Operating cash flow was negative at -$77.4M in 2026Q3 and free cash flow margin improved to -4.2% from -26.0% in 2024Q4, yet no dividends or buybacks were paid, so all capital is retained to fund ongoing burn.
Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RXRX) cash flow statement — 7-year operating, investing & financing cash flows
| Metric | TTM | Dec'25 | Dec'24 | Dec'23 | Dec'22 | Dec'21 | Dec'20 | Dec'19 |
|---|
| Cash from Operations | -310.53M | -371.81M | -359.17M | -287.78M | -83.52M | -158.61M | -45.4M | -57.04M |
| Operating CF Margin % | - | -497.86% | -610.44% | -655.89% | -210.49% | -1586.14% | -1330.18% | -3333.84% |
| Operating CF Growth % | 94.03% | -3.52% | -24.81% | -244.55% | 47.34% | -249.38% | 20.41% | - |
| Net Income | -475.67M | -644.76M | -463.66M | -328.07M | -239.48M | -186.48M | -87.01M | -61.88M |
| Depreciation & Amortization | 73.85M | 83.7M | 36.49M | 24.4M | 11.76M | 8.4M | 3.94M | 2.49M |
| Stock-Based Compensation | 88.5M | 111.22M | 81.69M | 53.5M | 27.91M | 14.84M | 4.29M | 1.39M |
| Deferred Taxes | -4.6M | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 827K | 0 | 0 |
| Other Non-Cash Items | 27.27M | 64.34M | 24.31M | 6.64M | 11.37M | 4.1M | 2.54M | 555K |
| Working Capital Changes | -19.89M | 13.69M | -38M | -44.26M | 104.92M | -306K | 30.83M | 408K |
| Change in Receivables | 7.62M | 32.94M | -6.07M | -7.76M | -2K | 114K | -1.12M | 605K |
| Change in Inventory | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7.83M | 0 | 0 |
| Change in Payables | 2.79M | -2.62M | 6.43M | -987K | 1.77M | 1.75M | -185K | -340K |
| Cash from Investing | -3.95M | -16.87M | 260.06M | -10.23M | 193.25M | -271.74M | -8.74M | -3.91M |
| Capital Expenditures | -1.95M | -6.47M | -13.7M | -11.96M | -37.06M | -39.8M | -5.83M | -3.91M |
| CapEx % of Revenue | 2.86% | 8.66% | 23.28% | 27.25% | 93.39% | 397.98% | 170.85% | 228.52% |
| Acquisitions | 0 | 0 | 277.1M | 1.84M | 0 | 231.95M | -2.6M | 0 |
| Investments | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Other Investing | -2M | -6.6M | -3.35M | -597K | -300K | -231.95M | -309K | 0 |
| Cash from Financing | 210.41M | 521.53M | 304.12M | 140.13M | 154.34M | 458.54M | 246.13M | 120.41M |
| Debt Issued (Net) | -8.92M | -8.43M | -4.44M | -766K | -90K | -12.8M | 6.32M | 705K |
| Equity Issued (Net) | 219.41M | 532.96M | 300.42M | 128.09M | 143.71M | 462.9M | 239.13M | 119.92M |
| Dividends Paid | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Share Repurchases | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Other Financing | -77K | -3M | 8.14M | 12.81M | 10.72M | 8.44M | 681K | -210K |
| Net Change in Cash | -105.61M | 150.9M | 201.6M | -157.69M | 263.76M | 28.18M | 192M | 59.46M |
| Free Cash Flow | -314.48M | -378.28M | -372.87M | -300.33M | -120.88M | -198.41M | -52.13M | -60.95M |
| FCF Margin % | -460.89% | -506.52% | -633.71% | -684.5% | -304.64% | -1984.12% | -1527.51% | -3562.36% |
| FCF Growth % | 29.81% | -1.45% | -24.15% | -148.45% | 39.07% | -280.58% | 14.47% | - |
| FCF per Share | -0.58 | -0.85 | -1.36 | -1.44 | -0.69 | -1.17 | -0.31 | -0.37 |
| FCF Conversion (FCF/Net Income) | 0.66x | 0.58x | 0.77x | 0.88x | 0.35x | 0.85x | 0.52x | 0.91x |
| Interest Paid | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 55K | 0 | 989K | 485K |
| Taxes Paid | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying RXRX stock.
Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RXRX) generated $-371.8M in net cash from operating activities in 2025. This reflects the cash generated directly from core business operations.
Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RXRX) reported negative free cash flow of $378.3M in 2025, indicating capital requirements exceeded cash from operations.
Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RXRX) spent $6.5M on capital expenditures in 2025. CapEx represents the cash invested in physical assets like property, plant, and equipment to maintain or grow the business.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Cash burn and dilution risk
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Operating Cash Burn Consistently Trails Losses
Across the most recent quarters, operating cash flow has run at roughly 0.4 to 1.4 times net income, meaning the company is consuming cash in most periods, though the gap is smaller than the headline loss figures would suggest and may partly reflect non-cash charges such as stock-based compensation of $23.0M to $41.7M per quarter.
The ratio of operating cash flow to net income ranged from 0.43 in 2025Q4 to 1.43 in 2026Q2, which indicates that reported losses are not fully mirrored in cash outflows. Stock-based compensation appears to account for a meaningful portion of the difference, suggesting that a substantial share of the economic cost of the platform is being paid in equity rather than cash. Investors should monitor whether the cash conversion gap narrows as the business matures, since a persistent reliance on equity compensation may imply ongoing dilution.
Free Cash Flow Deeply Negative but Narrowing
Free cash flow margins have improved from -26.0% in 2024Q4 to -4.2% in 2026Q3, yet the company still generated negative free cash flow in every reported quarter, and the most recent quarter's $77.8M burn implies continued dependence on existing reserves or external funding.
The move toward a -4.2% margin in 2026Q3 is encouraging, but the absolute burn remains large relative to the company's recognized revenue base. The volatility in quarterly results, including a -24.4% margin in 2026Q2, suggests that milestone timing strongly influences the trajectory, so a single quarter should not be read as a durable turn. Whether the margin trend holds will depend on revenue cadence from partners that cannot be confirmed from the supplied data.
Asset-Light Spending Profile Obscures Platform Investment
Capital expenditure has been minimal, at $0.2M to $4.6M per quarter and 2.2% to 28.8% of revenue, which indicates that the platform's infrastructure is not being built primarily through reported capex and that the cash cost of computing and laboratory capacity may sit elsewhere in operating expenses.
Given that the platform relies on high-performance computing and automated laboratories, the low reported capex suggests that infrastructure may be leased, cloud-based, or expensed through R&D. This classification affects how the cash intensity of the model should be interpreted, since operating cash burn already captures these costs. The wide range of capex-to-revenue ratios also reflects revenue volatility more than any deliberate change in investment pace.
Working Capital Swings Add Quarterly Noise
Working capital changes have moved between a $35.2M inflow in 2025Q2 and a $26.3M outflow in 2025Q3, reflecting timing effects of collaboration receivables and deferred revenue that make quarterly operating cash flow an unreliable read on underlying burn.
The large swings in working capital suggest that collaboration billing and milestone recognition are driving much of the variation in operating cash flow. Analysts should look at multi-quarter averages rather than individual periods when estimating run-rate burn. Limited visibility into the composition of these balances means the source of these swings cannot be fully confirmed from the supplied data.
No Shareholder Returns Amid Persistent Burn
Dividends and buybacks were zero across all reported quarters, and the one notable acquisition-related cash item of $277.1M in 2024Q4 appears to be an isolated event, indicating that cash has been retained for operations rather than returned to shareholders.
The absence of distributions is consistent with a company in an investment phase, but it also means the balance sheet is the sole buffer against continued burn. The 2024Q4 acquisition line requires separate investigation to understand whether it represented a strategic acquisition or a financing-related inflow, as the data alone does not confirm its nature. Investors should monitor future capital raises for dilution impact.
Stock Compensation Masks True Cash Economics
Stock-based compensation of $16.5M to $41.7M per quarter means that reported losses and even operating cash burn understate the full economic cost of the platform, which may dilute existing holders over time if equity remains the primary talent currency.
Treating SBC as a non-cash item flatters the cash profile, yet shareholders bear its cost through dilution. A cash-flow view that adds back SBC can make the business appear closer to self-funding than the economics warrant. This does not establish that management is using equity inappropriately, but it does warrant monitoring of share count growth alongside cash burn to assess the true cost of the operating model.