Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 22.3x · EV/EBITDA 17.3x · ROE 30.1%. (1997–2026 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $343.4B | $355.2B | $391.0B | $407.7B | $376.9B | $365.1B | $351.0B | $314.0B | $278.5B | $207.4B | $238.8B |
| Enterprise Value | $367.5B | $379.4B | $416.9B | $431.6B | $404.1B | $390.2B | $373.5B | $333.4B | $304.3B | $236.2B | $264.9B |
| P/E Ratio → | 22.27 | 22.15 | 24.47 | 27.40 | 25.72 | 24.75 | 24.53 | 24.11 | 76.68 | 21.27 | 15.59 |
| P/S Ratio | 3.95 | 4.08 | 4.64 | 4.85 | 4.60 | 4.55 | 4.61 | 4.43 | 4.11 | 3.10 | 3.67 |
| P/B Ratio | 6.58 | 6.54 | 7.48 | 8.06 | 8.01 | 7.79 | 7.52 | 6.70 | 5.85 | 3.92 | 4.28 |
| P/FCF | 21.58 | 22.32 | 27.84 | 24.67 | 27.34 | 26.91 | 22.52 | 21.91 | 23.41 | 18.60 | 25.49 |
| P/OCF | 16.90 | 17.48 | 21.95 | 20.54 | 22.37 | 21.83 | 19.10 | 18.04 | 18.27 | 13.95 | 18.73 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 4.36 | 4.95 | 5.14 | 4.93 | 4.87 | 4.91 | 4.70 | 4.50 | 3.53 | 4.07 |
| EV / EBITDA | 17.29 | 17.85 | 17.90 | 20.13 | 19.38 | 18.92 | 18.03 | 17.81 | 36.62 | 14.58 | 15.97 |
| EV / EBIT | 18.61 | 17.85 | 19.78 | 21.92 | 21.15 | 21.17 | 20.62 | 20.46 | 46.26 | 17.08 | 19.30 |
| EV / FCF | — | 23.84 | 29.69 | 26.12 | 29.31 | 28.76 | 23.97 | 23.27 | 25.58 | 21.18 | 28.27 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 50.2% | 50.2% | 51.2% | 51.4% | 47.9% | 47.4% | 51.2% | 50.3% | 48.6% | 48.5% | 49.8% |
| Operating Margin | 22.7% | 22.7% | 24.3% | 22.1% | 22.1% | 22.2% | 23.6% | 22.1% | 8.1% | 20.0% | 21.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | 18.4% | 18.4% | 19.0% | 17.7% | 17.9% | 18.4% | 18.8% | 18.4% | 5.8% | 14.6% | 23.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 30.1% | 30.1% | 31.1% | 30.5% | 31.2% | 31.5% | 30.6% | 27.6% | 7.8% | 17.9% | 26.9% |
| ROA | 12.7% | 12.7% | 12.9% | 12.2% | 12.3% | 12.5% | 11.9% | 11.0% | 3.3% | 8.2% | 12.4% |
| ROIC | 18.9% | 18.9% | 20.1% | 18.7% | 18.6% | 18.9% | 19.9% | 16.9% | 5.3% | 12.3% | 12.6% |
| ROCE | 22.3% | 22.3% | 23.0% | 21.3% | 21.4% | 20.9% | 20.7% | 18.2% | 6.3% | 14.8% | 14.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.76 | 0.63 | 0.59 | 0.57 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.61 | 1.61 | 1.52 | 1.56 | 1.70 | 1.57 | 1.58 | 1.90 | 3.62 | 1.94 | 1.91 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.45 | 0.50 | 0.47 | 0.58 | 0.54 | 0.48 | 0.41 | 0.54 | 0.55 | 0.47 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.14 | 1.14 | 1.11 | 1.11 | 1.30 | 1.22 | 1.09 | 1.04 | 3.11 | 1.78 | 1.57 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 1.52 | 1.84 | 1.45 | 1.97 | 1.85 | 1.45 | 1.36 | 2.17 | 2.59 | 2.78 |
| Interest Coverage | 24.23 | 24.23 | 23.23 | 21.28 | 25.28 | 41.99 | 36.09 | 35.05 | 12.92 | 27.34 | 29.51 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.63 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.85 | 0.75 | 0.83 | 0.88 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.47 | 0.47 | 0.49 | 0.53 | 0.44 | 0.45 | 0.52 | 0.68 | 0.58 | 0.66 | 0.72 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.27 | 0.28 | 0.23 | 0.22 | 0.31 | 0.49 | 0.34 | 0.42 | 0.50 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.59 | 0.59 | 0.56 | 0.54 |
| Inventory Turnover | 5.31 | 5.31 | 5.45 | 5.82 | 6.05 | 6.09 | 6.20 | 6.41 | 6.93 | 7.27 | 7.06 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 25.40 | 26.78 | 26.57 | 24.35 | 23.41 | 22.66 | 21.49 | 26.70 | 25.59 | 25.77 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.9% | 2.9% | 2.5% | 2.3% | 2.4% | 2.4% | 2.4% | 2.5% | 2.7% | 3.5% | 3.0% |
| Payout Ratio | 63.8% | 63.8% | 61.8% | 62.6% | 61.4% | 59.5% | 57.8% | 59.8% | 192.4% | 75.0% | 47.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 4.5% | 4.5% | 4.1% | 3.7% | 3.9% | 4.0% | 4.1% | 4.1% | 1.3% | 4.7% | 6.4% |
| FCF Yield | 4.6% | 4.5% | 3.6% | 4.1% | 3.7% | 3.7% | 4.4% | 4.6% | 4.3% | 5.4% | 3.9% |
| Buyback Yield | 1.5% | 1.4% | 1.7% | 1.2% | 2.0% | 2.7% | 3.1% | 2.4% | 1.8% | 3.4% | 2.2% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 4.3% | 4.3% | 4.2% | 3.5% | 4.3% | 5.1% | 5.5% | 4.8% | 4.5% | 6.9% | 5.2% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $2.4B | $2.5B | $2.5B | $2.5B | $2.5B | $2.6B | $2.6B | $2.5B | $2.7B | $2.7B |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
Bull/bear thesis, analyst target revisions, and earnings execution.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying PG stock.
