2025Q1 to 21.3% in 2026Q3, yet ROIC of 3.5% remains well below the 16.4% earned by TREX, indicating margin gains have not yet translated into capital efficiency.
Operating margin expanded from 4.8% to 13.6% over the period, which reflects better absorption of overhead by a higher-value Precast mix. However, the thin return on invested capital suggests the acquired goodwill and capital base are diluting returns on the expanded asset footprint. Net margin of 10.2% should therefore be read as an improving but not yet fully proven earnings quality signal.
Low Leverage Masks Rising Debt Absolute Levels
According to recent SEC filings, NWPX's debt-to-equity ratio of 0.27 is well below the 0.50 seen in 2024Q2, yet total debt climbed to $119.7M, implying the leverage improvement is largely an equity build rather than debt reduction.
Interest coverage has moved from 7.4x to 65.4x on a quarterly basis, but the distortion from lumpy quarterly interest expense makes trend analysis unreliable at the single-period level. Debt-to-EBITDA of 4.9x in the latest quarter is still meaningful, warranting monitoring of refinancing terms as debt rises alongside acquisition activity.
Strong Current Ratio Backed by Thin Cash
Based on reported figures, the current ratio of 2.56 and quick ratio of 1.84 appear solid, but cash of roughly $2.3M to $6.1M against $119.7M of debt leaves a limited immediate buffer should working capital reverse.
The quick ratio remaining above 1.8 suggests receivables and inventory are not the sole support for current liabilities, although the sharp quarterly swing from 4.02 to 2.56 in current ratio indicates meaningful working capital volatility. A 113-day cash conversion cycle implies significant capital tied up in operations. Under severe stress, dependence on collecting receivables would be the critical variable to watch.
Price-to-Earnings Misleads on Cyclical Earnings
The trailing P/E of 24.5x is most commonly misapplied to NWPX, because reported earnings swing sharply with steel pricing and percentage-of-completion timing, making a normalized through-cycle EBITDA or free cash flow multiple a more reliable anchor.
Trailing P/E treats a recovery year as a steady state, which overstates value if the 2025 margin trough of 16.7% was a more representative floor. Using EV/EBITDA or P/FCF on normalized figures better reflects the economics of a capital-intensive fabricator with volatile working capital. Free cash flow margins ranging from 1.0% to 26.7% across recent quarters argue for a multi-period average rather than any single-quarter multiple.