Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 95.9x · EV/EBITDA 35.2x · ROE 7.2%. (2013–2026 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $606M | $327M | $383M | $277M | $352M | $423M | $301M | $276M | $299M | $190M | $169M |
| Enterprise Value | $655M | $376M | $382M | $289M | $342M | $418M | $287M | $270M | $288M | $186M | $165M |
| P/E Ratio → | 95.87 | 51.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 2.21 | 1.20 | 1.49 | 1.17 | 1.63 | 2.20 | 1.78 | 1.82 | 2.32 | 1.66 | 1.61 |
| P/B Ratio | 6.61 | 3.52 | 4.50 | 3.54 | 5.58 | 8.29 | 7.62 | 9.73 | 9.05 | 5.13 | 4.24 |
| P/FCF | — | — | 19.02 | — | 98.87 | 172.77 | 249.55 | — | 27.38 | 273.88 | — |
| P/OCF | 21.88 | 11.82 | 14.41 | 22.55 | 40.14 | 63.63 | 68.97 | — | — | 59.99 | 438.40 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.37 | 1.49 | 1.22 | 1.58 | 2.18 | 1.70 | 1.78 | 2.23 | 1.62 | 1.58 |
| EV / EBITDA | 35.23 | 20.23 | 61.59 | 37.52 | 104.35 | 77.03 | 62.28 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 153.79 | 88.34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | 18.93 | — | 96.03 | 170.65 | 237.55 | — | 26.39 | 267.43 | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 61.1% | 61.1% | 60.7% | 62.2% | 63.7% | 61.6% | 62.0% | 59.0% | 59.2% | 59.5% | 56.8% |
| Operating Margin | 1.6% | 1.6% | -2.7% | -1.4% | -2.7% | -1.0% | -1.6% | -13.0% | -12.2% | -12.0% | -12.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | 2.4% | 2.4% | -2.7% | -0.4% | -1.7% | -0.8% | -1.4% | -12.4% | -11.3% | -11.5% | -12.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 7.2% | 7.2% | -8.4% | -1.2% | -6.4% | -3.5% | -7.2% | -61.2% | -41.6% | -34.1% | -31.3% |
| ROA | 3.4% | 3.4% | -4.5% | -0.6% | -3.0% | -1.6% | -2.9% | -23.7% | -19.2% | -17.9% | -17.3% |
| ROIC | 2.8% | 2.8% | -6.0% | -3.4% | -8.7% | -4.1% | -8.9% | -67.3% | -43.2% | -30.1% | -38.3% |
| ROCE | 3.4% | 3.4% | -6.8% | -3.6% | -8.5% | -3.7% | -7.3% | -58.6% | -44.3% | -35.2% | -31.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.19 | 0.38 | 0.22 | 0.28 | 0.07 | 0.18 | 0.14 | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.71 | 3.71 | 2.57 | 3.85 | 4.28 | 2.66 | 0.61 | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.52 | -0.02 | 0.16 | -0.16 | -0.10 | -0.37 | -0.24 | -0.33 | -0.12 | -0.10 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.62 | 2.62 | -0.31 | 1.58 | -3.08 | -0.96 | -3.15 | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | -0.10 | — | -2.83 | -2.13 | -12.00 | — | -0.99 | -6.45 | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | -2.37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.93 | 0.93 | 1.09 | 1.24 | 1.30 | 1.41 | 1.20 | 1.02 | 1.38 | 1.82 | 2.04 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.83 | 0.85 | 0.84 | 1.11 | 0.94 | 0.85 | 1.16 | 1.65 | 1.86 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.28 | 0.28 | 0.35 | 0.34 | 0.47 | 0.67 | 0.61 | 0.56 | 0.95 | 1.45 | 1.61 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.20 | 1.72 | 1.49 | 1.65 | 1.76 | 1.90 | 1.88 | 1.65 | 1.56 | 1.43 |
| Inventory Turnover | 6.58 | 6.58 | 7.72 | 4.52 | 2.99 | 5.34 | 5.24 | 7.43 | 5.21 | 7.63 | 7.75 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 1.0% | 2.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | 5.3% | — | 1.0% | 0.6% | 0.4% | — | 3.7% | 0.4% | — |
| Buyback Yield | 2.8% | 5.1% | 2.3% | 0.6% | 0.4% | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.6% | 1.0% | 1.3% | 0.9% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 2.8% | 5.1% | 2.3% | 0.6% | 0.4% | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.6% | 1.0% | 1.3% | 0.9% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $28M | $27M | $26M | $25M | $23M | $22M | $21M | $20M | $19M | $17M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 14 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying OOMA stock.
