Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.3x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -33.0%. (2006–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2M | $4M | $12M | $14M | $88M | $94M | $108M | $112M | $142M | $258M | $59M |
| Enterprise Value | $-14459953 | $-12320350 | $-1923343 | $3M | $39M | $50M | $109M | $109M | $135M | $249M | $57M |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 311.84 | 70.24 | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.91 | 2.09 | 3.96 | 3.16 | 22.16 | 18.29 | 16.55 | 2.67 | 6.18 | 22.52 | 8.05 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.11 | 0.36 | 0.94 | 1.60 | 2.62 | 2.22 | — | 7.27 | 7.29 | 17.50 | 8.89 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | 17.53 | — | — | — | — | 87.90 | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | 14.94 | — | — | — | — | 86.07 | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | -6.79 | -0.61 | 0.56 | 9.75 | 9.70 | 16.66 | 2.60 | 5.87 | 21.76 | 7.86 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 148.26 | 79.04 | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 165.46 | 79.52 | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | 7.71 | — | — | — | — | 84.92 | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 2.8% | 2.8% | -15.2% | 12.1% | -3.7% | 3.4% | 43.7% | 13.8% | 32.4% | 56.5% | 48.9% |
| Operating Margin | -149.6% | -149.6% | -188.8% | -321.6% | -568.9% | -209.5% | -271.4% | -14.3% | 3.5% | 27.1% | -17.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | -215.8% | -215.8% | -162.9% | -506.7% | -708.5% | -211.6% | -251.7% | -15.6% | 2.0% | 31.7% | -26.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -33.0% | -33.0% | -46.0% | -107.6% | -74.2% | -51.8% | -219.3% | -37.4% | 2.7% | 34.0% | -23.8% |
| ROA | -21.2% | -21.2% | -26.9% | -54.7% | -50.0% | -40.4% | -124.9% | -27.9% | 2.1% | 27.0% | -18.8% |
| ROIC | — | — | — | — | — | — | -212.0% | -36.3% | 6.7% | 41.4% | -13.0% |
| ROCE | -22.3% | -22.3% | -42.9% | -54.2% | -55.0% | -50.5% | -232.0% | -34.2% | 4.8% | 29.1% | -15.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.02 | 0.62 | 0.19 | 0.01 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -1.54 | -1.08 | -1.32 | -1.47 | -1.04 | — | -0.20 | -0.36 | -0.59 | -0.21 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -7.77 | -2.77 | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | -9.82 | — | — | — | — | -2.98 | — |
| Interest Coverage | -21.44 | -21.44 | — | — | -32.08 | — | — | -30.84 | — | — | -5.21 |
Net cash position: cash ($18M) exceeds total debt ($2M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.49 | 2.49 | 3.42 | 3.62 | 2.51 | 8.77 | 0.33 | 3.04 | 3.60 | 5.43 | 3.55 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.49 | 2.49 | 3.42 | 3.62 | 2.51 | 8.61 | 0.31 | 2.21 | 2.76 | 4.33 | 2.65 |
| Cash Ratio | 2.43 | 2.43 | 2.74 | 3.47 | 2.22 | 8.44 | 0.02 | 0.60 | 1.07 | 2.83 | 0.57 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.10 | 0.17 | 0.24 | 0.06 | 0.11 | 1.14 | 2.03 | 0.88 | 0.64 | 0.81 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | 5.65 | 37.62 | 8.26 | 2.80 | 1.47 | 1.70 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 86.42 | 31.16 | 21.99 | 62.75 | 38.74 | 91.75 | 72.84 | 167.53 | 137.83 | 212.02 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.3% | 1.4% | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | 5.7% | — | — | — | — | 1.1% | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $4M | $2M | $3M | $3M | $3M | $4M | $3M | $2M | $2M | $2M |
Business model viability failure
Based on reported financial filings, SGLY trades at a price-to-book ratio of 0.11, which suggests that the market is heavily discounting the company's assets despite its aggressive branding pivot toward AI and blockchain technologies, reflecting deep skepticism regarding the firm's long-term value creation potential.
The P/S ratio of 0.91 appears disconnected from the company's negative operating margins and contracting revenue base. Investors should monitor whether this valuation is supported by speculative retail sentiment rather than fundamental earnings power, as the lack of a positive P/E ratio makes traditional valuation metrics largely inapplicable.
As reported in recent financial statements, SGLY's gross margin has exhibited extreme volatility, reaching a low of -59.9% in 2024Q3, which underscores the company's inability to maintain consistent pricing power or cost control during its transition from legacy logistics to speculative technology ventures.
The persistent negative operating margins, such as the -149.56% reported, indicate that the company's core operations are currently value-destroying. This suggests that the firm lacks the necessary scale or operational efficiency to cover its fixed overhead, warranting further investigation into the sustainability of its current cost structure.
According to historical data, SGLY's asset turnover has remained stagnant at approximately 0.02 to 0.04, indicating that the company is failing to generate meaningful revenue from its asset base as it struggles to pivot its business model toward high-performance computing and crypto-mining infrastructure.
The erratic nature of the company's days sales outstanding and days payable outstanding suggests significant friction in managing its working capital cycle. This inefficiency appears to be a structural drag on liquidity, as the company struggles to convert its limited revenue into cash flow.
Based on reported figures, SGLY maintains a low debt-to-equity ratio of 0.15, yet the company's inability to generate positive operating income makes even minimal debt levels a potential burden on its rapidly depleting cash reserves, as evidenced by the negative interest coverage ratios observed.
While the low leverage might appear favorable in isolation, it masks the reality that the company is effectively funding its operations through equity dilution or cash reserves rather than debt. Investors should monitor the company's ability to refinance or secure new capital, as its current financial position appears increasingly precarious.
The price-to-book ratio is the most commonly misapplied metric for SGLY, as it obscures the fact that the company's book value is largely comprised of non-productive assets that may not be realizable in a liquidation scenario given the rapid depreciation of crypto-mining hardware.
Analysts should instead focus on the cash burn rate and the remaining runway, as these metrics provide a more accurate assessment of the company's survival probability. Relying on book value in a business model pivot often leads to an overestimation of the firm's floor value.
Includes 30+ ratios · 20 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying SGLY stock.
Singularity Future Technology Ltd.'s current P/E ratio is -0.3x. The historical average is 89.2x.
Singularity Future Technology Ltd.'s return on equity (ROE) is -33.0%. The historical average is -23.7%.
Based on historical data, Singularity Future Technology Ltd. is trading at a P/E of -0.3x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Singularity Future Technology Ltd. has 2.8% gross margin and -149.6% operating margin.