Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -2.7x · EV/EBITDA 13.6x · ROE -36.0%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.1B | $2.1B | $3.0B | $4.0B | $5.2B | $9.1B | $11.6B | $3.0B | $1.9B | $2.9B | $1.3B |
| Enterprise Value | $9.8B | $9.8B | $13.6B | $14.4B | $16.5B | $18.8B | $20.9B | $13.9B | $11.0B | $7.4B | $6.0B |
| P/E Ratio → | -2.67 | — | — | — | 23.02 | 20.91 | — | 69.08 | 20.25 | 5.81 | 11.59 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.30 | 0.31 | 0.46 | 0.62 | 0.82 | 1.54 | 3.23 | 0.57 | 0.53 | 0.93 | 0.42 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.23 | 1.17 | 1.05 | 1.24 | 1.46 | 2.22 | 4.36 | 1.63 | 2.58 | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | 53.48 | 8.66 | 14.49 | 58.75 | 6.00 | 10.58 | 8.16 | 4.14 |
| P/OCF | 4.09 | 4.20 | 8.39 | 8.68 | 5.97 | 10.15 | 34.16 | 4.28 | 5.36 | 6.37 | 3.11 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.41 | 2.06 | 2.27 | 2.58 | 3.19 | 5.83 | 2.62 | 3.06 | 2.36 | 1.96 |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.59 | 13.66 | 26.79 | — | 10.72 | 13.42 | — | 14.10 | 12.15 | 10.02 | 7.32 |
| EV / EBIT | 35.91 | — | 104.93 | — | 17.71 | 17.10 | — | 22.36 | 17.43 | 16.84 | 10.28 |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | 194.97 | 27.29 | 30.01 | 105.98 | 27.72 | 61.41 | 20.75 | 19.57 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 27.4% | 27.4% | 32.9% | 37.1% | 43.3% | 46.7% | 47.8% | 44.3% | 42.9% | 42.4% | 42.1% |
| Operating Margin | 3.9% | 3.9% | 1.1% | -10.8% | 15.2% | 17.9% | -11.5% | 10.8% | 17.7% | 15.1% | 17.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | -12.1% | -12.1% | -4.7% | -7.7% | 3.5% | 7.1% | -18.7% | 0.8% | 2.6% | 16.0% | 3.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -36.0% | -36.0% | -10.3% | -14.4% | 5.8% | 12.5% | -29.7% | 3.4% | 28.4% | — | — |
| ROA | -5.7% | -5.7% | -2.0% | -2.9% | 1.3% | 2.7% | -4.6% | 0.3% | 1.2% | 9.9% | 2.2% |
| ROIC | 1.8% | 1.8% | 0.4% | -3.6% | 5.1% | 6.2% | -2.5% | 3.8% | 6.7% | 8.3% | 9.6% |
| ROCE | 2.0% | 2.0% | 0.5% | -4.5% | 6.1% | 7.2% | -3.0% | 4.9% | 8.5% | 10.4% | 12.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 4.58 | 4.58 | 3.94 | 3.61 | 3.59 | 2.83 | 4.20 | 6.12 | 13.07 | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 11.65 | 11.65 | 22.23 | — | 8.37 | 8.27 | — | 11.49 | 10.59 | 6.45 | 6.05 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 4.21 | 3.69 | 3.27 | 3.14 | 2.38 | 3.50 | 5.88 | 12.42 | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 10.70 | 10.70 | 20.83 | — | 7.32 | 6.94 | — | 11.04 | 10.06 | 6.08 | 5.77 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | 141.49 | 18.63 | 15.52 | 47.23 | 21.71 | 50.84 | 12.59 | 15.43 |
| Interest Coverage | -1.02 | -1.02 | 0.27 | -0.08 | 1.23 | 1.96 | -0.53 | 1.16 | 1.17 | 0.95 | 1.26 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.82 | 1.11 | 1.74 | 1.96 | 2.42 | 0.71 | 0.92 | 0.76 | 0.74 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.82 | 1.11 | 1.65 | 1.85 | 2.42 | 0.63 | 0.83 | 0.67 | 0.63 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.47 | 0.47 | 0.50 | 0.72 | 1.40 | 1.64 | 2.16 | 0.48 | 0.65 | 0.52 | 0.43 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.49 | 0.43 | 0.40 | 0.37 | 0.35 | 0.24 | 0.37 | 0.33 | 0.60 | 0.61 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | 34.23 | 23.79 | — | 38.52 | 32.52 | 41.41 | 29.44 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 13.33 | 14.25 | 18.30 | 14.05 | 12.05 | 9.83 | 6.11 | 10.87 | 7.28 | 7.44 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | 4.3% | 4.8% | — | 1.4% | 4.9% | 17.2% | 8.6% |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | 1.9% | 11.6% | 6.9% | 1.7% | 16.7% | 9.5% | 12.2% | 24.2% |
| Buyback Yield | 17.0% | 16.6% | 0.0% | 3.8% | 11.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.8% | 2.6% | 0.8% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 17.0% | 16.6% | 0.0% | 3.8% | 11.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.8% | 2.6% | 0.8% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $145M | $152M | $152M | $177M | $176M | $134M | $118M | $100M | $93M | $91M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying PENN stock.
