Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 18.8x · EV/EBITDA 17.4x · ROE 15.3%. (2002–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.3B | $778M | $1.8B | $2.1B | $2.2B | $3.3B | $1.7B | $1.8B | $1.2B | $1.9B | $1.5B |
| Enterprise Value | $2.1B | $577M | $1.5B | $1.7B | $1.9B | $3.0B | $1.3B | $1.5B | $961M | $1.6B | $1.3B |
| P/E Ratio → | 18.84 | 6.35 | 5.12 | 38.78 | 12.59 | 16.58 | 21.12 | 27.71 | 12.41 | 25.34 | 13.62 |
| P/S Ratio | 2.65 | 0.88 | 2.27 | 3.21 | 2.29 | 3.61 | 3.12 | 3.91 | 2.35 | 3.63 | 2.71 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.78 | 0.94 | 2.36 | 2.79 | 2.96 | 5.06 | 3.02 | 3.33 | 2.33 | 3.85 | 3.41 |
| P/FCF | 373.53 | 124.00 | 55.66 | 20.76 | 42.57 | 22.16 | 17.34 | 26.84 | 37.33 | 20.62 | 13.31 |
| P/OCF | 38.18 | 12.67 | 23.61 | 13.76 | 25.91 | 18.80 | 14.53 | 23.24 | 11.52 | 18.30 | 12.01 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.65 | 1.93 | 2.72 | 2.05 | 3.22 | 2.49 | 3.21 | 1.81 | 2.99 | 2.26 |
| EV / EBITDA | 17.39 | 4.68 | 13.33 | 28.19 | 8.34 | 11.28 | 10.44 | 17.38 | 7.77 | 13.39 | 8.58 |
| EV / EBIT | 23.04 | 4.12 | 14.42 | 28.48 | 9.13 | 12.00 | 15.68 | 20.35 | 8.68 | 15.76 | 9.07 |
| EV / FCF | — | 91.85 | 47.31 | 17.60 | 38.08 | 19.78 | 13.84 | 22.04 | 28.79 | 17.00 | 11.11 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 48.3% | 48.3% | 45.9% | 42.3% | 49.2% | 50.0% | 48.2% | 48.6% | 49.2% | 48.0% | 49.4% |
| Operating Margin | 10.5% | 10.5% | 11.3% | 6.2% | 22.6% | 26.7% | 21.3% | 15.6% | 20.5% | 19.8% | 24.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | 13.9% | 13.9% | 11.1% | 8.3% | 18.2% | 21.7% | 14.8% | 14.1% | 18.9% | 14.3% | 19.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 15.3% | 15.3% | 11.8% | 7.2% | 24.8% | 32.9% | 14.6% | 12.0% | 19.5% | 16.0% | 27.6% |
| ROA | 10.9% | 10.9% | 8.7% | 5.4% | 17.9% | 23.3% | 11.1% | 9.4% | 14.7% | 11.5% | 21.1% |
| ROIC | 12.4% | 12.4% | 14.8% | 6.5% | 39.9% | 71.2% | 39.7% | 23.0% | 39.9% | 44.1% | 55.2% |
| ROCE | 10.8% | 10.8% | 11.2% | 5.1% | 29.2% | 38.6% | 19.9% | 12.6% | 20.2% | 21.3% | 33.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.01 | — | 0.05 | 0.06 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.04 | — | 0.21 | 0.17 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.24 | -0.35 | -0.42 | -0.31 | -0.54 | -0.61 | -0.60 | -0.53 | -0.68 | -0.56 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -1.64 | -1.64 | -2.35 | -5.06 | -0.98 | -1.36 | -2.64 | -3.78 | -2.30 | -2.86 | -1.70 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -32.15 | -8.35 | -3.16 | -4.49 | -2.38 | -3.50 | -4.80 | -8.54 | -3.63 | -2.20 |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | 2995.06 | — | — | 24070.85 | 293.04 | 235.04 | 1092.57 |
