Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -1.3x · EV/EBITDA 7.9x · ROE -39.3%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.9B | $1.9B | $3.5B | $4.4B | $4.6B | $5.2B | $6.1B | $7.1B | $5.4B | $12.4B | $11.9B |
| Enterprise Value | $5.4B | $5.4B | $6.6B | $7.7B | $8.3B | $7.0B | $9.2B | $10.1B | $8.1B | $15.1B | $17.1B |
| P/E Ratio → | -1.34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 48.28 | 40.79 | 103.76 | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.45 | 0.45 | 0.81 | 0.94 | 1.03 | 1.26 | 1.49 | 1.82 | 1.13 | 2.51 | 2.26 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.82 | 0.91 | 0.95 | 1.01 | 1.08 | 1.21 | 0.95 | 2.01 | 2.00 |
| P/FCF | 13.20 | 13.29 | 14.44 | 14.33 | 21.74 | 1237.39 | 13.07 | 28.20 | 10.93 | 20.37 | 21.74 |
| P/OCF | 8.03 | 8.08 | 9.73 | 10.74 | 14.92 | 33.25 | 9.57 | 18.18 | 9.04 | 17.78 | 18.21 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.26 | 1.51 | 1.65 | 1.87 | 1.70 | 2.25 | 2.60 | 1.70 | 3.05 | 3.24 |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.86 | 7.88 | 15.02 | 15.01 | 19.90 | 9.72 | 14.12 | 17.62 | 12.20 | 14.47 | — |
| EV / EBIT | 15.59 | — | 61.55 | 46.38 | 491.65 | 18.31 | 68.72 | 37.92 | 19.19 | 33.28 | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 36.98 | 26.95 | 25.27 | 39.40 | 1672.84 | 19.71 | 40.25 | 16.42 | 24.73 | 31.17 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 35.1% | 35.1% | 35.3% | 36.1% | 32.7% | 34.2% | 36.6% | 37.0% | 38.7% | 40.0% | 38.9% |
| Operating Margin | 8.1% | 8.1% | 2.6% | 3.3% | 1.8% | 9.9% | 6.5% | 4.5% | 5.0% | 12.1% | -37.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | -33.5% | -33.5% | -3.9% | -0.3% | -3.2% | -1.7% | -4.0% | 3.8% | 2.8% | 2.4% | -76.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -39.3% | -39.3% | -3.8% | -0.3% | -2.8% | -1.3% | -2.8% | 2.5% | 2.2% | 2.0% | -50.2% |
| ROA | -15.7% | -15.7% | -1.7% | -0.1% | -1.3% | -0.6% | -1.4% | 1.3% | 1.2% | 0.9% | -24.1% |
| ROIC | 3.7% | 3.7% | 1.1% | 1.4% | 0.8% | 3.9% | 2.3% | 1.5% | 2.1% | 4.5% | -11.2% |
| ROCE | 4.3% | 4.3% | 1.3% | 1.6% | 0.8% | 4.3% | 2.6% | 1.8% | 2.4% | 5.4% | -13.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.35 | 1.35 | 0.84 | 0.85 | 0.89 | 0.72 | 0.66 | 0.58 | 0.57 | 0.54 | 0.97 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 5.83 | 5.83 | 8.25 | 7.97 | 10.36 | 5.11 | 5.73 | 5.90 | 4.91 | 3.20 | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.17 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.77 | 0.36 | 0.55 | 0.52 | 0.47 | 0.43 | 0.87 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 5.05 | 5.05 | 6.97 | 6.50 | 8.92 | 2.53 | 4.76 | 5.28 | 4.08 | 2.55 | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | 23.69 | 12.51 | 10.94 | 17.66 | 435.45 | 6.64 | 12.05 | 5.49 | 4.36 | 9.43 |
| Interest Coverage | -6.99 | -6.99 | 0.57 | 0.95 | 0.11 | 3.07 | 1.05 | 2.10 | 3.25 | 2.62 | -21.16 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.76 | 2.76 | 2.38 | 1.79 | 2.44 | 2.43 | 2.27 | 2.04 | 1.89 | 1.96 | 1.53 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.63 | 1.63 | 1.34 | 1.07 | 1.41 | 1.79 | 1.50 | 1.32 | 1.32 | 1.40 | 1.09 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.54 | 0.47 | 0.54 | 1.17 | 0.46 | 0.27 | 0.36 | 0.47 | 0.34 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.50 | 0.45 | 0.43 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.36 | 0.34 | 0.43 | 0.43 | 0.38 |
| Inventory Turnover | 2.40 | 2.40 | 2.62 | 2.61 | 2.60 | 2.67 | 2.45 | 2.52 | 3.30 | 3.68 | 4.06 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 52.59 | 53.61 | 57.98 | 57.16 | 57.58 | 52.99 | 117.26 | 82.78 | 83.45 | 81.29 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 8.3% | 8.3% | 4.3% | 3.4% | 3.1% | 2.5% | 2.0% | 1.6% | 2.0% | 0.7% | 0.7% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 76.9% | 80.1% | 76.2% | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2.1% | 2.5% | 1.0% | — |
| FCF Yield | 7.6% | 7.5% | 6.9% | 7.0% | 4.6% | 0.1% | 7.7% | 3.5% | 9.2% | 4.9% | 4.6% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 2.7% | 0.0% | 7.5% | 1.5% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 8.3% | 8.3% | 4.3% | 3.4% | 3.1% | 2.5% | 4.7% | 1.6% | 9.4% | 2.3% | 0.7% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $139M | $137M | $135M | $135M | $134M | $136M | $137M | $138M | $143M | $143M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying PRGO stock.