PENN Entertainment, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -2.7x. The historical average is 12.6x.
PENN Entertainment, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 13.6x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 8.9x.
PENN Entertainment, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -36.0%. The historical average is 3.9%.
Based on historical data, PENN Entertainment, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -2.7x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
PENN Entertainment, Inc. has 27.4% gross margin and 3.9% operating margin.
PENN Entertainment, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 11.7x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
High leverage and negative margins
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Volatility Masks Underlying Strain
Gross margin swung from 34.7% in 2024Q3 to 7.1% in 2026Q2, while net margin improved to 1.8% in 2026Q2, per quarterly filings, reflecting promotional intensity and hold volatility.
The dramatic gross margin compression in 2026Q2 appears tied to promotional costs and hold volatility, not a structural collapse, as the prior quarter's 29.5% suggests. Operating margin of 7.1% in 2026Q2, up from 5.5% in 2026Q1, indicates some operating leverage, but the negative net margin of -12.1% TTM underscores persistent digital losses. Investors should monitor whether the 2026Q2 improvement is sustainable or a one-time benefit from the ESPN Bet transition.
Returns on Capital Remain Subdued
ROIC improved to 1.2% in 2026Q2 from -4.5% in 2025Q3, but remains far below the cost of capital, as reported in financial statements, indicating value creation is still elusive.
Despite the recent EPS beat, ROIC of 1.2% and ROE of 1.8% in 2026Q2 are minimal, reflecting the heavy capital base and thin margins. The 2025Q3 ROIC of -4.5% was distorted by the Barstool write-down, but even normalized returns appear insufficient to cover the cost of debt and equity. This suggests the company is still in a transition phase where digital investments have not yet generated adequate returns.
Working Capital Efficiency Shows Mixed Signals
Asset turnover held steady at 0.13 in 2026Q2, while DSO improved to 12 days from 17 in 2024Q1, per quarterly data, but the cash conversion cycle remains negative due to minimal inventory.
The stable asset turnover of 0.13 indicates that revenue growth is not outpacing asset growth, typical for a capital-intensive casino operator. DSO improvement suggests better receivables management, but the negative CCC (driven by low DPO of 4 days) implies PENN pays suppliers quickly, possibly reflecting its REIT lease structure. The lack of inventory data limits deeper analysis, but the working capital outflows seen in cash flow statements suggest ongoing promotional intensity.
Leverage Eases but Remains Elevated
Debt-to-equity improved to 3.68 in 2026Q2 from 5.72 in 2025Q3, while interest coverage rose to 1.39, per balance sheet data, but lease-adjusted leverage likely remains a concern.
The reduction in D/E from 5.72 to 3.68 reflects debt paydown and equity stabilization, but the ratio remains high relative to peers like BYD (1.04). Interest coverage of 1.39 in 2026Q2 is thin, meaning operating income barely covers interest expense, leaving little cushion for a downturn. The prior balance sheet analysis noted that reported debt excludes significant operating lease obligations to gaming REITs, so true leverage may be understated.
Liquidity Buffer Remains Thin
Current ratio improved to 0.89 in 2026Q2 from 0.74 in 2025Q1, but remains below 1.0, with cash of $887.2M against total debt of $6.8B, as per quarterly filings.
The current ratio below 1.0 indicates that current liabilities exceed current assets, a common trait in gaming due to high payables and accrued expenses, but it still signals limited short-term cushion. The quick ratio equals the current ratio at 0.89, suggesting no inventory buffer, which is typical for a service business. Under a severe stress scenario, the thin liquidity position could force PENN to rely on credit lines or asset sales, especially if digital losses persist.
Misapplied Metric: Net Margin
Net margin is often misapplied to PENN because it includes one-time charges like the Barstool write-down and ESPN transition costs, obscuring underlying profitability, as reported in financial statements.
The TTM net margin of -12.1% overstates the company's ongoing losses, as it includes non-recurring items such as the Barstool divestiture and asset impairments. A more accurate measure is segment-adjusted EBITDAR, which management emphasizes, as it excludes rent and one-time costs. Investors should focus on the Interactive segment's contribution margin and the retail segments' stable cash flows to assess true earning power.