Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -7.0x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -124.0%. (2022–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $204M | $20M | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $203M | $19M | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -7.05 | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 59.34 | 4.48 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 3.75 | 1.89 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 4.27 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | -4.0% | -4.0% | 16.1% | 22.0% | 24.1% |
| Operating Margin | -143.9% | -143.9% | -28.8% | -7.6% | 3.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | -126.6% | -126.6% | -28.4% | -8.5% | 9.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -124.0% | -124.0% | — | -66.1% | 38.8% |
| ROA | -58.8% | -58.8% | -20.4% | -7.1% | 10.9% |
| ROIC | -73.4% | -73.4% | -22.3% | -5.8% | 4.0% |
| ROCE | -101.9% | -101.9% | -47.1% | -10.2% | 6.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.10 | 0.10 | — | 531.98 | 1.85 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | 14.94 | 5.17 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.09 | — | 522.64 | 1.75 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | 14.68 | 4.87 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | 8.18 | 5.10 | — |
| Interest Coverage | -63.30 | -63.30 | -7.87 | -2.29 | 8.16 |
Net cash position: cash ($2M) exceeds total debt ($1M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 8.05 | 8.05 | 0.28 | 0.88 | 2.48 |
| Quick Ratio | 8.03 | 8.03 | 0.27 | 0.87 | 2.48 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.36 | 1.36 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.08 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.36 | 0.78 | 0.68 | 1.12 |
| Inventory Turnover | 187.25 | 187.25 | 187.98 | 101.18 | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 297.20 | 35.89 | 64.58 | 125.38 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $3M | $16M | $16M | $22M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 4 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying PC stock.
Premium Catering (Holdings) Limited's current P/E ratio is -7.0x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Premium Catering (Holdings) Limited's return on equity (ROE) is -124.0%. The historical average is -50.4%.
Based on historical data, Premium Catering (Holdings) Limited is trading at a P/E of -7.0x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Premium Catering (Holdings) Limited has -4.0% gross margin and -143.9% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Insolvency and liquidity crisis
Distressed Valuation Reflects Operational Fragility
Based on reported figures, the company's P/S ratio of 47.08 and P/FCF of 408.82 suggest that the market may be assigning a speculative premium to a business model that is currently failing to generate positive earnings or sustainable cash flow in its core catering operations.
The extreme valuation multiples appear disconnected from the underlying financial reality of negative margins and stagnant revenue growth. Investors should interpret these high ratios as a sign of market confusion or potential mispricing rather than an indicator of future growth potential, as the firm lacks the profitability to justify such valuations.
Negative Margins Indicate Structural Unviability
As reported in financial statements, the company's operating margin of -28.79% highlights a fundamental misalignment between fixed overhead costs and revenue generation, suggesting that the current business model is unable to achieve the economies of scale necessary for profitability in the competitive Singaporean catering market.
The thin gross margin of 16.14% leaves virtually no room for error, making the company highly susceptible to inflationary pressures on food and labor. This suggests that the firm is currently acting as a price-taker, and without a significant pivot in cost structure, achieving positive earning power appears unlikely.
Precarious Cash Position Threatens Continuity
According to recent financial disclosures, the company maintains a critical cash balance of only $34,237, which indicates an extremely limited buffer to absorb operational shocks or fund essential working capital requirements within its dormitory-based catering business model, warranting significant concern regarding the firm's immediate liquidity profile.
This minimal liquidity position suggests that the company is operating on a razor-thin margin of safety, leaving it vulnerable to even minor delays in contract payments or unexpected spikes in input costs. Investors should monitor this closely, as the current cash level may be insufficient to support ongoing operations.
Misapplied Revenue Metrics Obscure Reality
Based on an analysis of the firm's business model, the P/S ratio is the most commonly misapplied metric, as it fails to account for the low-margin, high-volume nature of dormitory catering and the significant going-concern risks inherent in the company's current financial structure.
Using revenue-based multiples in this context obscures the fact that the company is struggling with negative operating margins and a lack of pricing power. A more appropriate focus would be on cash-burn rates and contract-retention metrics, which provide a clearer picture of the firm's actual viability.