Ooma, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 95.9x. The historical average is 51.1x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
Ooma, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 35.2x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 51.7x.
Ooma, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 7.2%. The historical average is -20.0%.
Based on historical data, Ooma, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 95.9x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Ooma, Inc. has 61.1% gross margin and 1.6% operating margin.
Ooma, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.7x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Thin margins limit downside protection
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Valuation Anchored to Growth, Not Yield
Ooma's forward P/E of 17.49 suggests the market is pricing in the recent profitability inflection, while the absence of a dividend yield indicates all capital is being reinvested for growth, a stark contrast to traditional utility valuation models.
The significant discount from the trailing P/E of 99.61 to the forward P/E of 17.49 implies analysts expect a substantial earnings ramp, consistent with the reported acceleration in revenue and margin expansion. This valuation framework is driven by growth expectations rather than the stable, yield-based metrics typical of regulated utilities, warranting a focus on execution and margin sustainability.
ROE Recovery Lags Asset Growth
Despite a dramatic turnaround from a -2.7% ROE in 2025Q1 to 3.1% in 2027Q2, the return on equity remains well below levels that would typically justify the company's 6.87x price-to-book multiple, suggesting the recent asset base expansion has not yet generated commensurate returns.
The ROE trajectory shows clear improvement, but the current 3.1% level is modest for a company with a P/B of 6.87, indicating the market is pricing in future earnings power from the doubled asset base rather than current returns. Investors should monitor whether the improving operating margin trend translates into a sustained ROE expansion toward a cost-of-equity threshold.
Margin Expansion Drives Profitability Turnaround
Operating margin has swung from -4.4% in 2025Q1 to 4.8% in 2027Q2, a 920 basis point improvement that appears to be the primary driver behind the company's shift from net losses to profitability, as reported in recent financial statements.
This margin expansion suggests the company is achieving operating leverage, where revenue growth is outpacing cost increases. The trend indicates successful cost management or pricing power, but the absolute margin level remains thin, leaving limited buffer against cost inflation or revenue disruptions.
Conservative Leverage Supports Growth Funding
The debt-to-capital ratio has improved from 0.26 in 2025Q1 to 0.10 in 2027Q2, and with interest coverage strengthening to 4.80x, the balance sheet appears well-positioned to support the company's growth initiatives without straining credit quality.
The deleveraging trend, combined with a current ratio stabilizing near 0.95, suggests the company has successfully managed its capital structure through a period of significant investment. This conservative leverage profile provides financial flexibility, though the low debt level may also indicate the company is relying more heavily on equity issuances to fund its asset expansion.
Zero Dividend Maximizes Reinvestment Capacity
Ooma has paid no dividends throughout the ten-quarter period, a policy that appears designed to maximize internal funding for its growth strategy, as evidenced by the significant capital expenditures and equity issuances noted in cash flow analysis.
The absence of a dividend payout means 100% of net income and operating cash flow is available for reinvestment, which is critical given the company's recent asset base expansion and thin profitability. This policy aligns with a growth-oriented strategy but offers no direct income return to shareholders, placing the entire investment thesis on capital appreciation.
P/B Multiple Misapplied to Growth Story
The price-to-book ratio of 6.87 is the most commonly misapplied metric for Ooma, as it is typically used to value asset-heavy, regulated utilities with stable returns, whereas Ooma's valuation is driven by growth expectations and its recent profitability inflection.
Comparing Ooma's P/B to traditional utilities obscures the fact that its book value is growing rapidly from recent investments that have not yet fully contributed to earnings. A more appropriate lens is the forward P/E of 17.49, which captures the market's expectation of future earnings power from the expanded asset base, rather than the current, low return on those assets.