Net cash position: cash ($202M) exceeds total debt ($0)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.79 | 2.79 | 3.99 | 3.73 | 4.29 | 2.91 | 3.89 | 4.49 | 4.45 | 3.21 | 3.27 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.54 | 1.54 | 2.98 | 2.71 | 2.72 | 2.33 | 3.20 | 3.79 | 3.72 | 2.68 | 2.77 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.60 | 0.60 | 1.38 | 1.48 | 1.26 | 1.28 | 2.16 | 2.59 | 2.59 | 2.07 | 1.90 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.63 | 0.98 | 0.95 | 0.73 | 0.66 | 0.79 | 0.75 | 0.92 |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.09 | 1.09 | 2.15 | 1.70 | 1.67 | 2.83 | 2.54 | 2.66 | 3.31 | 2.89 | 3.92 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 87.19 | 106.17 | 111.19 | 79.53 | 82.56 | 78.36 | 86.80 | 63.15 | 55.19 | 48.30 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.9% | 8.6% | 3.7% | 0.8% | 2.3% | 1.6% | 2.9% | 2.5% | 3.5% | 1.7% | 1.5% |
| Payout Ratio | 54.8% | 54.8% | 75.4% | 31.6% | 28.9% | 27.1% | 61.3% | 68.4% | 43.2% | 42.8% | 20.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 5.3% | 15.7% | 19.5% | 2.6% | 7.9% | 6.0% | 4.7% | 3.6% | 8.1% | 3.9% | 7.3% |
| FCF Yield | 0.3% | 0.8% | 1.8% | 4.8% | 2.3% | 4.5% | 5.8% | 3.7% | 2.7% | 4.8% | 7.5% |
| Buyback Yield | 1.0% | 3.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 6.1% | 1.4% | 1.5% | 1.5% | 2.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 3.9% | 11.8% | 3.7% | 0.8% | 8.4% | 3.0% | 4.4% | 3.9% | 6.2% | 1.7% | 1.5% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $8M | $34M | $33M | $33M | $35M | $35M | $35M | $36M | $36M | $36M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 24 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying SIMO stock.
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation's current P/E ratio is 18.8x. The historical average is 16.3x. This places it at the 79th percentile of its historical range.
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 17.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 11.0x.
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 15.3%. The historical average is 12.6%.
Based on historical data, Silicon Motion Technology Corporation is trading at a P/E of 18.8x. This is at the 79th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation's current dividend yield is 2.91% with a payout ratio of 54.8%.
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation has 48.3% gross margin and 10.5% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
China export control exposure
Margin Expansion Reflects Firmware Moat
Gross margin climbed to 50.2% in 2026Q2 from 45.0% in 2024Q1, per financial statements, indicating pricing power from proprietary firmware. Operating margin more than doubled to 22.4%, showcasing operating leverage.
The sequential improvement in gross margin from 47.1% in 2026Q1 to 50.2% in 2026Q2 suggests that the company is capturing value from its turnkey controller solutions as NAND pricing recovers. Operating margin expansion from 15.3% to 22.4% in the same period implies that R&D and SG&A costs are growing slower than revenue, a hallmark of the fabless model. However, net margin of 30.2% in 2026Q2 exceeds operating margin by nearly 8 percentage points, indicating non-operating gains that may not recur; investors should focus on operating margin as the truer measure of earning power.
ROIC Inflecting Upward on Cyclical Recovery
ROIC rose to 8.4% in 2026Q2 from 3.1% a year earlier, as reported in financial statements, signaling a sharp cyclical recovery. ROE similarly expanded to 13.9% from 2.1%, driven by margin expansion rather than leverage.
