Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -10.5x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -24.9%. (2019–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.0B | $1.7B | $4.2B | $2.0B | $1.8B | $1.1B | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $822M | $1.5B | $3.9B | $1.8B | $1.7B | $843M | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -10.52 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 3.34 | 5.67 | 18.70 | 14.54 | 24.59 | 31.70 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 2.75 | 4.78 | 10.43 | 7.05 | 9.36 | 4.09 | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 5.00 | 17.57 | 13.23 | 22.65 | 24.44 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 63.7% | 63.7% | 61.1% | 52.2% | 49.4% | 46.0% | -16.3% | -30.6% |
| Operating Margin | -33.7% | -33.7% | -43.0% | -80.2% | -107.6% | -157.1% | -619.4% | -705.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | -31.0% | -31.0% | -40.7% | -77.8% | -116.2% | -173.6% | -687.0% | -680.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -24.9% | -24.9% | -26.8% | -44.3% | -37.6% | -36.5% | -117.6% | -143.6% |
| ROA | -18.3% | -18.3% | -19.5% | -29.7% | -27.0% | -25.9% | -56.4% | -67.7% |
| ROIC | -50.8% | -50.8% | -57.6% | -106.0% | -176.4% | -250.3% | -275.5% | — |
| ROCE | -22.5% | -22.5% | -23.0% | -34.5% | -27.1% | -25.1% | -57.4% | -78.9% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.20 | 0.28 | 0.39 | 0.20 | 0.90 | 0.79 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.57 | -0.63 | -0.63 | -0.74 | -0.94 | -0.74 | -0.64 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -25.60 | -25.60 | -20.85 | -25.51 | -15.82 | -9.30 | -9.08 | -56.98 |
Net cash position: cash ($287M) exceeds total debt ($78M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 6.85 | 6.85 | 9.07 | 7.63 | 7.73 | 20.08 | 7.57 | 7.42 |
| Quick Ratio | 5.77 | 5.77 | 8.01 | 6.77 | 6.92 | 19.27 | 7.05 | 6.43 |
| Cash Ratio | 4.35 | 4.35 | 6.28 | 5.60 | 6.31 | 18.74 | 6.89 | 6.19 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.61 | 0.42 | 0.34 | 0.24 | 0.10 | 0.06 | 0.10 |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.58 | 1.58 | 1.56 | 1.64 | 1.33 | 1.42 | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 98.97 | 135.75 | 129.65 | 74.31 | 47.26 | 73.26 | 65.02 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $56M | $52M | $47M | $44M | $44M | $35M | $34M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 7 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying PRCT stock.
PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation's current P/E ratio is -10.5x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is -24.9%. The historical average is -61.6%.
Based on historical data, PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation is trading at a P/E of -10.5x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation has 63.7% gross margin and -33.7% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Cash burn and dilution
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Gross Margin Expansion Amid Heavy Investment
Gross margin improved to 66.0% in 2026Q2 from 56.2% in 2024Q1, reflecting a favorable mix shift toward disposables, yet operating margin remains deeply negative at -29.0%, as per financial statements.
The 980 basis point gross margin expansion over nine quarters suggests pricing power and a growing contribution from high-margin handpieces, but the operating margin of -29.0% indicates that SG&A and R&D spending are still outpacing revenue scale. The gap between gross and operating margins highlights the heavy investment in commercial infrastructure, which is typical for a pre-profit medtech scaling phase. Investors should monitor whether operating leverage materializes as revenue grows, given the fixed-cost nature of the sales force and R&D.
Negative Returns Persist as Capital Burns
ROIC improved to -11.1% in 2026Q2 from -18.6% in 2024Q1, but remains deeply negative, indicating the company is still destroying value on invested capital, as reported in financial statements.
The improvement in ROIC is driven by a narrowing net loss and a stable invested capital base, but the absolute level remains far below the cost of capital. The trend suggests that while the business is moving toward profitability, it has not yet reached the inflection point where returns turn positive. The negative ROE of -7.8% and ROA of -5.6% in 2026Q2 reinforce that the company is still in a heavy investment phase, with returns likely to remain negative until operating leverage and scale are achieved.
Working Capital Drag Intensifies Cash Burn
Cash conversion cycle lengthened to 269 days in 2026Q2 from 242 days in 2024Q1, driven by rising DIO of 219 days, indicating inventory buildup that is consuming cash, as per reported figures.
The 27-day increase in CCC is primarily due to a 41-day rise in days inventory outstanding, which may reflect preparation for expected demand or a lengthening sales cycle. DSO has remained relatively stable around 98 days, while DPO has fluctuated, suggesting limited leverage over suppliers. The extended CCC, combined with negative FCF margin of -66.9% in 2026Q2, indicates that working capital is a significant drag on liquidity, and investors should monitor whether inventory levels normalize as the install base grows.
Low Leverage Masks Refinancing Risk
Debt-to-equity ratio improved to 0.23 in 2026Q2 from 0.33 in 2024Q3, but negative interest coverage of -30.79 indicates the company cannot service debt from operations, as per financial statements.
The modest D/E ratio suggests a conservative capital structure, but the negative interest coverage highlights that the company is relying on cash reserves and external funding to meet obligations. With cash of $227.9M and a quarterly burn rate of roughly $63M, the runway appears adequate for over three years, but continued losses will erode this buffer. The flat debt level of $77.5M indicates no new borrowing, but the company may need to access capital markets if the path to profitability extends, given the negative operating cash flow.
Liquidity Buffer Thinning but Still Strong
Current ratio declined to 6.55 in 2026Q2 from 9.07 in 2024Q4, while quick ratio fell to 5.35, indicating a shrinking but still ample liquidity cushion, as per balance sheet data.
The decline in the current ratio reflects the consumption of cash to fund operations, but the absolute level remains high, providing a substantial buffer against near-term shocks. The quick ratio of 5.35 suggests that even without inventory liquidation, the company can cover current liabilities over five times. However, the trend is concerning: if the burn rate persists, the liquidity position will continue to weaken, and the company may need to raise additional capital before reaching break-even.
Misapplied EV/EBITDA Multiple
The forward EV/EBITDA of 5.62 is misleading for a company with negative EBITDA, as it obscures the true cash burn and overstates relative value, based on reported financials.
For pre-profit companies like PRCT, EV/EBITDA is often misapplied because EBITDA is negative, making the multiple meaningless or artificially low. A more appropriate metric is EV/Sales, which at 4.01 reflects the market's premium for growth, but even this must be adjusted for the recurring revenue mix and the potential for margin expansion. Investors should focus on the trajectory of gross margin and operating leverage, rather than a static multiple, to assess whether the current valuation is justified by the path to profitability.