Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 39.4x · EV/EBITDA 5.7x · ROE 13.3%. (2018–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.5B | $4.6B | $1.2B | $308M | $228M | $948M | $1.1B | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $1.2B | $4.3B | $989M | $143M | $24M | $668M | $877M | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 39.37 | 138.79 | 508.15 | — | — | — | 1082.50 | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.01 | 4.04 | 1.31 | 0.45 | 0.39 | 1.94 | 4.06 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 9.55 | 15.12 | 6.12 | 1.85 | 1.19 | 3.08 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | 7.04 | 34.85 | 15.75 | — | — | — | 113.83 | — | — |
| P/OCF | 8.99 | 27.80 | 11.40 | — | — | — | 69.91 | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.76 | 1.07 | 0.21 | 0.04 | 1.37 | 3.15 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 5.67 | 33.48 | 17.49 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 13.29 | — | 30.18 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 32.40 | 12.83 | — | — | — | 88.23 | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 34.6% | 34.6% | 34.9% | 32.7% | 30.0% | 32.0% | 31.5% | 48.3% | 41.2% |
| Operating Margin | 7.7% | 7.7% | 2.6% | -7.5% | -21.1% | -19.3% | -47.9% | -35.1% | -58.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | 2.9% | 2.9% | 0.3% | -2.6% | -6.5% | -6.0% | 0.4% | -35.3% | -58.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 13.3% | 13.3% | 1.3% | -10.3% | -15.5% | -144.0% | — | — | — |
| ROA | 6.4% | 6.4% | 0.7% | -5.5% | -10.2% | -8.1% | 0.6% | -133.4% | -131.5% |
| ROIC | — | — | — | -2003.5% | -1246.3% | -249.6% | — | — | — |
| ROCE | 26.3% | 26.3% | 12.2% | -26.7% | -47.0% | -81.1% | — | — | — |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.08 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -1.06 | -1.13 | -0.99 | -1.07 | -0.91 | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -2.53 | -2.53 | -3.97 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | -2.45 | -2.92 | — | — | — | -25.61 | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | 34.23 | — | -217.80 | -354.10 | -952.53 | -181.52 | — |
Net cash position: cash ($341M) exceeds total debt ($18M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.93 | 1.93 | 1.75 | 1.66 | 1.84 | 4.07 | 0.73 | 0.66 | 0.51 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.93 | 1.93 | 1.75 | 1.66 | 1.84 | 4.07 | 0.73 | 0.66 | 0.51 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.62 | 1.62 | 1.40 | 1.22 | 1.43 | 3.35 | 0.64 | 0.40 | 0.15 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.72 | 2.44 | 2.17 | 1.69 | 1.19 | 0.90 | 2.50 | 2.23 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 11.52 | 13.08 | 23.23 | 29.02 | 25.42 | 38.72 | 28.58 | 2.14 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.5% | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | 480.3% | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 2.5% | 0.7% | 0.2% | — | — | — | 0.1% | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 14.2% | 2.9% | 6.3% | — | — | — | 0.9% | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.5% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.5% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.5% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $236M | $88M | $69M | $64M | $57M | $52M | $29M | $29M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 8 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying RSI stock.
Rush Street Interactive, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 39.4x. The historical average is 138.8x.
Rush Street Interactive, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 5.7x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 25.5x.
Rush Street Interactive, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 13.3%. The historical average is -31.0%.
Based on historical data, Rush Street Interactive, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 39.4x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Rush Street Interactive, Inc. has 34.6% gross margin and 7.7% operating margin.
Rush Street Interactive, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.1x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Illinois gaming tax hike
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Earnings Multiple Collapses on Forward Basis
According to recent market data, RSI trades at 87.71x trailing earnings but only 20.09x forward earnings, implying the market expects a sharp rise in per-share profitability from currently depressed levels over the coming year.