Perrigo Company plc's current P/E ratio is -1.3x. The historical average is 33.3x.
Perrigo Company plc's current EV/EBITDA is 7.9x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 14.0x.
Perrigo Company plc's return on equity (ROE) is -39.3%. The historical average is 2.0%.
Based on historical data, Perrigo Company plc is trading at a P/E of -1.3x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Perrigo Company plc's current dividend yield is 8.31%.
Perrigo Company plc has 35.1% gross margin and 8.1% operating margin.
Perrigo Company plc's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 5.8x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Persistent negative net income
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Compression Signals Structural Erosion
Gross margin fell from 37.6% in 2025Q1 to 30.7% in 2026Q2, a 690 basis point decline, according to recent financial statements, while operating margin collapsed to 2.3%, indicating eroding pricing power and fixed-cost absorption issues.
The sequential deterioration in gross margin, from 36.1% in 2025Q3 to 30.7% in 2026Q2, suggests that the company is facing persistent input cost pressures or unfavorable product mix shifts, not just one-off charges. Operating margin at 2.3% in 2026Q2, down from 10.0% in 2024Q4, implies that fixed costs are not being adequately covered by the shrinking revenue base, which may indicate a structural profitability problem rather than a temporary cyclical dip. Investors should monitor whether management can stabilize gross margin above 33% in coming quarters, as the current trajectory suggests further downside risk.
Return on Capital Decays Amid Asset Write-Downs
ROIC has hovered near zero, at 0.3% in 2026Q2, while ROE swung to 3.0% from -38.4% in 2025Q4, based on reported figures, indicating that the company is not generating adequate returns on its invested capital.
The near-zero ROIC across the last ten quarters, with a peak of only 1.1% in 2024Q4, suggests that Perrigo's asset base is not being deployed efficiently to generate profits. The sharp decline in equity, from $4.4B in 2025Q3 to $2.5B in 2026Q2, due to cumulative losses and goodwill impairments, has artificially inflated ROE in 2026Q2, but this is not a sign of operational improvement. The company's return on capital appears to be decaying, as margins remain weak and asset turnover is stagnant at 0.13, implying that the business is not compounding value for shareholders.
Working Capital Cycle Lengthens, Straining Cash
Cash conversion cycle extended to 153 days in 2026Q2 from 146 days in 2024Q1, as per financial statements, driven by rising DIO to 140 days, indicating slower inventory turnover and potential obsolescence risks.
The increase in days inventory outstanding from 138 days in 2024Q4 to 140 days in 2026Q2, coupled with a stable DSO around 60-66 days, suggests that Perrigo is holding more inventory relative to sales, which may tie up cash and increase the risk of write-downs. The cash conversion cycle of 153 days is notably high, indicating that the company takes over five months to convert its investments in inventory and receivables into cash, which is particularly concerning given its negative net income and high leverage. This inefficiency may be a result of declining demand, as revenue has contracted for eight consecutive quarters, and could further pressure liquidity if not addressed.
Leverage Spikes as Equity Base Shrinks
Debt-to-equity rose to 1.31 in 2026Q2 from 0.86 in 2025Q3, while D/EBITDA reached 22.91, based on reported figures, indicating that the company's debt burden is becoming less comfortable relative to its shrinking equity and weak earnings.
The debt-to-equity ratio has increased sharply, not because of additional borrowing (total debt remained near $3.3B) but because equity has been eroded by massive losses and impairments. With EBITDA likely depressed, the D/EBITDA multiple of 22.91 in 2026Q2 is extremely high, suggesting that the company may face challenges in servicing its debt from operating cash flows. Interest coverage of 3.74 in 2026Q2, while positive, is thin and could deteriorate if earnings continue to decline, raising refinancing risk. Investors should monitor whether the company can generate sufficient EBITDA to bring D/EBITDA down to a more manageable level, as the current trajectory suggests increasing financial strain.
Liquidity Ratios Mask Cash Constraints
Current ratio improved to 2.32 in 2026Q2, but cash dropped to $399.7M from $538.1M in 2024Q2, as per balance sheet data, indicating that liquidity is supported by other current assets, not cash.
The current ratio of 2.32 appears healthy, but the quick ratio of 1.32 suggests that a significant portion of current assets is tied up in inventory, which may not be easily convertible to cash in a stress scenario. The decline in cash reserves, despite a stable current ratio, indicates that the company's liquidity position is weaker than it appears, especially given the high inventory levels and negative net income. Under severe stress, such as a further revenue decline or a tightening of credit markets, Perrigo may find it difficult to meet its short-term obligations without relying on additional debt or asset sales.
Misapplied P/E Obscures Earnings Distortions
The trailing P/E of -1.33 and forward P/E of 6.23 are misleading due to non-recurring items and negative earnings, as per valuation data, suggesting that investors should focus on EV/EBITDA or P/FCF instead.
The P/E ratio is commonly misapplied to Perrigo because its net income is heavily distorted by one-time charges, such as the $1.4B loss in 2025Q4, making the metric unreliable for valuation. The forward P/E of 6.23 may appear cheap, but it relies on analyst estimates that may not account for the persistent revenue decline and margin erosion. A more appropriate metric is EV/EBITDA, which at 7.83 is more reflective of the company's operating performance, though it is still elevated relative to peers like Haleon (14.34) and Prestige (9.91). Alternatively, P/FCF of 13.06 provides a clearer picture of cash generation, but given the volatility in FCF, investors should use a normalized FCF figure to assess value.