Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 87.1x · EV/EBITDA 45.3x · ROE 14.0%. (2014–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.1B | $820M | $511M | $282M | $325M | $532M | $310M | $199M | $69M | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $1.1B | $779M | $477M | $253M | $294M | $500M | $301M | $190M | $59M | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 87.11 | 62.58 | 72.40 | 20.80 | 526.77 | 811.66 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 12.39 | 9.09 | 6.80 | 4.69 | 6.09 | 12.08 | 8.96 | 6.58 | 4.24 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 11.31 | 8.12 | 5.90 | 3.28 | 4.57 | 7.66 | 7.15 | 4.73 | 1.91 | — | — |
| P/FCF | 38.85 | 28.48 | 21.49 | 47.64 | 89.46 | 143.62 | 48.67 | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 38.11 | 27.94 | 21.34 | 18.73 | 26.07 | 59.45 | 47.52 | 120.96 | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 8.63 | 6.34 | 4.20 | 5.52 | 11.35 | 8.71 | 6.29 | 3.63 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 45.26 | 32.73 | 27.28 | 23.29 | 41.82 | 122.34 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 82.03 | 53.52 | 51.16 | 65.87 | 413.24 | 585.72 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 27.07 | 20.04 | 42.67 | 81.05 | 134.89 | 47.35 | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 83.7% | 83.7% | 81.4% | 78.3% | 77.1% | 74.6% | 67.4% | 59.5% | 47.0% | 17.6% | 6.1% |
| Operating Margin | 14.6% | 14.6% | 10.5% | 4.2% | 0.7% | -3.0% | -19.8% | -37.0% | -46.0% | -250.6% | -280.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | 14.6% | 14.6% | 9.3% | 22.5% | 1.2% | 1.5% | -19.7% | -36.6% | -42.1% | -250.6% | -367.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 14.0% | 14.0% | 8.1% | 17.2% | 0.9% | 1.2% | -16.0% | -28.3% | -25.4% | -130.5% | -124.3% |
| ROA | 12.5% | 12.5% | 7.3% | 15.9% | 0.8% | 1.0% | -13.5% | -25.0% | -21.1% | -98.1% | -106.6% |
| ROIC | 17.6% | 17.6% | 10.9% | 3.9% | 0.7% | -2.7% | -15.0% | -28.2% | -25.5% | -98.7% | -71.6% |
| ROCE | 13.7% | 13.7% | 9.0% | 3.1% | 0.5% | -2.2% | -14.9% | -27.7% | -27.7% | -130.5% | -94.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.11 | 0.07 | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.24 | 0.18 | 0.47 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.40 | -0.40 | -0.34 | -0.43 | -0.47 | -0.19 | -0.21 | -0.27 | -0.00 | -0.01 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -1.71 | -1.71 | -1.97 | -2.71 | -4.34 | -7.92 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | -1.42 | -1.45 | -4.97 | -8.41 | -8.73 | -1.31 | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | — | 121.86 | — | — | — | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($44M) exceeds total debt ($3M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 7.18 | 7.18 | 4.48 | 8.26 | 7.01 | 11.16 | 3.32 | 3.71 | 3.70 | 0.31 | 0.49 |
| Quick Ratio | 7.18 | 7.18 | 4.48 | 8.26 | 7.01 | 11.16 | 3.32 | 3.71 | 3.70 | 0.31 | 0.49 |
| Cash Ratio | 5.53 | 5.53 | 3.54 | 6.57 | 5.85 | 9.91 | 2.57 | 2.72 | 2.80 | 0.01 | 0.06 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.81 | 0.76 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.59 | 0.67 | 0.62 | 0.41 | 0.34 | 0.25 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 43.26 | 39.13 | 43.26 | 37.89 | 30.98 | 33.78 | 42.70 | 50.71 | 70.21 | 55.25 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.4% | 0.5% | 0.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | 31.8% | 31.8% | 59.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 1.1% | 1.6% | 1.4% | 4.8% | 0.2% | 0.1% | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 2.6% | 3.5% | 4.7% | 2.1% | 1.1% | 0.7% | 2.1% | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.1% | 0.1% | 1.1% | 1.3% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.4% | 0.6% | 2.0% | 1.3% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $14M | $14M | $14M | $14M | $13M | $12M | $11M | $10M | $10M | $10M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 12 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying RDVT stock.
Red Violet, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 87.1x. The historical average is 51.9x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
Red Violet, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 45.3x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 31.3x.