The improvement in ROIC from 3.1% in 2025Q2 to 8.4% in 2026Q2 is primarily attributable to higher operating margins, as asset turnover remained relatively stable around 0.31. ROE of 13.9% is supported by a conservative balance sheet with a D/E of 0.06, indicating that returns are generated from operations, not financial leverage. While the current ROIC is still below the cost of capital for many semiconductor firms, the upward trajectory suggests that the company is compounding returns as the NAND cycle strengthens. Investors should monitor whether ROIC can sustain above 10% through the cycle, as historical data shows it has been volatile.
Working Capital Swings Distort Efficiency Metrics
Cash conversion cycle extended to 255 days in 2026Q2, per reported figures, driven by DIO of 241 days, reflecting inventory build for anticipated demand. DSO improved to 55 days from 118 days a year earlier, indicating faster collections.
The dramatic reduction in DSO from 118 days in 2025Q1 to 55 days in 2026Q2 suggests that the company is collecting receivables more quickly as customers pay on time during the upcycle. However, DIO remains elevated at 241 days, which is unusually high for a fabless company and may indicate strategic inventory accumulation ahead of new product launches or a response to NAND price increases. The negative FCF margin of -15.9% in 2026Q2, despite strong net income, underscores the cash absorption from working capital, particularly inventory. This suggests that efficiency metrics are temporarily distorted by cyclical factors, and investors should expect normalization as inventory levels stabilize.
Minimal Debt Masks Strategic Flexibility
Debt-to-equity stands at 0.06 with D/EBITDA of 0.54 as of 2026Q2, per balance sheet data, indicating a conservative capital structure. Interest coverage is not reported, but negligible debt suggests ample coverage.
With only $59.2M in total debt against $1.0B in equity, Silicon Motion's leverage is minimal, providing significant financial flexibility for strategic initiatives or weathering downturns. The D/EBITDA of 0.54 is well below the 3x threshold typically considered risky, and the absence of significant debt service obligations means that earnings are not burdened by interest expenses. This conservative posture is consistent with the company's history of maintaining a fortress-like balance sheet, which may be a competitive advantage in a cyclical industry. However, the lack of reported interest coverage data limits a full assessment, but the low absolute debt levels suggest no near-term refinancing risk.
Liquidity Buffer Compresses as Working Capital Swells
Current ratio fell to 2.52 in 2026Q2 from 2.85 in 2026Q1, per balance sheet data, while quick ratio dropped to 1.13, indicating reduced liquidity. Cash declined to $74.4M, reflecting investment in receivables and inventory.
The decline in the current ratio from 4.45 in 2025Q1 to 2.52 in 2026Q2 suggests that the company is deploying its cash into working capital to support the rapid revenue growth. The quick ratio of 1.13, down from 3.37 a year earlier, indicates that inventory now constitutes a larger portion of current assets, which could be a concern if NAND prices were to fall. However, the absolute cash position of $74.4M, combined with minimal debt, still provides a reasonable liquidity cushion. Investors should monitor whether the working capital build is temporary or signals a structural shift in the business model, as the negative operating cash flow in 2026Q2 warrants attention.
P/E Misleads in Cyclical Semiconductor Recovery
The trailing P/E of 17.7 appears low, but forward P/E of 22.3 suggests the market expects earnings to normalize, per valuation data. Using P/E on peak cyclical earnings overstates value; EV/EBITDA or P/S may be more appropriate.
In cyclical semiconductor companies like Silicon Motion, trailing P/E ratios are often misleading because they are calculated on trough or peak earnings. The current trailing P/E of 17.7 is based on the last twelve months, which includes a period of depressed earnings, while the forward P/E of 22.3 implies that analysts expect earnings to decline from the current peak. This inversion is typical at cyclical peaks and suggests that the market is pricing in a normalization of margins. A more appropriate metric is EV/EBITDA, which at 16.24 on a trailing basis and 5.10 on a forward basis, indicates that the market is valuing the company on a forward basis that may not fully reflect the cyclicality. Investors should use a mid-cycle earnings estimate or a P/S multiple to better capture the company's intrinsic value, as P/E can be distorted by the timing of the cycle.