The gap between trailing and forward P/E suggests that near-term reported earnings understate the earnings power investors are underwriting, which is consistent with the recent margin expansion from roughly 5% to over 11% operating margin. The forward EV/EBITDA of 5.06x versus 9.12x trailing points the same direction and appears to price in continued scale benefits. Investors should monitor whether forward estimates are being met, since the valuation rests heavily on that earnings ramp and a single tax or promotional shock could compress it quickly.
Margin Expansion Lags Revenue Scale
Based on RSI's reported figures, operating margin rose from 2.8% in 2024Q3 to 11.1% in 2026Q3, yet net margin of 3.1% remains far below the operating line, suggesting significant below-the-line leakage absorbs much of the operating gain.
The spread between operating margin of 11.1% and net margin of 3.1% indicates that interest, taxes, or other items are consuming roughly 70% of operating profit, which warrants further investigation into the tax line and non-operating charges. Gross margin of 36.4% sits below DraftKings' 41.3% and MGM's 44.4%, consistent with a structurally lower take rate tied to jurisdictional taxes and third-party content royalties. Net margin volatility from 0.5% to 6.2% across quarters suggests reported earnings are a weak guide to underlying earning power, so operating margin is the more reliable signal here.
Equity Returns Recovering From Near Zero
As reported in financial statements, ROE climbed from -0.1% in 2024Q2 to 3.4% in 2026Q3, and ROA reached 1.5%, indicating returns are recovering from a low base rather than yet demonstrating durable compounding.
The ROE improvement is real but modest in absolute terms, and it is being achieved on an equity base that has been rebuilt from $63.4M to $195.3M largely through retained earnings, which mechanically limits how high ROE can rise while cash remains idle. ROIC readings of 5.1% and 12.3% in recent quarters are volatile and not clearly trending, so the compounding case is not yet established. Peers show mixed results, with MGM's 20.8% ROE reflecting a more mature asset base, so RSI's returns should be judged against its own trajectory rather than peer averages.
Negligible Debt Limits Financing Risk
Based on reported figures, RSI's debt-to-equity ratio sits at 0.04 in 2026Q2 and total debt has stayed near zero, compared with peer D/E ratios of 3.06 for DraftKings and 17.14 for MGM, placing RSI at the extreme conservative end of the group.
Near-zero leverage means interest coverage is largely irrelevant as a risk metric for the present, and refinancing or covenant risk appears minimal based on reported figures. The lack of leverage also means the company is not using debt to amplify equity returns, which partly explains the modest ROE despite improving operations. This profile suggests RSI is financed almost entirely by equity and retained cash, and investors should monitor whether management eventually deploys this capacity, since an unlevered balance sheet can depress returns on equity even as it protects against downside.
Cash Cushion Dominates Liquidity Profile
According to recent SEC filings, RSI's current ratio of 2.22 in 2026Q3 is supported by cash of $381.9M, up from $228.2M in 2025Q1, suggesting liquidity is abundant and would likely absorb a severe near-term operating shock.
A current ratio above 2 with near-zero debt indicates that short-term obligations, including player balances and payables, are well covered by liquid assets. However, the cash buildup may partly reflect favorable working capital timing and a World Cup-driven sports betting tailwind, so the headline ratio could overstate durable liquidity. Under a stress scenario in which player balances shrink or a tax hike compresses cash generation, the cushion would still be substantial, though the quality of that cash depends on how much is customer-owned rather than corporate.
Headline Ratios May Mask Customer Funds
Based on reported figures, RSI's strong current ratio and near-zero leverage may overstate financial strength, since a meaningful share of cash may be owed back to players and not freely available to shareholders.
Ratios computed on total cash treat player balances and payables as ordinary working capital, which may materially flatter liquidity for an online gaming operator. The most commonly misapplied metric here is the current ratio, because customer deposits are short-term liabilities whose true claim on cash is hard to isolate from the reported figures. A more defensible approach is to net player balances out of cash and assess liquidity on corporate-owned resources, which would likely produce a smaller cushion than the headline 2.22 suggests.