Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 0.0x · EV/EBITDA 0.2x · ROE 23.0%. (2019–2022 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2114 | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $281394 | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 0.00 | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.00 | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.00 | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 0.25 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 0.25 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 79.8% | 79.8% | 77.4% | 51.2% | 54.7% |
| Operating Margin | 30.0% | 30.0% | 45.8% | 30.0% | 45.5% |
| Net Profit Margin | 24.2% | 24.2% | 36.7% | 24.7% | 35.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 23.0% | 23.0% | 37.1% | 60.0% | 69.0% |
| ROA | 15.4% | 15.4% | 26.9% | 45.9% | 51.5% |
| ROIC | 20.2% | 20.2% | 33.6% | 66.7% | 120.5% |
| ROCE | 28.2% | 28.2% | 45.6% | 72.3% | 88.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.02 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.12 | 0.03 | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.02 | -0.45 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.11 | 0.03 | -0.54 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | 0.31 | 0.03 | -4.64 |
| Interest Coverage | 9.03 | 9.03 | 979.64 | 927.93 | 10818.50 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.77 | 1.77 | 1.52 | 2.10 | 2.91 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.75 | 1.75 | 1.52 | 2.09 | 2.91 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 1.32 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.55 | 0.66 | 1.64 | 1.45 |
| Inventory Turnover | 18.28 | 18.28 | — | 327.17 | 299.62 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 357.28 | 247.00 | 41.40 | 73.11 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | 69.1% | 52.4% | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 100.0% | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $1084 | $1084 | $1084 | $1084 |
Extreme liquidity concentration risk
According to the provided financial data, RPGL trades at an EV/EBITDA multiple of 0.25, a figure that appears anomalously low and likely reflects the market's inability to reconcile the company's high profitability with its near-zero cash balance and opaque capital allocation strategy.
The extremely low EV/EBITDA multiple suggests that investors are heavily discounting the firm's earnings power, likely due to concerns over the lack of cash retention. This valuation implies that the market views the company more as a pass-through entity for cash rather than a scalable software platform, warranting caution for those seeking long-term growth exposure.
Based on reported figures, RPGL achieved a 56.9% ROE in 2022Q4, demonstrating significant capital efficiency, though this follows a period of negative returns in 2022Q2, suggesting that the company's ability to compound capital is highly sensitive to quarterly working capital fluctuations.
The sharp swing from negative returns to over 50% ROE indicates that the business model is prone to extreme volatility in its capital base. Investors should monitor whether these high returns are sustainable or merely a byproduct of aggressive accounting adjustments that do not reflect underlying operational performance.
As reported in recent financial statements, the company's cash conversion cycle reached 53 days in 2022Q4, a significant improvement from the 3,195-day cycle observed in 2022Q2, indicating that the firm's ability to collect receivables remains the primary bottleneck for its operational cash flow.
The massive variance in the cash conversion cycle suggests that RPGL's working capital management is highly inconsistent, potentially due to the nature of its localized service contracts. This instability in collecting payments directly undermines the company's ability to maintain a stable liquidity buffer, leaving it vulnerable to even minor delays in client settlements.
According to the latest quarterly filings, RPGL maintains a current ratio of 1.77, yet this figure is misleading as the company holds a nominal cash balance of only $2,936, which suggests that the firm lacks the liquid assets necessary to navigate unforeseen operational or regulatory challenges.
While the current ratio appears adequate on paper, the concentration of assets in non-cash items makes the balance sheet appear far more robust than it is in reality. This lack of cash liquidity suggests that the company may be operating under a restrictive financial arrangement that prioritizes immediate cash extraction over maintaining a prudent safety margin.
As indicated by the financial data, the P/E ratio is a fundamentally flawed metric for RPGL, as the company's reported earnings are frequently decoupled from actual cash generation, making it an unreliable indicator of the firm's true economic value or its ability to fund future growth.
Investors should instead focus on Free Cash Flow (FCF) and the Cash Conversion Cycle to understand the company's actual earning power. Relying on P/E multiples in this context obscures the reality that the company's accounting profits may not be translating into the cash reserves required to sustain long-term operations.
Includes 30+ ratios · 4 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying RPGL stock.
Republic Power Group Ltd's current P/E ratio is 0.0x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Republic Power Group Ltd's current EV/EBITDA is 0.2x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA.
Republic Power Group Ltd's return on equity (ROE) is 23.0%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 47.3%.
Based on historical data, Republic Power Group Ltd is trading at a P/E of 0.0x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Republic Power Group Ltd has 79.8% gross margin and 30.0% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Republic Power Group Ltd's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.2x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.