Red Violet, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 14.0%. The historical average is -38.5%.
Based on historical data, Red Violet, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 87.1x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Red Violet, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 0.37% with a payout ratio of 31.8%.
Red Violet, Inc. has 83.7% gross margin and 14.6% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Red Violet, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.1x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Regulatory data privacy risks
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Expansion on Data Efficiency
Gross margin improved to 85.7% in 2026Q2 from 78.6% in 2024Q1, while operating margin surged to 22.8% from 1.9%, reflecting operating leverage, as per reported financials.
The gross margin trajectory underscores the low marginal cost of the CORE platform's data processing, with each incremental query adding minimal cost. Operating margin expansion from 1.9% in 2024Q4 to 22.8% in 2026Q2 indicates that revenue growth is outpacing fixed costs, a hallmark of the asset-light model. However, the 2025Q4 dip to 6.8% operating margin suggests some quarterly volatility, possibly from one-time items or investment timing, which investors should monitor for sustainability.
ROIC Recovery from Depressed Levels
ROIC climbed to 7.1% in 2026Q2 from 0.5% in 2024Q4, indicating a recovery in capital efficiency, though still below the cost of capital, based on reported figures.
The sharp recovery in ROIC from 0.5% to 7.1% over six quarters suggests that the company is beginning to generate meaningful returns on its invested capital, driven by margin expansion rather than asset turnover, which remains stable at 0.23. Despite the improvement, ROIC remains modest, implying that the company is still in a phase of building its earnings power. The low asset turnover reflects the asset-light nature, but the high gross margins indicate that the business model can scale efficiently, potentially driving ROIC higher as revenue grows.
Working Capital Efficiency with Stable DSO
DSO has remained stable around 39-42 days over the past ten quarters, while DPO spiked to 175 days in 2025Q4, indicating potential supplier leverage, as per the ratio data.
The stable DSO suggests consistent collection practices, with no deterioration in receivables quality. The DPO spike to 175 days in 2025Q4 is anomalous compared to the typical 42-66 days, possibly reflecting a one-time timing effect or a change in payment terms, but it normalized to 42 days by 2026Q2. The absence of DIO data indicates that inventory is not a significant factor, consistent with a software business. The overall working capital cycle appears efficient, with the company leveraging its subscription model to collect cash upfront, as evidenced by the strong cash conversion.
Minimal Leverage Preserves Flexibility
Debt-to-equity stands at 0.02 with D/EBITDA at 0.30, indicating negligible leverage, while interest coverage is not reported, as per the latest balance sheet data.
The company's balance sheet is virtually debt-free, with total debt of $2.6M against $50.0M cash, providing substantial financial flexibility. The D/EBITDA ratio of 0.30 suggests that EBITDA comfortably covers debt, though the absence of interest coverage data limits a full assessment. This conservative capital structure may indicate a lack of aggressive M&A ambition, but it also positions the company to weather regulatory or economic shocks without refinancing risk. Investors should monitor whether the company begins to deploy this balance sheet capacity for acquisitions or buybacks.
Fortress Liquidity with High Current Ratio
Current ratio stands at 10.88 in 2026Q2, with $50.0M cash, providing a substantial buffer against short-term obligations, as reported in the latest balance sheet.
The current ratio of 10.88 is exceptionally high, indicating that current assets, primarily cash, far exceed current liabilities. This liquidity position would hold up well under severe stress, such as a prolonged downturn in the real estate sector or a regulatory shock that increases compliance costs. The quick ratio equals the current ratio, confirming that inventory is not a factor. While this fortress-like liquidity is a strength, it also suggests that the company may be under-leveraging its balance sheet to drive growth, which could be a point of consideration for capital allocation.
Misapplied P/E on a Data Utility
The P/E of 71.78 may mislead investors by ignoring the company's asset-light, high-margin model, which is better evaluated using EV/EBITDA or P/FCF, as per valuation data.
The trailing P/E of 71.78 appears expensive, but it fails to capture the company's high free cash flow conversion and minimal capital intensity. With P/FCF at 32.02 and EV/EBITDA at 36.99, the valuation is more reasonable when adjusted for the asset-light nature. The market may be pricing RDVT as a high-growth software company, but its data utility characteristics suggest a more stable, recurring revenue base. Investors should focus on EV/EBITDA and P/FCF to avoid overstating the earnings multiple, especially given the potential for stock-based compensation to inflate reported earnings.