The Procter & Gamble Company's current P/E ratio is 22.3x. The historical average is 25.1x. This places it at the 47th percentile of its historical range.
The Procter & Gamble Company's current EV/EBITDA is 17.3x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 15.9x.
The Procter & Gamble Company's return on equity (ROE) is 30.1%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 24.7%.
Based on historical data, The Procter & Gamble Company is trading at a P/E of 22.3x. This is at the 47th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
The Procter & Gamble Company's current dividend yield is 2.86% with a payout ratio of 63.8%.
The Procter & Gamble Company has 50.2% gross margin and 22.7% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
The Procter & Gamble Company's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.6x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Margin compression from cost inflation
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Erosion Signals Pricing Power Limits
Gross margin fell from 51.4% in 2026Q1 to 48.5% in 2026Q4, a 290 bps decline, while operating margin dropped 760 bps to 18.6%, per recent financial statements, suggesting cost inflation is outpacing pricing power.
The sequential deterioration in gross margin from 51.4% to 48.5% over three quarters indicates that input cost inflation is not being fully offset by price increases, a critical concern for a company with historically stable margins. Operating margin compression to 18.6% in 2026Q4, the lowest in the ten-quarter period, suggests that SG&A leverage is insufficient to absorb the gross margin hit, implying a structural shift in cost dynamics rather than a one-off event. Investors should monitor whether management can restore gross margin toward the 51%+ level, as the current trajectory suggests a weakening ability to pass through costs in a competitive staple environment.
Return on Capital Decelerating from Peak
ROIC declined from 5.8% in 2025Q1 to 3.7% in 2026Q4, a 210 bps drop, while ROE fell from 7.7% to 5.5%, based on reported figures, indicating a clear deceleration in capital efficiency.
The decline in ROIC from 5.8% to 3.7% over the period reflects both margin compression and a relatively stable asset base, suggesting that the company is generating less return per dollar of invested capital. ROE's fall to 5.5% in 2026Q4, the lowest in the ten quarters, indicates that the earnings decline is not being offset by financial leverage, which remains stable at around 0.65 D/E. This trend suggests that the company's compounding engine is slowing, and unless margins recover, the return on capital may continue to decay, potentially impacting the premium valuation the market assigns to PG.
Working Capital Efficiency Holds Despite Margin Pressure
Cash conversion cycle improved to -37 days in 2026Q4 from -35 days a year earlier, driven by DPO of 131 days, according to financial statements, indicating PG continues to extract favorable payment terms from suppliers.
The negative cash conversion cycle, averaging around -37 days, reflects PG's ability to collect cash from customers before paying suppliers, a structural advantage in the consumer staples industry. DPO of 131 days in 2026Q4 is notably high, suggesting strong bargaining power with suppliers, while DSO remains stable at 27 days, indicating consistent receivables management. This efficiency provides a buffer against margin compression, as the company can fund operations with supplier credit, but investors should watch for any deterioration in DPO if suppliers push back on extended terms.
Leverage Stable but Interest Coverage Thins
Debt-to-equity remained steady at 0.64 in 2026Q4, but interest coverage fell to 6.16 from 31.63 in 2026Q1, based on reported figures, indicating a sharp decline in earnings relative to interest expense.
While the D/E ratio of 0.64 is conservative relative to peers like Unilever (1.68) and Kimberly-Clark (4.42), the dramatic drop in interest coverage from 31.63 to 6.16 over three quarters is concerning. This decline is driven by the operating margin compression, which reduced EBIT, not by a surge in debt, as total debt increased only modestly. The coverage ratio remains adequate, but the trend suggests that if margins continue to deteriorate, PG's ability to service debt could become strained, especially in a rising rate environment.
Thin Liquidity Buffer Raises Stress Concerns
Current ratio of 0.68 in 2026Q4, down from 0.75 in 2025Q1, and quick ratio of 0.47, per balance sheet data, indicate a tight liquidity position that may be vulnerable to operational shocks.
PG's current ratio has consistently remained below 1.0, indicating that current liabilities exceed current assets, a common trait for companies with negative cash conversion cycles. However, the quick ratio of 0.47 in 2026Q4 suggests that even excluding inventory, the company has limited liquid assets to cover near-term obligations, relying heavily on ongoing cash generation. While the negative CCC provides some cushion, a sudden disruption in cash flows or a tightening of supplier terms could expose the company to liquidity stress, warranting close monitoring.
P/E Misapplied to Staple's Cyclical Earnings
PG's trailing P/E of 21.86 appears reasonable, but with net margin down to 14.1% in 2026Q4 from 21.2% in 2026Q1, per financial statements, the multiple may be misleading if earnings are temporarily depressed.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for PG is the P/E multiple, as it fails to account for the cyclicality of commodity costs and the impact of one-time charges that have historically affected earnings. With net margin at 14.1% in 2026Q4, the lowest in the period, the trailing P/E of 21.86 may overstate the stock's expensiveness if margins are expected to revert to the 19-20% average. Instead, investors should focus on EV/EBITDA, which at 16.99 is more stable and less distorted by non-operating items, or use a normalized earnings power that adjusts for the current margin trough.